Back to Journals » Journal of Inflammation Research » Volume 18
Comparative Imaging Analysis of Kimura’s Disease Using 18F-FDG PET/CT and [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT
Authors Sun C, Ni H, Jiang M, Wang G, Su X, Liu Z
Received 9 January 2025
Accepted for publication 4 May 2025
Published 21 May 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 6483—6488
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S513892
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Adam D Bachstetter
Chuanyin Sun,1,* Haopeng Ni,2,* Mengdi Jiang,1 Guolin Wang,3 Xinhui Su,3 Zhenfeng Liu3
1Department of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People’s Republic of China; 2Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 3100058, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Zhenfeng Liu; Xinhui Su, Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, #79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]; [email protected]
Abstract: Kimura’s disease is a rare, chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by subcutaneous nodules, eosinophilia, and elevated serum IgE levels. It commonly affects young Asian males and typically presents in the head and neck region. Diagnosis is confirmed via histopathological examination, while treatment options include corticosteroids, surgery, and radiotherapy. [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated superior imaging, with clearer background and higher target-to-background ratio, highlighting lesions with higher SUV values and greater specificity for fibroblast activity. Compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, which is limited by nonspecific uptake in inflammatory tissues, [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT offers superior sensitivity and specificity in visualizing fibroblast activation. These advantages not only improve diagnostic accuracy in Kimura’s disease but may also have broader implications for other eosinophilic or inflammatory disorders sharing similar clinical features. This technique improves diagnostic accuracy, facilitates treatment planning, and may guide the development of future treatment.
Keywords: kimura’s disease, FAPI, PET
Introduction
Kimura’s disease is a rare, chronic inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology, which typically affects young Asian males and is classically marked by three key features: painless subcutaneous nodules in the head and neck region, peripheral eosinophilia, and elevated serum IgE levels.1–3 Currently, fewer than one thousand cases have been reported worldwide, with most publications consisting of individual case reports or small case series. Kimura’s disease is primarily manifested as long-standing and recurrent painless soft tissue masses in the head and neck, most commonly in the parotid region.4 Other frequent sites include the orbit, axilla, and groin, though it can also involve areas like the skull, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract, often accompanied by regional lymphadenopathy.5
Approximately 20% of patients may experience renal involvement, such as nephrotic syndrome or membranous nephropathy.6 Additionally, Kimura’s disease may be associated with other conditions, such as asthma, urticaria, and allergic rhinitis.
The gold standard for diagnosing Kimura’s disease is histopathological examination, which reveals lymphoid follicular hyperplasia with inflammatory cell infiltration, eosinophilic infiltration in the lymphoid cell areas, eosinophilic microabscesses, capillary proliferation, and fibrosis.7 However, current imaging modalities like 18F-FDG PET/CT often suffer from nonspecific inflammatory uptake that may obscure lesion delineation. This limitation underscores the need for novel imaging techniques. In this context, [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT emerges as a promising tool due to its ability to target fibroblast activation, offering a cleaner background and improved visualization of fibrotic lesions. Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy for Kimura’s disease. Available treatment options include surgical excision, local radiotherapy, and either local or systemic corticosteroid therapy.8
Case Presentation
A 20-year-old male presented with a mass in the right parotid gland, accompanied by swelling of the right eyelid, first noticed five years earlier. Physical examination found a localized swelling in the right parotid region. A mass measuring approximately 3.5 cm×2.0 cm×2.0 cm was palpable, with well-defined borders, poor mobility, a smooth surface, and a firm texture, without tenderness. He sought treatment at our hospital three years ago, and blood tests revealed a significant eosinophilia (29.7%) and elevated serum IgE levels (>5000 IU/mL). Serum IgG4 levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), highly sensitive C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum immunoglobulin levels are within the normal range, and antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are negative. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the oropharyngeal region revealed a mass in the right parotid area accompanied by multiple enlarged lymph nodes on both sides of the neck, with a primary consideration of a tumor (Figure 1). Histopathological analysis of a right parotid gland biopsy confirmed Kimura’s disease, revealing lymphoid proliferation within fibroadipose tissue, dense infiltration of lymphocytes and eosinophils, and the formation of lymphoid follicles. The tissue also exhibited eosinophilic microabscesses and evident capillary proliferation, features that further solidified the diagnosis of Kimura’s disease. Due to the non-invasive characteristic of positron emission computed tomography (PET), which allows for simultaneous assessment of both anatomical and metabolic abnormalities throughout the body, an initial 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was performed. The scan identified a soft tissue nodule in the right parotid gland (1.8×1.1cm) with increased radioactivity uptake (SUVmax=3.6), along with thickening of the eyelid (1.1 cm), both indicative of Kimura’s disease infiltration (Figure 2). The patient underwent a year-long treatment with corticosteroids (1 mg/kg) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which resulted in a gradual reduction of the mass size. However, symptoms recurred when the medications were tapered by himself and eventually discontinued. Upon recurrence, a second 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was conducted, identifying a soft tissue nodule in the right parotid gland measuring 2.0×2.7 cm with increased 18F-FDG uptake (SUVmax=4.5). The eyelid exhibited mild thickening (0.8 cm) with tracer uptake, and enlarged lymph nodes in the right neck and clavicular region (SUVmax = 3.9) were also observed (Figure 3). Meanwhile, the patient participated in a clinical trial evaluating [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging, approved by the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University institutional review board. This scan revealed a nodule in the right parotid gland and thickening of the eyelid, both exhibiting increased [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 uptake, consistent with Kimura’s disease. However, the enlarged lymph nodes identified on the 18F-FDG PET/CT scan were not visible on the [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT. Compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT offered superior visualization of fibroblast activation, which is closely associated with the disease process, highlighting its diagnostic advantage. Surgical excision of the mass is planned as the next step in treatment.
Discussion
The application of [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in diagnosing Kimura’s disease may demonstrate clear advantages by providing superior visualization of lesions in the eyelid and parotid gland compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT. This imaging modality highlights affected tissues and lymphatic structures while minimizing nonspecific inflammatory uptake, as evidenced by its lack of significant uptake in pharyngeal inflammatory lymph nodes, resulting in a cleaner background and enhanced lesion imaging. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), overexpressed in activated fibroblasts within the tumor microenvironment and at sites of inflammation, is minimally expressed in normal tissues and rapidly cleared from circulation. A careful differential diagnosis is essential in managing suspicious cases of Kimura’s disease. Differential considerations include ALHE, lymphoma, and other benign or malignant soft tissue lesions. Indeed, Kimura’s disease and angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE) share significant clinical and histopathological similarities, making differentiation challenging. They used to be considered as different stages of the same disease. However, the key distinction lies in the presence or absence of fibrosis in the stroma.9 Since FAPI imaging targets fibroblast activation protein (FAP), which is overexpressed in fibrotic tissue, it holds the potential to clearly distinguish between these two conditions by highlighting fibrotic involvement. This specificity could make FAPI PET an invaluable tool for differential diagnosis in such cases. The improved delineation of fibrotic lesions may directly impact treatment decisions by guiding the extent of surgical excision and helping to monitor therapeutic outcomes.
The current clinical use of FAPI-PET extends beyond Kimura’s disease. Recent studies have demonstrated its diagnostic utility in various inflammatory and fibrotic disorders, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and certain rheumatologic conditions, suggesting that its application may be beneficial in a broader clinical context. Its broader application could improve the differentiation between inflammatory and neoplastic lesions, potentially altering clinical management and improving patient outcomes. Among these, 68Ga-FAPI-04 has shown potential in pre-treatment staging and post-treatment evaluation of various tumors. However, its clinical utility is constrained by its short half-life and the limited preparation volume available for broader application. In contrast, 18F-labeled FAPI probes address these limitations with several advantages. Their longer half-life, higher radioactivity yields, and greater radiochemical purity make them more practical for widespread clinical use.10 Additionally, these probes exhibit favorable pharmacokinetics and efficient uptake in both tumor and normal tissue models, further enhancing their diagnostic value.
[18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT holds a higher target-to-background ratio, cleaner imaging and greater sensitivity compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT. This case marks the first reported application of [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in Kimura’s disease, showcasing its diagnostic potential. In this case, 18F-FDG PET/CT revealed nonspecific uptake in the tonsils (SUVmax = 9.4), likely due to inflammatory activity, while [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT avoided such uptake, instead clearly delineating lesions in the parotid gland and eyelid. This precision reflects the modality’s ability to target fibroblasts and activated stromal cells involved in fibrosis, one of the hallmarks of Kimura’s disease.11 By effectively distinguishing fibrotic from non-specific uptake, [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT facilitates a more precise assessment of disease extent. Its key advantages—high specificity for fibroblast activity, reduced background uptake, and improved differentiation of pathological components—provide critical insights for treatment planning and monitoring therapeutic outcomes. For example, it can guide the extent of surgical excision, minimizing unnecessary tissue damage, while also evaluating residual or progressive lesions following medical therapy.
Treatment of Kimura’s disease poses significant challenges, with therapeutic options encompassing pharmacological therapy, surgical intervention, and radiotherapy, as highlighted in current literature. Pharmacological treatment is the most commonly employed strategy. Corticosteroids, such as methylprednisolone, have proven effective in alleviating symptoms and reducing the size of masses in Kimura’s disease patients.12 Biological therapies are gaining attention as potential alternatives for Kimura’s disease management. Case reports indicate that treatment with Dupilumab or Omalizumab has led to reduced subcutaneous nodule size, decreased eosinophil counts, and lower total serum IgE levels, highlighting their therapeutic potential.13,14 Surgical excision is often indicated in cases involving significant mass effects, such as compression symptoms or cosmetic concerns. Surgery provides both diagnostic confirmation and therapeutic benefit.11 Despite a high local recurrence rate, recurrent masses can typically be resected again without major complications. Radiotherapy offers effective local control for Kimura’s disease, particularly in cases where other treatments are not feasible.15 However, caution is warranted due to potential late side effects, which limit its routine application.
The management of Kimura’s disease requires an individualized approach tailored to each patient’s specific circumstances. Combining pharmacological therapy with surgical intervention, when appropriate, offers the best potential for optimal outcomes. Continued research is essential to refine treatment strategies and explore emerging therapies. As a new imaging modality, [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT offers a novel perspective on understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of Kimura’s disease. By dynamically visualizing fibroblast activation in the disease process, this technique may contribute to the development of future targeted therapies, further enhancing diagnostic and therapeutic precision. Further research is needed to validate its clinical utility, but this case highlights its potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning.
Conclusion
The case presented here illustrates the diagnostic advantages of [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in Kimura’s disease, particularly its high specificity for fibroblast activity and superior imaging quality compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT. These benefits may not only refine the diagnostic process and treatment planning for Kimura’s disease but also hold promise for other eosinophilic and inflammatory conditions. However, this report is limited by its single-case nature. Future studies involving larger cohorts and multi-center trials are essential to validate these findings and to establish the broader clinical role of FAPI-PET in managing inflammatory and fibrotic diseases.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the patients who was involved in this study.
Consent for Publication
The patient has personally signed the informed consent form, which includes consent for both participation in the study and publication of their case details, including any identifiable information. The details published in this article have been approved by the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University.
Funding
The study was funded by Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Program (grant No.2023KY694), Natural Science Foundation (grant number:82201970), Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation (grant number: LTGY23H180014).
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no competing interest for this work.
References
1. Ohta N, Okazaki S, Fukase S, Akatsuka N, Aoyagi M, Yamakawa M. Serum concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophils of patients with Kimura’s disease. Allergol Int. 2007;56:45–49. doi:10.2332/allergolint.O-06-442
2. Dik VK, van de Wiel BA, Vasmel WLE. Kimura’s disease of the parotid glands and multiple cervical lymph nodes. Neth J Med. 2010;68:175–177.
3. Wang DY, Mao JH, Zhang Y, et al. Kimura disease: a case report and review of the Chinese literature. Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;111:c55–61. doi:10.1159/000178980
4. Yang B, Liao H, Wang M, et al. Kimura’s disease successively affecting multiple body parts: a case-based literature review. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22:154. doi:10.1186/s12886-022-02378-y
5. Pitak-Arnnop P, Bellefqih S, Chaine A, Dhanuthai K, Bertrand J-C, Bertolus C. Head and neck lesions of Kimura’s disease: exclusion of human herpesvirus-8 and Epstein-Barr virus by in situ hybridisation and polymerase chain reaction. An Immunohistochemical Study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38:266–270. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2009.08.001
6. Rajpoot DK, Pahl M, Clark J. Nephrotic syndrome associated with Kimura disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2000;14:486–488. doi:10.1007/s004670050799
7. Akosa AB. Kimura’s disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;13:901–902. doi:10.1097/00000478-198910000-00012
8. Dai L, Wei X-N, Zheng D-H, Mo Y-Q, Pessler F, Zhang B-Y. Effective treatment of Kimura’s disease with leflunomide in combination with glucocorticoids. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30:859–865. doi:10.1007/s10067-011-1689-2
9. Rajesh A, Prasanth T, Naga Sirisha VC, Azmi M. Kimura’s disease: a case presentation of postauricular swelling. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19:827–830. doi:10.4103/1119-3077.164361
10. Kratochwil C, Flechsig P, Lindner T, et al. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:801–805. doi:10.2967/jnumed.119.227967
11. Zhu W-X, Zhang -Y-Y, Sun Z-P, Gao Y, Chen Y, Yu G-Y. Differential diagnosis of immunoglobulin G4-related sialadenitis and Kimura’s disease of the salivary gland: a comparative case series. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;50:895–905. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2020.05.023
12. Zhu S, Wei P, Chen J, Zhao Z, Xu Q, Ye L. Diagnosis and treatment of a patient with Kimura’s disease associated with nephrotic syndrome and lymphadenopathy of the epitrochlear nodes. BMC Nephrol. 2015;16:10. doi:10.1186/s12882-015-0007-7
13. Lee -C-C, Feng I-J, Chen Y-T, et al. Treatment algorithm for Kimura’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment modalities and prognostic predictors. International Journal of Surgery. 2022;100:106591. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106591
14. Ao S, Huang G, Tang X, et al. Anti-immunoglobulin E provides an additional therapy to conventional steroids for Kimura’s disease. J Dermatol. 2024;51:602–606. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.17021
15. Fionda B, Loperfido A, Bussu F, et al. The role of radiotherapy in Kimura’s disease: a multicenter systematic review of literature. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021;25:4205–4210. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202106_26124
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.