Back to Journals » Journal of Inflammation Research » Volume 18
Recent Advances in Pathogenesis and Anticoagulation Treatment of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy
Authors Man C , An Y, Wang GX, Mao EQ, Ma L
Received 8 September 2024
Accepted for publication 31 December 2024
Published 18 January 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 737—750
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S495223
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Ning Quan
Chit Man,* Yuan An,* Guo-Xin Wang,* En-Qiang Mao, Li Ma
Department of Emergency, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Li Ma; En-Qiang Mao, Email [email protected]; [email protected]
Abstract: Coagulopathy in sepsis is common and is associated with high mortality. Although immunothrombosis is necessary for infection control, excessive thrombus formation can trigger a systemic thrombo-inflammatory response. Immunothrombosis plays a core role in sepsis-induced coagulopathy, and research has revealed a complex interplay between inflammation and coagulation. Different mechanisms underlying sepsis-related coagulopathy are discussed, including factors contributing to the imbalance of pro- and anticoagulation relevant to endothelial cells. The potential therapeutic implications of anticoagulants on these mechanisms are discussed. This review contributes to our understanding of the pathogenesis of coagulopathy in patients with sepsis. Recent studies suggest that endothelial cells play an important role in immunoregulation and hemostasis. Meanwhile, the non-anticoagulation effects of anticoagulants, especially heparin, which act in the pathogenesis of coagulopathy in septic patients, have been partially revealed. We believe that further insights into the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced coagulopathy will help physicians evaluate patient conditions effectively, leading to advanced early recognition and better decision-making in the treatment of sepsis.
Keywords: sepsis, coagulopathy, endotheliopathy, immunothrombosis, thromboinflammation, anticoagulant
Introduction
Coagulopathy, which commonly develops during sepsis, is a complex process involving simultaneous intravascular inflammation, thrombocytopathy, and endotheliopathy.1 These distinct but interrelated responses to external pathogen invasion can be devastating and even enhance lethality. Patients with sepsis who develop coagulopathy usually have a high mortality rate.2 Immunothrombosis and thromboinflammation are intricately linked in the pathogenesis of sepsis.3 Terms such as septic coagulopathy, sepsis-related coagulopathy, sepsis-induced coagulopathy, sepsis-associated coagulopathy, and sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation have been introduced because coagulopathy management has become a major concern in septic patients, mainly due to intravascular environment changes that are not fully explained by currently known mechanisms.
Although diagnostic criteria for overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) have been proposed by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the clinical presentations of DIC are variable and present in different forms. Manifestations of coagulopathy in the early phase of sepsis may not be able to alarm the potential amplification of coagulopathy, which often results in overt DIC. Therefore, a new category termed “sepsis-induced coagulopathy” (SIC) has been proposed, which aims to provide timely assessments, recognitions, and interventions in patients with sepsis.4 Laboratory features that differ from true DIC molecular dysfunction suggest the actual entity of sepsis-induced coagulopathy, which is now considered endotheliopathy-associated vascular microthrombotic disease (EA-VMTD).5
Delineating the mechanisms underlying SIC is essential in sepsis management. In this review, we have attempted to clearly illustrate the recent interpretation of coagulopathy in sepsis (Figure 1). Furthermore, we briefly discuss current SIC management.
Methods
We performed a search of PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). With the use of MeSH and keywords, such as “sepsis”, “immunothrombosis”, “thromboinflammation”, “inflammation”, “coagulopathy”, “endothelial”, and “anticoagulant”. We identified studies and reviews that are relevant to EA-VMTD that can lead to coagulopathy in septic patients. Based on the included articles and reviews, a general pathophysiology and anticoagulant strategy for coagulopathy in sepsis was provided.
Results
Pathogenesis
Uncontrolled Inflammation: Activation of Coagulation Cascade
Sepsis and sepsis-related deaths commonly result from major infections that mediate endotoxemia induction.6 Over the past decade, research has revealed a complex interplay between immunothrombosis and thromboinflammation in sepsis. Immunothrombosis is a process driven by an altered innate immune system that aims for pathogen clearance through a series of activations of immune cells, including neutrophils, monocytes-macrophages, and megakaryocytes-platelets,7 usually initiated once the external pathogens are recognized by a series of molecular patterns. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a prevalent pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMPs) that enables rapid distinction and response to pathogens through counterpart pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) interactions.8 Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in macrophages and neutrophils serves as a pathogen sensor.9,10 Sepsis induces auto-amplification of cytokines after LPS-TLR4 recognition.11,12 The aberrant expression of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferons (IFNs), and interleukins (ILs), including IL-6, IL-2, IL-12, IL-4, IL-10, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) are known to be involved in the development of coagulopathy.13,14
Upon hypercytokinemia, apart from its role in immunomodulation, monocyte-macrophage transitions into a procoagulant status due to surface tissue factor (TF) expression.15,16 The released TF-positive extracellular vesicles initiate clot formation, leading to macrophage pyroptosis via caspase-11 activation, which is induced by type I IFN signaling.17 During pyroptosis, cells undergo membrane shrinkage and blebbing, and surface phosphatidylserine exposure recruits macrophages and stimulates coagulation.18
Infection-induced endotoxemia activates macrophages and neutrophils for phagocytosis.19,20 Neutrophils serve as powerful host innate immune defense.9 Activated live neutrophils release antimicrobial enzymes (eg, neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase) while forming neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are web-like structures composed of tangled decondensed DNA, histones (mainly H1 and H3), and other granules.21,22 Proper NETosis is beneficial for pathogen clearance. However, under sepsis conditions, massive NETs ejection disrupts the intravascular microenvironmental homeostasis.23,24 During NET degradation, NETs debris includes pathogens, cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and cell-free histones (CFHs), which can enter circulation and act as precursors of clot formation and complement activation. Extensive circulating NETs debris induces the release of TF and upregulates TF expression on monocytes, which are harmful to the host by cytotoxic disruption of the endothelial barrier and increase the release of TF on endothelial cells (ECs). Moreover, CFHs can indirectly contribute to the formation of the prothrombinase complex and directly interact with prothrombin, resulting in thrombin generation.16,17,20,25
Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) derived from NETs and their degraded debris trigger leukocyte activation and adhesion, and generate more NETs through platelet activation, either directly or indirectly.26,27 During sepsis, changes in the transcriptome of megakaryocytes and platelets result in intravascular platelet rolling, aggregation, and activation. Activated platelets interact with neutrophils and ECs to initiate immunothrombosis.28,29 During pan-cellular activation, platelets undergo degranulation and release polyphosphate to activate intrinsic coagulation.5,15 The simultaneous release of platelet-derived extracellular vesicles (pEVs) consist of platelet factor 4 (PF4), soluble PF4, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), and histones, is able to interact with histone-decorated NETs and further promotes intercellular binding and clot modifications.30
C-system activation during sepsis induces the generation of a non-specific membrane attack complex (MAC) to facilitate pathogen clearance.31 However, while the coagulation and complement systems are intricately linked and mutually regulated to ensure optimal host protection, MAC is destructive.5,26 The complement/TF/neutrophil axis, known as the TF-dependent procoagulant activity, can lead to coagulation activation.30,32 Activation of C3 and C5 can be activated by coagulation enzymes such as thrombin, factor Xa, and FXIIa. C5a and C5b-9 alternatively induce platelet surface expression of phosphatidylserine and facilitate assembly of the prothrombinase complex.31,33
It is worth paying attention to cytotoxic histones, which are now assumed to be major mediators of sepsis-related death, because they induce microcirculation dysfunction without obvious hemodynamic changes.34 Cytotoxic histones are a key factor in dysregulated immune responses by releasing IL-8 and myeloperoxidase (MPO), resulting in oxidative stress (OS), neutrophil activation and degranulation, and the release of inflammatory factors and adhesion molecules.18 OS is required for both the NETosis process and neutrophil respiratory bursts.35
Unavoidable Endotheliopathy: Dysregulated Intravascular Microenvironment
ECs are non-immune cells that respond to external pathogens, circulating endotoxins, and subsequent cytokine storms via various phenotypic and functional modifications. Endothelial cell dysregulation represents an adaptive but harmful characteristic that intensifies inflammation and coagulopathy, disrupts vascular permeability, and results in vascular leakage and microcirculatory disturbances through immunothrombosis, particularly in the early phase of sepsis.36
A well-preserved endothelial glycocalyx is critical for vascular hemostatic regulation through the release of various antithrombotic substances and the expression of anticoagulant factors.27,37 Intact endothelium regulates plasma anticoagulant protein levels, including antithrombin (AT), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and protein C.38,39 Intact ECs are essential for coping with shear stress and accommodating blood supply, as they prevent inappropriate adhesion and activation of various functional cells under hemodynamic instability.40
With tissue damage, ECs’ natural anticoagulant properties are compromised due to the massive release of TF and complement system activation.17,26 TF induces the transition of the ECs phenotype into pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic states by degrading the surface endothelial glycocalyx through the action of endothelial heparinase.20,41,42 Heparinase exposes the glycocalyx-covered phosphatidylserine that contains coagulation factors (FII, FVII, FIX, and FX) toward the lumen and induces intravascular coagulation.38,43 Injured ECs exocytose the Weibel-Palade body, which increases circulating levels of adhesion molecules such as vWF and P-selectin, promoting platelets and leukocytes activation, adhesion, aggregation, and endothelial phenotype transition.43 Importantly, ultra-large von Willebrand factor (ULVWF) formation during endothelial exocytosis is considered to be the major initiator of microthrombogenesis.5,44 Under systemic inflammatory conditions, such as sepsis, rapid proteolysis of ULVWF multimers by ADAMTS13 is limited because of secondary ADAMTS13 deficiency under conditions of heightened consumption, diminished synthesis, proteolytic clearance, and the presence of inhibitors targeting the metalloprotease.45
During sepsis, disruption of redox homeostasis leads to a pro-oxidant intravascular environment. ROS, RNS, and inflammatory cytokines provoke the transition of pro-inflammatory microcirculation dysfunction through tissue damage and have a significant impact on endothelial function, such as activating sheddases, including metalloproteinases, heparanase, and hyaluronidase, which induce the enzymatic degradation of cytotoxic histones and further increase OS to injure ECs.46 Sepsis-mediated OS upregulates endothelial transient receptor potential melastatin 7 (TRPM7) expression to alter calcium and magnesium permeability. TRPM7 upregulation results in endothelial injury due to endothelial adhesion to neutrophils and platelets, and mediates the increased expression of vWF, P-selectin, and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM 1) and the release of free radicals.47,48 The lack of equivalence in eliminating OS by non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidant systems contributes to the procoagulant state during microcirculatory dysfunction.49,50 OS is also highly related to the structural integrity and functional stability of mitochondria to maintain certain levels of organ function.46,51
Natural Anticoagulants Defect: Functional ECs are Essential
Acquired anticoagulant deficiency frequently occurs in patients with sepsis.52 The functional endothelium is central to providing a favorable environment for natural anticoagulants to achieve efficient anticoagulation and anti-inflammation mechanisms, including antithrombin (AT), protein C and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI).38,53
AT, considered the most important and abundant natural anticoagulant, is significantly reduced during sepsis.52,54 Optimization of antithrombin activity (at least 70% and ideally 80%) is highly associated with disease severity and survival rate.55–57 AT is an endothelium-related marker that is essential for endothelium stabilization, possibly by preventing the shedding of endothelial glycocalyx. Intact endothelium prevents AT decline and exerts anti-inflammatory effects.58,59 In the early stage of sepsis, endogenous AT production decreases significantly and is rapidly depleted due to proteolysis by NE and massive TAT complex formation.60 AT expression is inversely proportional to the plasma levels of cytokines and cytotoxic debris, and the remaining AT is proteolyzed and catalyzed.61 Notably, endothelial glycosaminoglycan heparan sulphate (HS), known as endogenous heparin, can be destroyed after sheddase activation during sepsis.43,62
The protein C system is a vital component of the natural anticoagulant mechanisms in the body. Protein C, protein S, thrombomodulin (TM), and activated protein C (APC) serve as cytoprotective factors that help counteract inflammation-related dysregulation of the internal environment via various mechanisms such as stimulation of the protease activated receptor (PAR) on ECs and cleavage of cytotoxic histone.63,64 Functional protein C systems provide endothelial barrier protective effects by playing a role in the activation of PAR-1 and endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR), as well as through other potential mechanisms that are not yet fully understood. EPCR binds to FVIIa and FXa, resulting in physiologically relevant anticoagulant effects. During sepsis, protein C and TM are downregulated.15,54,65 Extracellular CFHs also affect protein C activation and TM-thrombin complex formation.15,66
Isolated TFPI synthesized by ECs has an indispensable impact on the anticoagulant system compared to the other anticoagulant mechanisms, especially during AT deficiency. TFPI inhibits the FVIIa-TF complex by inhibiting the FVII-activating protease and factor Xa via Xa-TFPI complex formation.67 TFPI can synergistically inhibit the prothrombinase complex with greater anticoagulant activity together with APC and Protein S and facilitate APC-mediated inactivation of FVa.68 TFPI is a strong fibrinolysis promoter due to its efficient inhibition of plasmin inhibitors.69 During the early stage of sepsis, cleavage and inactivation of TFPI can be mediated by the excessive generation of plasmin.70 Imbalanced production of TFPI fails to deactivate the coagulation cascade triggered by massive TF expression in activated immune cells and ECs. TFPI can be oxidized by FXa, thrombin, NE, and MPO released from the activated neutrophils.71,72
Fibrinolytic Dysfunction: Disrupted Coagulation/Fibrinolysis Balance
Hypo-fibrinolysis can be observed in patients with sepsis due to the abnormally increased expression of the superfamily of serine protease inhibitors (SERPINs), resulting in enhanced thrombotic events due to the co-existence of fibrin deposition and impaired removal. SERPINs are a group of plasminogen activation inhibitors that regulate the fibrinolytic, inflammatory, and complement systems in the hemostasis pathway.73
With an increase in circulating inflammatory factors, the serum Plg level can decrease significantly in patients with severe sepsis. LPS induces the active transition of Plg to Pla during inflammation and is accompanied by increased fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, D-dimer, and the plasmin-A2AP complex (PAP).74 Notably, while these fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products and D-dimer were significantly enriched in patients with organ dysfunction, they show a marked decline in sepsis-induced DIC.75–77 α2-antiplasmin (A2AP) serves as a principal inhibitor of Pla in vivo and generally synthesizes PAP in a 1:1 ratio.78,79 Under conditions of increased shear stress, the crosslinking of A2AP into the fibrin meshwork becomes more efficient. Consequently, the presence of ultra-large von Willebrand factor (ULVWF) on the endothelial surface serves as a relatively protective factor.80
The serum level of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) positively correlates with the level of circulating IL-6 in septic patients, particularly in patients who develop organ failure and DIC.71,81,82 During immune-inflammatory activation, PAI-1 is expressed by platelets and ECs, and is driven by TNF-α.83 The DNA-histone complex release during NETosis prolongs fibrinolysis by interacting with tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and unknown interactions with urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA).84 Studies have suggested that NETs serve as an internal medium to increase the heterogeneity of clots by forming thicker fibrin fibers through fibrin skeletal support enhancement. Therefore, NETosis debris inhibits fibrinolysis in the microcirculation,37,84 rendering microthrombi more resistant to anticoagulants during sepsis.15,23 In contrast, while the role of plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2) during sepsis is not fully understood, it is known to have a complex interplay with PAI-1 and to share functions with PAI-1 in response to inflammatory stimuli.85–87
C1-INH is the most abundant protease inhibitor, which targets the fibrinolytic system during sepsis by inhibiting Pla, tPA, and uPA.88,89 Abnormally increased expression of C1-INH leads to insufficient fibrinolysis. C1-INH acts effectively on the C system by neutralizing factors Xa, FXIIa, kallikrein, and the C1 component.90 The increased expression of C1-INH during sepsis enables effective anti-inflammatory action and helps preserve the endothelium through interactions with endotoxins, bacteria, neutrophils, macrophages, ECs, and extracellular matrix components. These effects are achieved independently of its role in protease inhibition. These interactions result in suppression of inflammatory factors and enhanced phagocytosis, as well as modulation of leukocyte rolling and migration.31,91,92
Protease nexin (PN) is a member of the SERPIN superfamily and is closely associated with PAI-1.93,94 PN-1 mitigates plasmin generation and activity of plasmin.95
Nevertheless, endothelium thrombomodulin-thrombin complex formation increases thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) activity, which contributes to pronounced hypofibrinolysis and anti-inflammatory activity, while AT decreases contribute to natural anticoagulant defects in patients with sepsis.96,97 TAFI activation reflects both thrombin generation and clot stability, and generally leads to fibrinolytic resistance in platelet-rich clots.98
Vicious Circle: Immunothrombosis and Thromboinflammation
The optimal event after pathogen invasion and recognition at the infectious site is localized immunothrombosis, a process of intravascular thrombus formation that facilitates pathogen elimination without causing diffuse activation of the innate immune response.99,100 However, uncontrolled systemic immunothrombosis was triggered. Immunothrombosis in sepsis is initiated by a series of activations of the inflammation and complementary system, and the release of these massive and varied cytokines leads to an alteration of the surface protein expression on immune and non-immune cells, which in turn results in feedback and feedforward effects on inflammatory events, a phenomenon known as thromboinflammation.101,102 Immunothrombosis and thromboinflammation contribute to intravascular injury and global systemic damage during sepsis.3,4,51,100,103
As discussed before, ECs in the vasculature are considered to be the major contributors to thromboinflammation due to their antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory roles.53 During immunothrombosis, with the activation of coagulation, studies have suggested that some coagulation factors and products also promote or trigger an inflammatory response.
Thrombin, also known as Factor IIa, plays a crucial role in the various pathways associated with inflammation and coagulation. In the common pathway, thrombin plays a key role in promoting fibrin formation and results in barrier disruption after PARs activation, including PAR-1, −3, and −4, inducing M1 macrophage polarization and directly activating ECs. These actions contribute to the activation of the NF-κB pathway.104–106 Thrombin upregulates IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, TGF-β, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and P-selectin in ECs, smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, epithelial cells, and monocytes.107–109 Thrombin induces the release of MCP-1, VEGF, metalloproteinases, and PDGF, further promoting inflammation.110–114 Thrombin generation is also induced by the TF-factor VIIa complex and factor Xa via PAR-1, and PAR-2 activation.104 FXIIa can directly activate the kallikrein-kinin and complement systems as well as activating the intrinsic pathway of the coagulation cascade. Bradykinin leads to thrombus stabilization, kinin formation, cytokine production, cell growth, and cell migration.115
The accompaniment of fibrin deposition is important for isolating and limiting the spread of pathogens.116 Fibrin exerts multiple effects by serving as a ligand for various cell surface receptors on leukocytes, ECs, platelets, fibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells, which induces inflammation in ECs and promotes leukocyte transmigration.117,118
Treatment
The comprehensive management of sepsis includes a series of supportive treatments, including fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, and mechanical ventilation.119 The recommended fundamental strategies are antimicrobial use and source control. Recently, some recognized anticoagulants have been shown to contribute to the regulation of coagulopathy and inflammatory host response in critically ill patients, and to deliver both therapeutic anticoagulant and non-anticoagulant effects in sepsis management.84,120
Anticoagulants
Heparin
Heparin, including UFH and LMWH, is a widely used anticoagulant and antithrombotic drug that plays a major role in sepsis management. Heparin has interdependent and interacting biological features associated with anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and anti-complementary activities, in addition to its anticoagulant effects. Regulatory effects are more predominant in UFH than in LMWH; however, inconsistencies remain in their therapeutic efficiency.3,24,54,121,122
Heparin plays a crucial role beyond anticoagulation in the management of sepsis.123 Heparin is a heterogeneous, linear, highly sulfated, anionic glycosaminoglycan with a high anion charge density. During sepsis, heparin selectively binds to key modulators of cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation, and alters the pathological progression of thromboinflammation, which further improves systemic microcirculation.124 Heparin neutralizes cytokines and chemoattractants, reduces NETs, and inhibits the feedback loop that amplifies pro-inflammatory factors.54,125 Heparin has a high affinity for proteins with a positive charge and can selectively interact with the central effectors during immunothrombosis, especially heparan sulfate-binding proteins.30,84 Circulating extracellular histones mediate cytotoxicity and procoagulant activity associated with death in patients with sepsis.122,126 Due to its structural similarity to heparan sulfate (HS), heparin can neutralize the debris released from the shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx.120,127,128 When endothelial glycocalyx shedding and NETosis occur, heparin with heparin fragments >1.7 kDa produces a neutralizing effect on histones and interrupts the direct interaction between cfDNA and vWF.44,129,130 Early administration of heparin (within 6 h of hospitalization) decreases the circulating levels of NET-related markers such as cfDNA, NE, and the MPO-DNA complex.121 Moreover, heparin-functionalized adsorbents showed a similar efficacy in reducing thrombotic complications by removing the core effect factors of immune thrombosis, acting independently of AT and its interaction with heparin’s antithrombin-binding pentasaccharide.30,130,131 Some in vitro animal experiments have shown that purified heparin with eliminated anticoagulant effect but other independent mechanisms relieve thromboinflammation and SIC progression while reducing the risk of bleeding.122,130 Therefore, heparin holds great promise for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-associated coagulopathy through its anticoagulant and non-anticoagulant effects.
Heparin and heparin-like compounds have been introduced as possible adjunctive therapies for patients with sepsis.132 A meta-analysis including 3482 patients from nine trials showed that heparin reduced 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis [odds ratio = 0.656, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.562–0.765, P < 0.0001] without increasing the incidence of bleeding events.133 However, another meta-analysis enrolling 2637 patients from nine trials showed that while heparin decreased mortality in patients with sepsis, septic shock, and DIC associated with infection, a small trial reported a significantly increased risk of major bleeding.134 Therefore, uncertainty regarding heparin safety and efficacy remains.
Activated Protein C, APC
APC is a natural mediator protein that regulates various pathological conditions through cleavage of cytotoxic histone H3 and alleviation of sepsis-induced interactions between platelets, neutrophils, and ECs.135 Recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC), known as drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DAA), was the first APC variant applied in septic patients with high mortality and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2001.136–138 In vitro studies showed that mono-drug application of rhAPC significantly reduced sepsis-induced platelet-neutrophil aggregates in plasma and decreased neutrophil aggregation and adhesion to damaged endothelial cells, suppressing excessive thrombus formation.135,139 However, the clinical benefit-to-risk ratio of rhAPC did not support its administration due to rising concerns regarding its proven efficacy in anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory effects in a PAR-1 targeted, but EPCR-independent manner.140,141 Especially in septic patients, because their coagulation system has been extensively disturbed, further multi-organ complications, commonly hemorrhage-related adverse events, can be easily triggered.136,138,142,143 In patients with severe sepsis and a low risk of death (APACHE II score <25 or single organ involvement), intravenous infusion (24 μg/kg/h) of rhAPC for 96 h showed no clinical benefit, but significantly increased risk of the bleeding events.144 Therefore, rhAPc was withdrawn from the anticoagulant market in 2011 because of its variable clinical benefits and perhaps increased bleeding risk between septic sub-phenotypes.137,142,145,146
To minimize the risks of complications and take advantage of APC properties. Several APC variants have been designed with enhanced neutralizing abilities of extracellular histone H3 and permanently diminished anticoagulant abilities, unlike wild-type APC. For example, the variants 3D2D-APC and 3D2D2A-APC. These rationally designed and produced novel APC variants are potential therapeutic agents for histone-associated diseases, including cancer and inflammatory diseases.126 Site-directed mutagenesis was used to modify the cytoprotective and antiapoptotic activities of APC while eliminating its anticoagulant activity, such as 229/230-APC and 3K3AAPC, also present similar therapeutic effects while greatly reducing the anticoagulant activity (<10%) through corresponding surface loop amino acid mutations.142,147
Antiplatelet Drugs
Thrombocytopenia is associated with poor outcomes in sepsis. Antiplatelet strategies aim to slow the progression of coagulopathy by decreasing platelet reactivity, which acts as a functional mediator between immunothrombosis and thromboinflammation. These strategies aim to prevent extensive microthrombus formation and progression to DIC.148–150
Antiplatelet drugs can reduce inflammatory biomarkers, such as CRP and P-selectin, and suppress leukocyte-platelet aggregates.1,151,152 Recently, the application of aspirin (ASA) in patients with sepsis has been suggested to have anti-inflammatory activity and bacterial control effects. A meta-analysis involving 689,897 patients with sepsis has shown that ASA effectively reduces mortality and improves prognosis.153,154 While ASA has a stronger effect in reducing mortality when managing patients with sepsis without established cardiovascular problems,155,156 septic patients with cardiovascular disease who receive chronic pre-sepsis ASA treatment before hospital admission also have reduced 90-day mortality.157
Chinese Herbal Medicine
Some traditional Chinese herbal medicines have the potential to be effective in treating sepsis and sepsis-mediated multi-organ injuries (Table 1).
![]() |
Table 1 Chinese Herbal Medicines and Their Use in the Treatment of Sepsis |
Conclusion
In conclusion, this review underscores the critical interplay between coagulation and inflammation in sepsis and emphasizes the pivotal role of endothelial cells in these processes. By elucidating the mechanisms behind sepsis-related coagulopathy and evaluating the therapeutic potential of anticoagulants, we offer insights that could transform the clinical approaches for managing sepsis. Our findings highlight the importance of early recognition and targeted intervention strategies that are vital for improving patient outcomes in this challenging condition. Ongoing research is essential to further refine these strategies and optimize the effectiveness of sepsis treatment protocols.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This study was supported by the Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (22Y11900300) to Li Ma, the Project of China Primary Health Care Foundation (MTP2022A0132) to Li Ma and the Project of Shanghai Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (ZXXT-202213) to En-Qiang Mao and Li Ma.
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this work.
References
1. Greco E, Lupia E, Bosco O, Vizio B, Montrucchio G. Platelets and multi-organ failure in sepsis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2200. doi:10.3390/ijms18102200
2. Lyons PG, Micek ST, Hampton N, Kollef MH. Sepsis-associated coagulopathy severity predicts hospital mortality. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(5):736–742. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002997
3. Li X, Li L, Shi Y, Yu S, Ma X. Different signaling pathways involved in the anti-inflammatory effects of unfractionated heparin on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human endothelial cells. J Inflamm. 2020;17:5. doi:10.1186/s12950-020-0238-7
4. Iba T, Helms J, Connors JM, Levy JH. The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Intensive Care. 2023;11(1):24. doi:10.1186/s40560-023-00672-5
5. Chang JC. Sepsis and septic shock: endothelial molecular pathogenesis associated with vascular microthrombotic disease. Thromb J. 2019;17:10. doi:10.1186/s12959-019-0198-4
6. Ząbczyk M, Kruk A, Natorska J, Undas A. Low-grade endotoxemia in acute pulmonary embolism: links with prothrombotic plasma fibrin clot phenotype. Thromb Res. 2023;232:70–76. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.10.020
7. Iba T, Levi M, Levy JH. Intracellular communication and immunothrombosis in sepsis. J Thromb Haemost. 2022;20(11):2475–2484. doi:10.1111/jth.15852
8. Moriyama K, Nishida O. Targeting cytokines, pathogen-associated molecular patterns, and damage-associated molecular patterns in sepsis via blood purification. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(16):8882. doi:10.3390/ijms22168882
9. Lenz M, Draxler DF, Zhang C, et al. Toll-like receptor 2 and 9 expression on circulating neutrophils is associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients. Shock. 2020;54(1):35–43. doi:10.1097/SHK.0000000000001467
10. Wang M, Feng J, Zhou D, Wang J. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced endothelial activation and dysfunction: a new predictive and therapeutic paradigm for sepsis. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):339. doi:10.1186/s40001-023-01301-5
11. Cui Z, Wang L, Li H, Feng M. Study on immune status alterations in patients with sepsis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;118:110048. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110048
12. van der Poll T, Shankar-Hari M, Wiersinga WJ. The immunology of sepsis. Immunity. 2021;54(11):2450–2464. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.10.012
13. Chousterman BG, Swirski FK, Weber GF. Cytokine storm and sepsis disease pathogenesis. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39(5):517–528. doi:10.1007/s00281-017-0639-8
14. Sikora JP, Karawani J, Sobczak J. Neutrophils and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(17):13469. doi:10.3390/ijms241713469
15. Yong J, Abrams ST, Wang G, Toh CH. Cell-free histones and the cell-based model of coagulation. J Thromb Haemost. 2023;21(7):1724–1736. doi:10.1016/j.jtha.2023.04.018
16. Musgrave KM, Scott J, Sendama W, et al. Tissue factor expression in monocyte subsets during human immunothrombosis, endotoxemia and sepsis. Thromb Res. 2023;228:10–20. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.05.018
17. Subramaniam S, Kothari H, Bosmann M. Tissue factor in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. Thromb Res. 2022;220:35–47. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2022.09.025
18. Marcello M, Virzì GM, Marturano D, et al. The cytotoxic effect of septic plasma on healthy RBCS: is eryptosis a new mechanism for sepsis? Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(18):14176. doi:10.3390/ijms241814176
19. Zhang Q, Ul Ain Q, Schulz C, Pircher J. Role of antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin in thrombosis and thromboinflammation. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1151926. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1151926
20. Zhang H, Wang Y, Qu M, et al. Neutrophil, neutrophil extracellular traps and endothelial cell dysfunction in sepsis. Clin Transl Med. 2023;13(1):e1170. doi:10.1002/ctm2.1170
21. Scozzi D, Liao F, Krupnick AS, Kreisel D, Gelman AE. The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in acute lung injury. Front Immunol. 2022;13:953195. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.953195
22. Lelliott PM, Momota M, Shibahara T, et al. Heparin induces neutrophil elastase-dependent vital and lytic NET formation. Int Immunol. 2020;32(5):359–368. doi:10.1093/intimm/dxz084
23. Zhou Y, Tao W, Shen F, Du W, Xu Z, Liu Z. The emerging role of neutrophil extracellular traps in arterial, venous and cancer-associated thrombosis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:786387. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.786387
24. Fu S, Yu S, Zhao Y, Ma X, Li X. Unfractionated heparin attenuated histone-induced pulmonary syndecan-1 degradation in mice: a preliminary study on the roles of heparinase pathway. Inflammation. 2022;45(2):712–724. doi:10.1007/s10753-021-01578-w
25. Ngo AT, Skidmore A, Oberg J, et al. Platelet factor 4 limits neutrophil extracellular trap- and cell-free DNA-induced thrombogenicity and endothelial injury. JCI Insight. 2023;8(22):e171054. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.171054
26. Yu S, Liu J, Yan N. Endothelial dysfunction induced by extracellular neutrophil traps plays important role in the occurrence and treatment of extracellular neutrophil traps-related disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(10):5626. doi:10.3390/ijms23105626
27. Colicchia M, Perrella G, Gant P, Rayes J. Novel mechanisms of thrombo-inflammation during infection: spotlight on neutrophil extracellular trap-mediated platelet activation. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023;7(2):100116. doi:10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100116
28. Ajanel A, Middleton EA. Alterations in the megakaryocyte transcriptome impacts platelet function in sepsis and COVID-19 infection. Thromb Res. 2023;231:247–254. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.05.015
29. Mandel J, Casari M, Stepanyan M, Martyanov A, Deppermann C. Beyond hemostasis: platelet innate immune interactions and thromboinflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(7):3868. doi:10.3390/ijms23073868
30. Ebeyer-Masotta M, Eichhorn T, Weiss R, et al. Heparin-functionalized adsorbents eliminate central effectors of immunothrombosis, including platelet factor 4, high-mobility group box 1 protein and histones. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1823. doi:10.3390/ijms23031823
31. Lupu F, Keshari RS, Lambris JD, Coggeshall KM. Crosstalk between the coagulation and complement systems in sepsis. Thromb Res. 2014;1(33 Suppl 1):S28–31. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2014.03.014
32. Jacobi J. The pathophysiology of sepsis—2021 update: part 1, immunology and coagulopathy leading to endothelial injury. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022;79(5):329–337. doi:10.1093/ajhp/zxab380
33. Zetoune FS, Ward PA. Role of Complement and Histones in Sepsis. Front Med. 2020;7:616957. doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.616957
34. Zhu C, Liang Y, Li X, Chen N, Ma X. Unfractionated heparin attenuates histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and prevents intestinal microcirculatory dysfunction in histone-infused rats. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87(3):614–622. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000002387
35. Ashar HK, Mueller NC, Rudd JM, et al. The role of extracellular histones in influenza virus pathogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2018;188(1):135–148. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.09.014
36. Ev D, W K, M R, Kk G. The effects of sepsis on endothelium and clinical implications. Cardiol Res. 2021;117(1):60–73.
37. Maneta E, Aivalioti E, Tual-Chalot S, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and immunothrombosis in sepsis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1144229. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1144229
38. Ito T, Kakuuchi M, Maruyama I. Endotheliopathy in septic conditions: mechanistic insight into intravascular coagulation. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):95. doi:10.1186/s13054-021-03524-6
39. Buchheim JI, Enzinger MC, Choukèr A, Bruegel M, Holdt L, Rehm M. The stressed vascular barrier and coagulation - The impact of key glycocalyx components on in vitro clot formation. Thromb Res. 2020;186:93–102. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2019.12.015
40. Lupu F, Kinasewitz G, Dormer K. The role of endothelial shear stress on haemodynamics, inflammation, coagulation and glycocalyx during sepsis. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(21):12258–12271. doi:10.1111/jcmm.15895
41. Uchimido R, Schmidt EP, Shapiro NI. The glycocalyx: a novel diagnostic and therapeutic target in sepsis. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):16. doi:10.1186/s13054-018-2292-6
42. Joffre J, Hellman J, Ince C, Ait-Oufella H. Endothelial responses in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(3):361–370. doi:10.1164/rccm.201910-1911TR
43. Oshima K, King SI, McMurtry SA, Schmidt EP. Endothelial heparan sulfate proteoglycans in sepsis: the role of the glycocalyx. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2021;47(3):274–282. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1725064
44. Grässle S, Huck V, Pappelbaum KI, et al. von Willebrand factor directly interacts with DNA from neutrophil extracellular traps. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34(7):1382–1389. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.303016
45. Rahmati N, Keshavarz Motamed P, Maftoon N. Numerical study of ultra-large von Willebrand factor multimers in coagulopathy. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2024;23(3):737–756. doi:10.1007/s10237-023-01803-5
46. Joffre J, Hellman J. Oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in sepsis and acute inflammation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021;35(15):1291–1307. doi:10.1089/ars.2021.0027
47. Jiménez-Dinamarca I, Prado Y, Tapia P, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation phenotype is regulated by the TRPM7 channel during sepsis. Biol Res. 2023;56(1):8. doi:10.1186/s40659-023-00419-4
48. Dalal PJ, Muller WA, Sullivan DP. Endothelial cell calcium signaling during barrier function and inflammation. Am J Pathol. 2020;190(3):535–542. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.11.004
49. Huet O, Dupic L, Harrois A, Duranteau J. Oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction during sepsis. Front Biosci. 2011;16(5):1986–1995. doi:10.2741/3835
50. Prado Y, Aravena D, Gatica S, et al. From genes to systems: the role of food supplementation in the regulation of sepsis-induced inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2024;1870(1):166909. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2023.166909
51. Lopes-Pires ME, Frade-Guanaes JO, Quinlan GJ. Clotting dysfunction in sepsis: a role for ros and potential for therapeutic intervention. Antioxidants. 2021;11(1):88. doi:10.3390/antiox11010088
52. Rodgers GM, Mahajerin A. Antithrombin therapy: current state and future outlook. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023;29:10760296231205279. doi:10.1177/10760296231205279
53. Sharma S, Tyagi T, Antoniak S. Platelet in thrombo-inflammation: unraveling new therapeutic targets. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1039843. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1039843
54. Mohseni Afshar Z, Tavakoli Pirzaman A, Hosseinzadeh R, et al. Anticoagulant therapy in COVID-19: a narrative review. Clin Transl Sci. 2023;16(9):1510–1525. doi:10.1111/cts.13569
55. Iba T, Tanigawa T, Wada H, Levy JH. The antithrombin activity recovery after substitution therapy is associated with improved 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb J. 2023;21(1):112. doi:10.1186/s12959-023-00556-6
56. Yarimizu K, Nakane M, Onodera Y, et al. Prognostic value of antithrombin activity levels in the early phase of intensive care: a 2-center retrospective cohort study. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023;29:10760296231218711. doi:10.1177/10760296231218711
57. Akahoshi T, Kaku N, Shono Y, et al. Impact of antithrombin activity levels following recombinant antithrombin gamma therapy in patients with sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022;28:10760296221135790. doi:10.1177/10760296221135790
58. Iba T, Maier CL, Tanigawa T, Levy JH. Risk stratification utilizing sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, antithrombin activity, and demographic data in sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):22502. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-49855-y
59. Chappell D, Jacob M, Hofmann-Kiefer K, et al. Antithrombin reduces shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx following ischaemia/reperfusion. Cardiol Res. 2009;83(2):388–396.
60. Joshi D, Manohar S, Goel G, Saigal S, Pakhare AP, Goyal A. Adequate antithrombin iii level predicts survival in severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Cureus. 2021;13(10):e18538. doi:10.7759/cureus.18538
61. Lopez E, Peng Z, Kozar RA, et al. Antithrombin III contributes to the protective effects of fresh frozen plasma following hemorrhagic shock by preventing syndecan-1 shedding and endothelial barrier disruption. Shock. 2020;53(2):156–163. doi:10.1097/SHK.0000000000001432
62. Catieau B, Devos V, Chtourou S, Borgel D, Plantier JL. Endothelial cell surface limits coagulation without modulating the antithrombin potency. Thromb Res. 2018;167:88–95. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2018.05.019
63. Thielen O, Mitra S, Debot M, et al. Mitigation of trauma-induced endotheliopathy by activated protein C: a potential therapeutic for postinjury thromboinflammation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024;96(1):116–122. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000004142
64. Oto J, Fernández-Pardo Á, Miralles M, et al. Activated protein C assays: a review. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;502:227–232. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2019.11.005
65. Catenacci V, Sheikh F, Patel K, Fox-Robichaud AE. The prognostic utility of protein C as a biomarker for adult sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):21. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-03889-2
66. Yokoyama H, Tateishi K, Baba Y, et al. Thrombin cleaves recombinant soluble thrombomodulin into a lectin-like domain fragment and a fragment with protein C-activating cofactor activity. Biosci Trends. 2022;16(6):444–446. doi:10.5582/bst.2022.01472
67. Tanratana P, Sachetto ATA, Mast AE, Mackman N. An anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor antibody increases tissue factor activity in extracellular vesicles isolated from human plasma. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024;8(1):102275. doi:10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102275
68. Li X, Song X, Mahmood DFD, Sim MMS, Bidarian SJ, Wood JP. Activated protein C, protein S, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor cooperate to inhibit thrombin activation. Thromb Res. 2023;230:84–93. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.08.012
69. Stephan F, Dienava-Verdoold I, Bulder I, et al. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor is an inhibitor of factor VII-activating protease. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(6):1165–1171. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04712.x
70. Lupu C, Herlea O, Tang H, Lijnen RH, Lupu F. Plasmin-dependent proteolysis of tissue factor pathway inhibitor in a mouse model of endotoxemia. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(1):142–148. doi:10.1111/jth.12044
71. Levi M, Van Der Poll T. Coagulation and sepsis. Thromb Res. 2017;149:38–44. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2016.11.007
72. Ravindranath TM, Goto M, Iqbal O, et al. Plasma thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor changes following sepsis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2007;13(4):362–368. doi:10.1177/1076029607305580
73. Humphreys SJ, Whyte CS, Mutch NJ. ‘Super’ SERPINs-A stabilizing force against fibrinolysis in thromboinflammatory conditions. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1146833. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1146833
74. Renckens R, Weijer S, de Vos AF, et al. Inhibition of plasmin activity by tranexamic acid does not influence inflammatory pathways during human endotoxemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(3):483–488. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000118280.95422.48
75. Iba T, Kidokoro A, Fukunaga M, Sugiyama K, Sawada T, Kato H. Association between the severity of sepsis and the changes in hemostatic molecular markers and vascular endothelial damage markers. Shock. 2005;23(1):25–29. doi:10.1097/01.shk.0000144422.32647.b6
76. Madoiwa S, Nunomiya S, Ono T, et al. Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 promotes a poor prognosis in sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation. Int J Hematol. 2006;84(5):398–405. doi:10.1532/IJH97.05190
77. Takahashi H, Tatewaki W, Wada K, Hanano M, Shibata A. Thrombin vs. plasmin generation in disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with various underlying disorders. Am J Hematol. 1990;33(2):90–95. doi:10.1002/ajh.2830330204
78. Wiman B, Collen DI. On the mechanism of the reaction between human alpha 2-antiplasmin and plasmin. J Biol Chem. 1979;254(18):1.
79. Fair DS, Plow EF. Synthesis and secretion of the fibrinolytic components, including α2-antiplasmin, by a human hepatoma cell line. J Lab Clin Med. 1983;101(3):372–384.
80. Mutch NJ, Koikkalainen JS, Fraser SR, et al. Model thrombi formed under flow reveal the role of factor XIII‐mediated cross‐linking in resistance to fibrinolysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(9):2017–2024. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03963.x
81. Vago JP, Zaidan I, Perucci LO, et al. Plasmin and plasminogen prevent sepsis severity by reducing neutrophil extracellular traps and systemic inflammation. JCI Insight. 2023;8(8):e166044. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.166044
82. Hoshino K, Nakashio M, Maruyama J, Irie Y, Kawano Y, Ishikura H. Validating plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 as a poor prognostic factor in sepsis. Acute Med Surg. 2020;7(1):e581. doi:10.1002/ams2.581
83. Morrow GB, Mutch NJ. Past, present, and future perspectives of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1). Semin Thromb Hemost. 2023;49(3):305–313. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1758791
84. Komorowicz E, Farkas VJ, Szabó L, Cherrington S, Thelwell C, Kolev K. DNA and histones impair the mechanical stability and lytic susceptibility of fibrin formed by staphylocoagulase. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1233128. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1233128
85. Siefert SA, Chabasse C, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Enhanced venous thrombus resolution in plasminogen activator inhibitor type-2 deficient mice. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12(10):1706–1716. doi:10.1111/jth.12657
86. Boncela J, Przygodzka P, Papiewska-Pajak I, Wyroba E, Cierniewski CS. Association of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 (PAI-2) with proteasome within endothelial cells activated with inflammatory stimuli. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(50):43164–43171. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.245647
87. Cater JH, Mañucat-Tan NB, Georgiou DK, et al. A novel role for plasminogen activator inhibitor type-2 as a hypochlorite-resistant serine protease inhibitor and holdase chaperone. Cells. 2022;11(7):1152. doi:10.3390/cells11071152
88. Karnaukhova E. C1-inhibitor: structure, functional diversity and therapeutic development. Curr Med Chem. 2022;29(3):467–488. doi:10.2174/0929867328666210804085636
89. Davis AE, Mejia P, Lu F. Biological activities of C1 inhibitor. Mol Immunol. 2008;45(16):4057–4063. doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2008.06.028
90. Wouters D, Wagenaar-Bos I, van Ham M, Zeerleder S. C1 inhibitor: just a serine protease inhibitor? New and old considerations on therapeutic applications of C1 inhibitor. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008;8(8):1225–1240. doi:10.1517/14712598.8.8.1225
91. Davis AE, Lu F, Mejia P. C1 inhibitor, a multi-functional serine protease inhibitor. Thromb Haemost. 2010;104(5):886–893. doi:10.1160/TH10-01-0073
92. Singer M, Jones AM. Bench-to-bedside review: the role of C1-esterase inhibitor in sepsis and other critical illnesses. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):203. doi:10.1186/cc9304
93. Sommer J, Gloor SM, Rovelli GF, et al. cDNA sequence coding for a rat glia-derived nexin and its homology to members of the serpin superfamily. Biochemistry. 1987;26(20):6407–6410. doi:10.1021/bi00394a016
94. Irving JA, Pike RN, Lesk AM, Whisstock JC. Phylogeny of the serpin superfamily: implications of patterns of amino acid conservation for structure and function. Genome Res. 2000;10(12):1845–1864. doi:10.1101/gr.147800
95. Boulaftali Y, Ho-Tin-Noe B, Pena A, et al. Platelet protease nexin-1, a serpin that strongly influences fibrinolysis and thrombolysis. Circulation. 2011;123(12):1326–1334. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.000885
96. Sotos KE, Goggs R, Stablein AP, Brooks MB. Increased thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor activity is associated with hypofibrinolysis in dogs with sepsis. Front Vet Sci. 2023;10:1104602. doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1104602
97. Totoki T, Ito T, Kakuuchi M, Yashima N, Maruyama I, Kakihana Y. An evaluation of circulating activated TAFI in septic DIC: a case series and review of the literature. Thromb J. 2022;20(1):6. doi:10.1186/s12959-022-00364-4
98. Colucci M, Semeraro N. Thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor: at the nexus of fibrinolysis and inflammation. Thromb Res. 2012;129(3):314–319. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2011.10.031
99. Engelmann B, Massberg S. Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(1):34–45. doi:10.1038/nri3345
100. Watanabe-Kusunoki K, Nakazawa D, Ishizu A, Atsumi T. Thrombomodulin as a physiological modulator of intravascular injury. Front Immunol. 2020;11:575890.
101. Iba T, Helms J, Levi M, Levy JH. Thromboinflammation in acute injury: infections, heatstroke, and trauma. J Thromb Haemost. 2023;22:7–22.
102. Pérez-Torres I, Aisa-Álvarez A, Casarez-Alvarado S, et al. Impact of treatment with antioxidants as an adjuvant to standard therapy in patients with septic shock: analysis of the correlation between cytokine storm and oxidative stress and therapeutic effects. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(23):16610.
103. Bode C, Weis S, Sauer A, Wendel-Garcia P, David S. Targeting the host response in sepsis: current approaches and future evidence. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):478. doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04762-6
104. Esmon CT. Targeting factor Xa and thrombin: impact on coagulation and beyond. Thromb Haemost. 2014;111(4):625–633. doi:10.1160/TH13-09-0730
105. Ma L, Dorling A. The roles of thrombin and protease-activated receptors in inflammation. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34(1):63–72. doi:10.1007/s00281-011-0281-9
106. Stavenuiter F, Mosnier LO. Noncanonical PAR3 activation by factor Xa identifies a novel pathway for Tie2 activation and stabilization of vascular integrity. Blood. 2014;124(23):3480–3489. doi:10.1182/blood-2014-06-582775
107. Strande JL, Phillips SA. Thrombin increases inflammatory cytokine and angiogenic growth factor secretion in human adipose cells in vitro. J Inflam. 2009;6(1):4. doi:10.1186/1476-9255-6-4
108. Minami T, Sugiyama A, Wu SQ, Abid R, Kodama T, Aird WC. Thrombin and phenotypic modulation of the endothelium. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis Vasc Biol. 2004;24(1):41–53. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000099880.09014.7D
109. Mosad E, Elsayh KI, Eltayeb AA. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor and p-selectin as markers of sepsis-induced non-overt disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2011;17(1):80–87. doi:10.1177/1076029609344981
110. Popović M, Smiljanić K, Dobutović B, Syrovets T, Simmet T, Isenović ER. Thrombin and vascular inflammation. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012;359(1–2):301–313. doi:10.1007/s11010-011-1024-x
111. Yang CC, Hsiao LD, Yang CM, Lin CC. thrombin enhanced matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression and migration of SK-N-SH cells via PAR-1, c-Src, PYK2, EGFR, Erk1/2 and AP-1. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(5):3476–3491. doi:10.1007/s12035-016-9916-0
112. Wojta J. Macrophages and thrombin-another link between inflammation and coagulation. Thromb Haemost. 2020;120(4):537. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1708551
113. Rahman A, Fazal F. Hug tightly and say goodbye: role of endothelial ICAM-1 in leukocyte transmigration. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11(4):823–839. doi:10.1089/ars.2008.2204
114. Blackburn JS, Brinckerhoff CE. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 and thrombin differentially activate gene expression in endothelial cells via PAR-1 and promote angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2008;173(6):1736–1746. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2008.080512
115. Renné T, Stavrou EX. Roles of factor XII in innate immunity. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2011. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.02011
116. Chen D, Dorling A. Critical roles for thrombin in acute and chronic inflammation. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7(Suppl 1):122–126. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03413.x
117. Luyendyk JP, Schoenecker JG, Flick MJ. The multifaceted role of fibrinogen in tissue injury and inflammation. Blood. 2019;133(6):511–520. doi:10.1182/blood-2018-07-818211
118. Yakovlev S, Medved L. Effect of fibrinogen, fibrin, and fibrin degradation products on transendothelial migration of leukocytes. Thromb Res. 2018;162:93–100. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2017.11.007
119. Li X, Ma X. The role of heparin in sepsis: much more than just an anticoagulant. Br J Haematol. 2017;179(3):389–398. doi:10.1111/bjh.14885
120. Hogwood J, Gray E, Heparin MB. Heparan sulphate and sepsis: potential new options for treatment. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(2):271. doi:10.3390/ph16020271
121. Galli E, Maggio E, Pomero F. Venous thromboembolism in sepsis: from bench to bedside. Biomedicines. 2022;10(7):1651. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10071651
122. Wildhagen KCAA, García de Frutos P, Reutelingsperger CP, et al. Nonanticoagulant heparin prevents histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and improves survival in sepsis. Blood. 2014;123(7):1098–1101. doi:10.1182/blood-2013-07-514984
123. Lindahl U, Li JP. Heparin - an old drug with multiple potential targets in Covid-19 therapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(9):2422–2424. doi:10.1111/jth.14898
124. Wang P, Chi L, Zhang Z, Zhao H, Zhang F, Linhardt RJ. Heparin: an old drug for new clinical applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;295:119818. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119818
125. Sun Y, Chen C, Zhang X, et al. Heparin improves alveolarization and vascular development in hyperoxia-induced bronchopulmonary dysplasia by inhibiting neutrophil extracellular traps. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;522(1):33–39. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.11.041
126. Huckriede JB, Beurskens DMH, Wildhagen KCCA, Reutelingsperger CPM, Wichapong K, Nicolaes GAF. Design and characterization of novel activated protein C variants for the proteolysis of cytotoxic extracellular histone H3. J Thromb Haemost. 2023;21(12):3557–3567. doi:10.1016/j.jtha.2023.08.023
127. Huang X, Han S, Liu X, et al. Both UFH and NAH alleviate shedding of endothelial glycocalyx and coagulopathy in LPS-induced sepsis. Exp Ther Med. 2020;19(2):913–922. doi:10.3892/etm.2019.8285
128. Zhu C, Liang Y, Liu Y, Shu W, Luan Z, Ma X. Unfractionated heparin protects microcirculation in endotoxemic rats by antagonizing histones. J Surg Res. 2023;282:84–92. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2022.09.019
129. Longstaff C, Hogwood J, Gray E, et al. Neutralisation of the anti-coagulant effects of heparin by histones in blood plasma and purified systems. Thromb Haemost. 2016;115(3):591–599. doi:10.1160/th15-03-0214
130. Sharma N, Haggstrom L, Sohrabipour S, Dwivedi DJ, Liaw PC. Investigations of the effectiveness of heparin variants as inhibitors of histones. J Thromb Haemost. 2022;20(6):1485–1495. doi:10.1111/jth.15706
131. Iba T, Saitoh D. Efficacy of antithrombin in preclinical and clinical applications for sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Intensive Care. 2014;2(1):66. doi:10.1186/s40560-014-0051-6
132. Cornet AD, Smit EGM, Beishuizen A, Groeneveld ABJ. The role of heparin and allied compounds in the treatment of sepsis. Thromb Haemost. 2007;98(3):579–586. doi:10.1160/TH07-01-0006
133. Wang C, Chi C, Guo L, et al. Heparin therapy reduces 28-day mortality in adult severe sepsis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):563. doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0563-4
134. Zarychanski R, Abou-Setta A, Kanji S, et al. Efficacy and safety of heparin in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):P123. doi:10.1186/cc14203
135. Kirschenbaum LA, Lopez WC, Ohrum P, Tsen A, Khazin J, Astiz ME. Effect of recombinant activated protein C and low-dose heparin on neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions in septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(8):2207–2212. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000229880.41513.86
136. Altaweel L, Sweeney D, Cui X, Barochia A, Natanson C, Eichacker PQ. Growing insights into the potential benefits and risks of activated protein C administration in sepsis: a review of preclinical and clinical studies. Biologics. 2009;3:391–406. doi:10.2147/btt.2009.3547
137. Annane D, Timsit JF, Megarbane B, et al. Recombinant human activated protein C for adults with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(10):1091–1097. doi:10.1164/rccm.201211-2020OC
138. Annane D, Buisson CB, Cariou A, et al. Design and conduct of the activated protein C and corticosteroids for human septic shock (APROCCHSS) trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6(1):43. doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0147-3
139. Ikezoe T. Thrombomodulin/activated protein C system in septic disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Intensive Care. 2015;3(1):1. doi:10.1186/s40560-014-0050-7
140. Weiler H, Kerschen E. Modulation of sepsis outcome with variants of activated protein C. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7(Suppl 1):127–131. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03377.x
141. O’Brien LA, Richardson MA, Mehrbod SF, et al. Activated protein C decreases tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand by an EPCR- independent mechanism involving Egr-1/Erk-1/2 activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27(12):2634–2641. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.153734
142. Mosnier LO, Gale AJ, Yegneswaran S, Griffin JH. Activated protein C variants with normal cytoprotective but reduced anticoagulant activity. Blood. 2004;104(6):1740–1744. doi:10.1182/blood-2004-01-0110
143. Flaumenhaft R, De Ceunynck K. Targeting PAR1: now what? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017;38(8):701–716. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2017.05.001
144. Abraham E, Laterre PF, Garg R, et al. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) for adults with severe sepsis and a low risk of death. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(13):1332–1341. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa050935
145. Papageorgiou C, Jourdi G, Adjambri E, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation: an update on pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutic strategies. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018;24(9_suppl):8S–28S. doi:10.1177/1076029618806424
146. Levy M, Levi M, Williams MD, Antonelli M, Wang D, Mignini MA. Comprehensive safety analysis of concomitant drotrecogin alfa (activated) and prophylactic heparin use in patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(7):1196–1203. doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1483-7
147. Zhao R, Xue M, Lin H, et al. A recombinant signalling‐selective activated protein C that lacks anticoagulant activity is efficacious and safe in cutaneous wound preclinical models. Wound Repair Regen. 2024;3:
148. Cox D. Sepsis - it is all about the platelets. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1210219. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1210219
149. Giustozzi M, Ehrlinder H, Bongiovanni D, et al. Coagulopathy and sepsis: pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and treatment. Blood Rev. 2021;50:100864. doi:10.1016/j.blre.2021.100864
150. Li X, Zhang G, Cao X. The function and regulation of platelet P2Y12 receptor. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023;37(1):199–216. doi:10.1007/s10557-021-07229-4
151. Muhlestein JB. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on inflammatory markers in atherothrombotic patients. Thromb Haemost. 2010;103(1):71–82. doi:10.1160/TH09-03-0177
152. Akinosoglou K, Alexopoulos D. Use of antiplatelet agents in sepsis: a glimpse into the future. Thromb Res. 2014;133(2):131–138. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2013.07.002
153. Ouyang Y, Wang Y, Liu B, Ma X, Ding R. Effects of antiplatelet therapy on the mortality rate of patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2019;50:162–168. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.12.004
154. Wang Y, Ouyang Y, Liu B, Ma X, Ding R. Platelet activation and antiplatelet therapy in sepsis: a narrative review. Thromb Res. 2018;166:28–36. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2018.04.007
155. Al-Husinat L, Abu hmaid A, Abbas H, et al. Role of aspirin, beta-blocker, statins, and heparin therapy in septic patients under mechanical ventilation: a narrative review. Front Med. 2023;10. doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1143090
156. Kobayashi M, Kudo D, Ohbe H, Kushimoto S. Antiplatelet pretreatment and mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a secondary analysis from a multicenter, prospective survey of severe sepsis in Japan. J Crit Care. 2022;69:154015. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154015
157. Hsu WT, Porta L, Chang IJ, et al. Association between aspirin use and sepsis outcomes: a national cohort study. Anesth Analg. 2022;135(1):110–117. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000005943
158. Li C, Wang P, Li M, et al. The current evidence for the treatment of sepsis with Xuebijing injection: bioactive constituents, findings of clinical studies and potential mechanisms. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;265:113301. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2020.113301
159. Cheng C, Ren C, Li MZ, et al. Pharmacologically significant constituents collectively responsible for anti-sepsis action of XueBiJing, a Chinese herb-based intravenous formulation. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2024;45(5):1077–1092. doi:10.1038/s41401-023-01224-1
160. Karimi A, Naeini F, Niazkar HR, et al. Nano-curcumin supplementation in critically ill patients with sepsis: a randomized clinical trial investigating the inflammatory biomarkers, oxidative stress indices, endothelial function, clinical outcomes and nutritional status. Food Funct. 2022;13(12):6596–6612. doi:10.1039/D1FO03746C
161. Nugent WH, Carr DA, Friedman J, Song BK. Novel transdermal curcumin therapeutic preserves endothelial barrier function in a high-dose LPS rat model. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2023;51(1):33–40. doi:10.1080/21691401.2022.2164584
162. Huang P, Guo Y, Hu X, Fang X, Xu X, Liu Q. Mechanism of shenfu injection in suppressing inflammation and preventing sepsis-induced apoptosis in murine cardiomyocytes based on network pharmacology and experimental validation. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;322:117599. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2023.117599
163. Hu Y, He S, Xu X, et al. Shenhuangdan decoction alleviates sepsis-induced lung injury through inhibition of GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;318:117047. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2023.117047
164. Li Z, Yu Y, Bu Y, et al. QiShenYiQi pills preserve endothelial barrier integrity to mitigate sepsis-induced acute lung injury by inhibiting ferroptosis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;322:117610. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2023.117610
165. Sun X, Zhou M, Pu J, Wang T. Stachydrine exhibits a novel antiplatelet property and ameliorates platelet-mediated thrombo-inflammation. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;152:113184. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113184
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.