Back to Journals » Risk Management and Healthcare Policy » Volume 17
A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Presenting with Acute Hyperkalemia in an Emergency Care Setting
Authors Zhang L, Sun P, Liu X, Yang Y, Sun RN, Wang XD
Received 23 May 2024
Accepted for publication 22 October 2024
Published 29 October 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 2599—2608
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S479582
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Jongwha Chang
Lei Zhang,* Peng Sun,* Xin Liu, Ya Yang, Ruo-Nan Sun, Xu-Dong Wang
Department of Emergency Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Xu-Dong Wang, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, 15 Yuquan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100049, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 01059975120, Email [email protected]
Objective: We aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with severe hyperkalemia in the emergency department.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients diagnosed with severe hyperkalemia who sought medical care at the emergency department of Aerospace Center Hospital between January 2018 and May 2022. Clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, laboratory findings, and outcomes, were systematically collected. Patients were categorized into survival and deceased groups based on in-hospital mortality. Comparative analysis between these groups identified significant differences, highlighting key clinically covariates. Binary logistic regression was employed to determine the primary factors influencing patient outcomes.
Results: Of 90 patients diagnosed with severe hyperkalemia, 64 were in the survival group, and 26 in the deceased group. Binary logistic regression identified several significant predictors of mortality, including higher APACHE II scores (odds ratio [OR] 1.41, P = 0.02), widened QRS wave on electrocardiogram (ECG) (OR 79.39, P = 0.04), and elevated serum potassium levels (OR 1.3, P = 0.04). In contrast, emergency blood purification was associated with a reduced mortality rate (OR 0.29, P = 0.03).
Conclusion: Key risk factors for mortality in patients with severe hyperkalemia include widened QRS wave on ECG, elevated APACHE II score, and high serum potassium level. Timely correction of hyperkalemia through emergency blood purification significantly improves patient outcomes.
Keywords: clinical manifestation, prognosis, risk factors, severe hyperkalemia, treatment
Introduction
Potassium ions are essential electrolytes with critical roles in cellular metabolism, osmotic balance, acid-base homeostasis, neuromuscular excitability, and normal myocardial function.1 Approximately 98% of the body’s total potassium is located within intracellular fluid, while only 2% is present in extracellular fluid. Normal serum potassium levels range between 3.5 to 5.0 mmol/L.2 Hyperkalemia, defined as a serum potassium level exceeding 5.0 mmol/L, can result from various factors, including renal insufficiency, excessive potassium intake, or a shift of potassium from intracellular to extracellular fluid. Severe hyperkalemia (serum K+ > 6.5 mmol/L) is a dangerous electrolyte imbalance associated with life-threatening arrhythmias, such as ventricular fibrillation and asystole, which can lead to cardiac arrest. This condition carries a high risk of mortality requiring immediate recognition and intervention.3
Electrocardiographic monitoring and timely emergency medical interventions are critical in managing hyperkalemia.4–7 The emergency department plays a crucial role in both the diagnosis and management of this condition, demanding that physicians be well-versed in its risk factors, clinical presentations, treatments strategies, and prognostic indicators.
The primary objective of this study was to identify the risk factors among patients presenting with hyperkalemia in the emergency department and to explore the relationship between serum potassium levels, initial laboratory findings, APACHE II scores, and in-hospital mortality rates.
Materials and Methods
Study Population
This single-center retrospective group study encompassed patients aged 18 years or older who arrived at the emergency department of Aerospace Center Hospital between January 2018 and May 2022 and underwent emergency laboratory testing revealing serum potassium levels greater than or equal to 6.5 mmol/L. Inclusion criteria were established by querying the emergency electronic medical record system. Exclusion criteria comprised patients with pseudo-hyperkalemia and terminally ill patients who declined all forms of intervention and treatment (Figure 1). Approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Aerospace Center Hospital, also known as Beijing Airlines Medical Ethics Review Committee (approval number: Beijing Airlines Medical Ethics Review 2022 No. 124). Given the retrospective nature of the study, informed consent was waived, and all clinical investigations adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki 2008.
![]() |
Figure 1 Patient enrollment process. |
Data Collection
The relevant clinical data of patients were retrieved through an inquiry of the emergency electronic medical record system. These encompassed variables such as sex, age, underlying diseases (including hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, cardiac insufficiency, renal insufficiency, and cerebrovascular disease), medications potentially associated with hyperkalemia (such as spironolactone, potassium chloride, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEI], and angiotensin receptor blockers [ARB]), chief complaint upon presentation, and vital signs (comprising of body temperature, respiration rate, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation) at the initial visit. Additionally, data included results from initial tests (pH value, partial pressure of oxygen [PO2], partial pressure of carbon dioxide [PCO2], lactic acid [Lac], bicarbonate [HCO3−], brain natriuretic peptide [BNP], C-reactive protein [CRP], D-dimer, white blood cell count [WBC], hemoglobin [HB], platelet count [PLT], blood glucose [Glu], serum sodium [Na], serum potassium [K], blood urea nitrogen [BUN], and serum creatinine [Cr]). It also included severity scores assessed in the emergency room (such as APACHE II score and Glasgow coma scale [GCS]), initial electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, measures employed for potassium reduction (administration of potassium-lowering medications, emergency bedside blood purification), and prognosis (in-hospital mortality or discharge, time of in-hospital mortality), among others.
Hypertension is characterized by systolic blood pressure exceeding 130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure surpassing 80 mmHg, or the use of antihypertensive medications. Diabetes is diagnosed in patients exhibiting a random blood glucose concentration exceeding 200 mg/dL, at least two fasting plasma glucose levels surpassing 126 mg/dL, or glycosylated hemoglobin levels exceeding 7.0%, or upon the administration of oral glucose-lowering agents or insulin therapy. Chronic renal insufficiency denotes a prior diagnosis of chronic renal insufficiency or sustained elevation in serum creatinine levels for over 3 months. Congestive heart failure is identified by New York Heart Association functional classification III or IV. End-stage malignancy is characterized by widespread metastasis of solid tumors throughout the body. In the emergency room, we used the APACHE II scoring system to assess the severity of each patient’s condition. The highest and lowest values of each indicator during the first 24 hours were recorded, and the corresponding scores were assigned according to the criteria outlined in Table 1. The higher score was used in the analysis. The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score was based on the initial assessment upon the patients’ arrival in the emergency room. Medications potentially linked with hyperkalemia are those presently prescribed, and potassium-lowering medications include intravenous administration of calcium gluconate and loop diuretics, intravenous infusion of glucose coupled with insulin, intravenous infusion of sodium bicarbonate, and oral administration of calcium polystyrene sulfonate. Emergency bedside blood purification refers to blood purification conducted within two hours of hyperkalemia diagnosis.
![]() |
Table 1 Distribution of APACHE II Scores Among Patients with Severe Hyperkalemia |
Statistical Analysis
Categorical variables were described by frequency and proportion and juxtaposed using a chi-square test. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared using a t-test after verifying normality. Patients were divided into the death group and the survival group based on prognosis, whereupon comparisons were drawn across various parameters such as sex, age, underlying diseases, baseline medications, presenting symptoms, initial vital signs, initial examination findings, emergency room scores, ECG findings, and treatment methods to discern notable distinctions between the groups. Subsequently, statistically significant and clinically relevant covariates were identified for binary logistic regression analysis. To reduce multicollinearity, only one variable was selected from highly correlated variable sets for inclusion in the binary logistic regression model. A P value less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
Results
Demographic and Clinical Baseline Characteristics
Between January 2018 and May 2022, the emergency department of a hospital attended to 273,759 patients, of whom 128 had serum potassium levels exceeding 6.5 mmol/L. After re-evaluation, 13 patients were diagnosed pseudo-hyperkalemia, and 25 were in terminal stage. As a result, 90 patients with severe hyperkalemia were included in the study, comprising 64 in the survival group and 26 in the death group (Table 2).
![]() |
Table 2 Serum Potassium Distribution |
Among these patients, 48 were male (53.3%) with an average age of 71.1 years, showing no significant gender difference between groups. However, significant differences were found between the survival and death groups in several comorbidities, including hypertension (79.7% vs 34.6%, p < 0.01), type 2 diabetes mellitus (60.9% vs 34.6%, p = 0.02), and coronary heart disease (71.9% vs 38.5%, p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in cardiac insufficiency, cerebrovascular diseases, chronic renal insufficiency, and regular dialysis (Table 3).
![]() |
Table 3 Demographic and Clinical Baseline Characteristics |
For chief complaints, impaired consciousness was more common in the death group (43.3%) compared to the survival group (14.1%) (p = 0.003). Upon initial presentation, significant differences were identified in respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation between the groups: respiratory rate (22.11±5.93 vs 17.73±10.07, p = 0.02), mean arterial pressure (93.21±25.85 vs 64.32±40.05, p < 0.001), and peripheral oxygen saturation (92.9±17.88 vs 72.81±37.87, p = 0.001) (Table 3).
Laboratory tests also revealed significant differences between the survival and death groups: lactate (5.93±8.52 vs 10.94±11.57, p = 0.04), CRP (30.54±41.07 vs 84.57±63.77, p < 0.001), D-dimer (2.56±2.98 vs 6.03±3.68, p = 0.01), WBC count (12.69±10.09 vs 17.92±14.14, p = 0.04), and serum potassium (7.66±0.90 vs 7.89±0.99, p = 0.02) (Table 3).
In terms of severity scores, significant differences were observed in GCS scores (13.07 ± 3.18 vs 9.31 ± 4.54, p < 0.001) and APACHE II scores (23.21 ± 5.41 vs 29.5 ± 9.08, p = 0.001). On ECG, a significant difference was noted in the prevalence of widened QRS waves between the survival and death groups (15.6% vs 23.4%, p = 0.04) (Table 4).
![]() |
Table 4 ECG Findings in Patients with Hyperkalemia |
Treatment and Prognosis in the Emergency Room of Patients
All enrolled patients received potassium-lowering therapy in the emergency room, with 88 patients (97.8%) undergoing glucose plus insulin treatment, 84 patients (93.3%) receiving sodium bicarbonate, and all patients receiving calcium gluconate. Also, 78 patients (74.4%) were administered diuretics, 26 (28.9%) received oral potassium-lowering resin, and 24 (26.7%) underwent emergency bedside blood purification therapy. Statistically significant differences were observed between the survival and death groups in the administration of calcium polystyrene sulfonate (35.9% vs 11.3%, p = 0.02) and emergency blood purification (35.9% vs 3.8%, p = 0.003).
Among the 90 enrolled patients, 64 patients (71.1%) were successfully discharged, including 6 patients discharged directly from the emergency room and 38 discharged following admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for further treatment. A total of 26 patients (28.9%) succumbed to the condition, with 11 deaths occurring in the emergency room and 15 deaths in the ICU (Table 3).
Relationship Between in-Hospital Mortality and Clinical Factors
To further assess the association between in-hospital mortality and clinical factors, univariable regression analysis was performed. As shown in Table 5, a history of diabetes, ACEI/ARB drug use, higher serum potassium, elevated Lac level, higher CRP level, increased D-dimer level, widened QRS wave, and higher APACHE II score were associated with higher mortality. Conversely, early blood purification treatment was associated with lower mortality rates. Although statistical analysis suggested that a history of hypertension, low respiratory rate, low mean arterial pressure, and low peripheral oxygen saturation were linked to lower mortality, these findings are more likely influenced by confounding bias from a clinical perspective. Based on both clinical relevance and the results of the above univariate regression analysis, we selected a history of diabetes, serum potassium levels, QRS waveform width, APACHE II score, and emergency blood purification as covariates for multivariate regression analysis. The results indicate that while a history of diabetes had a p-value of 0.059-falling short of statistical significance-this may be attributed to the limited sample size and potential multicollinearity (Table 6).
![]() |
Table 5 Univariable Regression Analysis Indicates a Correlation Between in-Hospital Mortality and Clinical Factors |
![]() |
Table 6 Prognostic Factors in Severe Hyperkalemia |
Discussion
This study conducted a retrospective analysis encompassing clinical presentations, ECG findings, laboratory results, diagnosis and treatment, and prognostic outcomes among patients diagnosed with severe hyperkalemia in the emergency department. Also, regression analysis was conducted to clarify various clinical factors associated with mortality.
Between January 2018 and May 2022, a total of 90 patients received a diagnosis of severe hyperkalemia, representing an incidence of 0.03%, a figure notably lower than those reported internationally. For instance, a Swiss university hospital reported a prevalence of hyperkalemia among emergency department patients at 0.3% (defined as serum or plasma potassium concentration ≥ 6 mmol/L).8 Among the study group, 26 patients succumbed in-hospital, yielding a mortality rate of 28.9%, similar to findings from a 2012 study conducted in South Korea, which reported a mortality rate of 30.7% for severe hyperkalemia.9 Chronic renal insufficiency emerged as the predominant underlying condition associated with severe hyperkalemia, with 70% of affected patients presenting a history of chronic kidney disease, and 23.3% undergoing regular dialysis therapy.10 These findings align with prior literature, underscoring the significance of serum potassium monitoring in patients with chronic renal insufficiency upon admission to emergency care settings.
In this study, medications potentially associated with hyperkalemia were analyzed. A notable proportion, ranging between 25% and 40% of patients, had a documented history of oral medications linked to an increased risk of hyperkalemia. Primarily, these medications encompassed spironolactone, potassium chloride extended-release tablets, and ACEI/ARB antihypertensive drugs, findings that align with previous research.11
In this study, patients diagnosed with severe hyperkalemia exhibited a variety of clinical manifestations lacking distinctive specificity. Predominantly, dyspnea, gastrointestinal symptoms, and impaired consciousness emerged as the primary presenting complaints. In contrast to findings reported in the literature, only a few patients demonstrated muscle and cardiac symptoms, such as fatigue and palpitations, with 5.5% of patients being entirely asymptomatic, incidentally discovered during the examination.12 Notably, the proportion of impaired consciousness was higher in the death group compared to the survival group (14.1% vs 43.3%, P = 0.003), revealing a potential association between complications with other critical diseases and heightened mortality risk in patients with hyperkalemia.
In this study, the initial laboratory findings following hospital visits revealed distinctive characteristics among patients, including pronounced metabolic acidosis (pH 7.2 ± 0.2, lactate 6.0 ± 8.1, bicarbonate 11.8 ± 6.9). Acute infections were prevalent in most patients, as evidenced by significantly elevated CRP and WBC levels. Also, significant changes in serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen were observed (blood urea nitrogen 30.5 ± 16.8, creatinine 496.4 ± 368.6). When comparing the test results between the survival and death groups, it was evident that serum lactate levels, WBC count, CRP, and D-dimer were significantly higher in the death group, indicating a potential association between clinical comorbidities such as metabolic acidosis, infection, and coagulation dysfunction, and increased mortality risk in patients with toxic hyperkalemia.13
This study observed diverse ECG findings among patients diagnosed with severe hyperkalemia, consistent with previous research.14–16 These findings encompassed peaked T waves, widened QRS waves, and sinus bradycardia. Notably, a substantial proportion of patients (31.1%) exhibited a normal ECG, underscoring the potential for misdiagnosis of hyperkalemia based solely on ECG findings. Also, the study identified widened QRS waves on ECG as a significant risk factor for death among patients with severe hyperkalemia.17 The shape and width of the QRS complex reflect the ventricular depolarization process and the integrity of the conduction system, including the His-Purkinje fibers. Severe hyperkalemia inactivates some voltage-gated sodium channels, shortening the depolarization phase and diminishing the upstroke and amplitude of the action potential. This leads to prolonged depolarization, conduction delays, and, in severe cases, conduction block. Sustained depolarization can also impact the function of L-type calcium channels, thereby impairing myocardial contractility. These electrophysiological changes significantly increase the risk of mortality in affected patients.
Nearly all patients included in this study received conventional potassium-lowering medications, such as calcium gluconate, glucose plus insulin, sodium bicarbonate, and loop diuretics.18 However, only 28.9% of patients received the potassium-lowering agent calcium polystyrene sulfonate, with a notably higher proportion observed in the survival group when compared to the death group. This discrepancy may be attributed to factors such as the prevalence of nausea, vomiting, or critical diseases among patients, rendering them unable to tolerate oral potassium-lowering medications. Emergency blood purification was administered to only 26.7% of patients, potentially influenced by factors such as the availability of medical resources, variations in the responses of patients to potassium-lowering medications, and the preferences of the families of patients regarding invasive treatments. Notably, the proportion of emergency blood purification was significantly higher in the survival group when compared to the death group (35.9% vs 3.8%, p = 0.003), revealing its potential role in reducing mortality risk among patients with hyperkalemia and emphasizing its importance in managing critically ill patients.19
To further clarify the relationship between clinical factors and mortality, we performed univariate regression analysis on all relevant variables. Based on the results of this analysis and their clinical significance, we selected a history of diabetes, serum potassium levels, widened QRS wave, APACHE II score, and emergency blood purification as covariates for multivariate regression analysis. The results revealed that widened QRS wave, increased APACHE II score, and increased serum potassium level emerged as primary risk factors for mortality in patients with severe hyperkalemia. Conversely, those who underwent emergency blood purification during hospitalization exhibited a reduced risk of death. APACHE II score served as a valuable tool for assessing mortality risk among patients with severe hyperkalemia in this study.
This study is subject to several limitations: 1) Inclusion was limited to patients with severe hyperkalemia, before the analysis of the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with mild hyperkalemia as a control group. 2) The retrospective nature of this group study, coupled with a small sample size may introduce statistical bias. 3) Analysis was restricted to the initial tests and ECGs upon admission, without providing descriptions of subsequent changes and the dynamic evolution process. Additionally, details regarding rescue interventions such as tracheal intubation and the administration of vasoactive drugs were not provided. 4) Only medications potentially contributing to renal insufficiency were considered, neglecting a comprehensive analysis of all medications taken by patients, potentially introducing bias.
Conclusion
Emergency department physicians should prioritize the identification and management of severe hyperkalemia, as patients often present with renal and cardiac insufficiency alongside infections, lacking distinctive clinical features. Key risk factors associated with increased mortality include a widened QRS wave on ECG, elevated APACHE II score, and high serum potassium levels. The prompt implementation of emergency blood purification can effectively correct hyperkalemia, offering significant benefits to patients.
Abbreviations
OR, odds ratio; CRP, C-reactive protein; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; ACEI, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; ARB, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; Lac, lactic acid; WBC, White Blood Cells; HB, hemoglobin; PLT, Platelets; BUN, Blood Urea Nitrogen; Cr, creatinine.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This study was conducted with approval from the Ethics Committee of Aerospace Center Hospital / Beijing Airlines Medical Ethics Review Committee (Approval Number: Beijing Airlines Medical Ethics Review 2022 No. 124). This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.
Funding
No funding was received.
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
1. Giebisch G. Renal potassium transport: mechanisms and regulation. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(5):F817–33. doi:10.1152/ajprenal.1998.274.5.F817
2. Macdonald JE, Struthers AD. What is the optimal serum potassium level in cardiovascular patients? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(2):155–161. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.06.021
3. Tran HA. Extreme hyperkalemia. South Med J. 2005;98(7):729–732. doi:10.1097/01.smj.0000149407.51134.77
4. Spodick DH. Effects of severe hyperkalemia. Am Heart Hosp J. 2008;6(1):68. doi:10.1111/j.1751-7168.2008.07777.x
5. Al AdAwi RM, Albu-Mahmood Z, Abdelgelil M, Abdelaziz H, Stewart D, Awaisu A. Incidence of co-trimoxazole-induced hyperkalemia in a tertiary care hospital. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:519–525. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S283471
6. Ettinger PO, Regan TJ, Oldewurtel HA. Hyperkalemia, cardiac conduction, and the electrocardiogram: a review. Am Heart J. 1974;88(3):360–371. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(74)90473-6
7. Gennari FJ. Disorders of potassium homeostasis. hypokalemia and hyperkalemia. Crit Care Clin. 2002;18(2):273–88,vi. doi:10.1016/s0749-0704(01)00009-4
8. Pfortmüller CA, Leichtle AB, Fiedler GM, Exadaktylos AK, Lindner G. Hyperkalemia in the emergency department: etiology, symptoms and outcome of a life threatening electrolyte disorder. Eur J Intern Med. 2013;24(5):e59–60. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2013.02.010
9. An JN, Lee JP, Jeon HJ, et al. Severe hyperkalemia requiring hospitalization: predictors of mortality. Crit Care. 2012;16(6):R225. doi:10.1186/cc11872
10. Takaichi K, Takemoto F, Ubara Y, Mori Y. Analysis of factors causing hyperkalemia. Intern Med. 2007;46(12):823–829. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.46.6415
11. Fordjour KN, Walton T, Doran JJ. Management of hyperkalemia in hospitalized patients. Am J Med Sci. 2014;347(2):93–100. doi:10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318279b105
12. Palmer BF, Clegg DJ. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperkalemia. Cleve Clin J Med. 2017;84(12):934–942. doi:10.3949/ccjm.84a.17056
13. Acker CG, Johnson JP, Palevsky PM, Greenberg A. Hyperkalemia in hospitalized patients: causes, adequacy of treatment, and results of an attempt to improve physician compliance with published therapy guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(8):917–924. doi:10.1001/archinte.158.8.917
14. Littmann L, Gibbs MA. Electrocardiographic manifestations of severe hyperkalemia. J Electrocardiol. 2018;51(5):814–817. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.06.018
15. Diercks DB, Shumaik GM, Harrigan RA, Brady WJ, Chan TC. Electrocardiographic manifestations: electrolyte abnormalities. J Emerg Med. 2004;27(2):153–160. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.04.006
16. Mattu A, Brady WJ, Robinson DA. Electrocardiographic manifestations of hyperkalemia. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18(6):721–729. doi:10.1053/ajem.2000.7344
17. Durfey N, Lehnhof B, Bergeson A, et al. Severe hyperkalemia: can the electrocardiogram risk stratify for short-term adverse events? West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(5):963–971. doi:10.5811/westjem.2017.6.33033
18. Davey M, Caldicott D. Calcium salts in management of hyperkalaemia. Emerg Med J. 2002;19(1):92–93. doi:10.1136/emj.19.1.92-a
19. Rafique Z, Liu M, Staggers KA, Minard CG, Peacock WF. Patiromer for treatment of hyperkalemia in the emergency department: a pilot study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(1):54–60. doi:10.1111/acem.13868
© 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Recommended articles

Leiomyoma with Bizarre Nuclei: A Current Update
Guo E, Li C, Hu Y, Zhao K, Zheng Q, Wang L
International Journal of Women's Health 2022, 14:1641-1656
Published Date: 25 November 2022

Mortality-Related Risk Factors and Novel Antimicrobial Regimens for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: A Systematic Review
Hu Q, Chen J, Sun S, Deng S
Infection and Drug Resistance 2022, 15:6907-6926
Published Date: 28 November 2022

Prognostic Factors of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Experience from a Regional Medical Center in Eastern China
Li P, Su X, Zhang X, Sun L, Zhang G
International Journal of General Medicine 2023, 16:453-465
Published Date: 3 February 2023

External Validation of the Nelson Equation for Kidney Function Decline in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
Zhou H, Chen W, Suo Y, Meng X, Zhao X, Wang M, Liu L, Li H, Pan Y, Wang Y
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2023, 18:901-909
Published Date: 6 June 2023


Palmoplantar Pustulosis: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Therapies
Heidemeyer K, May Lee M, Cazzaniga S, Yawalkar N, Naldi L
Psoriasis: Targets and Therapy 2023, 13:33-58
Published Date: 22 September 2023