Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 17

Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion is Efficacious and Safe for the Management of Talaromycosis in HIV-Infected Patients: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study in China

Authors Liu M, Yang H, Liu Q, He K, Yuan J, Chen Y 

Received 29 July 2024

Accepted for publication 2 December 2024

Published 14 December 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 5581—5593

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S481856

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Zhi Ruan



Min Liu,* Honghong Yang,* Qian Liu,* Kun He, Jing Yuan, Yaokai Chen

Department of Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, 400036, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Yaokai Chen, Email [email protected]

Background: Amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmB-D) have potential toxic effects in the treatment of talaromycosis, and high-quality, non-generic liposomal AmB (L-AMB) is still inaccessible in many regions of China. As such, the efficacy and safety of alternative drugs warrant further investigation for the management of talaromycosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion (ABCD) and AmB-D for the treatment of talaromycosis in a retrospective cohort of HIV-infected patients.
Methods: This was a retrospective study and the data of HIV-infected patients with talaromycosis who received ABCD or AmB-D from January 2018 to December 2022, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. We compared the efficacy and safety of the two antifungal drugs.
Results: Overall, 38 patients receiving ABCD and 33 patients receiving AmB-D were included. The conversion rates to fungal negativity at one week post-treatment were 86.84% (33/38) in the ABCD group and 90.09% (30/33) in the AmB-D group, which reached 100.00% in both groups at two weeks post-treatment. A higher symptom remission rate was observed at two weeks in the ABCD group compared with the AmB-D group (94.74% vs 75.76%; p=0.003). Additionally, the serum creatinine level significantly increased from baseline in the AmB-D group, whereas it did not increase significantly in the ABCD group. Furthermore, significantly fewer patients discontinued antifungal treatment due to drug intolerance in the ABCD group, and the incidences of leukopenia and elevated creatinine levels were lower in the ABCD group compared with the AmB-D group.
Conclusion: ABCD has a clinical efficacy comparable to AmB-D, with higher symptom remission rate, lower nephrotoxicity, and lower bone marrow suppression, indicating that ABCD may be an appropriate alternative option for the clinical management of talaromycosis.

Keywords: talaromycosis, human immunodeficiency virus, amphotericin B deoxycholate, amphotericin B colloidal dispersion, efficacy, safety

Introduction

Talaromycosis (formerly known as penicilliosis) is an invasive fungal disease caused by the dimorphic Talaromyces marneffei (TM) (formerly Penicillium marneffei) fungal organism. Talaromycosis is endemic in northern Thailand, Vietnam, Myanmar, and southern China including Hong Kong and Taiwan, and northeastern India.1 The disease mainly affects people living with HIV (PLWH), especially those with advanced HIV disease or those with a CD4+ T-lymphocyte cell count of <100 cells/µL.2–4 The common clinical presentations of patients with advanced HIV disease include fever, weight loss, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, respiratory, and gastrointestinal symptoms.5 However, the preceding manifestations are non-specific, and are indistinguishable from the clinical features of disseminated tuberculosis, systemic mycoses, or infections caused by intracellular pathogens such as Salmonella species. Recently, talaromycosis has been listed as the third most common HIV-associated opportunistic infection, after tuberculosis and cryptococcal meningitis.6 Without timely diagnosis and effective antifungal therapy, the risk of mortality from talaromycosis is up to 50%,7 and can be reduced to approximately 10–20% if appropriate antifungal drugs are prescribed timeously.8

Currently, amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmB-D) is recommended as the initial antifungal treatment for TM infection, and is generally an effective therapeutic option.9 However, the clinical applications of AmB-D are greatly limited due to its high toxicity and the occurrence of frequent adverse effects. Botero Aguirre JP et al, reported that over 80% of patients developed varying degrees of renal impairment during AmB-D treatment.10 Additionally, kidney disease is a common complication in PLWH,11 and administering AmB-D to individuals with renal compromise may further damage the kidney, leading to irreversible renal damage and renal failure.12,13 Therefore, the application of AmB-D as induction therapy is limited by the risk of renal injury and other safety concerns in PLWH with talaromycosis. Although liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is as effective as AmB-D for fungal infections and is associated with less infusion-related toxicity and less nephrotoxicity,14,15 only generic, locally-manufactured L-AmB is available in most part of China, especially under developed regions. Past evidence has shown that generic L-AmB made in China is not advantageous over AmB-D in terms of nephrotoxicity.16 Given the toxic effects of AmB-D and the overall unavailability of original L-AmB in China, it is necessary to investigate whether other amphotericin B formulations are effective and safe for this fatal disease.

Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion (ABCD) is a disk-shaped nanoparticle colloidal dispersion formed by amphotericin B and sodium cholesteryl sulfate at a molecular molar ratio of 1:1. Sodium cholesteryl sulfate binds to amphotericin B, thereby reducing the binding of amphotericin B to cholesterol in human cell membranes.17 Additionally, ABCD is rapidly absorbed by the liver, spleen, lungs, and other organs of the reticuloendothelial system after entering the blood, resulting in diminished kidney distribution and thus a lower likelihood of renal tubular damage.18 Evidence has shown that ABCD is effective and safe for patients who experienced renal insufficiency or nephrotoxicity during previous AmB-D treatment.19 In 2021, ABCD was approved as an antifungal medicine for patients with invasive fungal infections in China, and is particularly suitable for those who fail to tolerate or respond to AmB-D. Our previous study demonstrated that AmB-D had similar efficacy to voriconazole in HIV-infected patients with talaromycosis, and contributed to earlier fungal clearance and earlier clinical resolution of symptoms.20 However, there is a scarcity of data with regards to the efficacy and safety of ABCD use in patients with talaromycosis. In the present study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of ABCD and AmB-D when used in the treatment of advanced HIV-infected patients with talaromycosis, aiming to provide valid evidence for the clinical application of ABCD.

Patients and Methods

Study Design

This is a retrospective cohort study. We retrospectively collected data of HIV-infected patients with talaromycosis seen at Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, China, from January 2018 to December 2022. We then analyzed the differences in efficacy and safety between patients receiving ABCD and those receiving AmB-D for induction antifungal therapy. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Public Health Medical Center (2022-043-01-KY) and informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of this investigation. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the Figure 1.

Figure 1 Typical skin lesions caused by Talaromyces marneffei, distributed on the abdomen (A), extremities (B), and face (C).

Eligibility for Patient Inclusion

Data of all HIV-positive patients diagnosed with talaromycosis and who received ABCD or AmB-D treatment were screened. The diagnosis of talaromycosis was based on the culture-proven of the TM from blood, bone marrow, or other supposedly sterile body fluid samples. The identification of TM was established on the basis of the observation of the morphological characteristics of the mycelia and spores of the culture colony.21 Patients who had at least one body fluid sample culture result after antifungal treatment was initiated and who completed at least one two-week follow up were included for analysis. The data of those individuals who did not have fungal culture results prior to antifungal treatment and those who did not have fungal culture results after antifungal treatment was initiated were excluded from the analysis.

Antifungal Treatment Regimens

ABCD (CSPC Ouyi Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Hebei Province, China) was administered intravenously at an initial dosage of 1.0 mg/kg/d on day 1, 2.0 mg/kg/d on day 2, and 3.0 mg/kg/d for the remaining 12 days, with the total administered dose not exceeding 200 mg/d. AmB-D (North China Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hebei Province, China) was administered intravenously at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg/d on day 1, 0.2 mg/kg/d on day 2, and 0.5 to 0.7 mg/kg/d for the remaining 12 days of induction therapy. All patients received oral itraconazole (200 mg twice daily for 10 weeks) as consolidation therapy following induction therapy with either ABCD or AmB-D. The dosage and duration of ABCD or AmB-D were allowed to be adjusted according to each patient’s tolerance to either drug and/or on the severity of disease manifestations present in each patient.22–24 Additionally, all patients were routinely administered oral potassium supplements (3 g/d) to prevent the occurrence of hypokalemia, and saline hydration solution to prevent nephrotoxicity.

Efficacy and Safety Assessment

Efficacy of ABCD or AmB-D was assessed by negative fungal conversion rates and symptom remission rates. Safety of the two antifungal drugs was assessed via changes in hematological laboratory results, discontinuations, and incidence of adverse events. Adverse events (AEs) caused by ABCD or AmB-D were recorded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 5.0), and included laboratory test results that changed from normal to abnormal during the induction antifungal treatment period, or values that deviated from baseline values.

Statistical Analysis

All data analyses were performed using SPSS software (IBM Corp, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp). Continuous data were tested for normality of distribution via the Shapiro–Wilk method. If data was normally distributed, the data is described as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and the comparison was analyzed using Student’s t-test. Otherwise, medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) are used for description of data, and the Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test was used for comparison of differences. Categorical data are expressed as percentages (%) and frequencies, and were compared via Pearson’s Chi-Squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Effect sizes are reported with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 for all analyses.

Results

Baseline Characteristics of Patients

A total of 71 eligible patients were included in this study, among whom 38 received ABCD and 33 received AmB-D for induction antifungal therapy. All the 71 patients were confirmatively HIV-positive and tested positive for TM culture. Patient ages ranged from 19 years to 71 years, with a median age of 45.0 years in the ABCD group and 41.0 years in the AmB-D group, respectively. No differences were observed between the two groups in incident rates of bacterial pneumonia, tuberculosis, cytomegalovirus infection, and pneumocystis pneumonia, as well as in rates of physical TM infection-related disease manifestations, including fever, skin lesions (Figure 1) splenomegaly, deep lymph node enlargement, abdominal distension, and diarrhea (Figure 2). The median CD4+ cell counts of the two groups of patients were 18.00 and 12.00, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Baseline levels of CD4/CD8, neutrophil counts, haemoglobin, platelets, creatinine, alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) were found to be comparable between the two groups. The blood fungal cultures were performed at baseline for all patients included in the study. The blood culture results demonstrated an organism that produced red pigment on a microbiological culture plate containing Sabouraud dextrose agar after four days of incubation at 25°C. Furthermore, the organism exhibited binary fission yeast form at 37°C. Microscopic examination of the organism confirmed the presence of Talaromyces marneffei infection. (Figure 3). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to other parameters measured. Detailed information is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of Included Patients

Figure 2 Enhanced abdominal CT (AC) showing significant lymph node enlargement (red arrows) and multiple areas of thickening of the intestinal wall (white arrow).

Figure 3 Colony appearance and microscopic morphology of Talaromyces marneffei. Blood culture results (incubated for four days at 25°C) indicated the growth of an organism that produced a red pigment on a microbiological culture plate containing sabouraud dextrose agar (A), and microscopic examination of the organism revealed the presence of broom-shaped Talaromyces marneffei strains (B and C). Magnification, ×1000. The organism exhibited a binary fission yeast form at 37°C (D), and microscopic examination revealed that the organism was arranged in a sausage-like pattern, mixed with hyphal-like structures (E and F). Magnification: ×1000.

Efficacy Assessment: Negative Fungal Conversion Rates and Symptom Remission Rates

The negative fungal conversion rates at one week post-treatment were 86.84% (33/38) and 90.09% (30/33) in the ABCD group and the AmB-D group, respectively, and reached 100.00% in both groups (38/38 vs 33/33) at two weeks post-treatment (Table 2). There was no significant difference in negative fungal conversion rates between the two groups at one week or at two weeks of antifungal treatment. With respect to physical TM infection-related manifestations, we observed comparable symptom remission rates at one week post-treatment in both groups (81.58% vs 78.72%; 31/38 vs 26/33; p=0.775) and a higher symptom remission rate at two weeks post-treatment in the ABCD group, compared with the AmB-D group (94.74% vs 75.76%; 36/38 vs 25/33; p=0.003; Table 2).

Table 2 Negative Fungal Conversion Rates and Symptom Remission Rates in Both Groups

Safety Assessment: Changes in Laboratory Parameters During Treatment

Table 3 and 4 show the hematological test results of patients in the two groups at baseline and at different time points after treatment. Median platelet levels in the ABCD group significantly decreased after one week of antifungal treatment compared to pre-treatment levels (67.00 vs 99.00, p=0.026), but improved in the ABCD group after another week of treatment (107.00 vs 99.00, p=0.380). No decrease in median platelet levels was observed in the AmB-D group. Both red blood cell counts and hemoglobin levels decreased significantly in both groups after one week and two weeks of antifungal treatment, compared to pre-treatment levels (p<0.001).

Table 3 Results of Laboratory Parameters in Both Groups at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2

Table 4 Changes in Laboratory Parameters from Baseline at Week 1 and Week 2 in Both Groups

No increase in liver function indices was observed in either of the two groups. Indeed, AST levels, ALT levels, and total bilirubin levels were observed to be lower both at week one and week two compared to baseline levels. Additionally, none of the differences in the changes in liver function test results (compared with baseline levels) were observed to be statistically significantly different between the two groups.

The median serum creatinine levels in the ABCD group was significantly lower after one week of treatment compared to baseline levels (52.80 μmol/L vs 63.10 μmol/L, p<0.001), and there was no significant change in serum creatinine levels at week one in the AmB-D group compared to baseline levels. However, serum creatinine levels in the AmB-D group was significantly higher at week two compared to baseline levels (69.10 μmol/L vs 55.65 μmol/L, p=0.007), whereas serum creatinine levels in the ABCD group did not increase in a statistically significant manner, even after two weeks of antifungal treatment. Additionally, the increase in serum creatinine levels from baseline was significantly lower at week two in the ABCD group than in the AmB-D group (1.25 μmol/L vs 9.60 μmol/L, p=0.013, Table 4). No significant decrease in serum potassium levels was observed in both groups when compared to baseline, and there was no significant statistical difference in changes in potassium levels during the two week treatment period between the two groups (Table 4).

Safety Assessment: Discontinuations

When considering reasons for premature treatment discontinuation, we observed that significantly fewer patients in the ABCD group discontinued antifungal treatment due to drug intolerance, compared to patients in the AmB-D group (5.26% vs 27.27%, 2/38 vs 9/33, p=0.019). Four cases in the AmB-D group discontinued antifungal treatment because of renal impairment whereas no patients discontinued treatment in the ABCD group secondary to renal impairment. Two cases in the AmB-D group switched to ABCD due to renal impairment, and renal function parameters gradually normalized after the drug regimen switch. In the AmB-D group, six patients discontinued antifungal treatment due to myelosuppression; however, no cases discontinued antifungal treatment in the ABCD group because of bone marrow suppression. Of the two discontinuations occurred in the ABCD group, one discontinuation was due to myelosuppression and the other was associated with refractory hypokalemia.

Safety Assessment: Adverse Events Analysis

Adverse events (AEs) observed during AmB-D or ABCD treatment are summarized in Table 5. The incidence of AEs associated with leukopenia (42.11% vs 72.73%, 16/38 vs 24/33, p=0.009), and elevated creatinine levels (0.00% vs 18.18%, 0/38 vs 6/33, p=0.008) were significantly lower in the ABCD group than in the AmB-D group, respectively. In particular, among grade 3 or grade 4 AEs, the incidence of leukopenia (18.42% vs 54.55%, 7/38 vs 18/33, p=0.001) and neutropenia (5.26% vs 30.3%, 2/38 vs 10/33, p=0.005) was also significantly lower in the ABCD group than in the AmB group, respectively. However, the incidence of infusion reactions, which was defined as presence of a fever and/or chills during antifungal drug infusion, was observed to be significantly higher in the ABCD group than in the AmB-D group (31.58% vs 12.12%, 12/38 vs 4/33, p=0.05).

Table 5 Adverse Events in Both Groups

Discussion

The incidence of talaromyosis is closely correlated with that of HIV infection. For instance, 87.72% of talaromyosis cases occur in patients infected with HIV in mainland China.6 It is widely acknowledged that HIV infection contributes to the development of a number of common diseases, including those affecting the bones, kidneys and liver.25 Similarly, talaromyosis has the potential to disseminate to the liver, spleen and bone marrow.26 This is precisely why severe leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia,27,28 and hepatic dysfunction often occur in HIV-infected patients with talaromycosis. In accordance with the established guidelines, AmB is the recommended pharmaceutical agent for the treatment of talaromyosis.22 However, prolonged administration of AmB has been linked to the occurrence of adverse reactions, including anaemia, renal dysfunction and hypokalaemia.29 It is therefore necessary to optimize the treatment regimens and explore the potential of new antifungal drugs. This study represents the first retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ABCD and AmB in the treatment of talaromyosis infection in HIV-positive patients.

In our retrospective cohort study, we observed that the overall efficacy of ABCD is comparable to AmB-D at one week and at two weeks post-treatment, with fungal clearance rates reaching 86.84% in the ABCD group and 90.09% in the AmB-D group after one week of treatment, and fungal clearance rates reaching 100% in both groups after two weeks of treatment. Similar to our results, Thuy Le, M.D. found that the proportion of fungemia clearance by day 8 in the formulation of AmB was more than 90%.30 Additionally, we observed that symptom remission in the ABCD group was superior to that in the AmB-D group, particularly after two weeks of treatment. These results imply that ABCD has comparable fungicidal activity and clinical efficacy to AmB-D when used to treat talaromycosis in HIV-infected patients.

We also observed that ABCD seemed to have a superior safety profile and exhibit a lower incidence of nephrotoxicity. The results of observational studies among acquired immune deficiency syndrome patients with cryptococcal meningitis or talaromycosis who treated with AmB formulations indicate that the incidence of ABCD-related nephrotoxicity was lower than that of AmB, which is consistent with the results of our research.31 Unsurprisingly, our results indicated that serum creatinine levels in the AmB-D group was significantly higher at week two compared to baseline levels (69.10 μmol/L vs 55.65 μmol/L, p=0.007), whereas serum creatinine levels in the ABCD group did not increase significantly even after two weeks of antifungal treatment. We also observed that the increase in serum creatinine levels from baseline was significantly lower at week two in the ABCD group than in the AmB-D group. Further, we observed that four patients in the AmB-D group discontinued antifungal treatment secondary to renal impairment, whereas no patients in the ABCD group discontinued treatment due to renal impairment, and that two patients in the AmB-D group switched to ABCD due to renal impairment. Renal functional parameters in the two patients gradually reverted to normal after regimen switch. This finding suggests that deterioration in renal function is generally a dose limiting factor for AmB,32 thus ABCD may be useful in these settings owing to its superior safety profile.

Notably, ABCD was observed to have a less severe impact on bone marrow functional parameters. We observed that the incidence of leukopenia was significantly lower in the ABCD group compared to the AmB-D group, and this was especially true for grade 3 or grade 4 leukopenia and neutropenia. Six cases in the AmB-D group discontinued antifungal treatment due to myelosuppression, whereas no patients in the ABCD group discontinued antifungal treatment due to myelosuppression. These results suggest that for patients with underlying bone marrow dysfunction, ABCD may be a better choice to decrease adverse effects and improve outcomes. One patient discontinued the treatment due to refractory hypokalaemia, which highlights the necessity for immediate supplementation with electrolytic potassium upon the commencement of an AmB and its derivatives.

We observed that ABCD was more likely to result in infusion-associated reactions, such as fever and chills, which is consistent with the results of other studies.30,31 The observed increase in infusion-related toxic adverse reactions in patients treated with ABCD may be attributed to the upregulation of IL-1β protein synthesis and the concomitant decrease in IL-1ra levels.33 Additionally, such reactions were mostly mild or moderate, and fever and/or chills resolved quickly after a single dose of dexamethasone. None of the patients in either treatment group discontinued treatment as a consequence of fever or chills.

We acknowledge that our study has limitations. Our study was a retrospective study, and consequently, some data was incomplete, and evaluation of clinical symptom remission relied on past medical records, which may have introduced a degree of bias into the assessment results. Another limitation is that our sample size was relatively small. However, our results provide useful data for the therapeutic use of ABCD in the clinical management of HIV-associated talaromycosis. A multicentre prospective study will be conducted in the future to further validate the findings of this study.

Conclusion

In summary, we compared the efficacy and safety of ABCD and AmB-D in a cohort of HIV-infected patients with talaromycosis and found that ABCD had comparable clinical efficacy, a higher symptom remission rate, lower nephrotoxicity, and lower bone marrow suppression compared to AmB-D, indicating that ABCD is an appropriate alternative induction option for the clinical management of talaromycosis.

Abbreviations

AmB-D, Amphotericin B deoxycholate; L-AMB, liposomal AmB; ABCD, Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion; TM, Talaromyces marneffei; AEs, Adverse events; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile ranges; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase.

Data Sharing Statement

All data generated or analyzed is included in this published article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Public Health Medical Center.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the Figure 1.

Funding

This work was supported by the Chongqing Talent Cultivation Program (cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0275), the Key Project of the Chongqing Science & Technology Bureau (cstc2020jscx-cylhX0001), and the Chongqing Key Public Health Disciplines Improvement Project.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Qin Y, Huang X, Chen H. et al. Burden of Talaromyces marneffei infection in people living with HIV/AIDS in Asia during ART era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):551. doi:10.1186/s12879-020-05260-8

2. Chan JF, Lau SK, Yuen KY, et al. Talaromyces (Penicillium) marneffei infection in non-HIV-infected patients. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016;5(3):e19. doi:10.1038/emi.2016.18

3. Tsang C, Lau S, Woo P. Sixty Years from Segretain’s Description: what Have We Learned and Should Learn About the Basic Mycology of Talaromyces marneffei? Mycopathologia. 2019;184(6):721–729. doi:10.1007/s11046-019-00395-y

4. Cao C, Xi L, Chaturvedi V. Talaromycosis (Penicilliosis) Due to Talaromyces (Penicillium) marneffei: insights into the Clinical Trends of a Major Fungal Disease 60 Years After the Discovery of the Pathogen. Mycopathologia. 2019;184(6):709–720. doi:10.1007/s11046-019-00410-2

5. Le T, Wolbers M, Chi NH, et al. Epidemiology, seasonality, and predictors of outcome of AIDS-associated Penicillium marneffei infection in Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnam Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(7):945–952. doi:10.1093/cid/cir028

6. Hu Y, Zhang J, Li X, et al. Penicillium marneffei infection: an emerging disease in mainland China. Mycopathologia. 2013;175(1–2):57–67. doi:10.1007/s11046-012-9577-0

7. Ying RS, Le T, Cai WP, et al. Clinical epidemiology and outcome of HIV-associated talaromycosis in Guangdong, China, during 2011-2017. HIV Med. 2020;21(11):729–738. doi:10.1111/hiv.13024

8. Jiang J, Meng S, Huang S, et al. Effects of Talaromyces marneffei infection on mortality of HIV/AIDS patients in southern China: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(2):233–241. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.04.018

9. Sirisanthana T, Supparatpinyo K, Perriens J, et al. Amphotericin B and Itraconazole for Treatment of Disseminated Penicillium marneffei Infection in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Patients. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(5):1107–1110. doi:10.1086/520280

10. Botero Aguirre JP, Restrepo Hamid AM. Amphotericin B deoxycholate versus liposomal amphotericin B: effects on kidney function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;11:Cd010481. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010481.pub2

11. Gupta SK, Eustace JA, Winston JA, et al. Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease in HIV-infected patients: recommendations of the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(11):1559–1585. doi:10.1086/430257

12. Kleinberg M. What is the current and future status of conventional amphotericin B? Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;27(1):12–16. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.03.013

13. Sun J, Sun W, Tang Y, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for poor prognosis among HIV patients with Talaromyces marneffei bloodstream infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):514. doi:10.1186/s12879-021-06232-2

14. Johnson PC, Wheat LJ, Cloud GA, et al. Safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B compared with conventional amphotericin B for induction therapy of histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):105–109. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00008

15. Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(10):764–771. doi:10.1056/NEJM199903113401004

16. Liu SQ, Zhang H, Zeng WJ. Case reports of domestic liposomal amphotericin B in treatment of acquired immunedeficiency syndrome complicated with invasive fungal disease. World Clin Drugs. 2012;33(9):568–570.

17. Patel R. Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2000;1(3):475–488. doi:10.1517/14656566.1.3.475

18. Oppenheim BA, Herbrecht R, Kusne S. The safety and efficacy of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion in the treatment of invasive mycoses. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21(5):1145–1153. doi:10.1093/clinids/21.5.1145

19. Guo LS. Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion: an improved antifungal therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;47(2–3):149–163. doi:10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00104-1

20. Zhou Y, Qin Y, Lu Y, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Voriconazole Versus Amphotericin B Deoxycholate Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Talaromycosis: a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China. Infect Dis Ther. 2022;11(4):1575–1590. doi:10.1007/s40121-022-00658-0

21. Pruksaphon K, Intaramat A, Ratanabanangkoon K, et al. Diagnostic laboratory immunology for talaromycosis (penicilliosis): review from the bench-top techniques to the point-of-care testing. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;96(3):114959. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114959

22. Kaplan JE, Benson C, Holmes KK, et al. Guidelines for prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents: recommendations from CDC, the National Institutes of Health, and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009;58(Rr–4):1–207.

23. Chariyalertsak S, Supparatpinyo K, Sirisanthana T, et al. A controlled trial of itraconazole as primary prophylaxis for systemic fungal infections in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection in Thailand. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(2):277–284. doi:10.1086/338154

24. Qin Y, Zhou Y, Liu S, et al. HIV-associated talaromycosis: does timing of antiretroviral therapy matter? J Infect. 2022;84(3):410–417. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.032

25. Deeks SG, Overbaugh J, Phillips A, et al. HIV infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1(1):15035. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.35

26. Pan M, Fang G, Zheng F, et al. Clinical characteristics of tracheobronchial Talaromyces marneffei infection in non-HIV-infected patients in South China. Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2276310. doi:10.1080/07853890.2023.2276310

27. Tsui WM, Ma KF, Tsang DN. Disseminated Penicillium marneffei infection in HIV-infected subject. Histopathology. 1992;20(4):287–293. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.1992.tb00985.x

28. Chen D, Chang C, Chen M, et al. Unusual disseminated Talaromyces marneffei infection mimicking lymphoma in a non-immunosuppressed patient in East China: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):800. doi:10.1186/s12879-020-05526-1

29. Bennet J. Antimicrobial agents. In: Gilman AGRT, Nies AS, Taylor P, editors. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. New York: Pergamon Press; 1991:1165–1181.

30. Le T, Kinh NV, Cuc NTK, et al. A Trial of Itraconazole or Amphotericin B for HIV-Associated Talaromycosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2329–2340. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1613306

31. Tan Y, Mo Y, Wu S, et al. Safety of different amphotericin B formulations among AIDS patients with invasive fungal disease: a retrospective observational study. AIDS Res Ther. 2024;21(1):66. doi:10.1186/s12981-024-00649-w

32. Yoshida M, Tamura K, Masaoka T, et al. A real-world prospective observational study on the efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B in 426 patients with persistent neutropenia and fever. J Infect Chemother. 2021;27(2):277–283. doi:10.1016/j.jiac.2020.10.005

33. Simitsopoulou M, Roilides E, Dotis J, et al. Differential expression of cytokines and chemokines in human monocytes induced by lipid formulations of amphotericin B. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(4):1397–1403. doi:10.1128/AAC.49.4.1397-1403.2005

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.