Back to Journals » Risk Management and Healthcare Policy » Volume 17
Fall Prevention in Older Adults: Insights from Saudi Arabian Physical Therapists on the Otago Exercise Program
Authors Alsaleh HM, Alsaad SM , Alabdulwahab SS , Vennu V , Bindawas SM
Received 23 September 2024
Accepted for publication 26 October 2024
Published 4 November 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 2689—2703
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S495695
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Jongwha Chang
Hussam M Alsaleh,1,2 Saad M Alsaad,3 Sami S Alabdulwahab,1 Vishal Vennu,1 Saad M Bindawas1,4
1Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2Department of Physical Therapy, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 3Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4King Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Correspondence: Saad M Bindawas, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966114696226, Email [email protected]
Purpose: Falls among older adults are a growing public health concern in Saudi Arabia. The Otago Exercise Program (OEP) is an evidence-based intervention aimed at reducing fall risk in this population. This study assessed the knowledge and attitudes of Saudi Arabian physical therapists toward the OEP and examined potential gender-based differences.
Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between November 2023 and April 2024, involving 120 licensed physical therapists from Saudi Arabia, recruited via Email and social media. The survey captured sociodemographic data, knowledge, and attitudes regarding the OEP. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Cramér’s V to assess the strength of associations, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.
Results: Most physical therapists reported knowledge of the OEP’s clinical effectiveness (36.7%), cultural compatibility (35.0%), and fall prevention benefits (28.3%). Gender was not significantly associated with knowledge of clinical effectiveness (χ² = 3.84, p = 0.57), contraindications (χ² = 4.44, p = 0.48), cost-effectiveness (χ² = 4.15, p = 0.52), or fall prevention in older adults (χ² = 2.44, p = 0.78), with moderate effect sizes observed (Cramer’s V = 0.233 to 0.467). Attitudes toward the OEP were generally positive, with 51.7% supporting its use in regular aging care and 45.0% expressing confidence in delivering the program. There were no significant gender differences in understanding the OEP’s recommendations (χ² = 7.45, p = 0.11) or confidence in program delivery (χ² = 7.62, p = 0.10), although strong association effects were noted (Cramer’s V = 0.696 and 0.680, respectively).
Conclusion: This study highlights the strong knowledge and positive attitudes of Saudi physical therapists toward the OEP, underscoring its potential for integration into national healthcare strategies to improve geriatric care and reduce fall-related risks. The findings emphasize the importance of continuous professional development to address knowledge gaps and optimize the implementation of evidence-based fall prevention programs.
Keywords: healthcare policy, risk reduction, fall prevention, physical therapists, older adults, Saudi Arabia
Introduction
The global population is experiencing a significant demographic shift, with projections indicating that one in six people will be 60 years or older by 2030, and this number is expected to reach 2.1 billion by 2050.1 In Saudi Arabia, this demographic shift is even more pronounced, with ten million people projected to be over 60, including 1.6 million over 80, by 2050.2 This aging population is accompanied by an increase in aging-related conditions, including a significant rise in fall-related incidents among older adults.3,4
Falls are a major public health concern for older adults in Saudi Arabia.2 Studies indicate that approximately 21% of the elderly population in Riyadh experience falls annually,5 highlighting the need for targeted interventions to reduce fall risk and improve elderly care.6,7 The World Health Organization (WHO) defines a fall as “an event which results in a person coming to rest inadvertently on the ground or floor or other lower level”.8 Falls can lead to serious outcomes such as fractures, brain injuries, and loss of muscular strength and physical function.9 These injuries can be fatal or non-fatal, with older adults particularly vulnerable to severe consequences from falls.10 A recent comprehensive analysis of the trends in the incidence, prevalence, and disability burden of falls among older adults in Saudi Arabia from 1990 to 2019 highlighted a significant increase in fall-related incidents and associated disabilities, underscoring the urgent need for effective fall prevention strategies.11
Evidence suggests that balance and strength exercises, particularly in public parks,12 can significantly reduce fall risk by up to 42%, making them an effective fall prevention intervention.13,14 There is also recent evidence that using artificial intelligence to analyze fall risk data has proven to be an effective method for developing fall risk prediction models.15 The Otago Exercise Program (OEP) is one such intervention that has demonstrated significant success in reducing falls among frail older adults,16–18 with studies showing a 35–40% reduction in fall rates.19,20 The OEP involves a structured program of exercises tailored to improve strength, flexibility, balance, and mobility, delivered through home visits and monthly follow-up calls by physical therapists (PTs).20–22
Despite the proven efficacy of the OEP, there has been no research examining the knowledge, attitudes, and gender disparities among PTs regarding this program in Saudi Arabia.23 Gender differences in PT perceptions are influenced by clinical practices, decision-making, and healthcare approaches,24,25 especially in culturally diverse contexts like Saudi Arabia, where social norms and gender roles shape professional behavior. Thus, understanding PTs’ perspectives is crucial for effective implementation and scaling of the OEP across the country. This study addresses a critical gap by providing the first comprehensive assessment of PTs’ knowledge and attitudes toward the OEP in the country.23 We hypothesized that PTs possess a strong, positive attitude toward the OEP, with varying levels of knowledge, independent of gender differences. The findings from this study will contribute to improving the implementation of the OEP, enhancing fall prevention strategies, and ultimately improving the quality of life and independence of the older population in Saudi Arabia.
Materials and Methods
Study Design
A cross-sectional survey design was utilized, employing convenience sampling to recruit participants.
Participants
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Licensed physical therapists working in Saudi Arabia were included in the study. Students and non-physical therapists were excluded to ensure data accuracy and relevance.
Recruitment Process
Participants were recruited through targeted Email campaigns and professional social media platforms. They were invited to complete an online survey (Supplementary Table 1) and encouraged to share it within their professional networks. This approach aligns with established recruitment strategies in similar studies.26
Sample Size Determination
The Saudi Commission for Health Specialties reported 8681 registered PTs in Saudi Arabia as of 2022. Using Steven K. Thompson’s formula for finite population corrections, we determined a sample size of 120 respondents, assuming a 50% response proportion, a 5% margin of error, and a 95% confidence level.27
Data Collection
Findings of the Pilot Phase: Validity and Reliability
To evaluate the validity and reliability of the survey instrument, a pilot study was conducted with physiotherapists holding postgraduate qualifications and over seven years of experience in geriatric care. The pilot testing included two phases. First, a panel of four experts reviewed the survey to ensure comprehensive content coverage, establishing content validity. This evaluation confirmed that all items and response options were clear, comprehensible, and aligned with the study objectives. Face validity was subsequently assessed to confirm the clarity and appropriateness of the instrument for the target population.
After conducting a qualitative assessment for validity, the survey’s reliability was evaluated quantitatively. The knowledge and attitude scales demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.98 and 0.97, respectively, indicating strong internal reliability. Test-retest reliability was assessed by having 30 participants retake the survey after a two-week interval, yielding ICCs of 0.93 for the knowledge scale and 0.92 for the attitude scale, demonstrating strong stability over time. These findings suggest that our instrument is both valid and reliable, aligning with established guidelines recommending pilot phases to ensure validity and reliability, consistent with similar studies.28–30
Distribution and Data Collection Process
The finalized survey was divided into three sections: Section A (14 items) on sociodemographic information, Section B (15 items) on knowledge of the OEP, and Section C (13 items) on attitudes toward the OEP. Each item in sections provided multiple response options on a Likert scale. The survey was distributed via Google Forms, including detailed data storage guidelines and a study summary. Participants answered preliminary questions on eligibility and consent. For every participant, the survey sections A, B, and C were consistently arranged for all participants. All responses were collected anonymously between November 2023 and April 2024, with participants having the option to contact the research team for further information.
Variables
Description of Socio-Demographic Variables
The sociodemographic section (A) of the survey included items on age, gender, region, type of healthcare facility, highest educational qualification, and years of experience.
Knowledge and Attitude Measures
Sections B and C of the survey assessed the knowledge and attitudes of PTs regarding the OEP, using a Likert scale to capture responses.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, including means, standard deviations, frequencies, and percentages. Inferential analyses were conducted to test hypotheses and explore relationships between variables. Chi-square tests were used to analyze differences in knowledge and attitudes between male and female PTs, with a significance threshold set at 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 24 (IBM, SPSS Inc., NY, USA). The Cramer’s V effect size has been calculated corresponding to that specific chi-square test using the following formula:
Where X2, N, and k are the chis-square statistics, the total sample size, and the number of categories for the variable with the fewest categories, respectively. Cramer’s V has been interpreted as weakly, moderately, and strongly associated if the effect size is <0.2, 0.2 – ≤ 0.6, and > 0.6, respectively.31 The heatmap visualization was generated using Microsoft Excel 365 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA), employing conditional formatting to illustrate data variability and trends across the combination of Knowledge (15 items) and Attitudes (13 items) regarding OEP among PTs.
Results
Characteristics of the Participants
Table 1 provides a summary of the demographic characteristics of the survey respondents. The survey comprised 120 Saudi nationals, with a gender distribution of 57.5% male and 42.5% female participants. A predominant portion of the participants, accounting for 60%, were within the age range of 25 to 34 years, and 46.7% primarily resided in the central region. Employment settings were diverse, with a substantial number employed in public hospitals (44.2%), followed by those in military facilities (22.5%), universities (12.5%), and private healthcare establishments (15.8%). The highest level of educational attainment reported was a bachelor’s degree (49.2%), with a notable percentage (35.8%) possessing a master’s degree. The most prevalent subspecialty among respondents was general physical therapy (32.5%), and nearly half (49.2%) were engaged in both inpatient and outpatient settings.
![]() |
Table 1 Demographic Characteristics of Survey Respondents |
Knowledge of PTs About the OEP
The survey findings provide a comprehensive overview of the knowledge of PTs regarding OEP, with gender-based responses detailed in Table 2. Approximately 36.7% of the PTs reported being knowledgeable about the clinical effectiveness of OEP in older adults, while 32.5% expressed confidence in understanding how to use the OEP. Additionally, 35% of PTs agreed that OEP is culturally appropriate for the Saudi population and 43.3% acknowledged its benefits for fall prevention. About 30.8% of PTs were aware of potential adverse effects, while 19.2% remained neutral. Furthermore, 47.5% of the PTs recognized the effectiveness of the OEP in improving balance and 48.4% understood its role in reducing the risks of falls among older adults. In particular, 31.7% of the PTs agreed with the suitability of the OEP for different age groups and 31.6% were familiar with settings beyond rehabilitation hospitals where the OEP could be implemented. On the contrary, 40% of the PTs disagreed that OEP could be performed without strength exercises and 36.6% reported knowing about telerehabilitation as a delivery method for OEP.
![]() |
Table 2 Knowledge Regarding the OEP Among PTs, Gender-Based Responses |
A chi-square independence test revealed no significant associations between gender and knowledge of the clinical effectiveness of OEP, X2 (1, N = 136) = 3.84, p = 0.57, suitability for the Saudi population, X²(1, N = 136) = 5.12, p = 0.40, and knowledge of contraindications, X²(1, N = 136) = 4.44, p = 0.48. Similarly, there were no significant gender differences in awareness of adverse effects, X²(1, N = 136) = 3.22, p = 0.66, understanding of cost-effectiveness, X²(1, N = 136) = 4.15, p = 0.52, or knowledge of the reduction of fall risk, X2 (1, N = 136) = 2.44, p = 0.78.
Table 2 presents the gender-based analysis of the responses of the PTs in various domains of the OEP, including its effectiveness, implementation, and potential challenges. No significant differences were found between male and female PTs in all areas of knowledge examined. The effect sizes ranged from 0.1 to 0.4.
Figure 1 provides a heat map that illustrates PT responses in different knowledge items, highlighting key areas such as clinical effectiveness, fall prevention, and suitability for different contexts. The highest rates of agreement were observed on the benefits of fall prevention (43.3%) and clinical effectiveness (36.7%). Neutral responses were the most common for the suitability of the OEP in the Saudi population (21.7%) and the awareness of potential adverse effects (19.2%), while uncertainty persisted about the cost effectiveness of the OEP (20%) and the feasibility of performing it without strength exercises (21.7%).
![]() |
Figure 1 Heatmap of Physical Therapists’ Knowledge of the Otago Exercise Program. |
The Attitude of PTs Towards the OEP
Table 3 outlines physical therapists’ (PTs) attitudes toward the Otago Exercise Program (OEP), with a breakdown by gender. Approximately 45% of PTs agreed or strongly agreed that they were confident in providing the OEP, and 47.5% considered it safe for older adults. About 51.7% supported the use of the OEP as part of regular aging care, while 36.7% were neutral regarding their knowledge to prescribe the OEP safely. Additionally, 44.2% understood why the OEP is recommended for older adults, but 43.3% disagreed about having adequate resources to learn more. There was also considerable uncertainty (56.7%) regarding the effectiveness of telerehabilitation for OEP delivery.
![]() |
Table 3 Attitudes Toward the OEP Among Physical Therapists, Gender-Based Responses |
The chi-square test of independence revealed no significant associations between gender and attitudes, including understanding why the OEP is recommended, χ²(1, N = 136) = 7.45, p = 0.11, and confidence in delivering the OEP, χ²(1, N = 136) = 7.62, p = 0.10. Effect sizes ranged from 0.2 to 0.6, indicating varying levels of association, though none were significant.
Figure 2 presents a heatmap displaying the distribution of responses related to physical therapists’ attitudes toward OEP. Responses were categorized into Disagree, Neutral, and Agree. The highest levels of agreement were observed for supporting the OEP as part of regular aging care (51.7%) and confidence in providing the OEP (45.0%). Neutral responses were most frequent for the items related to the availability of adequate resources (43.3%) and comfort in advising patients about the OEP (40.8%). Disagreement was notable for having sufficient knowledge to prescribe the OEP (26.7%).
![]() |
Figure 2 Heatmap of Physical Therapists’ Attitudes Toward the Otago Exercise Program. |
Discussion
This study evaluated PT knowledge, attitudes, and gender differences about OEP in Saudi Arabia. The study found that most PTs were aware of the clinical efficacy of the OEP, confident in its implementation, and agreed with its cultural compatibility with the Saudi population. The majority of PTs believe OEP benefits fall prevention and remain neutral. Most PTs are aware of OEP’s accessibility, effectiveness in improving balance, and suitability for different age groups. However, nearly 20% of PTs selected “Not sure/Not applicable” for almost every statement about the knowledge of OEP. There was no significant association between gender and knowledge of clinical effectiveness, suitability, contraindications, cost-effectiveness, and ability to lower falls in older adults using the OEP. The suitability of the OEP for various age groups, understanding of potential fatigue, strength exercises, and telerehabilitation were not significantly associated with gender. However, it showed a moderately associated effect with most statements about the knowledge of OEP.
Regarding the attitude of PTs towards the OEP, the study found that the majority of PTs believe the OEP is effective in improving balance and reducing fall risk in older adults. Most PTs are confident in providing OEPs, and consider it safe. Some support OEP usage as part of regular aging care, but some have limited knowledge. Most PTs understand OEP’s importance and believe it can improve functional independence. The majority of PTs believe telerehabilitation can effectively deliver OEPs, and it is most effective when supervised by PTs. The study found no significant correlation between gender, patient comprehension of the OEP’s recommendation for older persons, and confidence in delivering the OEP, but a strong association of effect was observed.
The study supports previous research23,32 indicating the importance of understanding the effectiveness of OEP in improving balance and reducing healthcare expenses related to falls. The cost-effectiveness of the program may be the key factor in its beneficial effect.33 However, some respondents have no opinion on the cost-benefits of the OEP, possibly due to incomplete knowledge or personal experience. Practitioners may withhold their opinion due to a lack of personal knowledge or understanding of its implementation and outcomes.
The study examines the respondents’ opinions about the OEP’s applicability to different age groups. Some agreed, while others were neutral. The OEP is adaptable, allowing practitioners to adjust training regimens and age-related considerations.34 Its all-encompassing strategy targets multiple components,16 demonstrating its efficacy for various age groups. The program is classified as an evidence-based fall prevention program by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and meets the highest standards for evidence-based programs by the National Council on Aging.35
A large number of respondents in this survey agreed that the OEP is safe for older people, suggesting that the respondents had a positive view. The results of a previous study36 indicate that the OEP is safe and effective in improving falls, balance, and physical performance for a variety of age groups that are at high risk of falling.36 An outcome of a systematic review and meta-analysis37 showed that the OEP is safe and effective, as seen by significant improvements in physical function, balance, lower limb strength, frailty, and health status, specifically among older nursing home residents. However, it appears from the neutrality of the responses that many participants did not firmly agree or disapprove that the OEP was safe. This impartiality may result from things like not knowing much about the program and needing more details on its efficacy and safety.
The study found that some respondents were knowledgeable and positive about using telerehabilitation to provide OEP to older adults. However, the others were neutral. A possible reason might be their preference for in-person methods and limited access to technical support.38 Insufficient training for PTs may also hinder the adoption of telerehabilitation. The Iranian Physiotherapy Association suggests that future adoption depends on technology training at undergraduate and postgraduate levels.39 Over time, healthcare providers become more familiar with technology and more comfortable delivering healthcare through telerehabilitation.40
The reasons behind the responses in our survey could be multifaceted. The positive perception of the benefits of the OEP could stem from direct awareness or experience with the program’s results, such as reduced falls leading to improved quality of life that led to patient satisfaction and reduced healthcare costs.41 Meanwhile, neutrality might indicate the need for more robust evaluations supporting the OEP’s value over time. It also highlights an opportunity for enhanced educational efforts to effectively disseminate benefit analysis. As healthcare systems increasingly emphasize value-based care, understanding and addressing the factors that affect perceptions of effectiveness will be crucial for the broader adoption of programs like the OEP.20
According to this survey, there is no apparent relationship between the knowledge and attitudes of PTs towards OEP in Saudi Arabia and their gender. This indicates that the differences in the perceptions of PTs in the OEP are not significantly influenced by gender. A more equal gender ratio in the field could be one explanation. Therefore, gender differences cannot be the cause of the disparity in knowledge and attitude toward OEP. This may suggest that other variables, including employment in a healthcare facility, educational background, or years of experience,39 may have a greater impact on their opinions about the OEP.
Implications
The study explores the perspectives of PTs in Saudi Arabia on evidence-based OEP. It identifies knowledge gaps, addresses attitudes, emphasizes ongoing professional development, and contributes to quality improvement efforts.42 The research underscores the necessity for standardized training and evaluation of PTs, enabling consistent program43 delivery using artificial intelligence tools for low-cost predictive fall risk models with a high level of accuracy.15 The findings could also provide information to health policymakers and optimize patient care, ultimately improving functional outcomes and balance, especially installations of the OEP in public parks.12
Strengths and Limitations
This study is the first in Saudi Arabia to assess the attitudes and knowledge of PTs regarding the OEP. The inclusion of PTs from various regions and professional settings in Saudi Arabia improves the generalizability of the findings to the broader population of PTs. Additionally, the study examined gender differences in knowledge and attitudes towards the OEP, providing a nuanced understanding of the perspectives of PTs perspectives without significant gender bias. These findings suggest the feasibility and potential impact of implementing the OEP widely to improve fall prevention strategies for older adults in Saudi Arabia. By providing preliminary data from PTs with varying demographic backgrounds, this study establishes a standard for future research on evidence-based practice in the prevention of falls.
Despite its strengths, the study has several limitations. The use of convenience sampling may introduce selection bias, as participants might have had a preexisting interest or familiarity with the OEP, potentially affecting the representativeness of the results. The reliance on self-reported data can lead to recall bias, where participants may overestimate their knowledge or express socially desirable attitudes, which affects the accuracy of responses.27 The survey design was rigorously developed, ensuring high internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.976, but it suggests item redundancy, contrary to the maximum alpha value of 0.90.28 Moreover, the anchoring effect in decision-making may occur due to cognitive bias,44 as individuals answering the knowledge section first may influence their evaluation of its effectiveness. Although the sample size is adequate for initial insights, a larger sample would provide more robust statistical power and further validate the findings. The cross-sectional design limits the ability to draw causal inferences about the impact of PT knowledge and attitudes on the actual implementation and outcomes of the OEP in clinical practice. Additionally, the study does not account for changes in knowledge and attitudes over time, which could be critical to understanding the long-term adoption and integration of the OEP into PT practice. Furthermore, there is a potential for participation bias, as PTs with limited interest in older adults may be underrepresented in the survey.45
Conclusion
This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of PT knowledge and attitudes towards OEP for the prevention of falls among older adults in Saudi Arabia. The results indicate a substantial level of knowledge and generally positive attitudes toward OEP among PTs, with no significant gender differences observed. These findings suggest that the OEP is well respected for its clinical effectiveness and safety, highlighting its potential for widespread adoption in Saudi Arabian clinical practice to improve geriatric care. This study lays the foundation for future research on evidence-based practices in fall prevention and underscores the importance of continuous professional development to bridge knowledge gaps and optimize the implementation of OEP in Saudi Arabia.
Abbreviations
OEP, Otago exercise program; PTs, Physical therapists; WHO, World Health Organization.
Data Sharing Statement
Data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Ethics Statements
The study is consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of King Saud University (approval number: KSU-HE-23-387). Before starting the online survey, participants were informed about the purpose of the survey and provided their informed consent. To maintain participant privacy, the acquired data was kept confidential and the identities of the participants were kept anonymous.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the King Salman Center for Disability Research for funding this work through Research Group no KSRG-2023-317.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This research was funded by the King Salman Center for Disability Research through Research Group no KSRG-2023-317.
Disclosure
The author(s) report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Ageing and health [homepage on the internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.
2. Al-Amoud MM, Omar DI, Almashjary EN, Alomary SA. Morbidity profile among older people at primary health care centers in Saudi Arabia during the period 2012-2020. Saudi Med J. 2023;44(1):45–56. doi:10.15537/smj.2023.44.1.20220465
3. Demographic projection: Saudi Arabia [homepage on the internet]. New York, US: UNICEF; 2019. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/mena/media/4236/file/Saudi%20Arabia%20Fact%20Sheet%20-%20MENA%20Generation%202030.pdf#:~:text=URL%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unicef.org%2Fmena%2Fmedia%2F4236%2Ffile%2FSaudi%2520Arabia%2520Fact%2520Sheet%2520.
4. Vennu V, Bindawas SM. Relationship between falls, knee osteoarthritis, and health-related quality of life: data from the osteoarthritis initiative study. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:793–800. doi:10.2147/CIA.S62207
5. Alabdullgader A, Rabbani U. Prevalence and risk factors of falls among the elderly in unaizah city, Saudi Arabia. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2021;21(1):e86–e93. doi:10.18295/squmj.2021.21.01.012
6. S. AlHarkan K, Alsousi S, AlMishqab M, et al. Associations between polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications with risk of falls among the elderly in Saudi Arabia. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):222. doi:10.1186/s12877-023-03852-y
7. Alenazi AM, Alanazi MF, Elnaggar RK, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for falls among community-dwelling adults in Riyadh area. PeerJ. 2023;11:e16478. doi:10.7717/peerj.16478
8. Company-Sancho MC, Alonso-Poncelas E, Rich-Ruiz M, et al. The relation between functional performance, falls and previous falls among participants in the Otago programme: a secondary data analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(12):6501. doi:10.3390/ijerph18126501
9. Appeadu MK, Bordoni B. Falls and Fall Prevention in Older Adults. Bethesda, MD: StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2024.
10. Falls [homepage on the internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/falls.
11. Bindawas SM. The changing incidence and prevalence of falls and its disability burden among the geriatric population in Saudi Arabia from 1990 to 2019: a longitudinal analysis using global burden of disease study data. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e49117. doi:10.7759/cureus.49117
12. Leiros-Rodriguez R, Garcia-Soidan JL. Balance training in elderly women using public parks. J Women Aging. 2014;26(3):207–218. doi:10.1080/08952841.2014.888220
13. Sherrington C, Fairhall N, Kwok W, et al. Evidence on physical activity and falls prevention for people aged 65+ years: systematic review to inform the who guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):144. doi:10.1186/s12966-020-01041-3
14. Dyer SM, Suen J, Kwok WS, et al. Exercise for falls prevention in aged care: systematic review and trial endpoint meta-analyses. Age Ageing. 2023;52(12). doi:10.1093/ageing/afad217
15. Gonzalez-Castro A, Leiros-Rodriguez R, Prada-Garcia C, Benitez-Andrades JA. The applications of artificial intelligence for assessing fall risk: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e54934. doi:10.2196/54934
16. Tuvemo Johnson S, Anens E, Johansson AC, Hellstrom K. The Otago exercise program with or without motivational interviewing for community-dwelling older adults: a 12-month follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial. J Appl Gerontol. 2021;40(3):289–299. doi:10.1177/0733464820902652
17. Almarzouki R, Bains G, Lohman E, et al. Improved balance in middle-aged adults after 8 weeks of a modified version of Otago exercise program: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0235734. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235734
18. Wu S, Guo Y, Cao Z, et al. Effects of Otago exercise program on physical function in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2024;124:105470. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2024.105470
19. Shubert TE, Smith ML, Goto L, Jiang L, Ory MG. Otago exercise program in the United States: comparison of 2 implementation models. Phys Ther. 2017;97(2):187–197. doi:10.2522/ptj.20160236
20. Worum H, Lillekroken D, Ahlsen B, Roaldsen KS, Bergland A. Otago exercise programme-from evidence to practice: a qualitative study of physiotherapists’ perceptions of the importance of organisational factors of leadership, context and culture for knowledge translation in Norway. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):985. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05853-8
21. Thomas S, Mackintosh S, Halbert J. Does the ‘otago exercise programme’ reduce mortality and falls in older adults?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2010;39(6):681–687. doi:10.1093/ageing/afq102
22. Chiu HL, Yeh TT, Lo YT, Liang PJ, Lee SC. The effects of the Otago exercise programme on actual and perceived balance in older adults: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0255780. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255780
23. Cederbom S, Bjerk M, Bergland A. A qualitative study exploring physical therapists’ views on the Otago exercise programme for fall prevention: a stepping stone to ”age in place” and to give faith in the future. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;38(1):132–140.
24. Daly C, Clemens F, Lopez Sendon JL, et al. Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina. Circulation. 2006;113(4):490–498. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.561647
25. Gallieni M, Mezzina N, Pinerolo C, Granata A. Sex and gender differences in nephrology. In: Sex and Gender Aspects in Clinical Medicine. Springer; 2011:83–100.
26. Ali SH, Foreman J, Capasso A, Jones AM, Tozan Y, DiClemente RJ. Social media as a recruitment platform for a nationwide online survey of covid-19 knowledge, beliefs, and practices in the United States: methodology and feasibility analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):116.
27. Rodriguez Del Aguila M, Gonzalez-Ramirez A. Sample size calculation. Allergol Immunopathol. 2014;42(5):485–492. doi:10.1016/j.aller.2013.03.008
28. Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Personality Asses. 2003;80(1):99–103.
29. Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, et al. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150205.
30. Aschbrenner KA, Kruse G, Gallo JJ, Plano Clark VL. Applying mixed methods to pilot feasibility studies to inform intervention trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022;8(1):217. doi:10.1186/s40814-022-01178-x
31. Cramer’s v [homepage on the internet]. New York: US: IBM; 2024. Available from: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cognos-analytics/12.0.0?topic=terms-cramrs-v.
32. Davis JC, Robertson MC, Ashe MC, Liu-Ambrose T, Khan KM, Marra CA. Does a home-based strength and balance programme in people aged > or =80 years provide the best value for money to prevent falls? A systematic review of economic evaluations of falls prevention interventions. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(2):80–89.
33. Dykes PC, Curtin-Bowen M, Lipsitz S, et al. Cost of inpatient falls and cost-benefit analysis of implementation of an evidence-based fall prevention program. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4(1):e225125. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5125
34. Otago exercise programme. Physiopedia [homepage on the internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.physio-pedia.com/Otago_Exercise_Programme.
35. Shubert TE, Smith ML, Jiang L, Ory MG. Disseminating the Otago exercise program in the United States: perceived and actual physical performance improvements from participants. J Appl Gerontol. 2018;37(1):79–98. doi:10.1177/0733464816675422
36. Yang Y, Wang K, Liu H, et al. The impact of Otago exercise programme on the prevention of falls in older adult: a systematic review. Front Public Health. 2022;10:953593. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.953593
37. Peng Y, Yi J, Zhang Y, Sha L, Jin S, Liu Y. The effectiveness of a group-based Otago exercise program on physical function, frailty and health status in older nursing home residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatr Nurs. 2023;49:30–43. doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.10.014
38. Albahrouh SI, Buabbas AJ. Physiotherapists’ perceptions of and willingness to use telerehabilitation in Kuwait during the covid-19 pandemic. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):122. doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01478-x
39. Arzani P, Khalkhali Zavieh M, Khademi Kalantari K, Azadi F, Naim P. Tele-physiotherapy in Iran: perceived challenges by physiotherapists to its implementation in covid 19 outbreak. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022;36:17. doi:10.47176/mjiri.36.17
40. Cottrell MA, Hill AJ, O’Leary SP, Raymer ME, Russell TG. Service provider perceptions of telerehabilitation as an additional service delivery option within an Australian neurosurgical and orthopaedic physiotherapy screening clinic: a qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;32:7–16. doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2017.07.008
41. Aranda-Reneo I, Albornos-Munoz L, Rich-Ruiz M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of an exercise programme that provided group or individual training to reduce the fall risk in healthy community-dwelling people aged 65-80: a secondary data analysis. Healthcare. 2021;9(6):714. doi:10.3390/healthcare9060714
42. Worum H, Lillekroken D, Ahlsen B, Roaldsen KS, Bergland A. Bridging the gap between research-based knowledge and clinical practice: a qualitative examination of patients and physiotherapists’ views on the Otago exercise programme. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):278. doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1309-6
43. Abdullah Alfadhel SA, Vennu V, Alotaibi AD, Algarni AM, Saad Bindawas SM. The effect of a multicomponent exercise programme on elderly adults’ risk of falling in nursing homes: a systematic review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(4):699–704.
44. Haselton DN MG, Murray DR. The Evolution of Cognitive Bias. New York, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2015.
45. Omana H, Sureshkumar A, Aijo M, Hunter SW. Attitudes and beliefs of physical therapists and physical therapist students towards working with older adults: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2024;104(7):pzae052. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzae052
© 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.