Back to Journals » Psoriasis: Targets and Therapy » Volume 15
Psoriasis: Prevalence, Clinical Variants and Quality of Life, Among Patients Attending the Skin Clinic at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda
Authors Lubwama H, Mulyowa GK, Mirembe SK, Katungi TJ, Male M
Received 4 December 2024
Accepted for publication 15 March 2025
Published 2 April 2025 Volume 2025:15 Pages 117—126
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PTT.S497092
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Tina Bhutani
Hayidar Lubwama,1 Grace Kitunzi Mulyowa,1 Stephen Kizito Mirembe,1 Tumuhairwe Julian Katungi,1 Musa Male2
1Department of Dermatology, Mbarara Regional Hospital, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda; 2Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Hayidar Lubwama, Department of Dermatology, Mbarara Regional Hospital, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda, Tel +256-787906402, Email [email protected]
Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disorder that causes a detrimental physical and psychological impact on people living with the disease. However, little is known about its current prevalence, clinical variants, and quality of life among patients in Uganda.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of psoriasis, clinical variants, and quality of life (QoL) among patients attending Skin Clinic, Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), in western Uganda.
Methods: A cross-sectional study design and consecutive sampling were used. It was conducted between January and March 2023 at the skin clinic, MRRH, with a sample size of 384. The patients were thoroughly examined to assess clinical variants, and Quality of Life was evaluated using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Data obtained was entered using Excel version 20 and analyzed using STATA version 12.0 and GraphPad Prism 9.00. Descriptive statistics and comparison analysis (students t-test and ANOVA) were done.
Results: The overall prevalence of psoriasis was 3.91%. Majority of cases (86.67%) had chronic plaque psoriasis, 60% had a severe disease, and 60% were between 4 and 40 years. Most affected sites were arms (60%) and back (60%) and shins (53.33%), and the least affected were nails and dorsal feet (6.67%). Psoriasis moderately reduces QoL, with an overall mean DLQI score of 8.95 ± 1.35. There was no significant difference between QoL and age or gender.
Conclusion: Prevalence of psoriasis at MRRH in western Uganda is 3.91%. Chronic plaque psoriasis was the most common variant (86.67%), and the disease moderately affects the quality of life.
Keywords: psoriasis, prevalence, clinical variants, quality of life, MRRH–Uganda
Introduction
Psoriasis is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disorder that characteristically presents with sharply demarcated, erythematous plaques of various sizes and shapes that are usually covered with dry, adherent silvery-white scales.1 Psoriasis accounts for 1–3% of the world’s population.2 Its prevalence rates range between 0.09% and 11.43% in different locations worldwide.3 The only data in archives about psoriasis in Uganda dates back to the 1970s, with a prevalence of 2.8%.4
The clinical variants of psoriasis include chronic plaque psoriasis, generalised pustular psoriasis, inverse psoriasis, guttate psoriasis, palmoplantar psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis, and nail/joint psoriasis.5 This disease causes a considerable psychological effect and suffering to the patients to the extent that 10% contemplate suicide.6
Despite the fact that psoriasis is a commonly seen skin problem and has a significant effect on QoL, scanty data is available about this disease in Uganda. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of psoriasis, clinical variants of psoriasis, and quality of life among patients attending the Skin Clinic, MRRH.
Patients and Methods
Study Population
The National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST), the Institutional Research Ethics Committee (IREC) at MUST, and the Hospital Administration at MRRH approved the study protocol. The study also complies with the Declaration of Helsinki, 1964. It was a descriptive hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted on 384 patients who attended an outpatient skin clinic at MRRH from January to March 2023. The sample size was calculated using Kish Leslie, assuming 50% prevalence for maximum sample size.
All study participants were informed about the purpose of the study and signed a written informed consent form, and the parent or legal guardian of participants under 18 years of age provided informed consent. Patients below the age of 4 years, those who declined to participate, and those with other serious comorbidities that required medical attention were excluded, eg severe HIV infection and high output heart failure due to erythroderma. Otherwise, we included all patients who visited the skin clinic during the study period. The diagnosis of psoriasis was solely based on clinical presentations and confirmed by senior dermatologists.
Study Data
Data on the demographics of study participants, clinical variants, and QoL was collected using a standardized questionnaire (Biodata, Physical examination and Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQI). DLQI is a simplified and validated self-reported questionnaire used to measure how much a skin problem has affected the life of the patient over the previous 7 days. It consists of 10 questions covering six domains (symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and bothering with psoriasis treatment during the preceding one week). The score ranges from 0 to 30; the higher the score, the more the QoL is impaired.
Statistical Analysis
Differences between dependent variables and some independent variables were compared using Student’s t-test or ANOVA. Data was entered using Excel version 20 and analyzed with STATA software version 12.0 and GraphPad Prism 9.00. Missing and incomplete data were excluded from analysis. Two-tailed p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Characteristics of Study Participants
The detailed data on the characteristics of study participants are shown in Table 1. Mean age of presentation was 30.21 ± 0.78 years; the majority were females, 67.97%, and 80.47% were in the age range of 4–40 years. They were predominantly from Mbarara district (64.06%), and 63.02% were from urban areas. About occupation, 98.96% of our respondents worked from indoors. Out of the 384 study participants, 15 cases had psoriasis, giving an overall prevalence of psoriasis of 3.91%.
![]() |
Table 1 Demographic Characteristics of the Study Participants |
Demographic Characteristics of the Psoriasis Patients
Table 2 shows demographic characteristics of 15 psoriasis patients. Their mean age was 39.93 ± 4.62 years; males were slightly more (53.33%) and were predominantly from urban areas (53.33%). Majority of patients (60%) were between 4 and 40 years and nearly three-fifth (66.67%) were working from outdoors. Regarding the family history of psoriasis, those with a positive history accounted for only 26.67%.
![]() |
Table 2 Demographic Characteristics of Psoriasis Patients |
Clinical Characteristics of Psoriasis Patients
Table 3 shows the clinical characteristics of psoriasis patients. Majority of cases (40%) had their initial age of onset in the first peak (20–30 years). Chronic plaque psoriasis was the most prevalent morphological clinical variant (86.67%). This was followed by guttate psoriasis and inverse psoriasis, accounting three-fifth of cases having severe psoriasis (>10% BSA), followed by moderate psoriasis (26.67%) and mild psoriasis by 13.33%.
![]() |
Table 3 Clinical Characteristics of Psoriasis Patients |
Location or Sites
Table 4 shows locations or sites. The most affected sites were the forearms and back (60%), followed by the chest (53.3%) and scalp (26.67%), and the least were the nails and dorsal feet (6.67%).
![]() |
Table 4 Skin Sites Affected by Psoriasis |
Quality of Life of Psoriasis Patients According to the DLQI Scores
Table 5 illustrates QoL according to DLQI scores. The most affected domain was symptoms and feelings (3.00 ± 0.44), followed by Daily activities (2.06 ± 0.33), and the least affected was treatment (0.53 ± 0.19). The overall total mean DLQI score was 8.95 ± 1.35 (in moderate effect).
![]() |
Table 5 Distribution of Psoriasis Patients According to Their Mean Score in Different Domains of Quality of Life |
Out of the 15 psoriasis patients, majority (66.67%) generally had a moderate to large effect on their quality of life, as shown in Table 5.
Comparing the Difference in QoL and Severity of Psoriasis
Figure 1 shows the differences in QoL compared to different severity groups of psoriasis (ie, mild, moderate, and severe). There was a statistically significant difference in the mean DLQI scores across all groups (mild, moderate, and severe psoriasis), as demonstrated by a significant p-value, ie (p = 0.009).
![]() |
Figure 1 Mean DLQI score and severity of psoriasis. Data were analyzed and plotted as mean ± SD by One way ANOVA. |
Comparing the DLQI scores between mild and severe psoriasis, the difference in DLQI scores was statistically very significant (p = 0.010).
Further comparing the scores between mild and moderate, the difference in mean DQLI scores was statistically significant (p = 0.02). However, there was no statistically significant difference in mean DQLI scores between moderate and severe psoriasis (p = 0.996).
Comparing the Difference in QoL and Age of Onset
Figure 2 shows the difference in QoL between the early onset of psoriasis, ie, <40 years, and late on psoriasis, ie, >40 years. There was no significant statistical difference in mean DLQI scores between early onset, ie, <40 years, and late onset, ie, >40 years (p = 0.5884). The cut off at age of 40 years was adopted from previous studies.7
![]() |
Figure 2 Mean DLQI score and age of onset of psoriasis. Data were analyzed and plotted as mean ± SD by unpaired Student’s t-test. |
Comparing the Difference in QoL and Gender
Figure 3 shows the difference in QoL between females and males. There was no significant difference in mean DLQI scores between female gender and males (p = 0.0564).
![]() |
Figure 3 QoL and sex of psoriasis patients. Data were analyzed and plotted as mean ± SD by Unpaired t-test (P = 0.0564; n.s., not significant). |
Clinical Presentation of Psoriasis According Disease Severity
Figure 4 shows clinical presentation of psoriasis according to disease severity. Severe psoriasis affects all the different anatomical locations. The back, chest and legs are severely affected as shown in the (Figure 4C, F and I), respectively.
Discussion
In our study, prevalence of psoriasis was 3.91%. The results were comparable to a study done in Ethiopia, 4.0%,8 and South Africa, 4%.9 The similarity is probably due to similar ethnicity and environmental factors. Our prevalence was higher than in West Africa, where Ghana was 0.4%10 and Nigeria 0.6%.11 The discrepancy might be explained by variations in ethnicity (genetic) and environmental factors. In West Africa, the majority of the population is Nilotics, while in East and South Africa, there are predominantly Bantu-speaking ethnic groups.12 In Tanzania—7.7%13 might be due to a difference in the inclusion criteria, as they enrolled above 55 years. In addition, our prevalence is seemingly higher than the 1971 study done in Uganda.4
The discrepancy cannot be fully explained; however, a lot has happened since then, eg advent of HIV infection in the late 1980s, migrations, and intermarriages.
In contrast, Sweden (9.2%) and Norway (11.9%)14 recorded a far higher prevalence. The difference is probably due to geographical variations, where the Scandinavians have a low UV light exposure to the tropics. UVB phototherapy is a therapeutic modality in management of psoriasis.15
The most common clinical variant was chronic plaque psoriasis (86.67%). This is consistent with studies in the US, 80%,16 and Nigeria, 90%.11 Probably, most people in both populations have similar frequencies of the HLA-Cw6 allele, which is associated with more extensive plaques.17 By severity, severe psoriasis (>10% BSA) was the most prevalent variant (60%), and this was in line with a study in Nigeria, 44.1%18 and a larger survey in China, 97.06%.19 For West Africa, this may be explained by similar study settings and patient characteristics, eg, poor health-seeking behaviour. While for China, this may partly be due to a potential similarity in the disease genetics. Our result contradicted the US study (3.6%)20 and the UK (12%)21 Probably, due to better health-seeking behaviour and access to healthcare in the West compared to Africa. In Africa, poor health-seeking behaviour is mainly due to poor health infrastructure and a strong belief in traditional therapies.
By site, the most affected sites in our study were forearms (60%), back (60%), and shins (53.3%). The results were comparable to a study in Malaysia with arms, 53%, followed by the legs, 44%.22 Similarly, in Nigeria, the abdomen (100%) and lower limbs were the most affected (75.7%).11 The similarity is likely due to a similar distribution of HLA-Cw6 alleles, also associated with lesions on the extremities and the trunk. In contrast, a study in Taiwan showed that the scalp was the most affected compared to the extremities.23 Differences may be due to environmental variations and genetic diversities, which probably cause different clinical presentations.
In terms of QoL, our Mean DLQI score was 8.93 ± 1.35 (Moderate Effect), which was comparable to studies in Malaysia, 8.50 ± 6.47,24 India, 8.95 ± 8.4825 and Ethiopia, 6.25.26 Similar study designs (hospital-based cross-sectional studies) may explain this similarity. However, in a Chilean study, mean DLQI scores were higher at 14 compared to our scores.27 The reason might be due to the fact that almost half of the participants had psoriasis in “conspicuous and psychologically sensitive areas” like the face, hands, and genitalia. In addition, the most affected domains were the symptoms and feelings followed by daily activities. The results were consistent with a study in Nigeria, where symptoms and feelings were most affected.18 The ‘unsightly’ appearance of the psoriatic lesions makes patients feel embarrassment, shame, and low self-esteem and interrupts their daily activities. Generally, the majority of psoriasis patients (66.67%) had a “moderate to large effect” on their quality of life. This aligns with a study in Taiwan, where 61.1% had a “moderate to large effect”.23 India showed almost similar results (58.4%).25
The similarity might be due to similar disease characteristics, which probably affect quality of life in a similar way across the globe. More still, when we compared the difference between QoL and severity, there was a significant difference in mean DLQI scores across all groups (mild, moderate, and severe) (p = 0.009). The results were similar to a study in Poland28 and an Egyptian study.29
Likely, the more severe the disease (by BSA), the unsightlier its appearance and the higher the scores. Our study found no difference between mean DQLI scores and age of onset. The results were inconsistent with a number of famous studies in India,30 where <40 years had poor scores. In fact, young patients (adolescents) are at the climax of initiating their careers and social relationships and, thus, are expected to be severely affected. Therefore, finding no difference in mean DQLI scores and age of onset is a rare occurrence.
Lastly, our study still showed no significant difference in scores between males and females. The results align with a study in Madagascar, where gender and QoL were unrelated.31 The reason could be because of the similarity in population characteristics and patient behaviour since both studies were done in an African setting. In contrast, several studies, eg, a German study32 and the US, showed more females than males.33 The reason is probably because women tend to be more concerned about their beauty and appearance than men.
Limitations
The study was a hospital-based cross-sectional study with a small sample size, thus findings may not accurately represent the burden of psoriasis on the entire community. Children below 4 years were excluded due to the lack of a simplified tool to assess their quality of life (QoL). The DLQI tool used is based on self-reported questionnaires (with local language translations from English), thus a potential loophole for report or recall bias. Lastly, we were limited with funds, hence no biopsies were done to histologically confirm the psoriasis cases.
Conclusions
The prevalence of psoriasis at a skin clinic in Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in western Uganda is 3.91%. It presents a wide range of clinical variants, with chronic plaque psoriasis being the common variant by 86.67%. The study results suggested that psoriasis moderately affects patients’ quality of life. There was no significant difference between age or gender with QoL.
Recommendations
Owing to the above findings, we recommend multiple sites and a larger sample size or community-based studies to be done to get a clearer picture of the prevalence of psoriasis in Uganda. Public awareness campaigns to address the psychological impact of psoriasis in the community. Clinicians or healthcare workers should be sensitised to holistically manage both physical and psychological impact of psoriasis in patients. We finally argue authorities and health policy-makers to encourage more research on psoriasis, especially on disease genetics and molecular biology.
Disclosure
This paper is based on the thesis of [Dr. LUBWAMA HAYIDAR]. Its abstract has been published on Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) website, as a requirement for the Award of a Degree of Master of Medicine in Dermatology. No conflict of interest.
References
1. William D, James DE, James R, et al. Andrews’ Diseases of the Skin. Chicago: ELSEVIER; 2019.
2. Ayala F. Clinical presentation of psoriasis. Reumatismo. 2007;59(s1):40–45.
3. Nabawy Mohamed E, Mohamed Abd Al-Aal E, Abdallah Abdel-Mordy M. Knowledge and self-care practices among psoriatic patients in Benha City. J Nurs Sci Benha Univ. 2021;2(2):261–272. doi:10.21608/jnsbu.2021.186458
4. Lomholt G. Psoriasis in Uganda: a comparative study with other parts of Africa. In
5. Langley R, Krueger G, Griffiths C. Psoriasis: epidemiology, clinical features, and quality of life. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2005;64(suppl 2):ii18–ii23. doi:10.1136/ard.2004.033217
6. Gottlieb A. Alefacept: a Viewpoint by Alice Gottlieb. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(4):287. doi:10.2165/00128071-200304040-00007
7. Lønnberg AS, Skov L, Duffy D, et al. Genetic factors explain variation in the age at onset of psoriasis: a population-based twin study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016;96(1):35–38. doi:10.2340/00015555-2171
8. Shibeshi D. Pattern of skin diseases at the University teaching hospital, Addis Ababa. Ethiopia Int J Dermatol. 2000;39(11):822–825. doi:10.1046/j.1365-4362.2000.00085.x
9. Leder RO, Farber MM. The variable incidence of psoriasis in sub‐Saharan Africa. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36(12):911–919. doi:10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00251.x
10. Doe PT, Asiedu A, Acheampong JW, et al. Skin diseases in Ghana and the UK. Int J Dermatol. 2001;40(5):323–326. doi:10.1046/j.1365-4362.2001.01229.x
11. Yahya H. Psoriasis in Kaduna, North-West Nigeria: a twenty-year experience. Niger Postgraduate Med J. 2022;29(2):155. doi:10.4103/npmj.npmj_15_22
12. Ouédraogo -D-D, Meyer O. Psoriatic arthritis in sub-Saharan Africa. Joint Bone Spine. 2012;79(1):17–19. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.06.007
13. Mponda K, Masenga J. Skin diseases among elderly patients attending skin clinic at the Regional Dermatology Training Centre, Northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9(1):1–5. doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1933-6
14. Danielsen K, Duvetorp A, Iversen L, et al. Prevalence of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and patient perceptions of severity in Sweden, Norway and Denmark: results from the Nordic patient survey of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Acta Dermato Venereologica;2019;99(1):18–25. doi:10.2340/00015555-3017
15. Søyland E, Heier I, Rodríguez-Gallego C, et al. Sun exposure induces rapid immunological changes in skin and peripheral blood in patients with psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164(2):344–355. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10149.x
16. Armstrong AW, Read C. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of psoriasis: a review. JAMA. 2020;323(19):1945–1960. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4006
17. Guðjónsson JE, Valdimarsson H, Kárason A, et al. HLA-Cw6-positive and HLA-Cw6-negative patients with psoriasis vulgaris have distinct clinical features. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118(2):362–365. doi:10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01656.x
18. Ayanlowo O, Akinkugbe A. Clinical pattern of psoriasis in patients seen at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. J Clin Sci. 2016;13(3):137. doi:10.4103/2468-6859.185251
19. Ding X, Wang T, Shen Y, et al. Prevalence of psoriasis in China: a population-based study in six cities. Eur J Dermatol. 2012;22(5):663–667. doi:10.1684/ejd.2012.1802
20. Neimann AL, Porter SB, Gelfand JM. The epidemiology of psoriasis. Exp Rev Dermatol. 2006;1(1):63–75. doi:10.1586/17469872.1.1.63
21. Langan SM, Seminara NM, Shin DB, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with psoriasis: a population-based study in the United Kingdom. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(3):556–562. doi:10.1038/jid.2011.365
22. Sinniah B, Saraswathy Devi P, Prashant B. Epidemiology of psoriasis in Malaysia: a hospital based study. Med J Malaysia. 2010;65(2):112–114.
23. Lin TY, See L-C, Shen Y-M, et al. Quality of life in patients with psoriasis in northern Taiwan. Chang Gung Med J. 2011;34(2):186–196.
24. Chang Y-T, Chou CT, Shiao YM, et al. Psoriasis vulgaris in Chinese individuals is associated with PSORS1C3 and CDSN genes. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155(4):663–669. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07420.x
25. Barot PA, Brahmbhatt NY, Ninama HV, Kharadi DB, Malhotra SD. Quality of life in patients with psoriasis at a tertiary care teaching hospital–A cross sectional study. National J Med Res. 2015;5(02):93–97.
26. Kumsa SM, Tadesse TA, Woldu MA. Management practice, quality of life and associated factors in psoriasis patients attending a dermatological center in Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0260243. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260243
27. Valenzuela F, Silva P, Valdés MP, et al. Epidemiology and quality of life of patients with psoriasis in Chile. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2011;102(10):810–816. doi:10.1016/j.adengl.2012.01.007
28. Owczarek K, Jaworski M. Quality of life and severity of skin changes in the dynamics of psoriasis. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2016;33(2):102–108. doi:10.5114/pdia.2015.54873
29. Eid AA, Elweshahi HM. Quality of life of Egyptian patients with psoriasis: a hospital-based cross-sectional survey. Egypt J Dermatol venerol. 2016;36(1):11. doi:10.4103/1110-6530.194155
30. Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Age and gender differences in the impact of psoriasis on quality of life. Int J Dermatol. 1995;34(10):700–703. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4362.1995.tb04656.x
31. Sendrasoa FA, Razanakoto NH, Ratovonjanahary V, et al. Quality of life in patients with psoriasis seen in the Department of Dermatology, Antananarivo Madagascar. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:9292163.
32. Schmid-Ott G, Künsebeck H-W, Jäger B, et al. Significance of the stigmatization experience of psoriasis patients: a 1-year follow-up of the illness and its psychosocial consequences in men and women. Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85(1):27–32. doi:10.1080/000155550410021583
33. McKenna KE, Stern RS. The impact of psoriasis on the quality of life of patients from the 16-center PUVA follow-up cohort. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36(3 Pt 1):388–394. doi:10.1016/S0190-9622(97)80214-9
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Recommended articles
Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact on Life of Female Urinary Incontinence: An Epidemiological Survey of 9584 Women in a Region of Southeastern China
Wang Q, Que YZ, Wan XY, Lin CQ
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2023, 16:1477-1487
Published Date: 9 August 2023
Factors Associated with Treatment Satisfaction in Korean Patients with Psoriasis
Jung S, Suh D, Lee SM
Patient Preference and Adherence 2024, 18:2093-2105
Published Date: 4 October 2024
Prevalence, Activity Limitations and Quality of Life in Patients with Non-Specific Neck Pain in Burundi: A Cross-Sectional Study
Ndacayisaba G, Ndayishima B, Mapinduzi J, Ndayishimiye P, Sinzakaraye A, Van Cant J
Journal of Pain Research 2024, 17:4497-4507
Published Date: 24 December 2024
Predictors of Quality of Life in Psoriasis Patients: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study
Walniczek P, Ponikowska M, Kolarczyk EB, Spaleniak P, Mróz-Kijowska K, Czapla M, Uchmanowicz I
Psoriasis: Targets and Therapy 2025, 15:163-174
Published Date: 24 April 2025
Challenges Psoriasis and Its Impact on Quality of Life: Challenges in Treatment and Management
Ponikowska M, Vellone E, Czapla M, Uchmanowicz I
Psoriasis: Targets and Therapy 2025, 15:175-183
Published Date: 1 May 2025