Back to Journals » International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease » Volume 20

Factors Associated with Initial Treatment Failure in Inpatients with Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cohort Study

Authors Kohyama N , Hirai K , Sagara H , Sato MT , Ohbayashi M , Kogo M

Received 10 January 2025

Accepted for publication 27 June 2025

Published 10 July 2025 Volume 2025:20 Pages 2349—2360

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S516855

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jill Ohar



Noriko Kohyama,1 Kuniaki Hirai,2 Hironori Sagara,2 Miki Takenaka Sato,1 Masayuki Ohbayashi,1 Mari Kogo1

1Division of Pharmacotherapeutics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Showa Medical University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan; 2Division of Allergology and Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Showa Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence: Noriko Kohyama, Division of Pharmacotherapeutics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Showa Medical University School of Pharmacy, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan, Tel +81-3-3784-8221, Fax +81-3-3784-3838, Email [email protected]

Purpose: Some patients do not respond to initial therapy for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD), resulting in treatment failure that requires antimicrobial changes or advanced therapies. Appropriate treatment is possible if patients at a high risk of treatment failure at the start of treatment are properly identified. Therefore, this study examined the factors associated with initial treatment failure in patients with ECOPD.
Patients and Methods: We conducted a cohort study involving patients with ECOPD admitted to our hospital. The primary outcome was initial treatment failure, defined as a composite of treatment intensification for ECOPD and in-hospital mortality. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with initial treatment failure.
Results: The analysis included data of 152 patients with a mean age of 76± 8 years (mean±standard deviation); 81% of them were male patients. Treatment failure occurred in 26 (17%) patients. These included nine, two, one, and 14 patients who changed antimicrobial agents, received additional non-invasive positive pressure ventilation therapy due to non-improvement or symptom exacerbation, received additional invasive positive pressure ventilation therapy, and died in the hospital, respectively. Using multivariable analysis, home oxygen therapy (odds ratio, 5.335; 95% confidence interval, [1.542– 18.457]), neutrophil count ≥ 7000 cells/μL (3.550; [1.007– 12.519]), and acidemia (3.129; [1.009– 9.698]) were significant factors associated with treatment failure. In patients treated with narrow-spectrum antibiotics as the initial antibacterial therapy, the treatment failure rate in patients receiving home oxygen therapy was significantly higher than in those receiving none.
Conclusion: Home oxygen therapy, high neutrophil count, and acidemia on admission were risk factors for treatment failure. Particularly, patients receiving home oxygen therapy were at a higher risk of treatment failure with the use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics.

Keywords: home oxygen therapy, acidemia, neutrophils, antibacterial

Introduction

Exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD), such as symptom enhancement, requires additional treatment for stable management. ECOPD requiring hospitalization occurs in 15–31% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).1,2 The in-hospital mortality of patients with ECOPD is 2.6–20.1%;3 therefore, ECOPD requiring hospitalization has a poor prognosis.

Antimicrobials, bronchodilators, and steroids are the basic treatments of ECOPD. However, cases wherein initial treatment is unsuccessful exist. In such cases, antimicrobial agents may need to be changed, advanced medical care such as ventilation or intensive care unit (ICU) management may be required, or death in hospital might occur. Initial treatment failure rates are 10% and 15% at the three- and seven-day admission assessments, respectively.4,5 If patients at a high risk of initial treatment failure are identified at the start of initial treatment, they may be able to receive appropriate treatments.

Many studies have reported on factors and comorbidities associated with in-hospital mortality during ECOPD and readmission.3,6 Various outcomes have been used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment in patients with ECOPD.7 The composite outcome of intensified treatment, including antimicrobial change and ventilatory management, and in-hospital mortality is a high consensus outcome for determining the effectiveness of treating ECOPD.8,9 Research using the composite outcome can reveal factors that affect the effectiveness of initial treatment as well as the factors causing death, leading to improved treatment of ECOPD. However, few reports have examined the factors associated with the composite outcome of antimicrobial changes, ventilatory management, and in-hospital mortality after the initial treatment of hospitalized patients with ECOPD.5

Therefore, to select patients at a high risk of treatment failure at the start of initial treatment, this study examined the factors associated with initial treatment failure in patients hospitalized for ECOPD.

Methods

Study Design

This study is a cohort study based on a review of medical records and an exploratory analysis of risk factors.

Patients

This observational study enrolled patients diagnosed with ECOPD who were admitted to the Department of Allergology and Respiratory Medicine at Showa Medical University Hospital between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019. Respiratory specialists diagnosed patients with COPD and ECOPD according to the Japanese Respiratory Society Guidelines for the Management of COPD.10 The diagnostic criteria for COPD included exposure factors such as long-term smoking, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity ratio <0.7, and exclusion of other diseases that might cause airflow obstruction.10,11 ECOPD is characterized by increased shortness of breath, cough, and sputum production, and appearance or intensification of chest discomfort, which requires a change in therapy.10,11 The exclusion criteria were patients admitted owing to treatment of lung cancer, patients hospitalized for less than one day, patients transferred from another hospital after initial inpatient treatment of ECOPD, patients whose primary treatment during hospitalization was of heart failure and severe infection such as sepsis.

Ethics

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Showa Medical University School of Pharmacy, Japan (No.: 373), which waived the requirement for informed consent owing to the nature of the study. The patients were informed on the website of the Showa Medical University Hospital that they could opt out of using their data for research purposes. To protect personal information, it was processed so that individuals could not be identified and then used appropriately for research.

Treatment

Respiratory specialists treated patients during hospitalization for ECOPD according to the Japanese Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of COPD,10 based on the ABC approach using antibacterial agents, bronchodilators, and corticosteroids.

Data Collection

The following patient information was collected from medical records: age, sex, body weight, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, pack-year, comorbidities (bronchiectasis, heart failure, diabetes, and asthma), FEV1 (% predicted), global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) grade (GOLD 1: FEV1 ≥80%, GOLD 2:79% ≥FEV1 ≥50%, GOLD 3:49% ≥FEV1 ≥ 30%, GOLD 4:30% >FEV1),11 hospitalization due to ECOPD in the previous year, and treatment received for stable phase COPD (home oxygen therapy, inhaled corticosteroid, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and long-acting β2-agonist). Asthma was diagnosed according to the guidelines.12 Comorbidities included those diagnosed at other hospitals.

The following patient data were also collected at admission: dyspnea, respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, body temperature, SpO2, arterial blood gas analysis data (pH, PaCO2, PaO2, HCO3), and blood test results (white blood cell, eosinophil, neutrophil, lymphocyte counts, hemoglobin, albumin, C-reactive protein, glucose, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, blood urea nitrogen, sodium, potassium, and chloride levels).

The data obtained during hospitalization included the treatment received for ECOPD (antibiotics, bronchodilators, corticosteroids, and mechanical ventilation), admission to intensive care unit, and length of hospital stay. The initial dose of corticosteroids and increase in corticosteroids dose were collected. The dose of corticosteroids was expressed in prednisone equivalents, as follows: prednisone (4 mg) = methylprednisone (5 mg) = hydrocortisone (20 mg) = betamethasone (0.6 mg).13

Outcome

The primary outcome was initial treatment failure, which was defined as a composite of treatment intensification for ECOPD and in-hospital mortality. Initial treatment was defined as treatment of ECOPD initiated within 24 h after admission. Therapy intensification was defined as a switch from narrow-spectrum antibiotics to broad-spectrum antibiotics and addition of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NPPV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IPPV) because of non-improvement in exacerbation symptoms. Narrow-spectrum antibiotics, including intravenous ceftriaxone, levofloxacin, and sulbactam/ampicillin, were defined as the recommended antimicrobial agents for mild cases during inpatient treatment.14 Broad-spectrum antibiotics, intravenous tazobactam/piperacillin, meropenem, doripenem, cefepime, and ceftazidime, were defined as the recommended antimicrobial agents for severe cases.14 Increase in corticosteroids dose was not included in the treatment failure because the patient characteristics were considered different.

Statistical Analysis

Sample Size

We calculated that the required sample size was 131 patients to detect an odds ratio (OR) of 2.0, with 80% power at a significance level of 0.05, using a logistic regression model15 and assuming an initial treatment failure rate of 15% based on a previous study.5

Definitions

Continuous variables were categorized based on the clinical definitions. Based on the World Health Organization definition, patients were allocated into two groups according to the cutoff values for BMI (underweight, 18.5 kg/m2) and hemoglobin levels (anemia, <13 g/dL in men and <12 g/dL in women). Based on the definition of the phenotype marker of ECOPD, the patients were categorized into two groups according to the cutoff eosinophil and neutrophil counts of 2% and 7000 cells/μL, respectively.16 Based on the other blood test results, the patients were divided into two or three groups according to the upper and/or lower limit of the reference range for clinical laboratory values established by the Japanese Committee For Clinical Laboratory Standards.17 Patients were divided into two groups based on median age (77 years).

Risk Factors of Initial Treatment Failure

Continuous data are expressed as mean±standard deviation or median (min-max), and categorical data are expressed as numbers and percentages. Categorical variables were compared between patients with and without treatment failure using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using the significant factors from the univariate analysis. No correlations were found between these factors. A stepwise selection method was used for identifying the factors associated with initial treatment failure in patients with ECOPD. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software version 28 (IBM, Tokyo, Japan). Missing values were not imputed.

Relationship Between Antimicrobial Agents and the Risk Factors

To gain an insight into the selection of antimicrobial agents, we assessed the factors contributing to treatment failure for each type of antimicrobial agent used for the initial treatment. Antimicrobial agents were classified into two categories: narrow- and broad-spectrum. We stratified patients according to the type of antimicrobial agent they received and evaluated the association between the factors of treatment failure determined by multivariate analysis and outcomes using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Patients

Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. Ten patients were excluded from the 162 patients; data of 152 patients were included in the final analysis (Figure 1). The mean age was 76±8 years, and 123 (81%) were male patients. The rates of patients with bronchiectasis, heart failure, diabetes, and asthma were 2%, 16%, 20%, and 23%, respectively. Patients with GOLD grade 3 or higher were 82 (61%). Thirty-five cases (23%) had a history of hospitalization for ECOPD within the past year. Fifty-five (36%) patients were treated with home oxygen therapy for stable-phase COPD. The mean pH and neutrophil count were 7.383±0.103 and 8.2±4.7 (×10³ cells/μL), respectively. As an initial treatment of ECOPD, 135 (89%), 144 (95%), and 138 (91%) patients received antibacterial agents, bronchodilators, and corticosteroids, respectively. All patients received antimicrobials, bronchodilators, or corticosteroids.

Table 1 Characteristics of Hospitalized Patients with Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (ECOPD)

Figure 1 Study population flowchart.

Outcome

Treatment failure occurred in 26 patients (17%), comprising nine, two, one, and 14 patients who changed their antimicrobial agents, received additional NPPV, received additional IPPV, and died during hospitalization, respectively (Table 2). The median time to treatment failure was 8 days (range, 1–58), and the median length of hospital stay was 11 days (range, 1–163). Of the 138 patients, four patients required an increase in corticosteroid dose on the second, fourth, fifth, and ninth days, respectively. Two of these four patients died in hospital.

Table 2 Clinical Outcomes of Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (ECOPD) Evaluated During Hospitalization

Comparison Between Patients with and without Treatment Failure

Table 3 compares the characteristics of patients with and without treatment failure. The rates of patients with low BMI (58% vs 33%, P=0.017), history of hospitalization due to ECOPD within one-year (42% vs 19%, P=0.010), home oxygen therapy for stable phase of COPD (65% vs 30%, P=0.001), acidemia (52% vs 26%, P=0.014), hypercarbia (71% vs 44%, P=0.018), high neutrophil count (77% vs 51%, P=0.015), low hemoglobin (62% vs 36%, P=0.017), low albumin (50% vs 28%, P=0.037), high K (20% vs 7%, P=0.044), and low Cl levels (73% vs 51%, P=0.038) were significantly higher in the non-treatment failure group than that in the treatment failure group. Bronchiectasis, heart failure, diabetes, asthma, and COPD severity were not significantly associated with treatment failure.

Table 3 Comparison of Patient Characteristics Between Hospitalized Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (ECOPD) Patients with Treatment Failure and Without Treatment Failure

Risk Factors of Initial Treatment Failure

Logistic regression analysis revealed that the factors for initial treatment failure were home oxygen therapy for stable phase COPD (OR, 5.335; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.542–18.457; P=0.008), high neutrophil count (≥7000 cells/µL) (OR, 3.550; 95% CI, 1.007–12.519; P=0.049), and acidemia (OR, 3.129; 95% CI, 1.009–9.698’; P=0.048) (Table 4).

Table 4 Multivariable Analysis of Risk Factors for Treatment Failure for the Initial Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (ECOPD)

Relationship Between Antimicrobial Agents and the Risk Factors

Overall, the type of antimicrobial agent used during the initial treatment was not significantly associated with treatment failure (Table 3). In the patient population treated with narrow-spectrum antibiotics as the initial antibacterial therapy, the treatment failure rate in those receiving home oxygen therapy was significantly higher than that in participants receiving none (69% vs 24%, P<0.001) (Table 5). In patients using broad-spectrum antibiotics, neutrophil count (≥7000 cells/μL) was significantly associated with treatment failure (Table 5). Furthermore, patients using home-based oxygen therapy tended to switch from narrow- to broad-spectrum antibiotics (Table 6).

Table 5 Relationship Between Antimicrobial Agents and the Risk Factors

Table 6 Relationship Between the Risk Factors and Antibiotics Change in the Narrow-Spectrum Antibiotics Group

Discussion

In this study, we found that the home oxygen therapy for stable phase COPD, high neutrophil count (≥7000 cells/µL), and acidemia were factors associated with initial treatment failure in patients with ECOPD requiring hospitalization. Particularly, patients receiving home oxygen therapy are at a higher risk of treatment failure with the use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to identify the factors associated with the composite outcome of antimicrobial change, intensified therapy, and in-hospital mortality. These factors may be indicators for selecting patients at high risk of treatment failure at the start of initial treatment. Treatment considering the possibility of treatment failure might lead to promptly intensified therapy in patients with these factors.

Home oxygen therapy is used in patients with COPD whose respiratory function has declined to a stable level and who have hypoxemia. The presence or absence of home oxygen therapy can be confirmed even in patients transported to the emergency room, and this information is objective and does not depend of the patient’s subjective complaints. In this study, home oxygen therapy was associated with hypercarbonemia at admission (r=0.37, P<0.0001). Therefore, patients receiving home oxygen therapy might have died or required further treatment after the initial therapy due to their impaired respiratory function during the stable phase and the severity of exacerbations. The use of long-term oxygen therapy was reported to be approximately twice as common in the group of patients who died in the hospital as in those who survived,18 which is consistent with the results of this study. Therefore, the presence or absence of home-based oxygen therapy is a versatile and useful indicator for treatment failure, including in-hospital mortality.

A cause of neutrophilia is bacterial infection. Among patients with severe ECOPD requiring hospitalization, those with neutrophilia have higher rates of ICU admission and in-hospital mortality than do those with eosinophilia.19 In this study, the in-hospital mortality rate was also higher in patients with neutrophilia than in those with eosinophilia (18.3% [15/82] vs 3.8% [1/26]). Additionally, in patients with ECOPD, the higher the neutrophil count was, the lower the FEV1 and the more severe the disease were.20 Thus, patients with bacterial infections were likely to develop severe disease with reduced respiratory function and may have bad outcomes after the initial treatment.

Acidemia reflects ECOPD severity. In addition to chronic respiratory dysfunction, acidemia represents a condition that is not covered by renal compensation, either because of severe hypercarbonemia due to alveolar hypoventilation triggered by infection or other factors or because of renal impairment. Acidemia is a predictor of in-hospital mortality,18 which is consistent with the results of the present study. Acidemia is also a significant factor associated with prolonged hospitalization in patients with ECOPD.6 Therefore, the presence of acidemia at admission is a versatile and useful predictor for treatment failure, including in-hospital death.

In patients receiving home oxygen plus therapy, the use of narrow-spectrum antimicrobials is associated with a high risk of treatment failure and a high likelihood of switching to broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Therefore, in patients undergoing home oxygen therapy, the risk of treatment failure may be reduced by selecting broad-spectrum antibiotics as the initial antibacterial agents. The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients with high neutrophil counts at the time of hospitalization has been associated with a higher risk of treatment failure. This may reflect the fact that broad-spectrum antibiotics are selected for the initial treatment of severely ill patients.

In this study, the outcome was defined as a composite of antimicrobial changes, intensification of therapy, and in-hospital mortality. Among patients with ECOPD requiring hospitalization, those with relatively mild illnesses or at low risk of developing a Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection received oxygen therapy, bronchodilators, and steroids, plus a narrow-range antibacterial agent as initial therapy.10,11,14 If the initial treatment was ineffective, the patient was switched to a broad-range antibacterial agent with anti-Pseudomonas activity.14 If this change or initial treatment with anti-Pseudomonas antimicrobial agents was ineffective, the patient may have required additional mechanical ventilation and ICU management,10,11 or it may have resulted in in-hospital death. Therefore, the composite outcome is an indicator for comprehensively evaluating treatment effects in patients with relatively mild-to-severe ECOPD requiring hospitalization. Owing to the need for treating patients with ECOPD of various severities, examining the factors associated with such composite outcomes is of high clinical importance. Additionally, this would allow the examination of factors influencing the therapeutic effects of the initial antimicrobial agents. In patients with these factors, treatment while considering the possibility of treatment failure will be promptly intensified. These findings are expected to improve the overall success rate of ECOPD treatments.

Although studies have examined factors associated with death during hospitalization, reports examining the factors for treatment failure in ECOPD inpatient remain limited.3 A previous study using a composite outcome was limited to the analysis of outcomes up to seven days after hospitalization based on the recommended duration of antimicrobial and steroid use.5 Contrarily, the median length of stay in patients with ECOPD has been reported to be 10–16 days.21,22 Additionally, exacerbation recurrence may occur during hospitalization, prolonging the hospital stay. Because seven days was insufficient to assess outcomes during hospitalization, the entire hospital stay was analyzed in this study.

Previous studies have reported that the coexistence of bronchiectasis, heart failure, diabetes, and asthma is associated with poor prognosis of COPD and readmission due to COPD exacerbation.6 However, in this study, these comorbidities were not significantly associated with treatment failure of the initial treatment in patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation. This difference in results is thought to be due to differences in outcomes.

This study had three limitations. First, we did not assess whether self-reported symptoms during the stable phase or disease grade were associated with treatment failure. Since 10% of cases did not have GOLD grade data, we did not analyze the effect of disease grade using the multivariate analysis. Additionally, self-reported symptoms such as the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale or COPD assessment test, which are one of the predictors of in-hospital mortality during ECOPD,18 were rarely recorded in the medical records. Second, we could not adequately investigate the involvement of peripheral blood eosinophil counts. Several reports have indicated that a low eosinophil count is a predictor of in-hospital mortality.18,23 This study did not show an association between a low eosinophil count and treatment failure, which might have been influenced by the fact that the eosinophil count deficiency rate was 32%. Third, the number of patients was small. Therefore, some findings might have been mere coincidences. Further research is needed to develop predictive model and apply findings of this study in clinical practice.

Conclusion

This study identified home oxygen therapy for stable phase COPD, acidemia, and high neutrophil count (≥7000 cells/µL) at admission as factors of treatment failure for the initial treatment in hospitalized patients with ECOPD. These factors may be indicators for selecting patients at high risk of treatment failure at the start of initial treatment. Additionally, in patients undergoing home-based oxygen therapy, the risk of treatment failure may be reduced by selecting broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents as the initial treatment. Large-scale prospective studies are required to validate these findings.

Abbreviations

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; ECOPD, exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; ICU, intensive care unit; IPPV, invasive mechanical ventilation; NPPV, non-invasive mechanical ventilation; OR, odds ratio.

Data Sharing Statement

Data supporting the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available because of privacy and ethical restrictions.

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Showa Medical University School of Pharmacy.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Yuko Inoue, Erika Iwasaki, and Natsuki Ihara for their efforts in collecting and analyzing the data.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception, study design, and interpretation of data. NK performed material preparation, data collection, and analysis. NK wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript, agreed with the journal to which the article has been submitted, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

There is no funding to report.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Landis SH, Muellerova H, Mannino DM, et al. Continuing to confront COPD international patient survey: methods, COPD prevalence, and disease burden in 2012-2013. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;9:597–611. doi:10.2147/COPD.S61854

2. Müllerova H, Maselli DJ, Locantore N, et al. Hospitalized exacerbations of COPD: risk factors and outcomes in the Eclipse cohort. Chest. 2015;147(4):999–1007. doi:10.1378/chest.14-0655

3. Huang Q, He C, Xiong H, et al. DECAF score as a mortality predictor for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10):e037923. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037923

4. Soler N, Esperatti M, Ewig S, Huerta A, Agustí C, Torres A. Sputum purulence-guided antibiotic use in hospitalised patients with exacerbations of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2012;40(6):1344–1353. doi:10.1183/09031936.00150211

5. Crisafulli E, Torres A, Huerta A, et al. Predicting in-hospital treatment failure (≤7 days) in patients with COPD exacerbation using antibiotics and systemic steroids. COPD. 2016;13(1):82–92. doi:10.3109/15412555.2015.1057276

6. Mantero M, Rogliani P, Di Pasquale M, et al. Acute exacerbations of COPD: risk factors for failure and relapse. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:2687–2693. doi:10.2147/COPD.S145253

7. Mathioudakis AG, Moberg M, Janner J, Alonso-Coello P, Vestbo J. Outcomes reported on the management of COPD exacerbations: a systematic survey of randomised controlled trials. ERJ Open Res. 2019;5(2):00072–2019. doi:10.1183/23120541.00072-2019

8. Suehs CM, Zysman M, Chenivesse C, et al. Prioritising outcomes for evaluating eosinophil-guided corticosteroid therapy among patients with acute COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalisation: a Delphi consensus study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e035811. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035811

9. Li QY, An ZY, Pan ZH, Qi RY. Rationale and design of REGULATE: an observational study protocol for relationship between plasma metabolome and the efficacy of systemic glucocorticoid in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21(1):250. doi:10.1186/s12890-021-01614-3

10. The japanese respiratory society. The JRS guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2022, 6th edition, Tokyo: Medical Review, 2022. Available from: https://www.jrs.or.jp/publication/file/COPD6_20220726.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2025. Japanese.

11. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) scientific committee. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; 2022 report. Available from: http://www.goldcopd.com. Accessed January 31, 2022.

12. Nakamura Y, Tamaoki J, Nagase H, et al. Japanese Society of Allergology. Japanese guidelines for adult asthma 2020. Allergol Int. 2020;69(4):519–548. doi:10.1016/j.alit.2020.08.001

13. Liu D, Ahmet A, Ward L, et al. A practical guide to the monitoring and management of the complications of systemic corticosteroid therapy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013;9(1):30. doi:10.1186/1710-1492-9-30

14. Mikasa K, Aoki N, Aoki Y, et al. JAID/JSC guidelines for the treatment of respiratory infectious diseases: the Japanese association for infectious diseases/Japanese society of chemotherapy – the JAID/JSC guide to clinical management of infectious disease/guideline-preparing committee respiratory infectious disease WG. J Infect Chemother. 2016;22(7)(suppl):S1–S65. doi:10.1016/j.jiac.2015.12.019

15. Hsieh FY, Bloch DA, Larsen MD. A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regression. Stat Med. 1998;17(14):1623–1634. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980730)17:14<1623::aid-sim871>3.0.co;2-s

16. Kandemir Y, Doğan NÖ, Yaka E, Pekdemir M, Yılmaz S. Clinical characteristics of neutrophilic, eosinophilic and mixed-type exacerbation phenotypes of COPD. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;45:237–241. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.044

17. Ichihara K, Yomamoto Y, Hotta T, et al. Collaborative derivation of reference intervals for major clinical laboratory tests in Japan. Ann Clin Biochem. 2016;53(3):347–356. doi:10.1177/0004563215608875

18. Steer J, Gibson J, Bourke SC. The DECAF Score: predicting hospital mortality in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2012;67(11):970–976. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202103

19. Kang HS, Rhee CK, Kim SK, et al. Comparison of the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients requiring hospital admission to treat eosinophilic and neutrophilic exacerbations of COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:2467–2473. doi:10.2147/COPD.S116072

20. Papi A, Bellettato CM, Braccioni F, et al. Infections and airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severe exacerbations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173(10):1114–1121. doi:10.1164/rccm.200506-859OC

21. Montagnani A, Mathieu G, Pomero F, et al. Hospitalization and mortality for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an Italian population-based study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(12):6899–6907. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202006_21681

22. Hasegawa W, Yamauchi Y, Yasunaga H, et al. Factors affecting mortality following emergency admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:151. doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-151

23. Holland M, Alkhalil M, Chandromouli S, Janjua A, Babores M. Eosinopenia as a marker of mortality and length of stay in patients admitted with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology. 2010;15(1):165–167. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01651.x

Creative Commons License © 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.