Back to Journals » Open Access Emergency Medicine » Volume 16
An Atypical Presentation of Acute Cholecystitis with Left Sided Chest Pain and ST Elevation – A Case Report
Authors Meyer HG , Fäh K, Christ M
Received 8 June 2024
Accepted for publication 20 November 2024
Published 8 December 2024 Volume 2024:16 Pages 323—328
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S478102
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Hans-Christoph Pape
Helene G Meyer,1,2 Kristina Fäh,2 Michael Christ2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland; 2Emergency Department, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital and University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
Correspondence: Michael Christ, Email [email protected]
Background: ST elevation combined with typical chest pain is an indication for acute coronary vascularization and is usually associated with acute myocardial infarction. Herein, we present an unusual case of ST elevation.
Case Presentation: A 57-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with chest pain radiating to both arms and the back. Typical clinical presentation and inferolateral ST elevations were suggestive of ST elevation myocardial infarction. Interestingly, coronary occlusion was excluded by coronary angiography. Despite extensive diagnostic workup, no underlying diagnosis was made. Four days later, the patient returned and reported pain in the right upper abdomen. Clinical presentation, laboratory analysis, and imaging features led to a diagnosis of calculous acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed, and the diagnosis was confirmed. Electrocardiographic changes and pain resolved completely.
Conclusion: Acute calculous cholecystitis is initiated by gallbladder distension due to biliary duct occlusion caused by gallstones. ST elevations in response to gallbladder distension have been demonstrated in animal models. We hypothesize that the ST elevations observed in this patient with chest pain were linked to stone-mediated distension of the gallbladder, leading to reflex coronary vasoconstriction.
Keywords: electrocardiography, ECG, STEMI, cope’s sign, chest pain, case report
Background
Myocardial infarction affects more than 7 million people worldwide every year.1 It is differentiated according to features of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) into non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). STEMI is defined by the characteristic symptoms of myocardial ischemia associated with diagnostic ST elevation on 12-lead ECG.2 Both American and European Guidelines3,4 recommend an immediate reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients.
The global prevalence of gallbladder and biliary diseases is 193 million.5 Cholecystitis affects approximately 200’000 people yearly in the United States alone.6 Typical presentations include acute onset of pain in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen and fever. However, uncharacteristic pain localization, such as chest pain, has been described.7 Patients with acute cholecystitis can show ECG changes without cardiac causes. Previously observed changes include bradycardia, atrioventricular block, T-wave inversions8–11 and ST elevations.12–18 Here, we present the case of a patient with early stage of acute cholecystitis with diagnostic ST elevations in the inferolateral leads (defined as ≥1 mm in more than two contiguous leads2,19). This is an unusual case report because there were no clinical or laboratory signs of cholecystitis at the time of the ST elevation.
Case Presentation
A 57-year-old Caucasian male patient presented to the emergency department. He reported a sudden onset of chest pain radiating in both arms and the back starting three hours before. The pain intensity was reported to be 7 on a scale of 1–10. The patient’s medical history included chronic venous insufficiency. He took no regular medication and had no known allergies. The recorded 12-lead ECG showed ST elevations of ≥ 1 mm in leads II, III, aVF, V4, and V5 (see Figure 1). The clinical presentation and diagnostic ST elevations were highly suggestive of STEMI. The patient was administered 300 mg acetylic acid per os and immediately transferred for diagnostic coronary angiography and probably percutaneous coronary intervention. Contrary to expectations, coronary occlusion was excluded. Coronary artery sclerosis without relevant stenosis was noted.
![]() |
Figure 1 12-lead Electrocardiogram at time of presentation. |
Further diagnostic workup in the emergency department followed. The patient still reported chest pain with an intensity of 7 on a scale of 1–10. Focused echocardiography revealed no relevant wall-motion disorders. Computed tomography showed a normal thoracoabdominal aorta and no pulmonary embolism. Cholecystolithiasis without any signs of cholecystitis was noted. Further investigation of the abdominal and thoracic organs displayed no explanation for the patient’s symptoms. Normal values were recorded in laboratory analyses for inflammation parameters, cardiac markers, liver and cholestasis parameters (see Table 1, column “Day 1”). The pain significantly decreased with the administration of analgesic drugs and proton pump inhibitors. The “Big Five” (myocardial infarction, aortic dissection, pericardial tamponade, pneumothorax, and lung embolization) could be ruled out with high certainty. However, no clear diagnosis was found for the chest pain. After discussion with the patient, he was discharged in a shared decision-making process.
![]() |
Table 1 Laboratory Results from the Three Presentations in the Emergency Department with Reference Ranges |
He presented for a follow-up consultation the following day. Clinical examination results were unremarkable. The pathological changes on the 12-lead ECG were still present, but subsided. Laboratory findings (see Table 1, column “Day 2”) showed mild leukocytosis (8.2 G/l, reference range 2.6–7.8 G/l) and a CRP level of 6 mg/l (reference range <5 mg/l). On sonography, the gallbladder was full and cholecystolithiasis without thickening of the gallbladder wall was observed.
Three days after the initial presentation, the patient complained of aggravated pain in the right upper abdominal quadrant. Murphy’s sign was positive on clinical examination. Sonography revealed cholecystolithiasis and thickened gallbladder wall with no bile duct dilatation. Laboratory analysis revealed signs of inflammation (see Table 1, column “Day 4”). Cholecystitis was suspected and the patient was admitted to the hospital for diagnostic laparoscopy and cholecystectomy. An inflamed gallbladder was described intraoperatively, and acute ulcerative and phlegmonous cholecystitis was histologically confirmed. The postoperative course was uncomplicated, and the pathological ECG tracings completely resolved (Supplementary Figure 1).
The signs and symptoms of this patient at initial presentation were highly suggestive of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Initially, no clinical signs or laboratory findings associated with cholecystitis were found. Pain localization in the chest with radiation into both arms and ST-segment elevations on the 12-lead ECG were misleading and prompted the algorithm for acute coronary syndrome.
Discussion
We hypothesized that the initial distention of the gallbladder in our patient led to reflex coronary vasoconstriction and the observed ST elevations. The pathophysiology of calculous acute cholecystitis begins with (transient) obstruction of the cystic duct by gallstones. Initially, this leads to increased intraluminal pressure and distension of the gallbladder.6 Edema, inflammation, and tissue necrosis begin to develop only 2–4 days later.20 In addition, atypical pain localization such as chest pain has been described in acute cholecystitis.9
Our patient likely presented at the beginning of the cholecystitis development. At the time of the first presentation, we assumed that only distension of the gallbladder and the subsequent pain were present. Gallbladder inflammation and florid cholecystitis had only developed on day four. Inflammatory markers and imaging changes at that timepoint were consistent with the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.
Three mechanisms have been described in literature explaining the pathophysiology of ECG changes in patients with cholecystitis. The first is a reflex mediated by the vagus nerve, mostly referred to as the cardiobiliary reflex. Stimulation of the gallbladder, such as mechanical stimulation during surgery13 or dilation of the gallbladder,21 can lead to activation of efferent cardiac vagal nerves. The resulting ECG observations included bradycardia and atrioventricular block.13 However, vagus nerve activation alone does not explain the development of ST elevation.
Another possible mechanism is the anatomical proximity of the gallbladder to the heart. Most cases of cholecystitis and ST elevation report an ECG mimicking inferior or inferolateral STEMI.12–16 Local inflammation of the gallbladder in cholecystitis can lead to irritation of the diaphragm and the inferior myocardial wall, therefore affecting the myocardial tissue due to the close proximity. This irritation may induce the changes observed within the 12-lead ECG. Interestingly, predominantly inferior ST elevations have been described in patients with pancreatitis.22 In these patients, as in cholecystitis, the inflammatory processes of the pancreatic tissue are in anatomical proximity to the heart, supporting the above theory.
The third mechanism has been described in animal studies, where reflex coronary vasoconstriction with reduced coronary blood flow has been observed after experimental distension of the gallbladder.21,23 In a study of anesthetized pigs, the decrease in coronary blood flow was linear with the grade of gallbladder distension.21 This effect was absent after surgical removal of the vagus nerve. The authors suggested an afferent pathway of the reflex response within the vagus nerve and involvement of sympathetic mechanisms in the coronary arteries of the efferent pathways.
In the present case, no laboratory or clinical signs of cholecystitis were observed at the same time as the ST elevations. Subsequently, inflammation and cholecystitis developed. It is tempting to hypothesize that the bile duct was transiently occluded by gallstones at the time of initial presentation. The proposed mechanism for ST elevation in our case indicates reflex coronary vasoconstriction triggered by gallbladder dilation.
Of interest, the presence of ST elevations in combination with reciprocal ST-segment depressions would have been particularly suggestive of acute myocardial ischemia.24 Furthermore, in patients with STEMI and reciprocal ST-segment depressions higher maximum troponin levels and higher mortality have been observed compared to patients without reciprocal ST-segment depressions.25
It is important to be aware of atypical symptoms of the early stages of cholecystitis and the uncommon causes of ST elevation. Our case report describes an unusual case of ST elevation in a patient without any laboratory or clinical findings of cholecystitis. Previously described ST elevations associated with cholecystitis have been reported during advanced stages of inflammation. We propose the theory that in our patient, the mere presence of gallbladder dilation led to reflex coronary vasoconstriction, leading to ST elevation and therefore mimicry of STEMI. We believe this case report to be a relevant contribution to other physicians who encounter similar clinical situations.
Abbreviations
CRP, C-reactive protein; ECG, electrocardiogram; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Data Sharing Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information file.
Ethics Approval
No institutional ethics approval was required to publish the case details.
Informed Consent for Publication
Written and signed informed consent from the patient is available.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner foundation and the Swiss Academy of Medical Science, who supported HM with protected research time with an awarded “Young Talents in Clinical Research Beginner Grant”.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This work was supported by a “Young Talents in Clinical Research Beginner Grant” awarded to HM from the Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner foundation and the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (grant number YTCR 35/23). The funding source had no role in the study design, analysis, or interpretation of the publication.
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
1. Reed GW, Rossi JE, Cannon CP. Acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2017;389(10065):197–210. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30677-8
2. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019;40(3):237–269. doi:10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHY462
3. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan J, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes: developed by the task force on the management of acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2024;13(1):55–161. doi:10.1093/ehjacc/zuad107
4. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2021;144(22):E368–E454. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029
5. Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
6. Gallaher JR, Charles A. Acute cholecystitis: a review. JAMA. 2022;327(10):965–975. doi:10.1001/JAMA.2022.2350
7. Cope Z. A sign of gall-bladder disease. Br Med J. 1970;3(5715):147–148. doi:10.1136/BMJ.3.5715.147
8. Iftikhar H, Khan FS, Al-Marri NDR, Zaki HA, Masood M. Acute calculous cholecystitis with sinus bradycardia: cope’s sign encountered. Cureus. 2022;14(1). doi:10.7759/CUREUS.21187
9. Ola RK, Sahu I, Ruhela M, Bhargava S. Cope’s sign: a lesson for novice physicians. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(10):5375. doi:10.4103/JFMPC.JFMPC_919_20
10. Daliparty VM, Amoozgar B, Razzeto A, Ehsanullah SUM, Rehman F. Cholecystitis masquerading as cardiac chest pain: a case report. Am J Case Rep. 2021;22(1). doi:10.12659/AJCR.932078
11. Gould K, Miller S, Moll J. An early holiday surprise: cholecystitis wrapped in takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2020;4(2):137–141. doi:10.5811/CPCEM.2020.1.45474
12. Patel N, Ariyarathenam A, Davies W, Harris A. Acute cholecystits leading to ischemic ECG changes in a patient with no underlying cardiac disease. JSLS. 2011;15(1):105–108. doi:10.4293/108680811X13022985131534
13. Nakayama J, Seki H, Kadota Y, Innami Y, Ouchi T. Intraoperative coronary artery spasm likely triggered by surgical gallbladder manipulation: a case report. A a Pract. 2020;14(9):e01268. doi:10.1213/XAA.0000000000001268
14. Drachman DE, Dudzinski DM, Moy MP, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Chen JH. Case 27-2017. A 32-year-old man with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(9):874–882. doi:10.1056/NEJMCPC1706111
15. D’Alessandro AD, Smith AT. ST elevation in a patient with abdominal pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;73(6):624–626. doi:10.1016/J.ANNEMERGMED.2018.11.021
16. Sethi P, Murtaza G, Sharma A, Paul T. ST segment elevation with normal coronaries. Case Rep Med. 2016;2016:1–4. doi:10.1155/2016/3132654
17. Furuhashi M, Uno K, Satoh SI, et al. Right bundle branch block and coved-type ST-segment elevation mimicked by acute cholecystitis. Circ J. 2003;67(9):802–804. doi:10.1253/CIRCJ.67.802
18. Nasir JM, Durning SJ, Sweet JM, Cation LJ. Chest pain and ST segment elevation attributable to cholecystitis: a case report and review of the literature. Mil Med. 2006;171(12):1255–1258. doi:10.7205/MILMED.171.12.1255
19. Anderson JL. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127(4). doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742cf6
20. Adachi T, Eguchi S, Muto Y. Pathophysiology and pathology of acute cholecystitis: a secondary publication of the Japanese version from 1992. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022;29(2):212–216. doi:10.1002/JHBP.912
21. Vacca G, Battaglia A, Grossini E, Mary DASG, Molinari C. Reflex coronary vasoconstriction caused by gallbladder distension in anesthetized pigs. Circulation. 1996;94(9):2201–2209. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.94.9.2201
22. Yu ES, Lange JJ, Broor A, Kutty K. Acute pancreatitis masquerading as inferior wall myocardial infarction: a review. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2019;13(2):321–335. doi:10.1159/000501197
23. Hodge GB, Messer AL, Hill H, Durham M. Effect of the distention of the biliary tract on the electrocardiogram. Arch Surg. 1947;55:710. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1947.01230080721007
24. Lanza GA, Careri G, Crea F. Mechanisms of coronary artery spasm. Circulation. 2011;124(16):1774–1782. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.037283/SUPPL_FILE/LANZA_1774.PDF
25. Chen TE, Lo PH, Li TC, et al. Prognostic significance of reciprocal ST-segment depression in patients with acute STEMI undergoing immediate invasive intervention. Am J Emergency Med. 2012;30(9):1865–1871. doi:10.1016/J.AJEM.2012.03.032
© 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.