评论与讨论

波士顿大学缓和评论,以促进知情的、实质性的、文明的对话。 辱骂、亵渎、自我推销、误导、语无伦次或离题的评论将被拒绝。 版主在正常营业时间(EST)有澳门威尼斯人注册,只能接受用英语写的评论。 统计数据或事实必须包含引文或引文链接。

There are 6 comments on 如果波士顿很聪明

  1. 红绿灯的想法很好。 How often I’ve sat at a red light and cynically remarked, “Here comes crossing traffic. That means the light will now turn green for me in order to stop them!”

    The low technology solution was–during low volume periods like nighttime–to simply let the lights flash yellow for thru traffic and red for crossing traffic. That doesn’t seem to happen any more.

  2. 问题是让这些住在这里的聪明人在当地政府和行政部门工作。 I know it isn’t polite to point this out, but the smart folk mostly aren’t local, and the locals mostly aren’t smart. 只要看看令人难以置信的愚蠢MBTA或笨拙的当地执法部门(例如马拉松爆炸案)就知道了。

    1. It isn’t about being polite- It’s about being informed and having respect for those who work to keep you safe. So please don’t comment on something that you really don’t understand.

  3. Smarter office building security – smarter traffic ights – centralized traffic monitoring – smarter parking : You could make these ALL work better with LESS technology by allowing people to work from home. 智慧生活的第一个词是减少,然后是再利用和再循环。

  4. 哈! ! 智能城市? 智能交通灯? 在波士顿吗? The current traffic lights don’t even work; 它们一直处于关闭状态,闪烁黄色或完全关闭。 而且几乎没有人行横道的标志能正常工作。 如果波士顿不再支付警察每小时100美元(加上周末的加班费),让他们站在建筑工地无所事事,也许他们可以购买智能交通灯。

发表评论吧。

您的电子邮件地址将不会被公布。 必填项被标记 *