Back to Journals » Journal of Inflammation Research » Volume 18
Identification of Epigenetic Alteration of the IFI44L Gene in B Cells of Sjogren’s Syndrome as a Clinical Biomarker and Molecular Significance
Authors Zhang K, Luo Z , Yao X , Lu D , Hong T , Zhu X , Chen M, Wang X
Received 11 November 2024
Accepted for publication 5 February 2025
Published 19 February 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 2499—2512
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S503309
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Adam D Bachstetter
Kaiyuan Zhang,1,* Ziyue Luo,2,* Xinyi Yao,2 Dingqi Lu,2 Tao Hong,3 Xinchao Zhu,2 Mei Chen,2 Xinchang Wang4
1School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310053, People’s Republic of China; 2Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310053, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Respiratory, People’s Hospital of Changshan County, Quzhou, Zhejiang Province, 324200, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310005, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Xinchang Wang, Department of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China, Tel +8613065714635, Email [email protected]
Objective: Type 1 interferon (IFN-I)-related genes play a critical role in Sjögren’s syndrome (SS). However, study on its role and impact in peripheral blood B cells of SS is limited. This study investigated gene expression and epigenetic changes in IFI44L, analyzing its correlation with disease activity and clinical indicators.
Methods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified from the GSE199868 dataset, while IFN-I-related genes were collected from GeneCards. Intersection analysis revealed IFN-I-related DEGs in SS. ClueGO, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment, PPI network construction, and hub gene identification were conducted, with hub genes validated in GSE135809. Following this, we recruited 30 SS patients as the disease group and 11 healthy individuals as the control group. Clinical information and peripheral blood samples were collected from all participants. After isolating B cells from the peripheral blood, we used quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and pyrosequencing to examine the mRNA expression and DNA methylation status of the IFI44L gene. Further analyses were conducted in conjunction with clinical indicators.
Results: GSE199868 analysis revealed 125 upregulated and 16 downregulated DEGs. Among 2794 IFN-I-related genes from GeneCards, 26 DEGs overlapped, enriched in viral genome replication and IFN-I pathways. 14 hub genes were identified, with 7 genes confirmed in GSE135809: ISG15, IFIT1, OASL, IFI6, RSAD2, IFI44L, and USP18. IFI44L mRNA expression was significantly higher in SS B cells (P < 0.05), while its DNA methylation status was significantly lower (P < 0.05). IFI44L expression correlated positively with ESSDAI, ESSPRI, and IgG levels, while methylation correlated negatively with ESSDAI and ESSPRI (P < 0.05). ROC analysis revealed that the IFI44L gene had high diagnostic value (AUC = 0.8515).
Conclusion: The study highlights the clinical relevance of IFI44L mRNA expression and DNA hypomethylation in SS, underscoring its potential as a biomarker for disease activity and progression.
Keywords: Sjögren’s syndrome, IFI44L, DNA methylation, B cell, bioinformatics
Introduction
In 1933, Henrik Sjögren described a disease marked by dysfunction of salivary and lacrimal glands, leading to xerostomia (dry mouth) and xerophthalmia (dry eyes). This condition, later named Sjögren’s syndrome (SS), is now recognized as a systemic autoimmune disease with characteristic lymphocytic infiltration of exocrine glands. While the primary symptoms include dry eyes and mouth, SS can also affect vital organs such as the kidneys, liver, and lungs.1 The systemic manifestations of SS are diverse, ranging from fatigue and joint pain to severe complications like interstitial lung disease, renal tubular acidosis, and neuropathies. SS often overlaps with other autoimmune disorders, such as primary biliary cholangitis, sharing features like exocrine gland involvement and autoantibody seropositivity, including anti-SSA and anti-SSB antibodies.2 This clinical complexity underscores the need for novel biomarkers to improve diagnosis and disease stratification.
Hypergammaglobulinemia, particularly elevated IgG levels, is a hallmark of SS, highlighting the crucial role of B cells in its pathogenesis.3 The development and progression of SS are closely associated with the production of various autoantibodies by autoreactive B cells and plasma cells, including anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) as well as anti-SSA and anti-SSB antibodies.4,5 Recent studies have uncovered additional roles of B cells in the pathogenesis of SS, such as cytokine production6 and antigen presentation.7 Related research has elaborated on the functional diversity of B cell subsets in both immune and autoimmune pathogenesis.8 These findings collectively underscore the significance of B cell hyperactivation in the pathogenesis of SS. With rapid advancements in bioinformatics and microarray sequencing technologies, numerous biomarkers with specific expression patterns resulting from DNA methylation alterations have been discovered. Epigenetic changes are crucial in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, offering valuable insights into the mechanisms and pathophysiology of SS. Studies indicate that inflammation in the salivary glands of SS patients is regulated by DNA methyltransferases and results from dynamic changes in DNA methylation.9 Genome-wide analyses have identified more pronounced differentially methylated sites in B cells from SS patients, particularly hypomethylation of genes related to the type I interferon (IFN-I) pathway.10 This underscores the importance of investigating the DNA methylation status of IFN-I pathway-related factors in the B cells of SS patients.
Interferon-Induced Protein 44-Like (IFI44L) is a key stimulatory gene within the IFN-I pathway, and serves as a feedback regulator of IFN function.11 Currently, IFI44L expression has been found to be upregulated in patients with SS and significantly increased following stimulation with IFN-α and IFN-β.12 In systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, the methylation level of IFI44L has been identified as a potential diagnostic marker, correlating with clinical features and treatment outcomes.13,14 Despite these findings, research on the methylation status of IFI44L in SS is limited, particularly in B cells, which play a central role in the disease. Investigating whether hypomethylation of IFI44L in SS B cells contributes to its overexpression and the subsequent activation of the IFN-I pathway is critical for understanding the disease’s underlying mechanisms.
This study aims to comprehensively analyze the DNA methylation status of IFI44L in SS patients and its potential impact on gene expression and immune activation. Through mining publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets, conducting genome-wide DNA methylation profiling, and performing Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses, we sought to uncover epigenetic patterns associated with SS. Furthermore, experimental validation was carried out to confirm the findings, and clinical indicators were integrated to explore correlations between IFI44L methylation, gene expression, and disease activity. These insights may facilitate the identification of novel diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for SS. Figure 1 provides an overview of the study design.
![]() |
Figure 1 Flowchart of the study. |
Methods
Exploration of Microarray Data and IFN-I-Related Genes
The microarray dataset GSE199868 was retrieved from the GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). This dataset comprises human peripheral blood B lymphocytes from 14 patients with SS and 13 healthy individuals. IFN-I-related genes were downloaded from GeneCards (https://www.genecards.org/).
Acquisition of IFN-I-Related Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs)
The transcriptome database was analyzed using the Easy Visualization and Inference Toolbox for Transcriptomic Analysis (eVITTA6)15 for DEGs identification. A threshold of P<0.05 and log2|FC|≥1 was applied for screening DEGs in the GSE199868 dataset. To identify IFN-I-related DEGs in SS, the online tool Venn (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html) was used to overlap the IFN-I-related genes from GeneCards with the identified DEGs from GSE199868. Finally, the online tool Xiantao Academic (https://www.xiantaozi.com/) was utilized for visualizing the volcano plot of the identified IFN-I-related DEGs in SS.
Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) and Enrichment Analysis
PPI analysis of IFN-I-related DEGs in SS was conducted using STRING (http://www.string-db.org).16 The results were imported into Cytoscape (http://www.cytoscape.org)17 for visualization. GO enrichment analysis was performed using ClueGO, while KEGG enrichment analysis was conducted through the DAVID database (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/). A free online platform Wei Sheng Xin (https://www.bioinformatics.com.cn) was utilized for visualizing the results. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Analysis of Hub Genes
Hub genes were identified using the CytoHubba plugin in Cytoscape. The top 15 hub genes were determined using five algorithms: Maximum Clique Centrality (MCC), Maximum Neighborhood Component (MNC), Degree, Closeness, and Edge Percolated Component (EPC). The genes identified by these algorithms were intersected to obtain the final set of critical genes. Subsequently, a co-expression network of these hub genes was constructed using GeneMANIA (http://www.Genemania.org/).18
Validation of the Expression of Hub Genes
The mRNA expression of the identified hub genes was validated in the GSE135809 dataset. Comparisons between groups were performed using t-test. P-value<0.05 was considered significant.
Subject Information
A total of 30 patients diagnosed with SS were recruited from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University between May 2023 and March 2024. Diagnoses were made according to the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SS.19 Additionally, 11 healthy controls were enrolled from individuals undergoing routine health examinations at the same hospital during the same period. The exclusion criteria for SS patients included: (1) individuals with severe primary diseases of the cardiovascular system, liver, kidneys, brain, or hematopoietic system, or with a history of mental illness; (2) individuals with other autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis, acute or chronic infectious diseases, or malignant tumors; and (3) pregnant women. This study was conducted in full compliance with clinical trial laws and regulations as outlined in the Helsinki Declaration. The use of patient information and peripheral blood samples was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Ethics Approval No. 2023-KL-003-A01). All participants were fully informed of the content of the Informed Consent Form prior to the commencement of the study and voluntarily provided their consent for participation by signing the form.
Collection of Clinical Indicators
Clinical indicators were collected from 30 patients with SS, including the EULAR Sjögren’s syndrome disease activity index (ESSDAI),20 EULAR Sjögren’s syndrome patient reported index (ESSPRI),20 fatigue severity scale (FSS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), ANA, anti-SSA antibody, anti-SSB antibody, and IgG levels.
Isolation of Human CD19+ B Cells
A total of 2.5 mL of fresh EDTA-anticoagulated peripheral blood was collected. Lymphocyte separation medium was used to isolate peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from the blood sample. After isolation, the cells were resuspended in 1 mL of PBS containing 0.1% BSA. 10 μL of the suspension was pipetted onto a hemocytometer for cell counting, and the cell concentration was adjusted to 1×107 cells/mL under a microscope. Next, buffer 1 (BSA: PBS = 0.1g/100mL) and buffer 2 (FCS: 1640 = 1:99) were prepared. A CD19+ B cell positive selection kit was utilized for magnetic bead separation. The magnetic beads were washed with buffer 1, and 25 μL of the bead mixture was added per 1 mL of the cell suspension (1×107 cells/mL) into a centrifuge tube. The tube was incubated at 4°C for 15 minutes. After incubation, the tube was placed in a magnetic field to remove the supernatant, and then washed with 1 mL of buffer 1 by pipetting 2–3 times before returning it to the magnetic field. The CD19+ B cells bound to the magnetic beads were washed, and the cell pellet was resuspended in 100 μL of buffer 2, followed by the addition of 10 μL of release reagent and incubation at room temperature for 45 minutes. After incubation, the tube was placed back into the magnetic field, and the supernatant containing the released cells was transferred to a new centrifuge tube. An appropriate amount of buffer 2 was added for washing, and the sample was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes at 4°C to remove the release reagent. The resulting pellet contained the CD19+ B cells, which were labelled appropriately and stored at −80°C for future use.
Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) Assay
For RNA extraction, total RNA was isolated from CD19+ B cells (1 × 107 cells) using the Total RNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher, 15596026) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To obtain cDNA, reverse transcription was performed using PrimeScript RT Master Mix (TaKaRa, RR036A). For RT-qPCR, the CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System and SYBR Green Premix were applied, with GAPDH serving as the internal control to normalize gene expression levels. The specific PCR primers and genes examined are listed in Table 1. The PCR conditions included an initial denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, followed by 50 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 seconds and annealing at 60°C for 30 seconds. Gene expression was normalized using the 2−ΔΔCt method and expressed as the ratio of target gene to GAPDH.
![]() |
Table 1 PCR Primer Sequence |
Pyrosequencing
Genomic DNA was first extracted using a standard phenol/chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation. Eight micrograms (8 μg) of DNA were added to 192 μL of 0.05 mm NaOH and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. The resulting solution was then divided equally into two portions. One portion was subjected to oxidation using 4 μL of KRuO4 (15 mm in 0.05 mm NaOH, Alpha Aesar, MA, USA) on ice for 1 hour, followed by purification using a MicroSpin S-400 hR column (Roche, CA, USA). Two micrograms (2 μg) of the purified DNA were denatured in 0.3 mm NaOH at 50°C for 20 minutes. The denatured DNA was diluted in 500 μL of freshly prepared 10 mm hydroquinone and 3 M sodium bisulfite, and incubated at 70°C for 3 hours to convert unmethylated cytosines to uracils. The second portion of DNA underwent a mock oxidation treatment without KRuO4, with all other procedures remaining the same. To identify the CpG islands within the gene promoter regions, gene information from PubMed and other bioinformatics tools were utilized. PCR primers and sequencing primers were designed using the PyroMark Assay Design software (v 2.0), with their sequences provided in Table 2. Target fragments were amplified using a 50 μL PCR reaction mixture containing components from the Qiagen PyroMark PCR kit (PCR Buffer 2.5 μL, dNTPs 2 μL, forward and reverse primers each 0.5 μL, Taq DNA polymerase 0.2 μL, and cDNA template 1 μL). Five microliters (5 μL) of the PCR products were subjected to 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis to confirm the presence of clear bands of the expected size. Subsequently, 40 μL of PCR product was mixed with 36 μL of binding buffer and 4 μL of streptavidin-coated agarose beads. The beads were then transferred to a 96-well plate containing annealing buffer, heated to 80°C for 2 minutes for denaturation, and then cooled to room temperature. The methylation status of each CpG site was analyzed using the PyroMark Q48 sequencing instrument. The resulting pyrograms were processed using the PSQ48MA software (v 2.0.6) to covert the pyrograms into peak heights and calculate the methylation ratio (C/T) at each base position. Finally, the Pyro Q-CpG software integrated within the pyrosequencing instrument automatically analyzed the methylation status of each CpG site.
![]() |
Table 2 Sequence Information of Pyrophosphate Sequencing Primer |
Construction of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Model
ROC curves were constructed to evaluate the predictive values of the mRNA and DNA methylation expression of IFI44L for SS by comparing the two groups. The ROC curves were numerically integrated to determine the plot area under the curve (AUC).
Statistical Analysis
Numerical results were presented as means ± standard deviations (SD). Differences between the two groups were analyzed using an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. All count data were expressed in frequency (percentage) and analyzed using the Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (v 8.0.2) and the statistical software SPSS (v 22.0). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Identification of IFN-I-Related DEGs in SS
Based on the established criteria, we screened out 125 upregulated and 16 downregulated DEGs from the GSE199868 dataset (Figure 2A). Additionally, we identified 2,794 genes with an IFN-I correlation score exceeding 10. By intersecting the DEGs with the IFN-I-related genes, we obtained a total of 26 IFN-I-related DEGs (Figure 2B).
![]() |
Figure 2 Identification of IFN-I-related DEGs. (A) Volcano map of GSE199868. (B) Venn diagram showing the intersection between IFN-I-related genes and DEGs. |
PPI Analysis and Enrichment Analysis
The PPI analysis revealed that genes, including ISG15, CDK1, IFI44L, IFIT1, RSAD2, and IFI6 among the IFN-I-related DEGs, demonstrated strong interaction patterns, with their colors ranging from yellow to red, indicating an increasing Degree value (Figure 3A). The ClueGO results showed significant enrichment of these 26 IFN-I-related DEGs in signaling pathways such as viral genome replication and cellular response to IFN-I (Figure 3B). Additionally, the KEGG enrichment analysis indicated that these IFN-I-related DEGs were enriched in pathways related to asthma, as well as Th1, Th2, and Th17 cell differentiation (Figure 3C).
Hub Gene Selection and Analysis
To further identify hub genes among the IFN-I-related genes in SS, we employed five algorithms: MCC, MNC, Degree, Closeness, and EPC, to select the top 15 hub genes. By intersecting the results from these five algorithms, we ultimately identified 14 IFN-I-related hub genes: ISG15, IFIT1, SIGLEC1, OASL, IFI6, RSAD2, IFI44L, USP18, CDK1, AURKB, EXO1, BIRC5, TYMS, and UCHL1 (Figure 4A and Table 3). Then, we constructed a gene interaction network centered on these 14 hub genes. The analysis indicated that IFIT1, IFI44L, OASL, and IFI6 exhibited strong interactions, with functions related to response to IFN-I, cellular response to IFN-I, response to virus, and viral genome replication (Figure 4B).
![]() |
Table 3 The Top 15 Hub Genes Rank in CytoHubba |
Validation of the Expression of Hub Genes
To further validate the differential expression of hub genes between groups, we performed inter-group gene expression analysis using the GSE135809 validation set (Figure 5). While SIGLEC1, CDK1, AURKB, EXO1, BIRC5, TYMS, and UCHL1 showed no significant differences between the groups (P>0.05), ISG15, IFIT1, OASL, IFI6, RSAD2, IFI44L, and USP18 were significantly overexpressed in the SS group (P<0.05).
Baseline Comparison Between Groups
Baseline information, including clinical information, disease-related scales, and laboratory indicators, was collected from 30 patients and 11 healthy individuals. Detailed data for each item are presented in Table 4. Comprehensive patient data can be found in Supplementary Table 1.
![]() |
Table 4 Patients Basis Information |
PCR and Pyrosequencing Results
Based on the analytical results and literature review, the IFI44L gene was ultimately selected for validation among the identified hub genes. CD19+ B cells were extracted from 30 patients with SS and 11 healthy individuals. Through verification by RT-qPCR, a significant increase was revealed in the mRNA expression of IFI44L in CD19+ B cells from SS patients compared to healthy individuals (Figure 6A). Additionally, by subjecting CD19+ B cells to pyrosequencing, a significant decrease was observed in the DNA methylation status in CD19+ B cells from SS patients relative to healthy individuals (Figure 6B). The mRNA expression of the IFI44L gene exhibited a significant negative correlation with its DNA methylation status (P<0.05), suggesting the regulation of mRNA expressionthe of IFI44L by its the DNA methylation status (Figure 6C).
Association Between Epigenetic Regulation of IFI44L and SS Disease Scores and Clinical Indicators
The mRNA expression of IFI44L was significantly positively correlated with ESSDAI, ESSPRI, and IgG levels (P<0.05), but did not correlate significantly with ESR and FSS (P>0.05) (Figure 7A–E). Conversely, the DNA methylation status of IFI44L was negatively correlated with ESSDAI and ESSPRI (P<0.05), with no significant correlations observed with ESR, FSS, or IgG levels (P>0.05) (Figure 7F–J).
Combined ROC Analysis
ROC analysis was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of mRNA expression and DNA methylation status of the IFI44L gene as potential diagnostic biomarkers for SS. The AUC for mRNA expression was 0.8333 (P=0.0012) (Figure 8A), while the AUC for DNA methylation was 0.7939 (P=0.0043) (Figure 8B). To enhance diagnostic accuracy, we integrated the mRNA expression and DNA methylation status of IFI44L to develop a multi-marker diagnostic model through ROC regression analysis. This model could effectively predict the diagnosis of SS (AUC=0.8515, P=0.0006) (Figure 8C).
Discussion
Over the past decade, IFN-I signaling has been recognized as a central contributor to SS, serving as a critical link between innate and adaptive immune responses in SS.21 Clinical features of SS correlate strongly with the expression of IFN-I-related genes, and disease activity in SS is significantly increased in IFN-I-positive patients.22,23 IFN-I mediates B-cell infiltration of lymphocytes into salivary glands, activates B cells to induce the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and costimulatory molecules on salivary gland epithelial cells, and stimulates the production of autoantibodies, thereby promoting the apoptosis of salivary gland epithelial cells and leading to the development of salivary gland inflammation.24 Additionally, B-cell activating factor (BAFF), a key cytokine involved in the survival of circulating B cells, has been reported to show a significant correlation with higher levels of BAFF and BAFF mRNA expression in monocytes of SS patients and the presence of IFN-I scores. IFN-I induces the expression of BAFF through the IRF family, participating in B-cell activation.25 Additionally, IFN-I induces the expression of chemokines such as C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13), recruiting C-X-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CXCR5)+CD19+ B cells to accumulate in affected glands.26 A study on RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) found that genes upregulated in B cells of SS patients are mostly related to the IFN-I pathway, including IFI44L, IFI44, interferon-induced gene-1 (IFIT1), IFITM1, IFIT3, IFN regulatory factor 7 (IRF7), interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15).27 Therefore, the overexpression of IFN-I signature genes in B cells is of great significance in the pathogenesis and progression of SS.
In recent years, alterations in DNA epigenetics have emerged as one of the key mechanisms for understanding how genetic predispositions and environmental variables interact to contribute to chronic autoimmune diseases. Notably, global hypomethylation of IFN-I-induced genes has been well-documented and confirmed in various immune cell types in patients with SS. The DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs)-mediated DNA methylation process in SS regulates B-cell activation-related genes, such as CD86, POU domain class 2 transcription factor 2 (POU2F2), nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1), and Nfatc2, thereby limiting B-cell activation and modulating plasma cell differentiation.28 Additionally, hypomethylation of the CD70 promoter region has been observed in SS patients, which correlates with excessive B-cell activation.29 It is evident that the DNA methylation is involved in the production of autoantibodies in SS by affecting B-cell differentiation and activation, ultimately leading to the destruction of lacrimal and salivary glands and contributing to the onset and progression of SS. Studies have identified methylation alterations of various immune genes in CD4+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, whole blood, and salivary gland tissues of patients with SS,30–32 with these hypomethylation differences being more pronounced in B cells.10,33 Genome-wide DNA methylation studies have revealed that IFN-I-regulated genes are hypomethylated in CD19+ B cells of SS patients. Through evaluations10,34 of the methylation status of CD19+ B cells, the differential sites were found to be mainly IFN-I-related genes, such as myxovirus resistance 1 (MX1), IFI44L, IRFs, poly polymerase family member 9 (PARP9), and IFITM1, as compared to the controls. Notably, the number of these differentially methylated gene loci is higher in B cells than in T cells, and the differential sites correlate with disease activity and autoantibody positivity. A study conducted by IMGENBERG et al34 indicated that genes related to the IFN-I pathway are hypomethylated in SS B cells and correlates with an increase in B-cell numbers. The methylation changes of IFN-I signature genes in B cells were positively correlated with disease activity, further emphasizing the central role of B cells and the relevance of DNA methylation alterations in the pathogenesis of SS. Thus, DNA methylation changes in IFN-I-related genes may serve as effective biomarkers for assessing disease activity and clinical prognosis in SS.
IFI44L is an IFN-I-stimulated gene that functions as a feedback regulator to modulate and influence the function of IFNs. A genome-wide DNA methylation analysis revealed that the DNA methylation status of the IFI44L gene is significantly lower in isolated monocytes from SS patients compared to healthy individuals.31 In other autoimmune diseases, such as mixed connective tissue disease, genetic risk is increased due to DNA methylation changes in genes like IRF7 and IFI44, as well as in the HLA region.35 These studies suggest that the high expression of IFI44L is regulated by its DNA methylation status and may play a critical role in the immune response mechanisms of the IFN-I pathway in SS. Despite numerous studies highlighting the role of the IFI44L gene in SS, the relationship between its mRNA expression and DNA methylation status in B cells has not been fully elucidated. To address this, we carried out bioinformatics analyses to identify IFI44L as a key IFN-I-related gene in B cells of SS patients and employed RT-qPCR and second-generation high-throughput pyrosequencing to detect the mRNA expression and DNA methylation status of IFI44L in B cells, respectively. The results revealed that the mRNA levels of IFI44L were significantly higher in the SS group compared to healthy individuals, while the DNA methylation status was significantly lower. Moreover, a significant negative correlation was observed between the mRNA expression and DNA methylation status of IFI44L, confirming hypomethylation of the IFI44L gene in B cells of SS patients. This hypomethylation affects the mRNA expression of IFI44L in B cells and, to some extent, indicates an overactivated state of the IFN-I system in SS patients.
By integrating the clinical data and laboratory indicators of 30 SS patients and conducting Pearson correlation analysis, we found that the mRNA expression of IFI44L is significantly positively correlated with ESSDAI, ESSPRI, and IgG levels, while the DNA methylation status of IFI44L is significantly negatively correlated with ESSDAI and ESSPRI. These findings suggest that the mRNA expression regulated by the DNA methylation status of the IFI44L gene can partially reflect the disease activity and subjective symptoms of SS patients. Thus, assessing the disease activity of SS through the DNA methylation status of IFN-I signature genes may emerge as a more precise diagnostic method. However, our study did not find significant correlations between the methylation status of IFI44L and IgG, ESR, or FSS. This may be attributed to the presence of some SS patients with normal and relatively low ESR and IgG levels, who exhibit overall low disease activity, minimal organ damage, and low fatigue scores, while a small subset of patients display higher DNA methylation status. To enhance the robustness of our findings, future studies should consider expanding the sample size to include more SS patients with moderate to high disease activity and more pronounced fatigue symptoms. Additionally, increasing the number of experimental validations of IFN-I signature genes could help more accurately characterize the overall DNA methylation expression profile of IFN-I-related genes.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study establishes that the high expression of the IFI44L gene in SS is regulated by its DNA methylation status, and the expression status of IFI44L significantly correlates with disease activity scores and clinical indicators of SS patients. Thus, the DNA methylation status of the IFN-I signature gene IFI44L may serve as a valuable marker to assess the disease activity of SS, providing novel insights for the precise diagnosis and treatment of SS.
Data Sharing Statement
The datasets analysed in the current study were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), with accession numbers: GSE199868 and GSE135809, and additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (No. 2023-KL-003-A01).
Informed Consent Statement
Participants provided written consent to the storage of their samples for future research purposes.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82374402 and 82074341).
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no competing interests related to this work.
References
1. Zhan Q, Zhang J, Lin Y, Chen W, Fan X, Zhang D. Pathogenesis and treatment of Sjogren’s syndrome: review and update. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1127417. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1127417
2. Granito A, Muratori P, Muratori L, et al. Antibodies to SS-A/Ro-52kD and centromere in autoimmune liver disease: a clue to diagnosis and prognosis of primary biliary cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26(6):831–838. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03433.x
3. Du W, Han M, Zhu X, et al. The multiple roles of B cells in the pathogenesis of Sjögren’s syndrome. Front Immunol. 2021;12:684999. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.684999
4. Shen L, Gao C, Suresh L, et al. Central role for marginal zone B cells in an animal model of Sjogren’s syndrome. Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla). 2016;168. 30–36. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2016.04.008
5. Theander E, Jonsson R, Sjöström B, Brokstad K, Olsson P, Henriksson G. Prediction of Sjögren’s syndrome years before diagnosis and identification of patients with early onset and severe disease course by autoantibody profiling. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(9):2427–2436. doi:10.1002/art.39214
6. Youinou P, Pers JO. Disturbance of cytokine networks in Sjögren’s syndrome. Arthritis Res Therapy. 2011;13(4):227. doi:10.1186/ar3348
7. Adler LN, Jiang W, Bhamidipati K, et al. The other function: class II-restricted antigen presentation by B cells. Front Immunol. 2017;8:319. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00319
8. Ma K, Wang X, Shi X, et al. The expanding functional diversity of plasma cells in immunity and inflammation. Cell mol Immunol. 2020;17(4):421–422. doi:10.1038/s41423-019-0308-z
9. Lagos C, Carvajal P, Castro I, et al. Association of high 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels with Ten Eleven Translocation 2 overexpression and inflammation in Sjögren’s syndrome patients. Clinical Immunol. 2018;196:85–96. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2018.06.002
10. Miceli-Richard C, Wang-Renault SF, Boudaoud S, et al. Overlap between differentially methylated DNA regions in blood B lymphocytes and genetic at-risk loci in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2016;75(5):933–940. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206998
11. DeDiego ML, Martinez-Sobrido L, Topham DJ. Novel functions of IFI44L as a feedback regulator of host antiviral responses. J Virol. 2019;93(21). doi:10.1128/JVI.01159-19
12. Cui Y, Zhang H, Wang Z, et al. Exploring the shared molecular mechanisms between systemic lupus erythematosus and primary Sjögren’s syndrome based on integrated bioinformatics and single-cell RNA-seq analysis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1212330. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1212330
13. Zhao M, Zhou Y, Zhu B, et al. IFI44L promoter methylation as a blood biomarker for systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2016;75(11):1998–2006. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208410
14. Rodríguez-Carrio J, López P, Alperi-López M, Caminal-Montero L, Ballina-García FJ, Suárez A. IRF4 and IRGs delineate clinically relevant gene expression signatures in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:3085. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.03085
15. Cheng X, Yan J, Liu Y, Wang J, Taubert S. eVITTA: a web-based visualization and inference toolbox for transcriptome analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W207–w215. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab366
16. Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D808–815. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1094
17. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(3):431–432. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq675
18. Warde-Farley D, Donaldson SL, Comes O, et al. The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(Web Server issue):W214–220. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq537
19. Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Seror R, et al. 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism classification criteria for primary Sjögren’s syndrome: a consensus and data-driven methodology involving three international patient cohorts. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2017;76(1):9–16. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210571
20. Seror R, Bootsma H, Saraux A, et al. Defining disease activity states and clinically meaningful improvement in primary Sjögren’s syndrome with EULAR primary Sjögren’s syndrome disease activity (ESSDAI) and patient-reported indexes (ESSPRI). Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2016;75(2):382–389. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206008
21. Vakaloglou KM, Mavragani CP. Activation of the type I interferon pathway in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: an update. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23(5):459–464. doi:10.1097/BOR.0b013e328349fd30
22. Maria NI, van Helden-Meeuwsen CG, Brkic Z, et al. Association of increased treg cell levels with elevated indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity and an imbalanced kynurenine pathway in interferon-positive primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(7):1688–1699. doi:10.1002/art.39629
23. Maria NI, Brkic Z, Waris M, et al. MxA as a clinically applicable biomarker for identifying systemic interferon type I in primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2014;73(6):1052–1059. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202552
24. Baldini C, Fulvio G, La Rocca G, Ferro F. Update on the pathophysiology and treatment of primary Sjögren syndrome. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024;20(8):473–491. doi:10.1038/s41584-024-01135-3
25. Sjöstrand M, Johansson A, Aqrawi L, Olsson T, Wahren-Herlenius M, Espinosa A. The expression of BAFF is controlled by irf transcription factors. J Immunol. 2016;196(1):91–96. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1501061
26. Zhao J, Kubo S, Nakayamada S, et al. Association of plasmacytoid dendritic cells with B cell infiltration in minor salivary glands in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Modern Rheumatology. 2016;26(5):716–724. doi:10.3109/14397595.2015.1129694
27. Sun JL, Zhang HZ, Liu SY, et al. Elevated EPSTI1 promote B cell hyperactivation through NF-κB signalling in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2020;79(4):518–524. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216428
28. Barwick BG, Scharer CD, Martinez RJ, et al. B cell activation and plasma cell differentiation are inhibited by de novo DNA methylation. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1900. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04234-4
29. Yin H, Zhao M, Wu X, et al. Hypomethylation and overexpression of CD70 (TNFSF7) in CD4+ T cells of patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. J Dermatological Sci. 2010;59(3):198–203. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.06.011
30. Lu DQ, Yao XY, Ren YT, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation sequencing reveals epigenetic features and potential biomarkers of Sjögren syndrome. InterJ Rheumatic Dis. 2023;26(11):2223–2232. doi:10.1111/1756-185X.14918
31. Luo X, Peng Y, Chen YY, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in monocytes derived from patients with primary Sjogren syndrome. Chinese Med J. 2021;134(11):1310–1316. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000001451
32. Chi C, Solomon O, Shiboski C, et al. Identification of Sjögren’s syndrome patient subgroups by clustering of labial salivary gland DNA methylation profiles. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0281891. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0281891
33. Kabeerdoss J, Devarajalu P, Sandhya P. DNA methylation profiling of labial salivary gland tissues revealed hypomethylation of B-cell-related genes in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Immunol Res. 2024;72(3):450–459. doi:10.1007/s12026-024-09453-0
34. Imgenberg-Kreuz J, Sandling JK, Almlöf JC, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis in multiple tissues in primary Sjögren’s syndrome reveals regulatory effects at interferon-induced genes. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2016;75(11):2029–2036. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208659
35. Carnero-Montoro E, Barturen G, Povedano E, et al. Epigenome-wide comparative study reveals key differences between mixed connective tissue disease and related systemic autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1880. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01880
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Recommended articles
Network Analysis of Osteoarthritis Progression Using a Steiner Minimal Tree Algorithm
Xie Y, Shao F, Ji Y, Feng D, Wang L, Huang Z, Wu S, Sun F, Jiang H, Miyamoto A, Wang H, Zhang C
Journal of Inflammation Research 2024, 17:3201-3209
Published Date: 18 May 2024