Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 18
Distribution and Epidemiological Characteristics of Clinical Isolates of A. fumigatus in a Hospital from 2021 to 2023: A Retrospective Study
Authors You Z, Yan Y, Fu T, Yang X, Li Z, Zhou L, Zang F
Received 28 November 2024
Accepted for publication 24 February 2025
Published 28 February 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 1199—1208
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S507944
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 4
Editor who approved publication: Dr Sandip Patil
Zhongqiu You,1,* Yunying Yan,2,* Tingting Fu,1 Xiao Yang,1 Zhirui Li,2 Lijun Zhou,2 Feng Zang3
1Department of Infection Management, Chengdu Pidu District People’s Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611730, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Sichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Infection Management, Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Feng Zang, Department of Infection Management, Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210029, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected] Lijun Zhou, Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Sichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 6, Zhongxue Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]
Objective: The distribution characteristics of clinical isolates of A. fumigatus were analyzed to provide the basis for the prevention and control of A. fumigatus infection.
Methods: From January 2021 to December 2023, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University collected clinical isolates of A. fumigatus from hospitalized patients for study. Duplicate strains from the same patient in the same area were eliminated, and community-, hospital-, and colonization infections were grouped.
Results: A total of 561 clinical isolates of A. fumigatus were identified, with 402 (82.35%) originating from male patients and 159 (17.65%) from female patients. The percentage of individuals aged 51 to 90 years was 78.97% (443/561). With the exception of surgery, which predominantly involved colonization, other departments mainly exhibited community-acquired infections (CAI) (P=0.002). The length of hospital stay was less than < 15– 30 days for most cases in the healthcare-associated infection group (HAI) (P< 0.001). Lower respiratory tract infection accounted for the main site of infection across all three groups (95.37%), with ventilator-associated pneumonia being most prevalent in the HAI group (P< 0.001). The detection rates of A. fumigatus from 2021 to 2023 were 3.89‱, 7.15‱, and 12.50‱, respectively. The detection frequencies of A. fumigatus throughout the three groups exhibited a year-on-year increase (P< 0.001). Sputum samples constituted the main source of clinical isolates for all three groups, accounting for 61 strains (89.71%), 277 strains (78.69%), and 122 strains (86.52%) respectively, followed by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples.
Conclusion: The detection rate of A. fumigatus has exhibited a consistent upward trend over the past three years, with varying epidemiological characteristics observed across different infection types. It is recommended that medical institutions develop targeted prevention and control measures for A. fumigatus infections based on these unique characteristics.
Keywords: community-acquired infections, hospital-acquired infections, A. fumigatus, epidemiology
Introduction
Aspergillus fumigatus (A. fumigatus) is a prevalent airborne fungus and a significant opportunistic disease in humans. A. fumigatus infection is the predominant cause of invasive aspergillosis, resulting in around 14,000 hospitalizations and over 1,200 fatalities annually in the United States.1,2 A. fumigatus exhibits a saprophytic lifestyle and is likely to induce invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised individuals.3,4 The extensive utilization of hormones, immunosuppressants, and broad-spectrum antibiotics, along with the rising incidence of malignancies and immunodeficiency, has rendered invasive fungal infections a significant hazard to human health. Annual fatalities attributed to fungal diseases globally have surpassed 1.5 million.5 Worldwide, there might be around 5 million instances of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, 3 million instances of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, and 250,000 to 400,000 instances of invasive aspergillosis annually.6–10 The prevalence of mold infections has been rising annually, imposing a significant strain on the healthcare system and sufferers. The prevalence of invasive aspergillosis has surged significantly during the last two decades, with a fatality rate ranging from 60% to 90%.5 A retrospective review of invasive fungal infections across five Asian nations revealed that prevalent species were A. fumigatus (71.6%), Mucorales (10.2%), mixed infection molds (8.0%), miscellaneous species (8.0%), and Fusarium (2.3%). The findings further corroborate that Aspergillus is the most often identified fungus in clinical settings.11 A retrospective analysis was undertaken utilizing data from the Chinese Hospital Invasive Fungal Disease Surveillance Network, focusing on patients with fungal infections across several representative units in different areas to examine the epidemiological situation of fungal infections in China. In this investigation, 16,285 fungal strains were identified, with Aspergillus representing the largest share at 84.8% (13,806/16,285), of which A. fumigatus comprised 49.4% (6,819/16,285); the predominant specimen type was lower respiratory tract specimens, constituting 81.7% (13,305/16,285).1
Over 90% of Aspergillus infections are attributed to A. fumigatus, which significantly affects human and animal health and poses a life-threatening risk.12,13 A. fumigatus has developed resistance to antifungal agents compared to other Aspergillus species, and its environmentally resistant populations are proliferating globally, increasing the risk of human infection.14–16 A. fumigatus can invade the lungs of immunocompromised persons.17
Recently, there has been a rising incidence of panazole-resistant A. fumigatus strains in individuals without prior azole treatment. Aspergillus resistance to azoles denotes the capacity of Aspergillus species, especially A. fumigatus, to proliferate and endure in the presence of azole antifungal agents. Infections caused by azole-resistant Aspergillus are linked to increased rates of treatment failure and death.18 Due to the unpredictability of future developments, it is essential to observe the proliferation of A. fumigatus and regulate its increasing prevalence. This study retrospectively gathered and analyzed data from patients infected with clinical isolates of A. fumigatus at Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital over the past three years to enhance understanding of the epidemiological distribution of invasive A. fumigatus infections, thereby offering data support for the effective prevention and control of fungal infections in clinical settings.
Methods
Study Site
Clinical isolates of A. fumigatus, totaling 561, along with clinical data from hospitalised patients at Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital (First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University) were retrospectively gathered over a three-year period from January 2021 to December 2023. Strains isolated from the same portion of the same patient and incomplete clinical data were eliminated. All isolates were procured from patients at our hospital in accordance with standard hospital protocols, and this work received approval from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Ethics Number: 2024-SR-535).
Judgment Criteria
The “Nosocomial Infection Diagnostic Criteria (Trial)” categorises infection origins in patients into three types: hospital-acquired infection (HAI), community-acquired infection (CAI), and colonization.19 HAI denotes invasive pulmonary Aspergillus infection contracted by patients during their hospitalization, encompassing infections that manifest while admitted and those acquired in the hospital but presenting post-discharge. However, it excludes infections that began before to admission or were present at the time of admission. CAI denotes invasive lung Aspergillus infection that arises outside of a hospital setting. Colonization denotes the condition in which A. fumigatus resides and proliferates in a specific region of the human body without eliciting a clinical illness. All samples were cultured following standard fungal testing protocols utilizing Sabouraud medium, blood agar plate medium, or potato dextrose agar medium for the cultivation of Aspergillus. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the morphology of A. fumigatus when cultured in Sabouraud medium and on a blood agar plate, respectively. Each medical record of discovered A. fumigatus was meticulously evaluated item by item for assessment, and subsequently double-checked and validated. Patients with lung infections attributable to other bacteria, fungi, or new coronary pneumonia were excluded from the study.
![]() |
Figure 1 Morphology of A. fumigatus cultured on a blood agar plate. |
![]() |
Figure 2 Morphology of A. fumigatus cultured in Sabouraud medium. |
Data Sources
Specimen types encompass sputum, alveolar lavage fluid, nasal secretions, catheters, ear secretions, stool, ascites, oropharyngeal secretions, pus, skin secretions, wound secretions, pleural effusion, and tissue. Specimen culture was conducted in accordance with the National Clinical Laboratory Operation Procedures [M] 4th Edition.20 The isolates were identified at the complex or species level following standard hospital protocols, including morphological phenotypic identification, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight, and/or sequencing.
Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 statistical software, comparing the clinical distribution of A. fumigatus isolates among the community infection group, hospital infection group, and colonisation group during three consecutive years. The count data were represented as percentages (%), and the chi-squared test was employed. The temporal trend of the detection rate was analysed using the trend chi-squared test. A P value of less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
Results
Descriptive Results
A total of 561 clinical isolates of A. fumigatus were identified, comprising 68 healthcare-associated infections (HAI), 349 community-acquired infections (CAI), and 144 colonization strains (Figure 3). Among the patients, 402 (82.35%) were male and 159 (17.65%) were female. The percentage of individuals aged 51 to 90 years was 78.97% (443/561). The detection departments were mostly focused in the intensive care unit and internal medicine department, comprising 81.11% of the total. With the exception of the surgical department, which was mostly colonised, the remaining departments were primarily CAI (P=0.002). The duration of hospitalisation in the CAI and colonisation groups was mostly less than 15 days, but the HAI group primarily had a hospitalisation period of 15 to 30 days (P<0.001).
![]() |
Figure 3 Distribution of A. fumigatus clinical isolates (2021–2023): Healthcare-associated infections (HAI), community-acquired infections (CAI), and colonization strains. |
The infection locations in the three groups were largely lower respiratory tract infections (accounting for 95.37%), and ventilator-associated pneumonia accounted for the largest proportion in the HAI group (P<0.001) (Table 1).
![]() |
Table 1 Basic Distribution of Clinical Isolates of A. Fumigatus [n (%)] |
Trend of A. fumigatus Detection
The detection rates of A. fumigatus from 2021 to 2023 were 3.89‱, 7.15‱, and 12.50‱, respectively. The trend analysis indicated that the detection frequencies of A. fumigatus in the three groups escalated annually (P<0.001) (Table 2).
![]() |
Table 2 The Change of Detection Trend of A. Fumigatus Between 2021–2023 |
Source of A. fumigatus Specimens
The primary sources of clinical isolates of A. fumigatus in the three groups were sputum specimens, including 61 strains (89.71%), 277 strains (78.69%), and 122 strains (86.52%), respectively. The second source comprised bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens, yielding 5 strains (7.35%), 62 strains (17.61%), and 10 strains (7.09%), respectively (Table 3).
![]() |
Table 3 Sources of A. Fumigatus Specimens |
Discussion
The findings of this investigation indicated that the incidence of A. fumigatus infection in male patients was markedly greater than in female patients, with the 51–90 age demographic representing 78.97% of all identified cases. The disparity in gender and age distribution may be associated with the high-risk behaviors exhibited by male patients (such as smoking and occupational exposure) and the diminished immunity of the older demographic.4,21–24 However, our findings indicate no statistical difference in age and gender within the population; nonetheless, variations in fundamental health condition, behavior, profession, and immune function between men and women may contribute to disparities in the infectivity of A. fumigatus. Studies have demonstrated that gender differences have a definite influence on the incidence of many infectious illnesses caused by fungus, and various behavioral features or immunological responses of the host will alter the susceptibility to fungal infections.25 Despite the absence of research on the correlation between gender and A. fumigatus infection in humans, findings from a principal component analysis in an animal disease model indicated that females exhibited significantly elevated levels of immune components against A. fumigatus compared to males, implying that host gender may play a crucial role in the development of immune responses.26 Furthermore, A. fumigatus infection predominantly occurred in the critical care unit and internal medicine department, comprising 81.11% of cases, with the surgical department primarily exhibiting colonization, whereas other departments primarily had CAI (P=0.002). This distribution characteristic indicates that A. fumigatus infection is significantly associated with exposure to medical environments and high-risk departments, particularly affecting patients in the intensive care unit and internal medicine department, who may be more vulnerable to infection due to compromised immune function or invasive procedures.25
Regarding infection locations, the three groups predominantly exhibited infections in the lower respiratory tract (comprising 95.37%), with the HAI group demonstrating the greatest incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (P<0.001). This indicates that A. fumigatus infection is intimately connected with respiratory medical procedures, such as mechanical ventilation. Moreover, the duration of hospitalization for the CAI and colonization groups was mostly less than 15 days, but the HAI group primarily experienced stays of 15–30 days (P<0.001), further suggesting that hospital-acquired infections may extend patient hospitalization and elevate the medical burden. Between 2021 and 2023, the detection rate of A. fumigatus exhibited a notable increase. This trend may be attributed to several factors, including the rise in immunosuppressed patients and the heightened risk of environmental exposure to A. fumigatus. This trend indicates that A. fumigatus infection has emerged as a significant public health concern that warrants attention, necessitating enhanced monitoring, preventive, and control measures. The primary sources of clinical isolates of A. fumigatus throughout the three groups were sputum specimens, succeeded by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens. This outcome further validated the characteristics of A. fumigatus mostly affecting the lower respiratory tract and indicated that sputum specimens are a crucial sample type for the clinical diagnosis of A. fumigatus infection.27–29This study’s results indicate an increase in A. fumigatus infections in both community and hospital environments, mostly attributed to lower respiratory tract infections. Intensive care units and internal medicine departments are high-incidence areas for infections; thus, emphasis must be directed towards hospital-acquired A. fumigatus infections.
A. fumigatus conidia are frequently detectable in interior surroundings, including air, surfaces, and tap water in hospitals.30–32 A. fumigatus conidia are frequently identified in interior settings, such as air, surfaces, tap water, and various hospital situations.30–32A study assessing the prevalence of A. fumigatus in the indoor air of hospital wards revealed that A. fumigatus spores were found in the pulmonary disease department at concentrations reaching 300 CFU/m3, whereas the corridors and restrooms in other departments exhibited the highest levels of contamination.33 While no standard exists for the acceptable number of conidia in the atmosphere, one study suggested that the typical concentration of Aspergillus in outdoor air ranges from 0 to 20 CFU/m3 or more.34 We can consistently assess the air quality in high-risk departments, including critical care units, internal medicine, and geriatrics, to guarantee that the concentration of A. fumigatus spores remains under a safe threshold. Secondly, frequently touched objects in hospitals (such as bed rails, door handles, and medical equipment) can be routinely cleaned and disinfected using potent antifungal agents. Third, filters must be installed in high-risk locations, such as ICUs and transplant wards, to diminish the concentration of A. fumigatus spores in the air, guarantee adequate air circulation throughout the hospital, prevent humid environments, and mitigate circumstances conducive to mold proliferation. Moreover, the colonization of A. fumigatus may elevate the risk of invasive infections in immunocompromised individuals; therefore, early screening should be enhanced for high-risk patients to promptly identify A. fumigatus colonization or infection.
A study examining the thermal adaptation of 89 A. fumigatus strains from 12 countries across various climatic regions revealed significant variability in growth at different temperatures among strains, irrespective of geographic origin and genetic divergence. This indicates a robust capacity for A. fumigatus populations to adapt to climate change and global warming.35 Research indicates that A. fumigatus conidia may be disseminated by aerosols produced by sick individuals, leading to environmental contamination and potential cross-infection among patients.36–39 A Spanish investigation corroborates the notion that the hospital environment may facilitate the transmission or colonization of A. fumigatus in patients, adversely impacting treatment efficacy and exacerbating the challenges of hospital infection prevention and control.40 Given the potential increase in hospital-acquired A. fumigatus infections due to the admission of patients with community-acquired infections, it is imperative to consider the risk of environmental transmission from these patients. To mitigate this risk, enhancing indoor ventilation and purification conditions is essential to diminish the presence of A. fumigatus in indoor environments, thereby reducing the incidence of hospital-acquired infections.
Recent years have witnessed an expansion of vulnerable patient populations and the rise of drug-resistant A. fumigatus, resulting in a notable increase in the morbidity and mortality associated with A. fumigatus infections in both community and hospital settings. However, the precise mechanisms underlying azole resistance in A. fumigatus are inadequately understood, complicating patient treatment.10,16,37 Despite the global identification of azole-resistant A. fumigatus, active surveillance for resistant molds is insufficient or low in the majority of nations. Seventeen countries have now reported clinical isolates exhibiting resistance to azoles, and this strain of A. fumigatus has been identified in environmental samples across several more nations.41 The Dutch investigation, concentrating on high-risk patients, revealed that 20% of those with invasive aspergillosis harbored triazole-resistant bacteria.42 The extensive application of antifungal agents in human and veterinary medicine, agricultural practices, and timber products may have adverse side effects that might modify both the human microbiome and the natural microbiome. The relationship between the dissemination of A. fumigatus and alterations in the environmental microbiome remains uncertain; nevertheless, the presence of azoles that induce resistance in soil has been demonstrated to modify the soil microbiome.43 Current research indicates that A. fumigatus colonization does not invariably correlate with infection; rather, its presence in diverse immunocompromised groups significantly elevates the risk of invasive infection. A study examining cytokines and pathogen recognition in aspergillosis, focusing on human and animal infections, revealed that the immune response to aspergillosis entails a complex interplay of cytokines and chemokines, which are crucial for host defense and disease advancement. Various interactions exist between cytokines and chemokines in aspergillosis. 1. Pathogen-associated molecular patterns and cytokine synthesis; 2. Th1, Th2, and Th17 immune responses; 3. The function of chemokines. The interconnections between cytokines and chemokines in aspergillosis are intricate, and comprehending the host response via human and animal research will facilitate the development of novel treatment techniques and enhance customized therapy.44
The management of Aspergillus infection is hindered by challenges in diagnosis and a rise in reports of medication resistance.22,45,46 Despite our hospital doing medication sensitivity studies on Aspergillus, the available data is insufficient, and the overall in vitro sensitivity to voriconazole, caspofungin, and amphotericin B is 100%. Consequently, this data has not yet been included in the publication.
Currently, several laboratories in Chinese hospitals lack the capability to identify mold, and there is a scarcity of studies regarding the epidemiological data on mold diseases.1 Subsequent research ought to investigate the mechanisms of drug resistance and transmission pathways of A. fumigatus, while enhancing the utilization of drug sensitivity testing and whole genome sequencing technologies to inform clinical antifungal therapies and strategies for infection prevention and control. Enhancing environmental monitoring, improving hospital ventilation, optimizing the diagnosis and treatment of high-risk patients, and instituting pertinent infection monitoring mechanisms can create an environment for immunosuppressed patients and those with chronic lung disease that minimizes high spore exposure. It is anticipated to diminish the morbidity and mortality associated with A. fumigatus infection.
Conclusion
Comprehending the epidemiology of A. fumigatus is becoming more vital for the accurate formulation of hospital infection management, control measures, and therapeutic treatment methods in the future. Currently, we can significantly mitigate the danger of A. fumigatus infection by environmental management, personal safeguards, medical interventions, and the protection of high-risk populations. The findings of this study can serve as a foundation for high-risk departments to implement effective strategies for managing A. fumigatus hospital infections and enhancing clinical and environmental fungal surveillance. In clinical isolation therapy, it is crucial to differentiate between hospital-acquired and community-acquired infections to regulate the proliferation of A. fumigatus hospital infections and promote policies for enhanced clinical antifungal management.
Data Sharing Statement
The data used in this paper can be provided by Feng Zang.
Ethics Approval Statement
All isolates were procured from patients at our hospital in accordance with standard hospital protocols, and this work received approval from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Ethics Number: 2024-SR-535), and waiver of patient informed consent. The Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University does not require patients to consent to review their medical records because ethics, consent to participate, and consent to publish declarations: not applicable. We are committed to abide by the Declaration of Helsinki and to keep data containing patient information confidential.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
1. Zhang L, Chen KM, Zhongju C, et al. Epidemiological analysis of fungal infection in my country: a multicenter retrospective study. J Peking Union Med College. 2023;03:559–565.
2. Gold JAW, Ahmad FB, Cisewski JA. Increased deaths from fungal infections during the COVID-19 pandemic—National Vital Statistics System, United States, January 2020–December 2021. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;76:e255–e262. doi:10.1093/cid/ciac489
3. Latgé JP. The pathobiology of Aspergillus fumigatus. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9(8):382–389. doi:10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02104-7
4. Sugui JA, Kwon-Chung KJ, Juvvadi PR, et al. Aspergillus fumigatus and related species. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;5(2):a019786. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019786
5. Rayens E, Norris KA. Prevalence and healthcare burden of fungal infections in the United States, 2018. Open Forum Infect Diseases. 2022;9(1):ofab593. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofab593
6. Agarwal R, Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151(6):529. doi:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1187_19
7. Bongomin F, Asio LG, Baluku JB, Kwizera R, Denning DW. Chronic pulmonary Aspergillosis: notes for a clinician in a resource-limited setting where there is no mycologist. J Fungi. 2020;6:75. doi:10.3390/jof6020075
8. Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. Global and multi-National Prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. J Fungi. 2017;3:57. doi:10.3390/jof3040057
9. Brown GD, Denning DW, Gow NA, Levitz SM, Netea MG, White TC. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:165rv13. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3004404
10. Nywening AV, Rybak JM, Rogers PD, Fortwendel JR. Mechanisms of triazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22(12):4934–4952. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.15274
11. Rotjanapan P, Chen YC, Chakrabarti A, et al. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of invasive mould infections: a multicenter, retrospective analysis in five Asian countries. Med Mycol. 2018;56(2):186–196. doi:10.1093/mmy/myx029
12. Lass-Flörl C, Griff K, Mayr A, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of infections due to Aspergillus terreus: 10-year single centre experience. Br J Haematol. 2005;131:201–207. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05763.x
13. Balajee SA, Baddley JW, Peterson SW, et al. Aspergillus alabamensis, a new clinically relevant species in the section Terrei. Eukaryot Cell. 2009a;8:713–722. doi:10.1128/EC.00272-08
14. Toyotome T, Hagiwara D, Takahashi H, Watanabe A, Kamei K. Emerging antifungal drug resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus and among other species of Aspergillus. Curr Fungal Infection Rep. 2018;12:105–111. doi:10.1007/s12281-018-0318-9
15. Rybak JM, Fortwendel JR, Rogers PD. Emerging threat of triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(4):835–842. doi:10.1093/jac/dky517
16. Berger S, El Chazli Y, Babu AF, Coste AT. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: a consequence of antifungal use in agriculture? Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01024
17. Sabino R, Verissimo C, Viegas C, et al. The role of occupational Aspergillus exposure in the development of diseases. Med Mycol. 2019;57:S196–S205. doi:10.1093/mmy/myy090
18. Rivelli Zea SM, Toyotome T. Azole‐resistant Aspergillus fumigatus as an emerging worldwide pathogen. Microbiol Immunol. 2022;66(3):135–144. doi:10.1111/1348-0421.12957
19. China MoHotPsRo. Notice on Issuing the Nosocomial Infection Diagnosis Standards (Trial)[EB/OL] (2001-11-07). 2001.
20. Hong S, Yusan W, Ziyu S. National Clinical Laboratory Operating Procedures.
21. Latgé JP, Chamilos G. Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;33(1):10–1128. doi:10.1128/CMR.00140-18
22. Arastehfar A, Carvalho A, Houbraken J, et al. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis: from basics to clinics. Stud Mycol. 2021;100(1):100115. doi:10.1016/j.simyco.2021.100115
23. Rhodes JC. Aspergillus fumigatus: growth and virulence. Med Mycol. 2006;44(sup1):77–81. doi:10.1080/13693780600779419
24. Tekaia F, Latgé JP. Aspergillus fumigatus: saprophyte or pathogen? Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8(4):385–392. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.017
25. Egger M, Hoenigl M, Thompson III GR, Carvalho A, Jenks JD. Let’s talk about sex characteristics—as a risk factor for invasive fungal diseases. Mycoses. 2022;65(6):599–612. doi:10.1111/myc.13449
26. Schaefer AL, Ceesay M, Leier JA, Tesch J, Wisenden BD, Pandey S. Factors contributing to sex differences in mice inhaling Aspergillus fumigatus. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(23):8851. doi:10.3390/ijerph17238851
27. Munir MT, Rehman ZU, Shah MA, Umar S. Interactions of Aspergillus fumigatus with the respiratory system in poultry. World Poultr Sci J. 2017;73(2):321–336. doi:10.1017/S0043933917000022
28. Hong G, Alby K, Ng SC, et al. The presence of Aspergillus fumigatus is associated with worse respiratory quality of life in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2020;19(1):125–130. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2019.08.008
29. O’Dea AL, Feng R, Glaser LJ, et al. The clinical association between Aspergillus fumigatus and respiratory outcomes in adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis. Ann Am Thoracic Soc. 2023;20(7):984–992. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202210-852OC
30. Peláez-garcía de la Rasilla T, González-Jiménez I, Fernández-Arroyo A, et al. COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA): hospital or home environment as a source of life-threatening Aspergillus fumigatus infection? J Fungi. 2022;8(3):316. doi:10.3390/jof8030316
31. Araujo R, Amorim A, Gusmão L. Genetic diversity of Aspergillus fumigatus in indoor hospital environments. Sabouraudia. 2010;48(6):832–838. doi:10.3109/13693780903575360
32. Symoens F, Burnod J, Lebeau B, et al. Hospital-acquired Aspergillus fumigatus infection: can molecular typing methods identify an environmental source? J Hosp Infect. 2002;52(1):60–67. doi:10.1053/jhin.2002.1263
33. Górzyńska A, Grzech A, Mierzwiak P, Ussowicz M, Biernat M, Nawrot U. Quantitative and Qualitative Airborne Mycobiota Surveillance in High-Risk Hospital Environment. Microorganisms. 2023;11(4):1031. doi:10.3390/microorganisms11041031
34. Warris A, Voss A, Verweij PE. Hospital sources of Aspergillus species: new routes of transmission? Rev Iberoam Micol. 2001;18:156–162.
35. Korfanty G, Heifetz E, Xu J. Assessing thermal adaptation of a global sample of Aspergillus fumigatus: implications for climate change effects. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1059238. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1059238
36. Lavergne RAC, Hagen T, Toublanc F, et al. Home environment as a source of life-threatening azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:76–78. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw664
37. Godeau CR, Scherer G, Laboissiere E, et al. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in the hospital: surveillance from flower beds to corridors. Am J Infect Control. 2020;48:702–704. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2019.10.003
38. Lemaire BN, Forel AC, Cassir JM, et al. Hospitalized patient as source of Aspergillus fumigatus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;24:1524–1527. doi:10.3201/eid2408.171865
39. Engel TGPE, Van den Driessche E, Melchers KSJ, et al. Aerosol transmission of Aspergillus fumigatus in Cystic Fibrosis Patients in the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:797–799. doi:10.3201/eid2504.181110
40. Gonzalez-Jimenez I, Lucio J, Menéndez-Fraga MD, Mellado E, Peláez T. Hospital environment as a source of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains with tR34/L98H and g448s cyp51a mutations. J Fungi. 2021;7(1):22. doi:10.3390/jof7010022
41. Resendiz Sharpe A, Lagrou K, Meis JF, Chowdhary A, Lockhart SR, Verweij PE. Triazole resistance surveillance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Med Mycol. 2018;56:83–92. doi:10.1093/mmy/myx144
42. Burks C, Darby A, Gómez Londoño L, Momany M, Brewer MT. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in the environment: identifying key reservoirs and hotspots of antifungal resistance. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17:e1009711. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1009711
43. Lockhart SR, Chowdhary A, Gold JA. The rapid emergence of antifungal-resistant human-pathogenic fungi. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21(12):818–832. doi:10.1038/s41579-023-00960-9
44. Shankar J, Thakur R, Clemons KV, Stevens DA. Interplay of cytokines and chemokines in Aspergillosis. J Fungi. 2024;10(4):251. doi:10.3390/jof10040251
45. Kanaujia RS, Singh S, Rudramurthy SM. Aspergillosis: an update on clinical spectrum, diagnostic schemes, and management. Fungal Infect. 2023;17:144–155. doi:10.1007/s12281-023-00461-5
46. Dobiáš R, Stevens DA, Havlíček V. Current and future pathways in Aspergillus diagnosis. Antibiotics. 2023;12(2):385. doi:10.3390/antibiotics12020385
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.