Back to Journals » Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology » Volume 17
Correlation Between Tumor Budding and Survivin Expression in Colorectal Cancer
Received 5 June 2024
Accepted for publication 4 October 2024
Published 14 October 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 331—336
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S477718
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Andreas M. Kaiser
Guangping Zhang, Qingzhong Min
Department of Pathology, Ya’an People’s Hospital, Ya’an, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Qingzhong Min, Department of Pathology, Ya’an People’s Hospital, Ya’an, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13881637073, Fax +86 8352862005, Email [email protected]
Aim: Correlation of Survivin expression levels in tumor tissues and degree of tumor outgrowth with colorectal cancer characteristics.
Methods: The pathological tissues of 90 cases of colorectal cancer were observed by HE staining, and the tumor budding was judged by Ueno standard, and the expression of Survivin was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) technique (EnVision method), so as to analyze the correlation between tumor budding, the expression level of Survivin and the degree of tumor budding, and the correlation between the tumor budding and the patients’ clinical characteristics.
Results: The expression level of Survivin was significantly correlated with TNM stage, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer; tumor outgrowth was significantly correlated with TNM stage, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer (P < 0.05); the expression level of Survivin was significantly correlated with the degree of tumor budding in patients with colorectal cancer (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: In this paper, we tested the relationship between Survivin and tumor budding in colon cancer, and analyzed its relationship with clinicopathological features, with a view to providing a reference for the mechanism related to colorectal cancer.
Keywords: colorectal cancer, Survivin, tumor budding
Introduction
Colorectal cancer has the 3rd and 2nd highest incidence and mortality rates of malignant tumors China.1 With the improvement of people’s material living standard, the incidence rate of colorectal cancer has been increasing year by year and showing a trend of youthfulness.2 Tumor budding is a valid indicator for assessing the aggressive biological behavior of colorectal cancer and a poor prognosis for colorectal cancer because. Literature reports that tumor budding is closely associated with colorectal cancer histological grading, nerve invasion, lymphovascular infiltration, and tumor staging.3 Survivin is the most apoptosis-inhibiting protein among the apoptosis-inhibiting protein family discovered so far, and is highly expressed in a variety of tumor tissues, which can inhibit apoptosis and promote tumor cell invasion and metastasis.4 At present, the relationship between Survivin and tumor outgrowth in colorectal cancer tissues has not been reported. In this paper, we tested the relationship between Survivin and tumor outgrowth and analyzed its relationship with clinicopathological features, with a view to providing a reference for the mechanism related to colorectal cancer.
Methods
Colorectal Cancer Samples
Ninety specimens of colorectal adenocarcinoma, 42 males and 58 females, surgically resected in Ya’an People’s Hospital, Sichuan Province, China, from January 1, 2022, to January 1, 2023, were collected; The age of the patients ranged from 25 to 86 years, with a mean age of 60 years.
Interpretation of Tumor Budding
Correlation sections of 90 colorectal adenocarcinomas were performed for tumor budding interpretation, and hotspot areas were selected at 200x to assess scattered single tumor cells or small focal clusters of cells in the forefront mesenchyme of tumor infiltration (≤4), which were categorized as low (BD1), medium (BD2), and high (BD3), corresponding to 0–4, 5–9, and ≥10 buds (ie, 0.785 mm2 area).5 In this experiment, BD1 and BD2 were defined as low level and BD3 as high level.
Immunohistochemistry
Paraffin-embedded histologic specimens were cut into 4 µm thick sections. Then, sections were routinely dewaxed and rehydrated in xylol and graded alcohol. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide in a phosphate-buffered solution for 15 minutes and nonspecific binding was blocked with 2% bovine serum for 20 minutes. The slides were incubated with 1:200 diluted primary antibody against human CKpan and Survivin (Fujian Maixin Biotechnology Inc.) for 18 hours at 4°C in 2% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered solution. The horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody was added and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. The immune reaction was developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine-tetrahydrochloride-dihydrate. Slides were washed with distilled water, counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. All sections were observed and analyzed under a light microscope. The scoring of immunostaining was evaluated based on staining intensity and percentages of 3 randomly positive stained areas by 2 pathologists in a double-blinded manner. To score the expression of Survivin, we used a three-level scale: 1=weakly positive; 2=moderately positive; 3=strongly positive, ranging from: 1: 0–30%; 2: 30–60%; 3: 60–100%.
Statistical Analyses
SPSS 22.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc.) was used to analyze all data. The Student t test was employed to compare the differences between the 2 groups. Analysis of the relationship between Survivin and tumor budding and clinicopathological indicators using chi-square tests, and clinical features. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Survivin expression level in colorectal cancer tissues and its correlation with clinical features. IHC revealed that Survivin was mainly expressed in the cytoplasm. Among them, Survivin expression level was relatively low in 27 cases and higher in 63 cases. The expression of Survivin was correlated with lymph node metastasis (P=0.000), distant metastasis (P=0.005), and TNM stage of colorectal cancer (P=0.030) (P < 0.05), but not with the patient’s age and sex (P > 0.05) (Table 1).
![]() |
Table 1 Correlation of Survivin Expression and Degree of Tumor Budding with Patient Characteristics in 90 Colorectal Cancer Tissues |
Tumor budding in patients with colorectal cancer and its correlation with clinicopathological features. Among 90 colorectal cancer patients, 26 cases had lower tumor budding ratings (see Figure 1) and 64 cases had higher ratings. Statistical analysis showed that tumor budding rating was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (P=0.004), distant metastasis (P=0.010), and TNM stage (P=0.020) in patients with clinical and colorectal cancer (P < 0.05), and was not related to gender and age (Table 1).
Tumor budding is significantly associated with Survivin expression in colorectal cancer patients. Analysis of the correlation between Survivin protein expression and tumor budding revealed that the number of tumor outgrowth was higher in cancer tissues with higher levels of Survivin protein expression (P= 0.033) (Table 2).
![]() |
Table 2 Correlation of Survivin with Tumor Budding (P=0.033, P < 0.05) |
Discussion
Colorectal cancer is one of the most important malignant tumors affecting the health of our population, with about 376,300 new cases and 190,000 deaths per year, ranking the 5th among malignant tumors.6 The survival prognosis of colorectal cancer patients is poor, the 5-year survival rate of early-stage patients is about 77.4–93.8%, and the 5-year survival rate of late-stage patients is relatively low, about 7–14%.7 Therefore, the discovery of key clinical and molecular pathological features that affect the survival and prognosis of patients is clinically important for the development of new clinical intervention programs.
Tumor budding is considered an independent risk factor for tumor aggressiveness and prognosis, and can occur in various parts of the body, such as the rectum, colon, stomach, esophagus, larynx, tongue, nasopharynx, gallbladder, pancreas, lungs, breast glands, and endometrium.8 Tumor budding is scattered, undifferentiated single tumor cells or small foci of four cells at the leading edge of the tumor infiltrate.5 Tumor outgrowth is not a static histological feature; it represents a dynamic process of progression of an aggressive tumor with infiltrative and metastatic potential, implying not only a simple detachment of tumor cells, but also an important step in the progression of malignant tumors from focal to systemic disease. There have been a number of reports on the relationship between tumor budding and clinicopathological indicators of colorectal cancer. Okuyama et al9 studied 83 cases of highly and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas of the rectum in PT3 and found that the incidence of tumor budding was significantly higher in rectal cancers accompanied by lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion than in those without lymph node metastasis, and that local recurrence and hepatic metastases were also more frequent than in those with tumor budding. Ueno et al10 studied tumor budding in 638 cases of rectal cancer, and the results showed that tumor budding was closely associated with pathological features reflecting the aggressive behavior of the tumor, such as tumor differentiation, extra-plasma membrane spread, lymph node involvement, lymphocyte infiltration, and extra-plasma membrane vein invasion. Our study of 90 cases of colorectal cancer found that the number of tumor budding was significantly increased in pathological specimens with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and TNM stage III + IV, which is consistent with what has been reported in the literature, suggesting that tumor budding is able to reflect the invasive behavior of tumors, and that the greater the number of tumor budding, the more invasive the invasive behavior.
Survivin is overexpressed in most tumors and promotes tumor proliferation and metastasis. Survivin acts as a nodal protein and interacts with a variety of signals involved in mitosis, apoptosis, functionally integrated proliferation, cell death, and stability of the intracellular environment.11 It has been found that Survivin is associated with the metastasis of malignant tumors such as gastric, breast, colon and cervical cancers and cervical cancer.12,13 A study by Dawson et al14 showed that, in addition to Ki-67 and caspase-3 positivity in tumor outgrowth cells being associated with an increased risk of death in patients, changes in various proteins associated with apoptosis were found in tumor outgrowth cells. It has now been found15 that epithelial cells isolated from the surrounding extracellular matrix undergo a physiological form of programmed cell death known as loss-of-nest apoptosis. Therefore, budding, which are individual cells, must develop mechanisms to resist loss-of-nest apoptosis if they are to survive the process of migrating to the vasculature and generating metastasis. Survivin, an apoptosis inhibitory protein, inhibits apoptosis, and it is possible to resist loss-of-nest apoptosis mechanisms, and survivin proteins also promote cellular proliferation, which then has the potential to promote tumor outgrowth generation. Our study of 90 colorectal cancer patients found that Survivin expression levels increased in tissues with high ratings for the number of tumor outgrowths, suggesting that Survivin may play a promotional role in tumor outgrowth. It was also found that Survivin has the potential to promote local metastasis, distant metastasis and invasion of colorectal cancer through tumor budding.
Conclusions
We conducted a preliminary analysis of the clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer patients as well as on the Survivin expression and tumor outgrowth degree of tumor tissues. It was found that Survivin expression level was significantly correlated with colorectal cancer germination and clinical characteristics and TNM stage, and Survivin expression level was significantly correlated with the degree of tumor budding. This suggests that Survivin may regulate colorectal cancer cell budding, thus promoting colorectal malignant progression and poor prognosis. In the future, the molecular mechanism of Survivin in regulating tumor outgrowth should be further investigated and analyzed, so as to provide a target site for treatment. The experiment also has some limitations, such as a small sample size, and only a superficial study, not an in-depth study, is currently being conducted.
Ethical Approval
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of the Ya’an People’s Hospital (ethical review number: YARY: NO. 2022-003). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The present study fulfils the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
2. Song M, Chan AT, Sun J, et al. Influence of the gut microbiome, diet, and environment on risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(2):322–340. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.048
3. Ryan É, Khaw YL, Creavin B, et al. Tumor budding and PDC grade are stage independent predictors of clinical outcome in mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(1):60–68. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000931
4. Martínez-García D, Manero-Rupérez N, Quesada R, et al. Therapeutic strategies involving survivin inhibition in cancer. Med Res Rev. 2019;39(3):887–909. doi:10.1002/med.21547
5. Lugli A, Kirsch R, Ajioka Y, et al. Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016. Mod Pathol. 2017;30(9):1299–1311. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.46
6. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–132. doi:10.3322/caac.21338
7. Wang R, Wang MJ, Ping J. Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of colorectal cancer in young versus elderly: a population—based cohort study of SEER 9 registries data (1988–2011). Medicine. 2015;94(35):e1402. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000001402
8. Shi N, Wang K, Zhou X, et al. Correlation of tumor budding with KRAS, NRAS, BRAF gene mutation and MSI status in colorectal adenocarcinoma and their clinical significance. J Clin Exp Pathol. 2023;39(11):1362–1367. Article in Chinese.
9. Okuyama T, Oya M, Ishikawa H. Budding as a useful prognostic marker in pT3 well- or moderately-differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2003;83(1):42–47. doi:10.1002/jso.10230
10. Ueno H, Murphy J, Jass JR, et al. Tumor “Budding” as a index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer. Histopathology. 2002;40(2):127–132. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.01324.x
11. Liu F, Sun Y, Liu B, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma by activating survivin. Oncol Rep. 2018;40(2):952–958. doi:10.3892/or.2018.6516
12. Chade MC, Piato S, Galvão MAL, et al. Evaluation of survivin immunoexpression in the differentiation of high- and low-grade breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Einstein. 2018;16(1):eAO4065. doi:10.1590/s1679-45082018ao4065
13. Samad NA, Abdul AB, Rahman HS, et al. Zerumbone suppresses angiogenesis in HepG2 cells through inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-9, vascular endothelial growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor expressions. Pharmacogn Mag. 2018;13(Suppl 4):S731–S736. doi:10.4103/pm.pm_18_17
14. Dawson H, Koelzer VH, Karamitopoulou E, et al. The apoptotic and proliferation rate of tumour budding cells in colorectal cancer outlines a heterogeneous population of cells with various impacts on clinical outcome. Histopathology. 2014;64(4):577–584. doi:10.1111/his.12294
15. Ino-Silva LS, Salcedo-Hernández RA, Gamboa-Domínguez A. Tumour budding in rectal cancer. A comprehensive review. Contemp Oncol. 2018;22(2):61–74.
© 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.