Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 18

Emerging Mobile Colistin Resistance Gene Mcr-1 and Mcr-10 in Enterobacteriaceae Isolates From Urban Sewage in China
Authors Zhang Y, Chen J, Yang X, Wu Y, Wang Z, Xu Y, Zhou L, Wang J, Jiao X , Sun L
Received 7 November 2024
Accepted for publication 8 February 2025
Published 19 February 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 1035—1048
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S502067
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Sandip Patil
Yujing Zhang,1– 3 Jiajie Chen,1– 3 Xinyu Yang,1– 3 Yangshiyu Wu,1– 3 Zhenyu Wang,1– 3 Yawen Xu,4 Le Zhou,4 Jing Wang,1– 3 Xinan Jiao,1– 3 Lin Sun1– 3
1Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Zoonosis, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 3Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Biological Hazard Factors (Animal Origin) for Agrifood Safety and Quality, Ministry of Agriculture of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 4Yangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Xinan Jiao, Email [email protected]; Lin Sun, Email [email protected]
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology and dissemination of mcr-positive Enterobacteriaceae in urban sewage in Yangzhou, China.
Methods: A total of 366 sewage samples were collected from the Yangzhou Wastewater Treatment Plant in Jiangsu Province. Colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae was identified through PCR targeting mcr-1 to mcr-10 genes. The isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and whole-genome sequencing was performed to analyze their genomic features. Additionally, conjugation experiments were conducted to assess the transferability of mcr-positive plasmids.
Results: Three mcr-positive Enterobacteriaceae isolates were identified, representing an isolation rate of 0.82%. These included one mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli (ST167) and two mcr-10-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae complex strains with novel sequence types ST6801 and ST6825. The mcr-1 gene was located on an IncI2 plasmid (pYZ22WS208_3) and successfully transferred to recipient strains. In contrast, the mcr-10 gene was carried on IncF plasmids (pYZ22WS067_1 and pYZ22WS223_1) but was not transferable in this study. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the mcr-1-positive E. coli strain clustered within Clade II, alongside strains from various countries and sources. Phylogenomic analysis of mcr-10-positive isolates showed their sporadic distribution across 13 countries, with associations to diverse hosts and environments, indicating potential for widespread transmission.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the presence of mcr-1 and mcr-10-positive Enterobacteriaceae in wastewater, emphasizing the importance of wastewater surveillance for tracking antibiotic resistance. The horizontal transfer of mcr-1 and potential spread of mcr-10 across various hosts underscore the need for ongoing monitoring and preventive measures.
Plain Language Summary: 1. Colistin resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates were identified in urban sewage.
2. The common genotypes revealed were mcr-1 and mcr-10.
3. Urban sewage may serve as a reservoir for antibiotic resistance genes, presenting a significant risk to public health.
Keywords: mcr, Enterobacteriaceae, urban sewage, antibiotic resistance, whole genome sequencing
Introduction
The rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria poses a significant threat to clinical care and global public health.1–3 Among these, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has been categorized as critical priority pathogens by the World Health Organization (WHO) due to their limited treatment options.4 The emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance genes, such as mcr-1, has further exacerbated this issue by compromising colistin’s effectiveness as a last-resort antibiotic.5 The increased use and misuse of colistin in livestock farming has inevitably led to the emergence of colistin-resistance isolates.6,7
Mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-1, first identified in Escherichia coli from a pig in China in 2015,8 has since been reported globally across various bacterial species and hosts, including humans, animals, and the environmental sources.9 The horizontal transfer of mcr genes via plasmids facilitates the rapid spread of colistin resistance.10 To date, ten different variants of the mcr gene family (mcr-1 to mcr-10) have been identified, reflecting the diversity of mechanisms that contribute to colistin resistance.8,11–19
The Klebsiella pneumoniae complex comprises species such as K. pneumoniae, K. quasipneumoniae, K. variicola, and K. Africana.20 These Gram-negative opportunistic pathogens are commonly associated with infections in hospital settings21–25 and is frequently implicated in the dissemination of mcr genes.8,16,26–34
Recent studies have highlighted the emergence of colistin-resistant strains in various environments, including wastewater treatment plants. For instance, Cherak et al identified MCR-1 producing Gram-negative bacteria in aquatic settings in Algeria,35 while Snyman et al discovered mcr-3 and mcr-5 positive Aeromonas spp. in water sources in South Africa.36 Additionally, Puljko et al isolated mcr-4.3 positive Klebsiella spp. from treated wastewater in Croatia.32 These findings underscore the role of wastewater plants as critical junctures for the dissemination of antibiotic resistance, integrating antibiotics excreted in urine and feces from both human and veterinary sources, and ultimately facilitating the transfer of resistance genes into the environment.37–40 While colistin resistance in wastewater is a global concern, several factors make China a critical region for this research. First, the widespread agricultural use of antibiotics, particularly in the animal farming sector, significantly contributes to the development and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the environment.41–44 Second, the rapid urbanization and heavy industrialization seen in many Chinese regions result in a high volume of wastewater containing antibiotic-resistant bacteria, further exacerbating the problem. These factors, coupled with growing public health concerns regarding the increasing prevalence of resistant bacteria in both human populations and environmental ecosystems, underscore the importance of closely monitoring colistin resistance in China’s wastewater systems. Therefore, our study aims to explore how these local challenges specifically influence the spread of resistance, with the goal of providing valuable data to guide targeted interventions.
This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, genomic characteristics, and horizontal gene transfer potential of mcr-carrying Enterobacteriaceae isolates from the influent of the Yangzhou Wastewater Treatment Plant in China, contributing to the understanding of their epidemiology and transmission dynamics within this environmental context.
Materials and Methods
Sample Collection and Bacterial Isolation
From March 2022 to January 2024, a total of 366 sewage samples were collected from the influent of the Yangzhou Wastewater Treatment Plant in Jiangsu Province, China. Briefly, 5 mL of each sewage sample was enriched in 25 mL of sterile Luria-Bertani broth and incubated overnight at 37°C with agitation at 180 rpm. Subsequently, 10 μL of the enriched sample was streaked onto Eosin-Methylene Blue Agar plates supplemented with 2 mg/L colistin. After 18 to 24 hours of incubation at 37°C, colonies with distinct morphologies were selected and further purified. Bacterial species were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany).
PCR Detection of Mcr Genes
The presence of mcr genes (mcr-1 to mcr-10) in colistin-resistant isolates was confirmed by PCR using specific primers, as previously described.15,45,46
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of 15 antibiotics were determined using agar dilution or broth microdilution methods (specifically for colistin and tigecycline) in accordance with the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The tested antibiotics included ampicillin, cefotaxime, meropenem, gentamicin, amikacin, streptomycin, tetracycline, tigecycline, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, colistin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, florfenicol, and fosfomycin. The results were interpreted according to the 2022 CLSI guidelines (document M100-S32), except for the breakpoints of streptomycin, tigecycline, and florfenicol, which were interpreted according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines (https://www.eucast.org/). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control strain.
Conjugation Experiments
Conjugation experiments were conducted using the mcr-positive isolates as donor strains, and E. coli C600 (streptomycin-resistant) as the recipient strain, following a previously described protocol.47 Transconjugants were selected on LB agar plates supplemented with streptomycin (3000 mg/L) and colistin (2 mg/L). PCR was performed to confirm the presence of the mcr genes in the transconjugants.
Whole-Genome Sequencing and Analysis
Genomic DNA from mcr-positive isolates was extracted and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq and Oxford Nanopore MinION platforms. Hybrid de novo assembly was performed using SPAdes 3.1148 and Unicycle 0.4.9,49 with corrections applied using Pilon 1.23.50 Genome annotations were conducted with Prokka 1.13.51 Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, plasmid replicons and mobile genetic elements were identified using tools from the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/). In silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed using the Institut Pasteur MLST online database (https://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/). Alignment of the mcr-bearing plasmids was visualized using the BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) (http://brig.sourceforge.net/),52 and the genetic context comparisons were visualized using the Easyfig tool (http://mjsull.github.io/Easyfig/).53 Reference genomes were collected from the NCBI Genomic Database. The phylogenetic tree based on core genome single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was generated using ParSNP v. 1.2 (https://github.com/marbl/parsnp),54 and the tree was visualized using ChiPlot (http://chiplot.online/#).55
Results
Isolates Identification and Resistant Phenotypes
A total of 33 colistin-resistant strains were isolated from the 366 sewage samples. Among these, three mcr-positive isolates were identified, corresponding to an isolation rate of 0.82%. These included one isolate harboring mcr-1 (YZ22WS208) and two isolates harboring mcr-10 (YZ22WS067 and YZ22WS223). Species identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS, which confirmed YZ22WS208 as E. coli, while YZ22WS067 and YZ22WS223 were identified as Klebsiella quasipneumoniae subsp. similipneumoniae and Klebsiella variicola subsp. variicola, respectively.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed distinct resistance profiles between the E. coli and Klebsiella strains. The Klebsiella strains, YZ22WS067 and YZ22WS223, were resistant to and ampicillin, chloramphenicol and colistin but were susceptible to all other antibiotics tested, including cefotaxime, meropenem, gentamicin, amikacin, streptomycin, tetracycline, tigecycline, florfenicol, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, fosfomycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In contrast, E. coli strain YZ22WS208 exhibited a broader, more extensive resistance pattern, demonstrating resistance to a wide range of antibiotics, including ampicillin, cefotaxime, meropenem, gentamicin, amikacin, streptomycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, florfenicol, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, colistin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Notably, YZ22WS208 was only susceptible to fosfomycin and tigecycline, which highlights the significant differences in antimicrobial resistance profiles between the E. coli and Klebsiella strains (Table 1).
![]() |
Table 1 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns in YZ22WS067, YZ22WS223, YZ22WS208 and Its Transconjugant |
Transferability of Mcr-1 and Mcr-10 Gene
Horizontal transfer of mcr gene was confirmed through conjugation experiments. The E. coli strain YZ22WS208 successfully transferred mcr-1 to the recipient strains, resulting in transconjugants that retained colistin resistance, with a MIC value of 8 mg/L (Table 1). The transfer frequency of mcr-1 was determined to be 2.0462 × 10−2. In contrast, the mcr-10 genes present in the Klebsiella strains did not demonstrate detectable transferability in this study.
Genomic Features of Mcr-1-Positive Isolates
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) identified E. coli YZ22WS208 as sequence type ST167 (Table 2), which is commonly associated with the dissemination of resistance genes. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that YZ22WS208 comprised a 4,853,249-bp chromosome and five plasmids. The chromosome contained six antimicrobial resistance genes, including aph(4)-Ia, aadA1, aadA2b, aac(3)-IV, cmlA1 and sul3. Plasmid pYZ22WS208_1, harboring the carbapenem resistance gene blaNDM-5, was classified as an IncHI2 plasmid. The plasmid showed high similarity to other NDM-producing IncHI2 plasmids found in Enterobacteriaceae, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium, from both animal and human origins (Figure 1A). Plasmid pYZ22WS208_2 was categorized as an IncFIB/IncFIC hybrid plasmid and carried five drug resistance genes. Sequence analysis demonstrated 99.75% identity and 87–89% coverage with six previously reported IncFIB/IncFIC plasmids from E. coli strains (eg, pEC-10, pAR349, pCUVET20-1667.1, pYLPK12, pMCR1-PA and pMR0516mcr). These plasmids shared a common backbone region that included several resistance genes, such as blaCTX-M-55, as well as replication initiation gene repB and other essential genetic elements (Figure 1B). Plasmid pYZ22WS208_3 was identified as a multireplicon plasmid with an IncI2 replicon. It showed high similar to pHNSHP45, the first plasmid reported to carry mcr-1 (Figure 1C). The genetic environment surrounding the mcr-1-flanking region in pYZ22WS208_3 showed 99.98% identity to that of pHNSHP45 (accession number KP347127.1). However, the transposable elements ISApl1 and IS683 found upstream of mcr-1 in pHNSHP45, were absent in pYZ22WS208_3. Additionally, pYZ22WS208_3 carried the blaCTX−M−99 gene, which was located within a typical transposition unit (ISEcp1–blaCTX−M−199–orf477) (Figure 1D).
![]() |
Table 2 Genomic Characteristics of Mcr-Carrying Enterobacteriaceae Isolates |
Genomic Features of Mcr-10-Positive Isolates
MLST analysis identified that two strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae complex, YZ22WS067 and YZ22WS223, belonged to novel sequence types ST6801 and ST6825, respectively (Table 2). The genome of YZ22WS067 consisted of a 5,162,045-bp chromosome and six plasmids, while YZ22WS223 harbors a 5,575,338-bp chromosome and two plasmids (Table 2). Both isolates carried the same antimicrobial resistance genes on their chromosomes, including fosA and oqxAB. However, chromosomal beta-lactam resistance genes differed between the two strains, with YZ22WS067 carrying blaSHV-182 and YZ22WS223 harboring blaLEN-16. Both strains carried the mcr-10 gene on plasmids pYZ22WS067_1 (250,618 bp) and pYZ22WS223_1 (192,277 bp), respectively, with no additional resistance genes identified on the other plasmids.
A BLASTN comparison between the mcr-10 plasmids identified in this study and those available in the GenBank database revealed that pYZ22WS067_1 shared over 61% coverage and more than 99.5% identity with four mcr-10-carrying plasmids: three from K. pneumoniae (pMyNCGM088, pMyNCGM084, pKP46-mcr10, pKP57-mcr10), and one from Raoultella ornithinolytica (strain FDAARGOS_431, plasmid unnamed1). Similarity, pYZ22WS223_1 exhibited over 57% coverage and 100% identity three mcr-10-carrying plasmids: two from K. pneumoniae (pMyNCGM088, pMyNCGM084), and one from R. ornithinolytica (strain FDAARGOS_431, plasmid unnamed1) (Figure 2A). Despite the relatively low coverage, both plasmids contained an undiversified replicon, likely belonging to the IncF group (Table S1).
Comparative analysis of the two mcr-10 positive plasmids in this study and those previously reported plasmids revealed structural differences in their surrounding genetic environment. In E. coli, in K. pneumoniae and Enterobacter roggenkampii, the basic plasmid backbone was conserved, with the xerC gene, encoding a tyrosine recombinase, located upstream of all mcr-10 genes. Various insertion sequences were also identified upstream and/or downstream of the mcr-10 genes (Figure 2B). ISEcp36 and a truncated ISEcI1 were present downstream of mcr-10 in pYZ22WS067_1 (Figure 2B), differing from the first reported mcr-10-positive plasmid, pMCR10_090065 (accession number CP045065), which contained two truncated IS903B sequences flanking mcr-10, forming a composite transposon. In contrast, pYZ22WS223_1 carried a more diverse set of insertion sequences downstream of mcr-10, including ISKox1, ISEc27, ISKpn42, ISsm1, and a truncated ISEcI1.
Phylogenetic Analysis of Mcr-1-Bearing Isolates
A phylogenetic comparison was conducted on the mcr-1-positive E. coli isolate in this study, along with 38 published E. coli genomes from 17 countries, sourced from the NCBI database (Figure 3). The analysis revealed that all isolates clustered into two major evolutionary branches, exhibiting a wide range of sequence types.
![]() |
Figure 3 Phylogenetic relationships among 38 mcr-1-positive E. coli strains, with sequence type, source, and resistance genes indicated on the right. |
Clade I comprised fourteen strains from nine countries, including Egypt, Pakistan, Italy, China, Lebanon, India, Singapore, the United Kingdom and Malaysia. These strains were isolated from a variety of sources, including humans, animals, and environmental samples, reflecting their widespread distribution across diverse ecological niches.
The E. coli isolate from this study clustered within clade II, alongside strains from India, Japan, China, Thailand, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Belgium, Brunei, Brazil, Italy, Austria and South Korea. In Clade II, the majority of mcr-1-harboring E. coli isolates was originated from environmental or animal sources. Notably, strain YZ22WS208 exhibited the closest phylogenetic relationship to a strain from human feces in Hangzhou, China. Both strains shared the same sequence type (ST167), indicating a potential link in their evolutionary history and suggesting a common source and transmission pathway.
Phylogenetic Analysis of Mcr-10-Bearing Isolates
To explore the prevalence and distribution of mcr-10 in the K. pneumoniae complex, a phylogenomic analysis was performed based on core genomes SNPs. The phylogenetic tree included 43 mcr-10-positive K. pneumoniae complex isolates, comprising two strains from this study and 41 strains from the NCBI GenBank database (Figure 4). The analysis revealed that mcr-10 is sporadically distributed across 13 countries, with a predominance of strains of human origin and a wide range of sequence types. The isolates were grouped into four distinct clades: Clade I (n=2, 4.65%), Clade II (n=12, 27.90%), Clade III (n=10, 23.26%), and Clade IV (n=19, 44.18%).
![]() |
Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationships among 43 mcr-10-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae complex strains, with sequence type, source, and resistance genes indicated on the right. |
Strain YZ22WS067 clustered within clade I, along with strain 23-M-SRM-61, which was isolated from hospital wastewater in Zhejiang, China. Both strains were identified as K. variicola subsp. variicola (Kp3). Strain YZ22WS223 was closely related to strain SB610, which was isolated from water in New Zealand and clustered into Clade III. The remaining clades consisted of isolates from human, environmental, and animal sources. Clade II and III, which exhibited the greatest diversity, included K. pneumoniae (Kp1) and K. quasipneumoniae subsp. similipneumoniae (Kp4). Clade IV, composed of K. quasipneumoniae subsp. quasipneumoniae (Kp2), contained strains from the USA, China, and Singapore, with the majority originating from Singapore, all sharing the sequence type ST526.
Discussion
Enterobacteriaceae strains carrying the mcr gene were isolated from 366 wastewater samples collected at the influent of a wastewater treatment plant in Yangzhou City, with an isolation rate of 0.82%. This study identified one E. coli strain harboring the mcr-1 gene and two K. pneumoniae complex strains carrying the mcr-10 gene. While the mcr-10 gene has previously been reported in human samples, such as patients and slaughterhouse workers, as well as environmental samples, including hospital sewage, disinfected tableware, and animals like companion animals and chickens in China,15,56–60 this is the first time that mcr-10 has been detected in a wastewater treatment plant.
The E. coli strain YZ22WS208, which harbored the mcr-1 gene, exhibited resistance to colistin, consistent with previous studies.59,61 The two K. pneumoniae complex isolates carrying the mcr-10 gene, YZ22WS067 and YZ22WS223, also showed resistance to colistin. Some studies report that mcr-10-positive strains do not show phenotypic colistin resistance,15,57 while others have observed high levels of resistance.58,59,61 This discrepancy suggests that the expression of the mcr-10 gene may be closely linked to the genetic background of individual strains. The complexity of antibiotic resistance mechanisms underscores the need for further investigation into the relationship between the mcr genes and colistin resistance. The emergence of K. pneumoniae complex carrying the mcr-10 gene in Yangzhou highlights a concerning development, emphasizing the need to remain vigilant about the potential threat posed by the mcr gene. The spread and evolution of the mcr gene is a dynamic process, and highly resistant strains may emerge in the future, posing a serious threat to public health.
Previous studies have shown that plasmids carrying the mcr-10 gene are primarily found in Enterobacter spp.,15,58,62,63 suggesting that mcr-10-harboring isolates may exhibit stable genus specificity. The two K. pneumoniae complex strains YZ22WS067 and YZ22WS223, isolated from sewage, present novel sequence types. Data from domestic and international reports of mcr-1-carrying isolates from sewage align with our findings, with E. coli being the main carrier of the mcr-1-gene.64–68 E. coli isolates with various sequence types (STs) carrying mcr-1 have been identified in animals, foods, humans and environmental samples.10,69–73 The ST167 identified in this study has also been reported as a common mcr-1 carrier in humans and sewage in China.40,74–76 The E. coli YZ22WS208, isolated from Yangzhou sewage, harbored not only the mcr-1 gene and blaCTX-M-55 but also blaNDM-5 and blaOXA-10. YZ22WS208 exhibited carbapenem resistance, which was confirmed to be due to the production of the carbapenemase NDM-5, as identified by whole-genome sequencing. This gene is located on the IncHI2 plasmid pYZ22WS208_1 and is consistent with other studies reporting NDM-5-mediated resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. However, for the two Klebsiella isolates (YZ22WS067 and YZ22WS223), antimicrobial susceptibility testing indicated that they were not resistant to carbapenems. This finding aligns with the absence of carbapenemase genes in these isolates. Outside of China, E. coli ST167 mcr-1-positive has also been reported. For example, in 2016, an E. coli ST167 strain carrying mcr-1 was isolated from the sputum of a pneumonia patient in Spain.77 In 2019, Yoko Nukui et al reported the first isolation of an E. coli ST167 strain co-harboring blaNDM-5, blaCTX-M-14, blaOXA-10, and mcr-1 from the sputum of a Japanese pneumonia patient.78 To date, E. coli ST167 has been classified as an internationally disseminated clonal lineage associated with the global spread of CTX-M broad-spectrum β-lactamases and NDM metallo-β-lactamases in humans and animals.79
Plasmids play a critical role in the global spread of resistance genes, including mcr-1 in Enterobacteriaceae.10 Three plasmid incompatibility groups, including IncI2, IncX4 and IncHI2, have been identified as vectors of mcr-1.10,80 Consistent with previous findings, the presence of mcr-1 in the IncI2 plasmid was detected in E. coli YZ22WS208, which shared 99.98% identity with plasmid pHNSHP45 (accession number KP347127.1). The plasmid pYZ22WS208_3 identified in this study possesses conjugative capabilities, increasing the risk of mcr-1 transmission between bacteria. Additionally, the bacterium carries IncF and IncHI2 plasmids that harbor other resistance genes. Although the conjugation experiment was unsuccessful, there remains a possibility that these resistance genes could transfer in the future through mediation by other insertion elements. This is concerning, as such events could lead to infections that are difficult to treat and pose significant public risks.
In 2022, Yin et al summarized the genetic background associated with mcr-10. This study confirmed that in YZ22WS067 and YZ22WS223, mcr-10 gene was located in a similarity conserved structure, with xerC located upstream and ISEc36/IS26 positioned downstream of the core xerC-mcr-10 structure in most strains.59 Consistent with these findings, the genetic environment of mcr-10 in strains YZ22WS067 and YZ22WS223 was consistent with this conserved arrangement.
Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses revealed a close relationship between mcr-10 and mcr-1-carrying isolates from human, animal, and the environmental sources. This suggests that mcr-positive plasmid isolates may have the potential to spread across different hosts and environmental boundaries. To better understand this threat, further research is crucial to identify the transmission routes of mcr-10-positive and mcr-1-positive Enterobacteriaceae cross these ecosystems. Additionally, more epidemiological studies are needed to elucidate the transmission patterns of mcr-positive Enterobacteriaceae in diverse populations. By investigating these pathways, we can implement more effective measures to control the spread of mcr genes and mitigate the public health risks posed by antibiotic resistance.
Conclusion
This study detects mcr-1-positive E. coli and mcr-10-positive K. pneumoniae complex strains in wastewater in Yangzhou, China. The presence of mcr-positive Enterobacteriaceae isolates in wastewater highlights the potential risk of gene spread, even in environments with limited colistin exposure. Early detection and ongoing monitoring are crucial, and wastewater surveillance is a valuable tool for tracking antibiotic resistance across ecosystems.
Data Sharing Statement
The genome sequences in this study have been deposited into NCBI GenBank under PRJNA1162414.
Ethical Statement
This study does not involve any direct interaction with animals or human subjects, nor does it collect private or identifiable information. In accordance with the “Measures for the Ethical Review of Science and Technology” (Trial), issued jointly by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, and other departments of the People’s Republic of China under document number Guo Ke Fa Jian [2023] No. 167, this research does not require ethical approval as it does not involve human or animal subjects nor sensitive data. Additionally, we confirm that permission for the collection of wastewater samples was granted by Mr. Qingbo Shang, Director of the Tangwang Wastewater Treatment Plant, Yangzhou Jieyuan Environmental Co., Ltd. Mr. Shang approved the sampling work and arranged for staff to assist with the wastewater collection.
Funding
This work was supported by the fifth phase of the “333 Project” scientific research project in Jiangsu Province (BRA2020002), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution (PAPD), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (SJCX23_1958) and the Medical Research Project of Yangzhou Commission of Health (2023-2-33).
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Sagor MS, Hossain MS, Islam T. et al. Phenotypic and Genotypic Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Profiling of Enterococcus faecalis Isolated from Poultry at Two Major Districts in Bangladesh. Pak Vet J. 2022;42(2):153–160. doi:10.29261/pakvetj/2022.019
2. Leone S, Pezone I, Pisaturo M, et al. Pharmacotherapies for multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections: current options and beyond. Expert Opinion Pharmacothe. 2024;25(8):1027–1037. doi:10.1080/14656566.2024.2367003
3. Macesic N, Uhlemann AC, Peleg AY. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Lancet. 2025;405(10474):257–272. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02081-6
4. WHO. WHO bacterial priority pathogens list, 2024: bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. 2024.
5. Giamarellou H. Epidemiology of infections caused by polymyxin-resistant pathogens. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;48(6):614–621. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.09.025
6. Jeannot K, Bolard A, Plésiat P. Resistance to polymyxins in Gram-negative organisms. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;49(5):526–535. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.029
7. Srinivas P, Rivard K. Polymyxin resistance in Gram-negative pathogens. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2017;19(11):38. doi:10.1007/s11908-017-0596-3
8. Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):161–168. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00424-7
9. Xiaomin S, Yiming L, Yuying Y, et al. Global impact of mcr-1 -positive Enterobacteriaceae bacteria on “one health”. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2020;46(5):565–577. doi:10.1080/1040841x.2020.1812510
10. Wang R, van Dorp L, Shaw LP, et al. The global distribution and spread of the mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1179. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03205-z
11. AbuOun M, Stubberfield EJ, Duggett NA, et al. mcr-1 and mcr-2 (mcr-6.1) variant genes identified in Moraxella species isolated from pigs in Great Britain from 2014 to 2015. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(10):2904. doi:10.1093/jac/dky272
12. Borowiak M, Fischer J, Hammerl JA, et al. Identification of a novel transposon-associated phosphoethanolamine transferase gene, mcr-5, conferring colistin resistance in d-tartrate fermenting Salmonella enterica subsp. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(12):3317–3324. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx327
13. Carattoli A, Villa L, Feudi C, et al. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mcr-4 gene in Salmonella and Escherichia coli, Italy 2013, Spain and Belgium, 2015 to 2016. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(31). doi:10.2807/1560-7917.Es.2017.22.31.30589
14. Carroll LM, Gaballa A, Guldimann C, et al. Identification of novel mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-9 in a multidrug-resistant, colistin-susceptible Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium Isolate. mBio. 2019;10(3). doi:10.1128/mBio.00853-19
15. Lei CW, Zhang Y, Wang YT, et al. Detection of Mobile Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-10.1 in a Conjugative Plasmid from Enterobacter roggenkampii of Chicken Origin in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(10). doi:10.1128/aac.01191-20
16. Wang X, Wang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Emergence of a novel mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-8. NDM Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2018;7(1):122. doi:10.1038/s41426-018-0124-z
17. Xavier BB, Lammens C, Ruhal R, et al. Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr-2, in Escherichia coli, Belgium, June 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(27). doi:10.2807/1560-7917.Es.2016.21.27.30280
18. Yang YQ, Li YX, Lei CW, et al. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-7.1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(7):1791–1795. doi:10.1093/jac/dky111
19. Yin W, Li H, Shen Y, et al. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-3 in Escherichia coli. mBio. 2017;8(3):10–128. doi:10.1128/mBio.00543-17
20. Wyres KL, Lam MMC, Holt KE. Population genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(6):344–359. doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0315-1
21. Chew KL, Octavia S, Lai D, et al. Genomic characterization of Klebsiella quasipneumoniae from clinical specimens in Singapore. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65(8):e0041221. doi:10.1128/aac.00412-21
22. de Campos TA, de Almeida FM, de Almeida APC, et al. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella variicola strains isolated in a Brazilian hospital belong to new clones. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:604031. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.604031
23. Furlan JPR, Lopes R, Gonzalez IHL, et al. Hypermucoviscous/hypervirulent and extensively drug-resistant QnrB2-, QnrS1-, and CTX-M-3-coproducing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST2121 isolated from an infected elephant (Loxodonta africana). Vet Microbiol. 2020;251:108909. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108909
24. Mathers AJ, Crook D, Vaughan A, et al. Klebsiella quasipneumoniae provides a window into carbapenemase gene transfer, plasmid rearrangements, and patient interactions with the hospital environment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(6). doi:10.1128/aac.02513-18
25. Rodríguez-Medina N, Martínez-Romero E, De la Cruz MA, et al. A Klebsiella variicola plasmid confers hypermucoviscosity-like phenotype and alters capsule production and virulence. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:579612. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.579612
26. Chen FJ, Lauderdale TL, Huang WC, et al. Emergence of mcr-1, mcr-3 and mcr-8 in clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in Taiwan. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(2):305–307. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.043
27. Fernandes MR, Cerdeira L, Silva MM, et al. Novel mcr-5.3 variant in a CTX-M-8-producing Escherichia coli ST711 isolated from an infected horse. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(12):3520–3522. doi:10.1093/jac/dky341
28. He YZ, Long TF, He B, et al. ISEc69-mediated mobilization of the colistin resistance gene mcr-2 in Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:564973. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.564973
29. Lemlem M, Aklilu E, Mohamed M, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli with mcr-4, mcr-5, mcr-6, and mcr-9 genes from broiler chicken and farm environment. BMC Microbiol. 2023;23(1):392. doi:10.1186/s12866-023-03118-y
30. Liu Z, Hang X, Xiao X, et al. Co-occurrence of blaNDM-1 and mcr-9 in a conjugative IncHI2/HI2A plasmid from a bloodstream infection-causing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:756201. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.756201
31. Phetburom N, Boueroy P, Chopjitt P, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae complex harboring mcr-1, mcr-7, and mcr-8 isolates from slaughtered pigs in Thailand. Microorganisms. 2021;9(12):2436. doi:10.3390/microorganisms9122436
32. Puljko A, Barišić I, Dekić Rozman S, et al. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem and colistin resistance in Klebsiella and other Enterobacterales from treated wastewater in Croatia. Environ Int. 2024;185:108554. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.108554
33. Tartor YH, Abd El-Aziz NK, Gharieb RMA, et al. Whole-Genome sequencing of gram-negative bacteria isolated from bovine mastitis and raw milk: the first emergence of colistin mcr-10 and fosfomycin fosA5 resistance genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae in Middle East. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:770813. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.770813
34. Yu Y, Andrey DO, Yang RS, et al. A Klebsiella pneumoniae strain co-harbouring mcr-1 and mcr-3 from a human in Thailand. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(8):2372–2374. doi:10.1093/jac/dkaa133
35. Cherak Z, Loucif L, Bendjama E, et al. Dissemination of carbapenemases and MCR-1 producing gram-negative bacteria in aquatic environments in Batna, Algeria. Antibiotics. 2022;11(10):1314. doi:10.3390/antibiotics11101314
36. Snyman Y, Whitelaw AC, Barnes JM, et al. Characterisation of mobile colistin resistance genes (mcr-3 and mcr-5) in river and storm water in regions of the Western Cape of South Africa. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021;10(1):96. doi:10.1186/s13756-021-00963-2
37. Reichert G, Hilgert S, Alexander J, et al. Determination of antibiotic resistance genes in a WWTP-impacted river in surface water, sediment, and biofilm: influence of seasonality and water quality. Sci Total Environ. 2021;768:144526. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144526
38. Manoharan RK, Srinivasan S, Shanmugam G, et al. Shotgun metagenomic analysis reveals the prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements in full scale hospital wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Manage. 2021;296:113270. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113270
39. Pazda M, Kumirska J, Stepnowski P, et al. Antibiotic resistance genes identified in wastewater treatment plant systems - A review. Sci Total Environ. 2019;697:134023. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134023
40. Wang D, Zou H, Zhao L, et al. High prevalence of Escherichia coli co-harboring conjugative plasmids with colistin- and carbapenem resistance genes in a wastewater treatment plant in China. Int J Hygi Environl Health. 2023;250:114159. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114159
41. Li X, Zhu X, Xue Y. Drug Resistance and Genetic Relatedness of Escherichia coli from Mink in Northeast China. Pak Vet J. 2023;43(4):824–827. doi:10.29261/pakvetj/2023.062
42. Bastidas-Caldes C, de Waard JH, Salgado MS, et al. Worldwide Prevalence of mcr-mediated Colistin-Resistance Escherichia coli in Isolates of Clinical Samples, Healthy Humans, and Livestock-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pathogens. 2022;11(6):659. doi:10.3390/pathogens11060659
43. Binsker U, Käsbohrer A, Hammerl JA. Global colistin use: a review of the emergence of resistant Enterobacterales and the impact on their genetic basis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2022;46(1). doi:10.1093/femsre/fuab049
44. Rhouma M, Madec JY, Laxminarayan R. Colistin: from the shadows to a One Health approach for addressing antimicrobial resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023;61(2):106713. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106713
45. Borowiak M, Baumann B, Fischer J, et al. Development of a novel mcr-6 to mcr-9 multiplex pcr and assessment of mcr-1 to mcr-9 occurrence in colistin-resistant Salmonella enterica Isolates from environment, feed, animals and food (2011-2018) in Germany. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:80. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00080
46. Rebelo AR, Bortolaia V, Kjeldgaard JS, et al. Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance determinants, mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4 and mcr-5 for surveillance purposes. Euro Surveill. 2018;23(6). doi:10.2807/1560-7917.Es.2018.23.6.17-00672
47. Chen L, Chen ZL, Liu JH, et al. Emergence of RmtB methylase-producing Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae isolates from pigs in China. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59(5):880–885. doi:10.1093/jac/dkm065
48. Antipov D, Korobeynikov A, McLean JS, et al. HybridSPAdes: an algorithm for hybrid assembly of short and long reads. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(7):1009–1015. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv688
49. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, et al. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(6):e1005595. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595
50. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112963. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112963
51. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–2069. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153
52. Alikhan NF, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, et al. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics. 2011;12(1):402. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-402
53. Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(7):1009–1010. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039
54. Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, et al. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol. 2014;15(11):524. doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0524-x
55. Xie J, Chen Y, Cai G, et al. Tree visualization by one table (tvBOT): a web application for visualizing, modifying and annotating phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(W1):W587–w592. doi:10.1093/nar/gkad359
56. Liu MC, Jian Z, Liu W, et al. One Health Analysis of mcr -Carrying Plasmids and Emergence of mcr-10.1 in Three Species of Klebsiella Recovered from Humans in China. Microbiol Spect. 2022;10(6):e0230622. doi:10.1128/spectrum.02306-22
57. Xu L, Wan F, Fu H, et al. Emergence of colistin resistance gene mcr-10 in Enterobacterales isolates recovered from fecal samples of chickens, slaughter house workers, and a nearby resident. Microbiol Spect. 2022;10(2):e0041822. doi:10.1128/spectrum.00418-22
58. Xu T, Zhang C, Ji Y, et al. Identification of mcr-10 carried by self-transmissible plasmids and chromosome in Enterobacter roggenkampii strains isolated from hospital sewage water. Environ Pollut. 2021;268(Pt B):115706. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115706
59. Yin Y, Qiu L, Wang G, et al. Emergence and transmission of plasmid-mediated mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-10 in humans and companion animals. Microbiol Spect. 2022;10(5):e0209722. doi:10.1128/spectrum.02097-22
60. Zhang S, Sun H, Lao G, et al. Identification of mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-10 in disinfectant and antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli from disinfected tableware. Antibiotics. 2022;11(7):883. doi:10.3390/antibiotics11070883
61. Guan J, Li L, Zheng L, et al. First report of the colistin resistance gene mcr-10.1 carried by IncpA1763-KPC plasmid pSL12517-mcr10.1 in Enterobacter cloacae in Sierra Leone. Microbiol Spect. 2022;10(4):e0112722. doi:10.1128/spectrum.01127-22
62. Liao W, Cui Y, Quan J, et al. High prevalence of colistin resistance and mcr-9/10 genes in Enterobacter spp. in a tertiary hospital over a decade. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2022;59(5):106573. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106573
63. Zhou H, Wang S, Wu Y, et al. Carriage of the mcr-9 and mcr-10 genes in clinical strains of the Enterobacter cloacae complex in China: a prevalence and molecular epidemiology study. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2022;60(4):106645. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106645
64. Caltagirone M, Nucleo E, Spalla M, et al. Occurrence of extended spectrum β-Lactamases, KPC-Type, and MCR-1.2-Producing Enterobacteriaceae from wells, river water, and wastewater treatment plants in Oltrepò Pavese Area, Northern Italy. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2232. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02232
65. Hayashi W, Tanaka H, Taniguchi Y, et al. Acquisition of mcr-1 and cocarriage of virulence genes in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from municipal wastewater influents in Japan. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85(22). doi:10.1128/aem.01661-19
66. Jin L, Wang R, Wang X, et al. Emergence of mcr-1 and carbapenemase genes in hospital sewage water in Beijing, China. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(1):84–87. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx355
67. Lekunberri I, Balcázar JL, Borrego CM. Detection and quantification of the plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene conferring colistin resistance in wastewater. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50(6):734–736. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.08.018
68. Wang X, Li L, Sun F, et al. Detection of mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli in slaughterhouse wastewater collected from Dawen river. Vet Med Sci. 2021;7(5):1587–1592. doi:10.1002/vms3.489
69. Furlan JPR, Lopes R, Ramos MS, et al. Colistin-resistant mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli ST1775-H137 co-harboring blaCTX-M-2 and blaCMY-2 recovered from an urban stream. Infect Genet Evol. 2021;96:105156. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105156
70. Lu X, Zhang P, Du P, et al. Prevalence and genomic characteristics of mcr-positive Escherichia coli strains isolated from humans, pigs, and foods in China. Microbiol Spect. 2023;11(3):e0456922. doi:10.1128/spectrum.04569-22
71. Shen Y, Wu Z, Wang Y, et al. Heterogeneous and flexible transmission of mcr-1 in hospital-associated Escherichia coli. mBio. 2018;9(4). doi:10.1128/mBio.00943-18
72. Song Y, Wang Z, Wang C, et al. An urban soil environmental E. coli ST354 isolate co-harbouring mcr-1 and blaNDM-9. J Global Antimicrob Resist. 2022;29:173–175. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2022.03.011
73. Wang Y, Xu C, Zhang R, et al. Changes in colistin resistance and mcr-1 abundance in Escherichia coli of animal and human origins following the ban of colistin-positive additives in China: an epidemiological comparative study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(10):1161–1171. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30149-3
74. He QW, Xu XH, Lan FJ, et al. Molecular characteristic of mcr-1 producing Escherichia coli in a Chinese university hospital. Ann Clinic Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017;16(1):32. doi:10.1186/s12941-017-0207-z
75. Xia S, Wang W, Cheng J, et al. Emergence of a novel hybrid mcr-1-bearing plasmid in an NDM-7-producing ST167 Escherichia coli strain of clinical origin. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:950087. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.950087
76. Xu L, Wang P, Cheng J, et al. Characterization of a novel bla NDM-5-harboring IncFII plasmid and an mcr-1-bearing IncI2 plasmid in a single Escherichia coli ST167 clinical isolate. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:511–519. doi:10.2147/idr.S192998
77. Sánchez-Benito R, Iglesias MR, Quijada NM, et al. Escherichia coli ST167 carrying plasmid mobilisable mcr-1 and blaCTX-M-15 resistance determinants isolated from a human respiratory infection. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50(2):285–286. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.05.005
78. Nukui Y, Ayibieke A, Taniguchi M, et al. Whole-genome analysis of EC129, an NDM-5-, CTX-M-14-, OXA-10- and MCR-1-co-producing Escherichia coli ST167 strain isolated from Japan. J Global Antimicrob Resist. 2019;18:148–150. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.001
79. Loucif L, Chelaghma W, Cherak Z, et al. Detection of NDM-5 and MCR-1 antibiotic resistance encoding genes in Enterobacterales in long-distance migratory bird species Ciconia ciconia, Algeria. Sci Total Environ. 2022;814:152861. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152861
80. Liu JH, Liu YY, Shen YB, et al. Plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance genes: mcr. Trends Microbiol. 2024;32(4):365–378. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2023.10.006
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.