Back to Journals » Journal of Inflammation Research » Volume 18
Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signalling Pathways in Heart Failure: From Molecular Mechanism to Therapeutic Potential
Authors Zhao M , Bian R, Xu X, Zhang J, Zhang L, Zheng Y
Received 4 January 2025
Accepted for publication 16 April 2025
Published 23 April 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 5477—5498
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S515757
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Professor Ning Quan
Meng Zhao,1– 3 Rutao Bian,2 Xuegong Xu,2 Junpeng Zhang,2 Li Zhang,2 Yi Zheng2
1The First Clinical Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Cardiology, Zhengzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, People’s Republic of China; 3Joint Formula and Syndrome Research Laboratory of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine & Zhengzhou Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Xuegong Xu; Junpeng Zhang, Zhengzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]; [email protected]
Abstract: Sphingolipids are essential components of cell membranes and lipoproteins. They are synthesized de novo in the endoplasmic reticulum and subsequently undergo various enzymatic modifications in different organelles, giving rise to a diverse range of biologically active compounds. These molecules play a critical role in regulating cell growth, senescence, migration, apoptosis, and signaling. In recent years, the sphingolipid metabolic pathway has been recognized as a key factor in heart failure (HF) pathophysiology. Abnormal levels of sphingolipid metabolites, such as ceramide (Cer) and sphingomyelin (SM), contribute to oxidative stress and inflammatory responses, ultimately promoting cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Conversely, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P) regulate vascular function and influence cardiac remodeling. Additionally, enzymes such as diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) and sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase 1 (SGPL1) modulate cardiac lipid metabolism. Given their role in HF progression, monitoring sphingolipid alterations offers potential as valuable biomarkers for assessing disease severity, prognosis, and diagnosis. Given the complexity of sphingolipid metabolism and its involvement in diverse regulatory biological processes, a comprehensive understanding of its roles at both the cellular and organismal levels in physiopathology remains incomplete. Therefore, this review aims to explore the physiological functions, regulatory mechanisms, and therapeutic potential of sphingolipid metabolism. It will summarize the specific molecular mechanisms driving key pathological processes in HF, including ventricular remodeling, myocardial fibrosis, vascular dysfunction, and metabolic disorders. Finally, the review will highlight targeted sphingolipid metabolites as potential therapeutic strategies, offering new insights into HF diagnosis and treatment, with the goal of advancing adjunctive clinical therapies.
Keywords: sphingolipids, ceramide, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, mechanisms
Introduction
Heart failure (HF) is a multifaceted clinical syndrome characterized by insufficient cardiac output and/or elevated intracardiac pressure, resulting from impaired ventricular pumping, reduced filling capacity, or structural and functional abnormalities of the heart.1 HF is stratified into three categories based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; LVEF ≥50%), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF; LVEF 41–49%), and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; LVEF ≤40%).1,2 The clinical presentation typically involves dyspnoea, ankle swelling, and fatigue, and is often associated with elevated jugular venous pressure, pulmonary wet rales, and peripheral oedema.3 Recent data indicate that the prevalence of HF has exceeded 60 million cases worldwide.4 Despite advancements in medical technology, the five-year survival rate of HF remains below 50%,5,6 and projections suggest that the prevalence of HF will increase by 46% by 2030.7,8 The low quality of life, high readmission rates, and poor prognosis associated with HF impose significant challenges and substantial economic burdens on global healthcare systems.9 Therefore, gaining an in-depth understanding of the pathological mechanisms underlying HF and exploring effective therapeutic approaches is of paramount importance.
Although numerous studies have investigated the pathological mechanisms of HF, significant gaps in understanding persist.10–12 This is especially true for cardiac lipid homeostasis, which recent research has shown to play a crucial role in HF pathogenesis.13–18 However, comprehensive knowledge regarding the roles of specific lipids, such as sphingolipids, in HF remains limited. Sphingolipids, as essential components of cell membranes and lipoproteins,19 significantly influence various cellular physiological properties and biological processes, including cell growth, senescence, migration, and apoptosis, as well as inflammation, immune responses, and oxidative stress.20–23 Studies have shown that sphingolipids are not only crucial for cardiac development but also play a key role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases.24,25 On one hand, the accumulation of sphingolipids can trigger inflammatory responses and lipid deposition in cardiomyocytes,26 leading to cardiac and vascular dysfunction.27 Consequently, sphingolipids, such as ceramide (Cer), sphingomyelin (SM) and glycosphingolipid (GSL), are commonly used as lipid biomarkers for cardiovascular diseases.28 On the other hand, the activity of enzymes involved in sphingolipid metabolism can reduce sphingolipid levels, decrease cardiomyocyte death,29 slow myocardial fibrosis progression, mitigate inflammatory responses,30 and promote cardiac function recovery. This regulatory mechanism presents a promising therapeutic target for cardiovascular disease treatment.31
Due to the complexity of sphingolipid metabolism and the multidirectional regulation of biological processes, a comprehensive understanding of the role of sphingolipids at both the cellular and organismal levels, as well as their involvement in pathophysiology, remains incomplete. In this paper, we review the critical roles of sphingolipid metabolic pathways in HF, highlighting their physiological functions, mechanisms of action, and potential therapeutic targets. Our goal is to offer valuable insights and strategic guidance for future research on HF.
Sphingolipid Metabolism
Since their discovery and naming in the late 19th century, sphingolipids have garnered widespread attention.32–34 In previous studies, the biological structure and the metabolic processes of sphingolipids have been clearly elucidated (for a summary of the metabolic pathways, see Figure 1). Sphingolipids are a class of amphipathic lipids whose sphingoid backbone is N-acylated with various fatty acid chains (Figure 2).35 The main lipids involved in sphingolipid metabolic processes are Cer, SM, GSL, sphingo-sine-1-phosphate (S1P), and ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P), which all share the same sphingolipid base.21 Sphingolipids, as essential components of biological membranes, play crucial roles in cellular structure and function.22 Their physiological activities are largely dependent on their association with membranes, vesicles, and membrane contact sites (MCS). These specialized sites facilitate the transfer and exchange of lipids between organelles, ensuring proper sphingolipid metabolism and signaling.36 The regulatory mechanisms governing sphingolipid involvement in biological processes are closely linked to this membrane-dependent property, highlighting their significance in maintaining cellular homeostasis and function.37,38 It has been suggested that Cer, Sph, and dihydroceramide (dhCer) are primarily associated with the induction of cell cycle arrest and/or cell death,19 whereas S1P, C1P, and glucosylceramide (GlcCer) are linked to enhanced cell survival, promoting cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration.39
De novo Synthesis of Sphingolipids
The de novo synthesis of sphingolipids begins in the ER, where enzymes located on the cytoplasmic side of the ER catalyse the synthesis of sphingolipid bases from the substrates L-serine and palmitoyl cofactor a (Figure 1a).40 Subsequently, serine palmitoyl transferase (SPT) catalyses the synthesis of 3-keto-dihydrosphingosine (3KDS), which is then reduced by 3-keto-dihydrosphingosine reductase (KDSR) to form dihydrosphingosine (dhSph).41,42 Catalysed by ceramide synthetases (CERSs), dhSph is converted into dhCer with various acyl chain lengths. dhCer is subsequently converted into Cer following the addition of a double bond catalysed by sphingolipid Δ4-desaturase DES1 (DEGS1) (Figures 1a and 2a).43 Cer serves as a key substrate for the synthesis of other sphingolipids and represents a central intermediate in the sphingolipid metabolic pathway.
Main Pathways of Sphingolipid Metabolism
Salvage and Degradation Pathway
Acidic ceramidases (CDases) catalyse the hydrolysis of Cer into sphingosine (Sph), which can subsequently be resynthesised into Cer by CERSs,44 constituting the savage pathway in sphingolipid metabolism (Figures 1a and 2b). Sph is phosphorylated by sphingosine kinases (SPHKs) to generate S1P.45 S1P can be converted back into Sph through the combined actions of S1P phosphatases (SGPPs) and lipid phosphate phosphatases (PLPPs), thereby reentering the salvage pathway (Figures 1a and 2c). Alternatively, S1P is degraded into hexadecenal and ethanolamine phosphate by sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase 1 (SGPL1),46 marking the endpoint of sphingolipid metabolism.
SM and GSL Synthesis Pathway
Cer is transported to the trans-Golgi network (TGN) by the ceramide transfer protein (CERT).47 Within the TGN, sphingomyelin synthase 1 (SMS1) catalyses the conversion of Cer into SM and diacylglycerol (DAG) (Figures 1c and 2d). The DAG produced in this reaction can further activate protein kinase D (PKD). Activated PKD inhibits CERT, establishing a negative feedback regulatory system to precisely regulate SM flux.48 Meanwhile, Cer is transported via vesicles to the cytoplasmic side of the Golgi apparatus, where UDP-glucose ceramide glycosyltransferase (UGCG) catalyses its conversion into GlcCer. Subsequently, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate adaptor protein 2 (FAPP2) transports GlcCer within the TGN, where it is further processed to synthesize various GSL (Figures 1c and 2e).49,50 A portion of GSL and SM is translocated to lysosomes through endocytosis and/or cytosolic pathways, where they are converted back into Cer by the catalytic actions of acid sphingomyelinase (aSMase) and glycosidases, respectively (Figure 1b). The remaining portion is transported to the plasma membrane, where it aggregates with other lipids to form lipid microdomains (Figure 1e).51
C1P and Acylceramide Synthesis Pathway
Two additional conversion pathways for Cer occur in the TGN. In one pathway, Cer is directly phosphorylated by ceramide kinase (CERK) to generate C1P, a bioactive molecule that functions as a second messenger extensively involved in the regulation of diverse biological processes (Figures 1c and 2f).52 In the other pathway, a portion of Cer is converted into acyl ceramides through a shunt pathway catalysed by diacylglycerol O-acyltransferases (DGATs) and stored in lipid droplets. This step plays a critical role in maintaining Cer flux within the cell (Figures 1d and 2g).53,54
Regulation of Cell Function by Sphingolipid Metabolism
Sphingolipid metabolism is a highly complex biological process, with its regulatory effects on cellular functions largely determined by the key enzymes involved and their metabolic products. As the central molecule in sphingolipid metabolism, Cer plays a crucial role in maintaining cell membrane stability, regulating organelle functions, and mediating cell signaling processes.35 A primary regulatory mechanism of Cer is its role as a pro-apoptotic driver. Cer can activate the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway or directly interact with pro-apoptotic proteins of the Bcl-2 family, leading to organelle permeabilization and the regulation of apoptosis.55 The accumulation of Cer can interfere with mitochondrial fission and promote the generation of reactive oxygen species, inducing oxidative stress that directly impairs mitochondrial function.56,57 Furthermore, Cer plays a critical role in the formation and secretion of exosomes, thereby regulating intercellular signal transduction.58 SPT, a complex composed of enzymes from the SPT family, serves as a key rate-limiting enzyme in the sphingolipid metabolic pathway. Additionally, it functions as a negative regulator of Cer, preventing its abnormal accumulation and maintaining intracellular sphingolipid homeostasis.41
Sph inhibits protein kinase C (PKC), disrupting calcium homeostasis,59 thereby exhibiting lysosomal toxicity. To counteract this, Sph can be transported out of lysosomes by sphingosine kinase 1 (SPHK1) and converted into S1P on the cytosolic surface. S1P promotes cell migration, proliferation, and mitosis,60 while also exerting anti-apoptotic effects by activating extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and inhibiting JNK signaling.61 Acting as a “sphingolipid variable resistor”,62 S1P helps regulate the balance between pro-apoptotic and proliferation-related molecules, in coordination with Cer, to maintain cellular homeostasis. Moreover, S1P participates in the regulation of various physiological processes, including the nervous system, immune system, vascular physiology, and more.26,63,64 SM is enriched in the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, where it coexists with other lipids. This lipid composition contributes to an increase in membrane thickness and plays a key role in maintaining the structural integrity of the cell membrane.65 This aggregated lipid microstructure is referred to as lipid rafts, which regulate the shuttling of molecules across the cell surface, signal transduction pathways, and the entry of pathogens and toxins. Lipid rafts have also been strongly implicated in brain cell aging and neurodegenerative diseases.51 Additionally, SM associates with cholesterol in the plasma membrane to form SM/cholesterol complexes, which play a key role in regulating cellular cholesterol homeostasis.66 GSL, also found within lipid microstructure, plays a key role in regulating membrane homeostasis. Its complex glycosyl structure allows interaction with extracellular vesicles (EVs), thereby influencing intercellular signaling and potentially inducing apoptosis.67 GSL can also increase mitochondrial calcium (Ca2+) influx, leading to changes in membrane potential and promoting mitochondrial fission. These changes can disrupt normal mitochondrial function and trigger alterations in the organism’s energy metabolism.68 Additionally, C1P, produced through Cer phosphorylation by CERK, stimulates fibroblast DNA synthesis and proliferation, thereby promoting cell growth.69 C1P effectively modulates inflammatory responses by inhibiting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, and by blocking the NF-κB signaling pathway.70
Sphingolipid Metabolism in CVD
The pathogenesis and treatment of CVD remain a significant challenge and a major focus of research in the cardiovascular field. Several studies have reported abnormal concentrations of sphingolipid metabolites in plasma samples from patients with atherosclerosis (AS), hypertension, and HF. These findings suggest that sphingolipid metabolism plays a critical role in the pathogenesis and progression of CVD.23–25,71 An increasing number of studies have demonstrated that sphingolipid metabolism plays a pivotal role in pathophysiological processes, including inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, and lipid deposition.26,27 These metabolites mediate physiological and pathological processes in the cardiovascular system by contributing to pathological alterations such as vascular dysfunction, myocardial abnormalities, and disturbances in cardiac energy metabolism.31 Studies have further shown that abnormally elevated levels of Cer, SM, and GSL exacerbate AS and HF.72 Moreover, abnormal changes in S1P levels have been shown to exert dual effects on atherosclerosis, either promoting or inhibiting its development. However, overall, abnormal S1P levels are associated with the exacerbation of pathophysiological processes such as fibrosis and cardiac remodeling.25 Therefore, sphingolipids, as a class of potential biomarkers, have been extensively studied and utilized in the prediction and diagnosis of CVD.28,72 Additionally, the modulation of key enzymes involved in sphingolipid metabolism, through dietary or pharmacological interventions, as well as the supplementation or inhibition of related metabolites, has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for CVD.73 (Table 1 that outlines the roles of various sphingolipid metabolites in different cardiovascular conditions).
![]() |
Table 1 Roles of Sphingolipid Metabolites in Cardiovascular Diseases |
Effects of Sphingolipid Metabolism on Cardiovascular Function
Role of Sphingolipid Metabolism in Vascular Function
Vascular endothelial cells are a single layer of flattened squamous epithelial cells lining the inner surface of blood vessels. They form a barrier between blood vessels and tissues, regulate the exchange of substances between blood and tissue fluids, and control vascular tone.92 Abnormal regulation of sphingolipid metabolites or their key enzymes can act as mediators that influence the functional state of endothelial cells.93 This dysregulation can alter vascular permeability, promote vasoconstriction, and trigger inflammatory responses. Collectively, these processes contribute to vascular dysfunction, forming the pathophysiological basis of CVDs.94
Regulation of Endothelial Cell Function
Sphingolipid metabolism exerts a bidirectional regulatory effect on endothelial cell function. Its detrimental effects on endothelial cells are primarily manifested through the induction of oxidative stress and apoptosis. In contrast, its protective effects include anti-apoptotic properties, inhibition of inflammatory responses, and the promotion of cell proliferation and growth. Specifically, the accumulation of Cer in endothelial cells enhances the activity of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, promoting the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This process impacts the activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), reduces nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, and induces oxidative stress, ultimately leading to vascular dysfunction.74 Additionally, Cer induces apoptosis in endothelial cells through various pathways, including the stimulation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (CAPK) and the SAPK/JNK cascade reaction. Cer can also directly regulate the physical properties of cell membranes, further driving apoptosis and contributing to destructive effects on vascular function.75 S1P binds to different sites on sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors (S1PRs), exerting distinct effects.76
Promote Vascular Remodelling
Binding of S1P to S1PR2 activates the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) pathway, which inhibits AKT phosphorylation, disrupts adhesion junctions, and increases paracellular permeability.77 Conversely, S1PR1 enhances the production and exocytosis of S1P, promoting vascular smooth muscle cell migration to facilitate vascular repair.95 SPHK1 is one of the key enzymes regulating sphingolipid metabolism. As a downstream effector of the LIM domain 2 (Lmo2) transcription factor, it promotes endothelial cell migration and participates in vascular remodeling.78 SGPL1 prevents damage to the endothelial cell barrier caused by pro-inflammatory factors, ensuring the stability of endothelial cell function under inflammatory conditions and exerting a protective effect on blood vessels.96
Role of Sphingolipid Metabolism in Cardiac Function
Abnormalities in cardiac structure and function are central to the pathological progression of CVDs. Current studies have shown that sphingolipid metabolites play a crucial role in regulating key biological processes such as myocardial contraction, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and myocardial fibrosis.97
Regulation of Myocardial Contraction
The modulation of these metabolites may hold potential for reversing pathological changes in cardiac structure and improving cardiac function.98 Research indicates that Cer and S1P directly regulate contractile function in cardiomyocytes. S1P activates specific G-proteins, reducing Ca2+ influx and inhibiting isoproterenol-induced cAMP accumulation, thereby producing a negative inotropic effect.26,99 Cer increases the phosphorylation of the myofilament proteins cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and cardiac myosin-binding protein-C (cMyBP-C), thereby inhibiting myocardial contractility.100 CDase facilitates Cer degradation, reducing Cer levels in the heart and alleviating cardiac remodeling, thereby improving cardiac function.101
Improvement in Myocardial Fibrosis
S1P plays a pivotal role in tissue fibrosis.97 S1P regulates fibroblast migration, myofibroblast differentiation, and TGF-β signaling via its receptor S1PR3, mediating the fibrotic response of tissues.102 SPHK1 plays a critical role in regulating myocardial fibrosis under both physiological and pathological conditions. Under physiological conditions, it facilitates myocardial cell proliferation and growth. Under pathological conditions, particularly in myocardial hypoxia, SPHK1 exerts anti-inflammatory effects and effectively suppresses the progression of cardiac fibrosis. Additionally, inhibiting the overexpression of SPHK1 can attenuate myocardial fibrosis mediated by the S1P-S1PR2 signaling pathway.76,79 Inflammation is a critical factor in fibrosis and remodeling following cardiac injury. C1P contributes to cardiac fibrosis by modulating the inflammatory response, primarily through the activation of prostaglandin synthesis and release. CERK, an upstream regulator of C1P, also participates in this process.80
Involvement in Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis
In addition, cardiomyocyte apoptosis is a critical contributing factor to cardiac insufficiency. The abnormal accumulation of sphingolipid metabolites may initiate apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. Cer has been shown to induce apoptosis in cardiomyocytes, with mitochondria as a key target. Cer promotes apoptosis by activating the caspase-3 signaling pathway, promoting mitochondrial fission, and increasing the permeability of the outer mitochondrial membrane.81,98 Furthermore, overexpression of serine palmitoyltransferase 1(SPTLC1) and/or serine palmitoyltransferase 1(SPTLC2) results in Cer accumulation, which disrupts mitochondrial respiration and further promotes apoptosis in cardiomyocytes.82
Regulation of Cardiac Energy Metabolism by Sphingolipid Metabolism
Under normal conditions, the heart primarily derives its energy from the β-oxidation of fatty acids in the mitochondria, using free fatty acids and glucose as substrates. These substrates undergo oxidation reactions catalyzed by acetyl coenzyme A, producing ATP to meet the heart’s energy demands.103 When energy metabolism is aberrant, a failure to utilize these substrates results in lipid deposition in the vasculature, further contributing to the progression of CVD.13 Sphingolipid metabolism products can both mediate and reverse this process.31 The accumulation of Cer has been shown to induce mitochondrial fission factor, leading to mitochondrial calcium overload and apoptosis, thereby interfering with lipid metabolism. Similarly, GSL can regulate mitochondrial calcium retention capacity and energy production.104 SPT, as an initiator of sphingolipid metabolism, regulates the de novo synthesis of sphingolipids. Silencing SPT gene expression reduces the accumulation of Cer, GSLs, and other sphingolipids.83,105 Targeted ablation of DES1, a key enzyme in Cer synthesis, ameliorates disorders of lipid metabolism.84 Specific depletion of SPTLC2 in non-adipose cells exhibits similar effects, modulating steatosis and enhancing energy expenditure.106 It has been shown that inhibition of sphingolipid expression in cardiomyocytes improves mitochondrial respiration and regulates insulin signaling, glucose uptake, and related metabolic pathways.107 In addition, sphingolipids activate the expression of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), which inhibits Akt/protein kinase B (Akt/PKB) signaling. This inhibition alters glucose uptake and oxidation while limiting fatty acid availability, thereby impacting cardiac energy metabolism.108
During ischemia, the limited availability of oxygen forces the heart to rely on anaerobic glycolysis as a compensatory mechanism. This shift results in reduced ATP production and lactate accumulation, leading to intracellular acidosis and mitochondrial dysfunction.109 Once blood flow is restored, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation resumes, accompanied by the reactivation of fatty acid oxidation and a sudden surge in reactive ROS. These events further impair mitochondrial function, and ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury induces maladaptive myocardial remodeling, ultimately leading to hypertrophy and heart failure.110 Studies have shown that GSL and SM are significantly reduced at ischemic sites, whereas Cer levels are markedly increased.111 Cer exacerbates this metabolic imbalance by promoting oxidative stress, further worsening ischemic injury. Myriocin inhibits the expression of SPT, reducing Cer synthesis. This, in turn, enhances mitochondrial β-oxidation, accelerating ATP production, and plays a crucial role in regulating cardiac remodeling and energy generation.112 Additionally, CDase promotes the hydrolysis of Cer in cardiomyocytes, enhancing mitochondrial respiration and supporting metabolic adaptation under ischemic conditions.113 Activation of S1P signaling helps modulate mitochondrial homeostasis in I/R injury, restoring lipid metabolic balance in vivo.114
The Role of Sphingolipid Metabolism in CVD
An increasing number of studies have focused on monitoring sphingolipid levels as key indicators of CVD progression and exploring their potential as therapeutic targets for intervention.25,26,28,73 Research has demonstrated that sphingolipids play a critical role in the pathogenesis of AS.28 The pathological process of AS is characterized by the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1β, which stimulate SM hydrolysis to produce Cer, which acts as a signaling intermediate. Cer, in turn, induces IL-6 gene expression, aggravates inflammation, promotes endothelial cell apoptosis, and facilitates the formation of atherosclerotic plaques.75,85 Meanwhile, oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) stimulates the enzymatic activities of CERSs, SPHKs, and acid aSMase, thereby promoting the production of S1P. S1P binds to S1PR2 to regulate macrophage infiltration and inflammatory cytokine secretion, promoting atherosclerotic progression. Conversely, S1P interacts with S1PR1 to inhibit pro-inflammatory factors, exhibiting anti-atherosclerotic effects.76,77,115 Additionally, inhibition of aSMase mediates the Nrf2 pathway, reducing macrophage infiltration and lipid deposition.87
The imbalance of sphingolipid metabolism is closely associated with the pathogenesis of hypertension. Relevant studies have shown that under hypertensive pathological conditions, the levels of Cer and Sph in endothelial cells are abnormally elevated.86 In addition, the absence of SPHK1 and sphingosine kinase 2 (SPHK2) expression reduces arterial contractility, a phenomenon positively correlated with S1P levels. Meanwhile, activation of aSMase also elevates S1P levels, impairing endothelial cell function and contributing to elevated blood pressure. This process may involve S1P-induced oxidative stress mechanisms.88 A study assessing the risk of hypertension found that risk scoring based on Cer concentration and plasma ratios could effectively predict disease progression and outcomes.116
In the pathological progression of acute coronary syndrome and myocardial infarction (MI), Cer and S1P exhibit opposing functional trends. In vivo experiments have confirmed that the levels of sphingolipid metabolites, such as dhCer, CER6, and Cer, significantly increase in the plasma of MI mice. However, this trend reverses during the MI recovery phase, and elevated sphingolipid levels are regarded as an important marker of cardiac dysfunction.117 Further research has shown that activating CDases can accelerate the hydrolysis of Cer, thereby reducing cardiomyocyte apoptosis, improving overall cardiac function, and extending survival post-MI.30 Additionally, S1P interacts with S1PR2 and S1PR3, playing a critical role in maintaining the normal conduction of action potentials in cardiomyocytes.118 Furthermore, S1P mediates the mTOR signaling pathway, inducing autophagy in cardiomyocytes post-MI, effectively preventing adverse remodeling and demonstrating significant cardioprotective effects.119
Sphingolipid Metabolism with HF
HF represents the endstage manifestation of all CVDs, resulting from abnormalities in cardiac function or structure.8 The etiology of HF is complex, with pathological mechanisms encompassing endothelial injury, vascular dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, myocardial fibrosis, and energy metabolism disturbances, among others.11–13 Studies have shown that the sphingolipid metabolic pathway is disrupted during the progression of HF, resulting in altered levels of key enzymes and related metabolites.120 In the plasma of HF patients, elevated levels of SPT, Cer, SM, Sph, and GSL have been observed, accompanied by decreased levels of S1P and C1P, along with an elevated Cer/S1P ratio.72,121 Therefore, abnormal changes in sphingolipid levels serve as risk factors for assessing and predicting HF progression.122 In recent years, increasing research on sphingolipid metabolism has identified key substances in this process as potential therapeutic targets for HF.120 It is thus evident that sphingolipid metabolism is integral to the pathogenesis of HF (Figure 3).
Mechanisms of Sphingolipid Metabolism in HF
Although the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines classify HF into three types based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)—HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%), HFmrEF (LVEF 41–49%), and HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 40%)—HFmrEF is considered an intermediate stage and often progresses to either HFpEF or HFrEF.1,123 Therefore, research has primarily focused on the two major types, HFrEF and HFpEF, when studying the effects of sphingolipid metabolism on HF.
Sphingolipid Metabolism in the HFrEF
The main pathological features of HFrEF include ventricular dilatation, systolic dysfunction, and myocardial fibrosis, which are primarily linked to ischemic damage to the heart.124,125 The sphingolipid metabolic pathway plays a key role in the pathological process of HFrEF by impairing cardiomyocyte function, promoting oxidative stress, and triggering inflammatory responses.97,98
Changes in sphingolipid metabolism directly affect the physiological state of cardiomyocytes. Studies have shown that Cer and dhSph levels are elevated, while SM levels are reduced, in the myocardial tissues of post-MI HF mouse models.126 Abnormal elevation of Cer not only affects mitochondrial respiratory capacity and disrupts membrane structure but also increases mitochondrial permeability to cytochrome c, ultimately promoting cardiomyocyte apoptosis.127 Increased levels of dhSph, a key substrate for Cer synthesis, serve as the raw material for Cer production,42 while Cer may also be derived from the catabolism of SM. Inhibiting the expression of SPT isoforms SPTLC1 and SPTLC2 reduces myocardial Cer accumulation and alleviates contractile dysfunction.128
Oxidative stress plays a key role in the progression of myocardial fibrosis and cardiac hypertrophy. GSL generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and activate ERK-1/p44 MAPK in cardiomyocytes, leading to myocardial hypertrophy and subsequent HF. Elevated levels of GlcCer have been observed in cardiac tissues of patients with HFrEF, with a similar trend observed in mouse models.89 Further studies revealed that UGCG, the rate-limiting enzyme in GlcCer synthesis, was overexpressed in cardiomyocytes and promoted mitochondrial ROS production, driving cardiac hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis.90
The levels of S1P and SM are significantly negatively correlated with the severity of HFrEF. As a key regulator, S1P mediates the pathological mechanisms of post-ischemic reperfusion injury and promotes cardiac remodeling.129 By activating the SPHK1-S1P signaling pathway, S1P regulates reactive ROS levels via S1PR3, providing cardioprotective effects.130 Additionally, the β1-adrenergic receptor (β1-AR) induces chronic inflammation at the site of myocardial damage in HF. The SPHK1/ S1P/ S1PR1 axis plays a critical role in regulating the β1-AR-induced pro-inflammatory response. This axis helps modulate the inflammatory environment and can contribute to restoring normal myocardial function, potentially alleviating some of the pathological changes associated with HF.131
Sphingolipid Metabolism in the HFpEF
HFpEF is strongly associated with disorders in cardiac energy metabolism, with metabolic diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) serving as major contributors to HFpEF pathophysiology.124,125 Sphingolipid metabolism may directly or indirectly disrupt systemic lipid metabolism, leading to the deposition of circulating lipids in the heart. This accumulation of lipids induces myocardial remodeling and vascular dysfunction, ultimately driving the progression of HFpEF.13,103
In a high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mouse model of HF, fatty acid oxidation in the heart is impaired, leading to the accumulation of Cer and resulting in cardiac lipotoxicity, which exacerbates systolic dysfunction in HF.120 DGAT1, an important rate-limiting enzyme for the metabolism of Cer to acyl ceramides, also plays a key role in the conversion of DAG to triglycerides (TG). In the failing heart, a decrease in DGAT1 expression results in increased Cer and DAG specificity, further worsening cardiac dysfunction.91 Excessive accumulation of GSL in cardiomyocytes induces LacCer-initiated intracellular oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways,72 reduces the efficiency of energy metabolism, and impairs cardiac function. Thus, modulation of the GSL pathway is essential for restoring cardiac energy metabolism and alleviating myocardial injury in HFpEF.72,132 Autophagy may represent a critical mechanism in the regulation of HFpEF associated with metabolic diseases. In an in vitro model of diabetes combined with HF, CERS5 and Cer induced autophagy by altering the localization or activity of membrane-resident proteins, thereby mediating cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.133
Furthermore, persistent hyperglycemia and insulin resistance in T2DM, recognized as risk factors for HFpEF, disrupt sphingolipid metabolism. These disturbances can lead to lipotoxicity, oxidative stress, and myocardial dysfunction.Elevated levels of dhCer and GlcCer, which disrupt energy metabolism, exacerbate insulin resistance, and increase cardiac lipotoxicity by inhibiting autophagy-related pathways, have been observed in the plasma of patients with T2DM.72,134 Under conditions of cardiac lipotoxicity, Cer adaptation promotes fatty acid uptake and storage while reducing glucose utilization, leading to apoptosis and fibrosis, which further increase Cer levels.135 Increasing CDase activity facilitates Cer reduction and activates the AMPK-PPARα/PGC-1α pathway and related downstream signaling to regulate oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis, thereby improving cardiac lipid metabolism.136 Additionally, in diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) mouse models, acid aSMase has been shown to trigger apoptosis by increasing reactive ROS production through the stimulation of NOX4 expression. Conversely, specific knockdown of aSMase in cardiomyocytes restored HFD-induced cardiac dysfunction, remodeling, and apoptosis, while NOX4 protein expression was downregulated.137 Furthermore, plasma S1P has been identified as an independent predictor of CVD development in patients with T2DM. Elevated S1P levels have been shown to counteract insulin signaling dysfunction and promote cardiomyocyte survival.138
Sphingolipid Metabolism as a Biomarker for HF
Currently, sphingolipid metabolites and key enzymes are widely utilized as potential biomarkers for cardiovascular risk assessment and prognosis in clinical settings.24,25,28,116 They are valuable in evaluating disease progression, therapeutic response, and prognostic outcomes in HF. In lipidomic studies of CVD patients, several sphingolipids, including dhCer, Cer, and SM, have been identified that are heritable and linked to genetic characteristics of CVD. Most of these sphingolipids are positively correlated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC) levels.139 A meta-analysis exploring the association between different Cer isoforms and CVD revealed that major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are strongly linked to plasma concentrations of specific Cer isoforms, including Cer(d18:1/16:0), Cer(d18:1/18:0), and Cer(d18:1/24:1).140 Similarly, Javaheri et al found that long-chain and ultra-long-chain Cer are strongly associated with MACE, with elevated long-chain Cer concentrations, independent of conventional risk factors, serving as a specific marker for diagnosing HFpEF.141 Alterations in Cer ratios, such as Cer(d18:1/16:0)/Cer(d18:1/24:1), are also associated with mortality and hospitalization rates in HF patients.142 Additionally, researchers have developed a comprehensive scoring system called the Ceramide Heart Failure Score (CHFS), which was created to evaluate myocardial injury, inflammation, and fluid retention. This scoring system helps stratify the risk of poor prognosis in HF patients and highlights the potential of Cer as a therapeutic target in HF drug development.143
In addition to Cer, SM and aSMase may serve as potential biomarkers for HF. In a recent cohort study from the Cardiovascular Health Study, which followed 4,612 participants over a 10-year period, elevated plasma levels of SM and Cer were associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death.144 Similarly, a study on the etiology of HF reported that serum SM levels in HFpEF patients showed a decreasing trend compared to healthy individuals, potentially serving as a key indicator for HF identification.145 Elevated aSMase activity was detected in the muscle of patients with HF and was positively correlated with inflammation levels and HF disease markers. ASMase activation may represent a potential mechanism underlying HF-related functional impairment.146 Valerie Samouillan analyzed lipid metabolism in cardiac tissues of post-MI pa-tients using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). They found elevated SM levels at the infarction site, with a positive correlation between esterified lipids and adverse cardiac remodeling. FTIR lipid metrics could potentially serve as biomarkers of cardiac remodeling.147
S1P is not only regarded as a clinical marker of HF but also considered a potential therapeutic target. A study on sphingolipid metabolism-related genes revealed that levels of S1P and CERS1 were significantly elevated in the cardiac tissues of patients with advanced chronic HF. Notably, CERS1 was closely associated with the cardiac remodeling process, making the monitoring of S1P and CERS1 levels an important criterion for assessing HF severity.121 Furthermore, the specific deletion of S1PR1 was shown to exacerbate cardiac remodeling after MI and may lead to cardiac insufficiency.148 Therefore, activation of the S1P/S1PR1 signaling pathway during cardiac repair is regarded as an indicator of recovery of cardiac function after MI. Measuring S1P levels may also serve as an early diagnostic tool for HF.149 Furthermore, plasma S1P levels in HF patients exhibited a U-shaped correlation with mortality. Notably, the prognostic value of abnormally elevated S1P levels for predicting death remained entirely independent of traditional risk factors and HF-related predictors. This highlights the importance of S1P for the long-term prognosis of HF.150
Sphingolipid Metabolism as a Potential Therapeutic Target in HF
Dietary Intervention
Sphingolipid metabolism is crucial for maintaining organismal health and influencing disease progression. Consequently, there is growing interest in the role of dietary supplementation in modulating sphingolipid metabolism as a potential strategy for preventing metabolic and CVDs.151,152 Studies have shown that a Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) enriched with extra virgin olive oil or nuts directly modulates Cer biosynthesis, reducing plasma Cer concentrations and high-risk factors for CVD. This could positively contribute to the prevention of MACE.153
Meanwhile, the Nordic diet—which includes whole grains, fruits, vegetables, berries, vegetable oils, margarine, fish, low-fat dairy products, and low-fat meats—improves plasma concentrations of Cer, SM, and Sph, while modulating lipid and glucose metabolism in obesity and T2DM. It also reduces systemic inflammation.154 In a study investigating the relationship between dairy consumption and plasma sphingolipidomics, dairy consumption was negatively correlated with plasma levels of dhCer, a marker of T2DM, suggesting that dairy intake may reduce the risk of T2DM. This finding has important implications for HFpEF prevention.155 Furthermore, studies have shown that milk and dairy products are rich in SM, and supplementation with SM has been shown to inhibit intestinal lipid absorption. This process promotes brown-like transformation in white fat, which may prevent the development of AS and HF.156 A preliminary study on sphingolipid metabolism in hypertriglyceridemic patients demonstrated that fish oil supplementation effectively reduced plasma TG levels, along with Cer and SM concentrations in lipoproteins. These changes were associated with a decreased risk of AS and an improved prognosis for CVD.157 Furthermore, a dietary intervention study in overweight postmenopausal women with risk factors for CVD investigated changes in SM and Cer concentrations in fasting and postprandial plasma, as well as chylomicron particles. The study found that supplementing the diet with milk and increasing SM interaction with intestinal cholesterol reduced high-risk factors for CVD.158
Exercise Intervention
Regular exercise and structured workouts play a crucial role in regulating sphingolipid metabolism and serve as powerful adjuncts in the prevention and treatment of cardiometabolic diseases.159 An 8-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT) study demonstrated that HIIT is a safe and effective strategy for reducing Cer levels and improving health outcomes in patients with cardiometabolic diseases.160 In dyslipidemic individuals, exercise has been shown to reduce dhCer and SM levels while mitigating insulin resistance-associated lipid accumulation, which is essential for preventing T2DM.161 Research has demonstrated that exercise elevates S1P levels and its terminal breakdown products in the myocardium. This elevation facilitates muscle contraction, enhances mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation, and provides protection against cardiac I/R injury.162
Obesity-induced elevations in circulating free fatty acids further stimulate Cer synthesis, increasing the risk of CVD. In contrast, physical exercise reduces SM and Cer concentrations while increasing S1P levels, thereby promoting cardioprotective mechanisms and lowering CVD risk.163 Furthermore, research indicates that weight loss achieved through exercise is associated with a reduction in circulating SM biosynthesis. The extent of this reduction correlates positively with decreased LDL-C levels, suggesting that exercise may enhance vascular function by modulating SM metabolism.164 Regular training enhances energy efficiency, increases insulin sensitivity, and decreases Cer levels in skeletal muscle in patients with T2DM, a change that may be linked to improved mitochondrial oxidative capacity. The beneficial effects of exercise on reducing CVD risk have been particularly significant in patients with T2DM.165
![]() |
Table 2 Drugs Targeting Sphingolipid Metabolism and Their Effect on HF |
Drug Therapy
Although no therapeutic drugs currently target sphingolipid components specifically for HF, the role of sphingolipid metabolism in regulating cardiac function and HF has prompted the development and clinical application of various drugs targeting sphingolipid metabolism or its signaling pathways (Table 2). These drugs offer valuable insights for the clinical prevention and management of HF. Myriocin, an SPT inhibitor, has been shown to inhibit sphingolipid metabolism through the de novo synthesis pathway, reduce the accumulation of Cer. Additionally, myricetin modulates the expression of key regulatory factors, including caspase-3, interleukin-8 (IL-8), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), leading to the attenuation of apoptosis and the inflammatory response in vivo.166 It also restores mitochondrial function,57 abrogates plaques, and regulates lipid levels in AS mouse models.167 Empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor commonly used to treat T2DM, has been shown to reduce Cer and SM levels in the rat heart168 and inhibit the expression of pro-inflammatory factors. In the treatment of HF, empagliflozin improves clinical symptoms and lowers the risk of HF readmission in patients with the condition.169 AdipoRon, an orally active lipocalin receptor agonist, reduces Cer levels in mouse tissues,170 improves lipid metabolism, and mitigates Cer-induced lipotoxic myocardial injury and cardiac hypertrophy.171 DES1 is the final key enzyme in Cer synthesis, and CIN038 specifically inhibits DES1 expression. This inhibition mediates sphingolipid imbalance, modulates NF-κB signaling, and regulates the expression of β-MHC, collagen type I, and TNF-α genes. Consequently, it attenuates the inflammatory response in the heart and alleviates cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in neonatal rats.172 In addition, another DES1 inhibitor, Fenretinide, a retinoid, promotes the expression of PPARγ and inhibits the LPS-induced release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6, thereby reducing blood pressure.173
In addition, there are targeted drugs against S1P and its receptor S1PR1, such as Fingolimod (FTY720), which acts as an S1P receptor agonist, directly targeting the site of ischemic injury. It promotes endothelial cell repair, improves vascular injury, inhibits cardiac apoptosis, and enhances cardiac function.174 Amiselimod, another S1PR1 agonist, has demonstrated superior cardiac safety in clinical studies compared to FTY720.175 SEW2871, another S1PR1 agonist, modulates endothelial homeostasis, improves vascular impairment, and regulates hypertension in rats.176 Additionally, as an antagonist, SEW2871 disrupted S1PR1 ligand-dependent complexes within primary macrophages and AS plaques in mice. This suggests that SEW2871 can attenuate AS and provide cardiovascular protective effects.177
Several drugs that activate or inhibit key enzymes of sphingolipid metabolism have been investigated in experimental and clinical studies. For example, PF543, a selective inhibitor of SPHK1, suppresses the serum expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. This reduction in inflammatory signaling mitigates the cardiac inflammatory response following MI and contributes to improved cardiac function.178 Consequently, these effects slow myocardial fibrosis progression, and promotes cardiac remodeling in HF.179 The SPHK1 activator K6PC-5 increases S1P levels, which prevents oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD)-induced cardiomyocyte death, ameliorates myocardial injury, and offers potential therapeutic benefits for ischemic heart disease.180 Dysregulated of aSMase activity is associated with the development of AS and other CVD.182 The aSMase inhibitor amitriptyline reduces TNF-α-induced endothelial inflammation, thereby improving vascular endothelial function, while also protecting cardiomyocytes from hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced injury.181
Discussion
Despite increasing research into the risk factors and pathogenesis of HF, as well as significant progress in clinical prevention and treatment that has improved HF cure rates and reduced mortality,183 HF remains a major challenge for the global healthcare system due to its high comorbidity rates, complex disease course, poor prognosis, and high readmission rates.8–11 Therefore, further research is required to investigate the multifactorial pathways underlying HF pathogenesis and to develop more effective treatment strategies.
The sphingolipid metabolic pathway is a complex network of enzymes and metabolites under precise regulatory control. It is extensively involved in biological processes and plays a central role in regulating pathophysiological mechanisms, including apoptosis, inflammatory responses, immune responses, and oxidative stress.21–23 Recent studies have elucidated the role of sphingolipid metabolism in CVD, with growing evidence highlighting its involvement in numerous CVD pathophysiological processes. Sphingolipid metabolism plays a critical role in regulating vascular function, improving cardiac structure, and restoring energy metabolism.25–27
In this review, we examine the role of sphingolipid metabolism in HF. In the pathological mechanisms of HF, sphingolipid metabolites such as Cer, SM, Sph, and S1P, along with key enzymes such as SPTLC1, SPHK1, and aSMase, play essential roles in processes such as endothelial injury,74 vascular dysfunction,128 myocardial fibrosis,90 and cardiac hypertrophy.133 Several studies have demonstrated that alterations in sphingolipid metabolic pathways are recognized as potential biomarkers and are widely used in clinical research.141–144 Certain drugs targeting sphingolipid metabolites and key enzymes, such as Myriocin, AdipoRon, Fenretinide, and Amitriptyline, have demonstrated cardioprotective effects through diverse mechanisms, improving clinical symptoms and enhancing survival rates in HF patients.166–168 Additionally, dietary interventions may regulate sphingolipid metabolism,167 thereby reducing the risk of CVD and offering preventive benefits.151,152
Existing studies provide substantial evidence supporting the role of sphingolipid metabolism in HF. However, significant challenges persist in leveraging sphingolipid metabolic pathways for clinical diagnostics and pharmacological applications, necessitating further research and development.
- The specificity of sphingolipid assays remains undefined, leading to potential variability in results when assessing sphingolipid metabolism across different sample types. For instance, sphingolipid levels may vary between cardiac tissues and plasma or serum, the latter being more accessible for clinical collection and follow-up monitoring.184 However, given that the heart is the primary organ affected in HF, alterations in sphingolipid metabolism within cardiac tissue may play a crucial role in mediating structural and functional changes in the heart.24
- Sphingolipids can influence biological processes based on their molecular structure, including acyl chain length, the number and position of unsaturations, and their localization within membrane regions. Additionally, their effects are modulated by the specific lipid composition of the membranes in which they are embedded. However, research on the molecular structure of sphingolipids remains limited, highlighting the need for further investigation in this area.
- Sphingolipid metabolism is a highly complex process involving a diverse range of metabolites and enzymes. However, current research has primarily focused on a limited subset, including Cer, S1P, Sph, SPT, and SphK1. In contrast, the roles of more complex sphingolipids and the regulatory factors influencing sphingolipid production—such as the activity and expression of enzymes involved in sphingolipid synthesis and metabolism—remain largely unexplored, highlighting the need for further investigation.
- The drugs used in sphingolipid metabolism research often lack specificity and selectivity. Given that sphingolipids have diverse cellular functions and their metabolic pathways are highly intricate, designing drugs that can precisely regulate target sphingolipids and selectively produce therapeutic effects through relevant pathological pathways remains an urgent challenge.
Future Research Direction
With advancements in lipidomics technology,185 targeted analysis of sphingolipid metabolism has become increasingly prevalent in related research. In the future, more precise profiling of sphingolipid dynamics in patients with HF may facilitate the identification of novel therapeutic targets. The investigation of sphingolipid metabolism should extend beyond well-characterized components to explore lesser-known metabolites and their regulatory mechanisms at the molecular level. Additionally, the development of highly selective drugs that modulate sphingolipid metabolism while minimizing off-target effects is essential. Rigorous clinical trials assessing efficacy and safety will be crucial in advancing precision treatment for HF.
Conclusion
In this review, we highlight the pivotal role of sphingolipid metabolism in the pathogenesis of HF. Dysregulation of sphingolipid metabolic pathways promotes cardiomyocyte apoptosis, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses, leading to cardiac lipotoxicity in metabolic disorders. These processes, in turn, drive key pathological mechanisms of HF, including ventricular remodeling, myocardial fibrosis, vascular abnormalities, and cardiometabolic disturbances. Monitoring these metabolic alterations during disease progression may serve as a valuable marker for the clinical identification of HF. Targeted reduction of sphingolipid metabolic levels through dietary interventions, exercise, and pharmacological treatments may improve cardiac function and long-term prognosis in HF patients. These findings provide a systematic and comprehensive perspective on novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies targeting sphingolipids, addressing gaps in current knowledge. Future research should focus on sphingolipid metabolites and their regulatory mechanisms, employing advanced techniques to more precisely profile sphingolipid dynamics in HF patients. Additionally, the development of highly selective regulatory drugs with minimal off-target effects holds significant promise for the precise treatment of HF.
Abbreviations
CVD, Cardiovascular disease; HF, Heart failure; ER, Endoplasmic reticulum; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction; HFpEF, Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HfmrEF, Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction; HFrEF, Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; Cer, Ceramide; SM, Sphingomyelin; GSL, Glycosphingolipid; S1P, Sphingosine-1-phosphate; C1P, Ceramide-1-phosphate; MCS, membrane contact sites; dhCer, Dihydroceramide; GlcCer, Glucosylceramide; SPT, Serine palmitoyl transferase; 3KDS, 3-keto-dihydrosphingosine; KDSR, 3-keto-dihydrosphingosine reductase; CERSs, Ceramide synthetases; dhSph, Dihydrosphingosine; DEGS1, Sphingolipid Δ4-desaturase DES1; CDases, Acidic ceramidases; Sph, Sphingosine; SPHKs, Sphingosine kinases; SGPPs, S1P phosphatases; PLPPs, Phosphate phosphatases; SGPL1, Sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase 1; TGN, Trans-Golgi network; CERT, Ceramide transfer protein; SMS1, Sphingomyelin synthase 1; DAG, Diacylglycerol; PKD, Protein kinase D; UGCG, UDP-glucose ceramide glycosyltransferase; aSMase, Acid sphingomyelinase; CERK, Ceramide kinase; DGATs, Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferases; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; PKC, Protein kinase C; SPHK1, Sphingosine kinase 1; SPHK2, Sphingosine kinase 2; ERK, Extracellular signal-regulated kinase; Evs, Extracellular vesicles; AS, Atherosclerosis; MI, Myocardial infarction; NADPH, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; eNOS, Endothelial nitric oxide synthase; NO, Nitric oxide; CAPK, cAMP-dependent protein kinase; S1PRs, Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors; PTEN, Phosphatase and tensin homolog; SPTLC1, Serine palmitoyltransferase 1; SPTLC2, serine palmitoyltransferase 2; T2DM, Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Funding
State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the People’s Republic of China: GZY-KJS-2022-042-1; Henan Science and Technology Department: 232102311192; Henan Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine: 2023ZY1026, 2023ZY2147, 2022ZYZD and 2018ZY3008.
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this work.
References
1. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: a Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(18):e895–e1032. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063
2. Redfield MM, Borlaug BA. Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Review. JAMA. 2023;329(10):827–838. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.2020
3. McDonagh TA, Adamo M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Failure. 2022;24(1):4–131. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2333
4. Yan T, Zhu S, Yin X, et al. Burden, Trends, and Inequalities of Heart Failure Globally, 1990 to 2019: a Secondary Analysis Based on the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12(6):e027852. doi:10.1161/JAHA.122.027852
5. Jones NR, Roalfe AK, Adoki I, Hobbs FDR, Taylor CJ. Survival of patients with chronic heart failure in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Failure. 2019;21(11):1306–1325. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1594
6. Roger VL. Epidemiology of Heart Failure: a Contemporary Perspective. Circulation Research. 2021;128(10):1421–1434. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318172
7. Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: a Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(8):e254–e743. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950
8. Khan MS, Shahid I, Bennis A, Rakisheva A, Metra M, Butler J. Global epidemiology of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024;21(10):717–734. doi:10.1038/s41569-024-01046-6
9. Savarese G, Becher PM, Lund LH, Seferovic P, Rosano GMC, Coats AJS. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovas Res. 2023;118(17):3272–3287. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvac013
10. Rubin J, Maurer MS. Cardiac Amyloidosis: overlooked, Underappreciated, and Treatable. Ann Rev Med. 2020;71(1):203–219. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-052918-020140
11. Rosenbaum AN, Agre KE, Pereira NL. Genetics of dilated cardiomyopathy: practical implications for heart failure management. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(5):286–297. doi:10.1038/s41569-019-0284-0
12. Arrigo M, Jessup M, Mullens W, et al. Acute heart failure. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2020;6(1):16. doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0151-7
13. Lopaschuk GD, Karwi QG, Tian R, Wende AR, Abel ED. Cardiac Energy Metabolism in Heart Failure. Circulation Research. 2021;128(10):1487–1513. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318241
14. Wittenbecher C, Eichelmann F, Toledo E, et al. Lipid Profiles and Heart Failure Risk: results From Two Prospective Studies. Circulation Research. 2021;128(3):309–320. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317883
15. Yamamoto T, Sano M. Deranged Myocardial Fatty Acid Metabolism in Heart Failure. Int J mol Sci. 2022;23(2):996. doi:10.3390/ijms23020996
16. Da Dalt L, Cabodevilla AG, Goldberg IJ, Norata GD. Cardiac lipid metabolism, mitochondrial function, and heart failure. Cardiovas Res. 2023;119(10):1905–1914. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvad100
17. Wang X, Gao Y, Zhang J, et al. Revealment study on the regulation of lipid metabolism by Lingguizhugan Decoction in heart failure treatment based on integrated lipidomics and proteomics. Biomed Pharmacothe. 2023;158:114066. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114066
18. Schiattarella GG, Altamirano F, Kim SY, et al. Xbp1s-FoxO1 axis governs lipid accumulation and contractile performance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1684. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21931-9
19. Hannun YA, Obeid LM. Sphingolipids and their metabolism in physiology and disease. Nat Rev mol Cell Biol. 2018;19(3):175–191. doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.107
20. Chaurasia B, Summers SA. Ceramides in Metabolism: key Lipotoxic Players. Ann Rev Physiol. 2021;83(1):303–330. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-031620-093815
21. Kuo A, Hla T. Regulation of cellular and systemic sphingolipid homeostasis. Nat Rev mol Cell Biol. 2024;25(10):802–821. doi:10.1038/s41580-024-00742-y
22. Sakuragi T, Nagata S. Regulation of phospholipid distribution in the lipid bilayer by flippases and scramblases. Nat Rev mol Cell Biol. 2023;24(8):576–596. doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00604-z
23. Green CD, Maceyka M, Cowart LA, Spiegel S. Sphingolipids in metabolic disease: the good, the bad, and the unknown. Cell Metab. 2021;33(7):1293–1306. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2021.06.006
24. Kovilakath A, Jamil M, Cowart LA. Sphingolipids in the Heart: from Cradle to Grave. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:652. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00652
25. Borodzicz-Jażdżyk S, Jażdżyk P, Łysik W, Cudnoch-Jȩdrzejewska A, Czarzasta K. Sphingolipid metabolism and signaling in cardiovascular diseases. Front Cardiovas Med. 2022;9. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.915961
26. Jozefczuk E, Guzik TJ, Siedlinski M. Significance of sphingosine-1-phosphate in cardiovascular physiology and pathology. Pharmacol Res. 2020;156:104793. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104793
27. Wilkerson JL, Tatum SM, Holland WL, Summers SA. Ceramides are fuel gauges on the drive to cardiometabolic disease. Physiol Rev. 2024;104(3):1061–1119. doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2023
28. Di Pietro P, Izzo C, Abate AC, et al. The Dark Side of Sphingolipids: searching for Potential Cardiovascular Biomarkers. Biomolecules. 2023;13(1):168. doi:10.3390/biom13010168
29. Ji X, Chen Z, Wang Q, et al. Sphingolipid metabolism controls mammalian heart regeneration. Cell Metab. 2024;36(4):839–856.e838. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2024.01.017
30. Hadas Y, Vincek AS, Youssef E, et al. Altering Sphingolipid Metabolism Attenuates Cell Death and Inflammatory Response After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2020;141(11):916–930. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041882
31. Le Barz M, Boulet MM, Calzada C, Cheillan D, Michalski M-C. Alterations of endogenous sphingolipid metabolism in cardiometabolic diseases: towards novel therapeutic approaches. Biochimie. 2020;169:133–143. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2019.10.003
32. Carter HE, Haines WJ, Ledyard WE, et al. Biochemistry of the sphingolipides; preparation of sphingolipides from beef brain and spinal cord. J Biol Chem. 1947;169(1):77–82. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(17)35063-9
33. Carter HE, Humiston CG. Biochemistry of the sphingolipides. V. The structure of sphingine. J Biol Chem. 1951;191(2):727–733. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(18)55977-9
34. Brady RO. The sphingolipidoses. New Engl J Med. 1966;275(6):312–318. doi:10.1056/NEJM196608112750606
35. Quinville BM, Deschenes NM, Ryckman AE, Walia JS. A Comprehensive Review: sphingolipid Metabolism and Implications of Disruption in Sphingolipid Homeostasis. Int J mol Sci. 2021;22(11):5793. doi:10.3390/ijms22115793
36. Skotland T, Sagini K, Sandvig K, Llorente A. An emerging focus on lipids in extracellular vesicles. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2020;159:308–321. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.03.002
37. Sehrawat TS, Arab JP, Liu M, et al. Circulating Extracellular Vesicles Carrying Sphingolipid Cargo for the Diagnosis and Dynamic Risk Profiling of Alcoholic Hepatitis. Hepatology. 2021;73(2):571–585. doi:10.1002/hep.31256
38. Su H, Rustam YH, Masters CL, et al. Characterization of brain-derived extracellular vesicle lipids in Alzheimer’s disease. J Extracell Vesicles. 2021;10(7):e12089. doi:10.1002/jev2.12089
39. Reza S, Ugorski M, Suchański J. Glucosylceramide and galactosylceramide, small glycosphingolipids with significant impact on health and disease. Glycobiology. 2021;31(11):1416–1434. doi:10.1093/glycob/cwab046
40. Harrison PJ, Dunn TM, Campopiano DJ. Sphingolipid biosynthesis in man and microbes. Nat Prod Rep. 2018;35(9):921–954. doi:10.1039/C8NP00019K
41. Davis DL, Gable K, Suemitsu J, Dunn TM, Wattenberg BW. The ORMDL/Orm-serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) complex is directly regulated by ceramide: reconstitution of SPT regulation in isolated membranes. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(13):5146–5156. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA118.007291
42. Liu Q, Chan AKN, Chang WH, et al. 3-Ketodihydrosphingosine reductase maintains ER homeostasis and unfolded protein response in leukemia. Leukemia. 2022;36(1):100–110. doi:10.1038/s41375-021-01378-z
43. Siddique MM, Li Y, Chaurasia B, Kaddai VA, Summers SA. Dihydroceramides: from Bit Players to Lead Actors. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(25):15371–15379. doi:10.1074/jbc.R115.653204
44. Sociale M, Wulf AL, Breiden B, et al. Ceramide Synthase Schlank Is a Transcriptional Regulator Adapting Gene Expression to Energy Requirements. Cell Rep. 2018;22(4):967–978. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.090
45. Zelnik ID, Rozman B, Rosenfeld-Gur E, Ben-Dor S, Futerman AH. A Stroll Down the CerS Lane. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1159:49–63.
46. Saba JD. Fifty years of lyase and a moment of truth: sphingosine phosphate lyase from discovery to disease. J Lipid Res. 2019;60(3):456–463. doi:10.1194/jlr.S091181
47. Hanada K, Kumagai K, Yasuda S, et al. Molecular machinery for non-vesicular trafficking of ceramide. Nature. 2003;426(6968):803–809.
48. Capasso S, Sticco L, Rizzo R, et al. Sphingolipid metabolic flow controls phosphoinositide turnover at the trans-Golgi network. EMBO J. 2017;36(12):1736–1754. doi:10.15252/embj.201696048
49. Hill CH, Cook GM, Spratley SJ, Fawke S, Graham SC, Deane JE. The mechanism of glycosphingolipid degradation revealed by a GALC-SapA complex structure. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):151. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02361-y
50. Ryckman AE, Brockhausen I, Walia JS. Metabolism of Glycosphingolipids and Their Role in the Pathophysiology of Lysosomal Storage Disorders. Int J mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6881. doi:10.3390/ijms21186881
51. Grassi S, Giussani P, Mauri L, Prioni S, Sonnino S, Prinetti A. Lipid rafts and neurodegeneration: structural and functional roles in physiologic aging and neurodegenerative diseases. J Lipid Res. 2020;61(5):636–654. doi:10.1194/jlr.TR119000427
52. Hoeferlin LA, Wijesinghe DS, Chalfant CE. The role of ceramide-1-phosphate in biological functions. Handbook Exp Pharmacol. 2013;2013(215):153–166.
53. Senkal CE, Salama MF, Snider AJ, et al. Ceramide Is Metabolized to Acylceramide and Stored in Lipid Droplets. Cell Metab. 2017;25(3):686–697. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.02.010
54. Bayerle A, Marsching C, Rabionet M, et al. Endogenous levels of 1-O-acylceramides increase upon acidic ceramidase deficiency and decrease due to loss of Dgat1 in a tissue-dependent manner. Biochim Biophys Acta mol Cell Biol. Lipids. 2020;1865(9):158741. doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2020.158741
55. Alizadeh J, da Silva Rosa SC, Weng X, et al. Ceramides and ceramide synthases in cancer: focus on apoptosis and autophagy. Eur J Cell Biol. 2023;102(3):151337. doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2023.151337
56. James BN, Oyeniran C, Sturgill JL, et al. Ceramide in apoptosis and oxidative stress in allergic inflammation and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(5):1936–1948.e1939. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2020.10.024
57. Lima TI, Laurila PP, Wohlwend M, et al. Inhibiting de novo ceramide synthesis restores mitochondrial and protein homeostasis in muscle aging. Sci Trans Med. 2023;15(696):eade6509. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.ade6509
58. Guo BB, Bellingham SA, Hill AF. The neutral sphingomyelinase pathway regulates packaging of the prion protein into exosomes. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(6):3455–3467. doi:10.1074/jbc.M114.605253
59. Höglinger D, Haberkant P, Aguilera-Romero A, et al. Intracellular sphingosine releases calcium from lysosomes. eLife. 2015;4. doi:10.7554/eLife.10616
60. Bravo G, Cedeño RR, Casadevall MP, Ramió-Torrentà L. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate (S1P) and S1P Signaling Pathway Modulators, from Current Insights to Future Perspectives. Cells. 2022;11(13):2058. doi:10.3390/cells11132058
61. Spiegel S, Maczis MA, Maceyka M, Milstien S. New insights into functions of the sphingosine-1-phosphate transporter SPNS2. J Lipid Res. 2019;60(3):484–489. doi:10.1194/jlr.S091959
62. Newton J, Lima S, Maceyka M, Spiegel S. Revisiting the sphingolipid rheostat: evolving concepts in cancer therapy. Exp Cell Res. 2015;333(2):195–200. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.02.025
63. Chua XY, Chai YL, Chew WS, et al. Immunomodulatory sphingosine-1-phosphates as plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease and vascular cognitive impairment. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2020;12(1):122. doi:10.1186/s13195-020-00694-3
64. Grewe JM, Knapstein PR, Donat A, et al. The role of sphingosine-1-phosphate in bone remodeling and osteoporosis. Bone Res. 2022;10(1):34. doi:10.1038/s41413-022-00205-0
65. Carreira AC, Santos TC, Lone MA, et al. Mammalian sphingoid bases: biophysical, physiological and pathological properties. Prog lipid res. 2019;75:100988. doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2019.100988
66. Kim Y, Mavodza G, Senkal CE, Burd CG. Cholesterol-dependent homeostatic regulation of very long chain sphingolipid synthesis. J Cell Biol. 2023;222(12). doi:10.1083/jcb.202308055
67. Horbay R, Hamraghani A, Ermini L, Holcik S, Beug ST, Yeganeh B. Role of Ceramides and Lysosomes in Extracellular Vesicle Biogenesis, Cargo Sorting and Release. Int J mol Sci. 2022;23(23):15317. doi:10.3390/ijms232315317
68. Scheffer DDL, Garcia AA, Lee L, Mochly-Rosen D, Ferreira JCB. Mitochondrial Fusion, Fission, and Mitophagy in Cardiac Diseases: challenges and Therapeutic Opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signaling. 2022;36(13–15):844–863. doi:10.1089/ars.2021.0145
69. Spaulding SC, Bollag WB. The role of lipid second messengers in aldosterone synthesis and secretion. J Lipid Res. 2022;63(4):100191. doi:10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100191
70. Presa N, Gomez-Larrauri A, Dominguez-Herrera A, Trueba M, Gomez-Muñoz A. Novel signaling aspects of ceramide 1-phosphate. Biochim Biophys Acta mol Cell Biol. Lipids. 2020;1865(4):158630. doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2020.158630
71. Cirillo F, Piccoli M, Ghiroldi A, et al. The antithetic role of ceramide and sphingosine-1-phosphate in cardiac dysfunction. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(7):4857–4873. doi:10.1002/jcp.30235
72. Huang S, Abutaleb K, Mishra S. Glycosphingolipids in Cardiovascular Disease: insights from Molecular Mechanisms and Heart Failure Models. Biomolecules. 2024;14(10):1265. doi:10.3390/biom14101265
73. Choi RH, Tatum SM, Symons JD, Summers SA, Holland WL. Ceramides and other sphingolipids as drivers of cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(10):701–711. doi:10.1038/s41569-021-00536-1
74. Cogolludo A, Villamor E, Perez-Vizcaino F, Moreno L. Ceramide and Regulation of Vascular Tone. Int J mol Sci. 2019;20(2):411. doi:10.3390/ijms20020411
75. Jernigan PL, Makley AT, Hoehn RS, Edwards MJ, Pritts TA. The role of sphingolipids in endothelial barrier function. Biol Chem. 2015;396(6–7):681–691. doi:10.1515/hsz-2014-0305
76. Wang N, Li JY, Zeng B, Chen GL. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Signaling in Cardiovascular Diseases. Biomolecules. 2023;13(5):1.
77. Liu H, Peng H, Chen S, et al. S1PR2 antagonist protects endothelial cells against high glucose-induced mitochondrial apoptosis through the Akt/GSK-3β signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;490(3):1119–1124. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.06.189
78. Matrone G, Meng S, Gu Q, et al. Lmo2 (LIM-Domain-Only 2) Modulates Sphk1 (Sphingosine Kinase) and Promotes Endothelial Cell Migration. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis Vasc Biol. 2017;37(10):1860–1868. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309609
79. Ahmed N, Linardi D, Muhammad N, et al. Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator Fingolimod (FTY720) Attenuates Myocardial Fibrosis in Post-heterotopic Heart Transplantation. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:645. doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00645
80. Dong W, Li Q, Lu X, et al. Ceramide kinase-mediated C1P metabolism attenuates acute liver injury by inhibiting the interaction between KEAP1 and NRF2. Exp Mol Med. 2024;56(4):946–958. doi:10.1038/s12276-024-01203-4
81. Stiban J, Perera M. Very long chain ceramides interfere with C16-ceramide-induced channel formation: a plausible mechanism for regulating the initiation of intrinsic apoptosis. BBA. 2015;1848(2):561–567. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.11.018
82. Kuo A, Checa A, Niaudet C, et al. Murine endothelial serine palmitoyltransferase 1 (SPTLC1) is required for vascular development and systemic sphingolipid homeostasis. eLife. 2022;11:e78861.
83. Bekhite M, González-Delgado A, Hübner S, et al. The role of ceramide accumulation in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes on mitochondrial oxidative stress and mitophagy. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021;167:66–80. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.02.016
84. Chaurasia B, Tippetts TS, Mayoral Monibas R, et al. Targeting a ceramide double bond improves insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis. Science. 2019;365(6451):386–392. doi:10.1126/science.aav3722
85. Ren K, Lu YJ, Mo ZC, et al. ApoA-I/SR-BI modulates S1P/S1PR2-mediated inflammation through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in HUVECs. J Physiol Biochem. 2017;73(2):287–296. doi:10.1007/s13105-017-0553-5
86. Jujic A, Matthes F, Vanherle L, et al. Plasma S1P (Sphingosine-1-Phosphate) Links to Hypertension and Biomarkers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease: findings From a Translational Investigation. Hypertension. 2021;78(1):195–209. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.17379
87. Lallemand T, Rouahi M, Swiader A, et al. nSMase2 (Type 2-Neutral Sphingomyelinase) Deficiency or Inhibition by GW4869 Reduces Inflammation and Atherosclerosis in Apoe(-/-) Mice. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis Vasc Biol. 2018;38(7):1479–1492. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311208
88. Di Pietro P, Carrizzo A, Sommella E, et al. Targeting the ASMase/S1P pathway protects from sortilin-evoked vascular damage in hypertension. J Clin Invest. 2022;132(3). doi:10.1172/JCI146343.
89. Andersson L, Cinato M, Mardani I, et al. Glucosylceramide synthase deficiency in the heart compromises β1-adrenergic receptor trafficking. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(43):4481–4492. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab412
90. Cui S, Zhang X, Li Y, et al. UGCG modulates heart hypertrophy through B4GalT5-mediated mitochondrial oxidative stress and the ERK signaling pathway. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2023;28(1):71. doi:10.1186/s11658-023-00484-3
91. Liu L, Trent CM, Fang X, et al. Cardiomyocyte-specific loss of diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) reproduces the abnormalities in lipids found in severe heart failure. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(43):29881–29891. doi:10.1074/jbc.M114.601864
92. Bloom SI, Islam MT, Lesniewski LA, Donato AJ. Mechanisms and consequences of endothelial cell senescence. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(1):38–51. doi:10.1038/s41569-022-00739-0
93. Sasset L, Chowdhury KH, Manzo OL, et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate controls endothelial sphingolipid homeostasis via ORMDL. EMBO Rep. 2023;24(1):e54689. doi:10.15252/embr.202254689
94. Lai Y, Tian Y, You X, Du J, Huang J. Effects of sphingolipid metabolism disorders on endothelial cells. Lipids Health Dis. 2022;21(1):101. doi:10.1186/s12944-022-01701-2
95. Akhter MZ, Chandra Joshi J, Balaji Ragunathrao VA, et al. Programming to S1PR1(+) Endothelial Cells Promotes Restoration of Vascular Integrity. Circulation Research. 2021;129(2):221–236. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.318412
96. Stepanovska B, Lange AI, Schwalm S, Pfeilschifter J, Coldewey SM, Huwiler A. Downregulation of S1P Lyase Improves Barrier Function in Human Cerebral Microvascular Endothelial Cells Following an Inflammatory Challenge. Int J mol Sci. 2020;21(4):1240. doi:10.3390/ijms21041240
97. Liu J, Liu X, Luo Y, et al. Sphingolipids: drivers of cardiac fibrosis and atrial fibrillation. J Mol Med. 2024;102(2):149–165. doi:10.1007/s00109-023-02391-8
98. Park LK, Garr Barry V, Hong J, Heebink J, Sah R, Peterson LR. Links between ceramides and cardiac function. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2022;33(1):47–56. doi:10.1097/MOL.0000000000000802
99. Means CK, Miyamoto S, Chun J, Brown JH. S1P1 receptor localization confers selectivity for Gi-mediated cAMP and contractile responses. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(18):11954–11963. doi:10.1074/jbc.M707422200
100. Simon JN, Chowdhury SA, Warren CM, et al. Ceramide-mediated depression in cardiomyocyte contractility through PKC activation and modulation of myofilament protein phosphorylation. Basic Res Cardiol. 2014;109(6):445. doi:10.1007/s00395-014-0445-6
101. Ji R, Akashi H, Drosatos K, et al. Increased de novo ceramide synthesis and accumulation in failing myocardium. JCI Insight. 2017;2(9). doi:10.1172/jci.insight.96203.
102. Ohkura SI, Usui S, Takashima SI, et al. Augmented sphingosine 1 phosphate receptor-1 signaling in cardiac fibroblasts induces cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis through angiotensin II and interleukin-6. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182329. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182329
103. Karwi QG, Uddin GM, Ho KL, Lopaschuk GD. Loss of Metabolic Flexibility in the Failing Heart. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018;5:68. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2018.00068
104. Schömel N, Geisslinger G, Wegner MS. Influence of glycosphingolipids on cancer cell energy metabolism. Prog lipid res. 2020;79:101050. doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2020.101050
105. Imierska M, Zabielski P, Roszczyc-Owsiejczuk K, et al. Serine Palmitoyltransferase Gene Silencing Prevents Ceramide Accumulation and Insulin Resistance in Muscles in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet. Cells. 2022;11(7):1123. doi:10.3390/cells11071123
106. Chaurasia B, Kaddai VA, Lancaster GI, et al. Adipocyte Ceramides Regulate Subcutaneous Adipose Browning, Inflammation, and Metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016;24(6):820–834. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.10.002
107. Park M, Kaddai V, Ching J, et al. A Role for Ceramides, but Not Sphingomyelins, as Antagonists of Insulin Signaling and Mitochondrial Metabolism in C2C12 Myotubes. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(46):23978–23988. doi:10.1074/jbc.M116.737684
108. Levin MC, Andersson L, Borén J. Cardiomyocytes, sphingolipids and cardio myotoxicity. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2023;34(4):180–188. doi:10.1097/MOL.0000000000000829
109. Tian H, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Xia Z. Abnormalities of glucose and lipid metabolism in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Biomed Pharmacothe. 2023;163:114827. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114827
110. Pizarro G. Ischemia Reperfusion Injury: harder to Treat Than Cyanide Poisoning. JACC. 2023;8(10):1295–1297. doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2023.08.009
111. Yu S, Wang K, Li Q, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis critically rewires the ischemia/reperfusion-induced dysregulation of cardiolipins and sphingolipids in mice. Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. 2023;12(1):3–19. doi:10.21037/hbsn-21-133
112. Bonezzi F, Piccoli M, Dei Cas M, et al. Sphingolipid Synthesis Inhibition by Myriocin Administration Enhances Lipid Consumption and Ameliorates Lipid Response to Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury. Front Physiol. 2019;10:986. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00986
113. Jiang Y, He X, Simonaro CM, Yi B, Schuchman EH. Acid Ceramidase Protects Against Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Modulating Sphingolipid Metabolism and Reducing Inflammation and Oxidative Stress. Front Cell Develop Biol. 2021;9:633657. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.633657
114. Kang JW, Choi HS, Shin JK, Lee SM. Resolvin D1 activates the sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling pathway in murine livers with ischemia/reperfusion injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;514(4):1058–1065. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.05.041
115. Keul P, Peters S, von Wnuck Lipinski K, et al. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate (S1P) Lyase Inhibition Aggravates Atherosclerosis and Induces Plaque Rupture in ApoE(-/-)Mice. Int J mol Sci. 2022;23(17):9606. doi:10.3390/ijms23179606
116. Yin W, Li F, Tan X, et al. Plasma Ceramides and Cardiovascular Events in Hypertensive Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk. Am J Hypertens. 2021;34(11):1209–1216. doi:10.1093/ajh/hpab105
117. Hua T, Bao Q, He X, Cai W, He J. Lipidomics Revealed Alteration of Sphingolipid Metabolism During the Reparative Phase After Myocardial Infarction Injury. Front Physiol. 2021;12:663480. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.663480
118. Lu S, She M, Zeng Q, Yi G, Zhang J. Sphingosine 1-phosphate and its receptors in ischemia. Int J Clin Chem. 2021;521:25–33. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2021.06.020
119. Yang LG, Wang AL, Li L, et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate induces myocyte autophagy after myocardial infarction through mTOR inhibition. Eur J Pharmacol. 2021;907:174260. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174260
120. Kovilakath A, Wohlford G, Cowart LA. Circulating sphingolipids in heart failure. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1154447. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1154447
121. Pérez-Carrillo L, Giménez-Escamilla I, Martínez-Dolz L, et al. Implication of Sphingolipid Metabolism Gene Dysregulation and Cardiac Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Accumulation in Heart Failure. Biomedicines. 2022;10(1):135. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10010135
122. Lemaitre RN, Jensen PN, Hoofnagle A, et al. Plasma Ceramides and Sphingomyelins in Relation to Heart Failure Risk. Circulation. 2019;12(7):e005708. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005708
123. Greenberg B, CM O, Felker GM. Classifying Heart Failure in the 21st Century: matching Taxonomy With Science. JACC Heart Fail. 2021;9(10):771–773. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2021.08.004
124. Simmonds SJ, Cuijpers I, Heymans S, Jones EAV. Cellular and Molecular Differences between HFpEF and HFrEF: a Step Ahead in an Improved Pathological Understanding. Cells. 2020;9(1):242. doi:10.3390/cells9010242
125. Pieske B, Tschöpe C, de Boer RA, et al. How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2019;40(40):3297–3317. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641
126. Sansbury BE, DeMartino AM, Xie Z, et al. Metabolomic analysis of pressure-overloaded and infarcted mouse hearts. Circulation. 2014;7(4):634–642. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001151
127. Funai K, Summers SA, Rutter J. Reign in the membrane: how common lipids govern mitochondrial function. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2020;63:162–173. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2020.01.006
128. Hoffman M, Palioura D, Kyriazis ID, et al. Cardiomyocyte Krüppel-Like Factor 5 Promotes De novo Ceramide Biosynthesis and Contributes to Eccentric Remodeling in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2021;143(11):1139–1156. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047420
129. Raza Z, Saleem U, Naureen Z. Sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling in ischemia and reperfusion injury. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediators. 2020;149:106436. doi:10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2020.106436
130. Polzin A, Piayda K, Keul P, et al. Plasma sphingosine-1-phosphate concentrations are associated with systolic heart failure in patients with ischemic heart disease. J mol Cell Cardiol. 2017;110:35–37. doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.07.004
131. Zhang F, Xia Y, Yan W, et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling contributes to cardiac inflammation, dysfunction, and remodeling following myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circulatory Physiol. 2016;310(2):H250–261. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00372.2015
132. Balram A, Thapa S, Chatterjee S. Glycosphingolipids in Diabetes, Oxidative Stress, and Cardiovascular Disease: prevention in Experimental Animal Models. Int J mol Sci. 2022;23(23):15442. doi:10.3390/ijms232315442
133. Russo SB, Baicu CF, Van Laer A, et al. Ceramide synthase 5 mediates lipid-induced autophagy and hypertrophy in cardiomyocytes. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(11):3919–3930. doi:10.1172/JCI63888
134. Mousa A, Naderpoor N, Mellett N, et al. Lipidomic profiling reveals early-stage metabolic dysfunction in overweight or obese humans. Biochim Biophys Acta mol Cell Biol. Lipids. 2019;1864(3):335–343. doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2018.12.014
135. Summers SA. Editorial: the Role of Ceramides in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:667885. doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.667885
136. Kim Y, Lim JH, Kim EN, et al. Adiponectin receptor agonist ameliorates cardiac lipotoxicity via enhancing ceramide metabolism in type 2 diabetic mice. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(3):282. doi:10.1038/s41419-022-04726-8
137. Liu R, Duan T, Yu L, et al. Acid sphingomyelinase promotes diabetic cardiomyopathy via NADPH oxidase 4 mediated apoptosis. Cardiovascular Diabetology. 2023;22(1):25. doi:10.1186/s12933-023-01747-1
138. Diarte-Añazco EMG, Méndez-Lara KA, Pérez A, Alonso N, Blanco-Vaca F, Julve J. Novel Insights into the Role of HDL-Associated Sphingosine-1-Phosphate in Cardiometabolic Diseases. Int J mol Sci. 2019;20(24):6273. doi:10.3390/ijms20246273
139. Cadby G, Melton PE, McCarthy NS, et al. Heritability of 596 lipid species and genetic correlation with cardiovascular traits in the Busselton Family Heart Study. J Lipid Res. 2020;61(4):537–545. doi:10.1194/jlr.RA119000594
140. Mantovani A, Dugo C. Ceramides and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Clin Lipidol. 2020;14(2):176–185. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2020.01.005
141. Javaheri A, Allegood JC, Cowart LA, Chirinos JA. Circulating Ceramide 16:0 in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am College Cardiol. 2020;75(17):2273–2275. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.062
142. Targher G, Lunardi G, Mantovani A, et al. Relation between plasma ceramides and cardiovascular death in chronic heart failure: a subset analysis of the GISSI-HF trial. ESC Heart Failure. 2020;7(6):3288–3297. doi:10.1002/ehf2.12885
143. Ren L, Li F, Tan X, et al. Abnormal plasma ceramides refine high-risk patients with worsening heart failure. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1185595. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1185595
144. Bockus LB, Jensen PN, Fretts AM, et al. Plasma Ceramides and Sphingomyelins and Sudden Cardiac Death in the Cardiovascular Health Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(11):e2343854. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43854
145. Zordoky BN, Sung MM, Ezekowitz J, et al. Metabolomic fingerprint of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0124844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124844
146. Olsson K, Cheng AJ, Al-Ameri M, et al. Sphingomyelinase activity promotes atrophy and attenuates force in human muscle fibres and is elevated in heart failure patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(5):2551–2561. doi:10.1002/jcsm.13029
147. Samouillan V, Martinez de Lejarza Samper IM, Amaro AB, et al. Biophysical and Lipidomic Biomarkers of Cardiac Remodeling Post-Myocardial Infarction in Humans. Biomolecules. 2020;10(11):1471. doi:10.3390/biom10111471
148. Kuang Y, Li X, Liu X, et al. Vascular endothelial S1pr1 ameliorates adverse cardiac remodelling via stimulating reparative macrophage proliferation after myocardial infarction. Cardiovas Res. 2021;117(2):585–599. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvaa046
149. BG S, Gowda D, Kain V, et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate interactions in the spleen and heart reflect extent of cardiac repair in mice and failing human hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circulatory Physiol. 2021;321(3):H599–h611. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00314.2021
150. Xue Y, Jiang W, Ma Q, et al. U-shaped association between plasma sphingosine-1-phosphate levels and mortality in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: a prospective cohort study. Lipids Health Dis. 2020;19(1):125. doi:10.1186/s12944-020-01262-2
151. Calzada C, Vors C, Penhoat A, Cheillan D, Michalski MC. Role of circulating sphingolipids in lipid metabolism: why dietary lipids matter. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2022;9:1108098. doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.1108098
152. Phung NV, Rong F, Xia WY, et al. Nervonic acid and its sphingolipids: biological functions and potential food applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(24):8766–8785. doi:10.1080/10408398.2023.2203753
153. Wang DD, Toledo E, Hruby A, et al. Plasma Ceramides, Mediterranean Diet, and Incident Cardiovascular Disease in the PREDIMED Trial (Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea). Circulation. 2017;135(21):2028–2040. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024261
154. Lankinen M, Schwab U, Kolehmainen M, et al. A Healthy Nordic Diet Alters the Plasma Lipidomic Profile in Adults with Features of Metabolic Syndrome in a Multicenter Randomized Dietary Intervention. J Nutr. 2015;146(4):662–672. doi:10.3945/jn.115.220459
155. Fumeron F, Nicolas A, Bastard JP, et al. Dairy consumption is associated with lower plasma dihydroceramides in women from the D.E.S.I.R. cohort. Diabetes Metabolism. 2020;46(2):144–149. doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2019.06.002
156. Jiang C, Cheong LZ, Zhang X, et al. Dietary Sphingomyelin Metabolism and Roles in Gut Health and Cognitive Development. Adv Nutr. 2022;13(2):474–491. doi:10.1093/advances/nmab117
157. Ferchaud-Roucher V, Zair Y, Aguesse A, Krempf M, Ouguerram K. Omega 3 Improves Both apoB100-containing Lipoprotein Turnover and their Sphingolipid Profile in Hypertriglyceridemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(10):3152–3164. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa459
158. Vors C, Joumard-Cubizolles L, Lecomte M, et al. Milk polar lipids reduce lipid cardiovascular risk factors in overweight postmenopausal women: towards a gut sphingomyelin-cholesterol interplay. Gut. 2020;69(3):487–501. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318155
159. Laurila PP, Wohlwend M, Imamura de Lima T, et al. Sphingolipids accumulate in aged muscle, and their reduction counteracts sarcopenia. Nat Aging. 2022;2(12):1159–1175. doi:10.1038/s43587-022-00309-6
160. Carrard J, Hofer M, Prechtl L, et al. Effect of an eight-week high-intensity interval training programme on circulating sphingolipid levels in middle-aged adults at elevated cardiometabolic risk (SphingoFIT)-Protocol for a randomised controlled exercise trial. PLoS One. 2024;19(5):e0302477. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302477
161. Broussard JL, Garfield A, Zarini S, et al. Combined diet and exercise training decreases serum lipids associated with insulin resistance. Obesity. 2024;32(12):2334–2344. doi:10.1002/oby.24156
162. Hodun K, Chabowski A, Baranowski M. Sphingosine-1-phosphate in acute exercise and training. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31(5):945–955. doi:10.1111/sms.13907
163. Brandao CFC, Krempf M, Giolo de Carvalho F, et al. Sphingolipid and Trimethylamine-N-Oxide (TMAO) Levels in Women with Obesity after Combined Physical Training. Metabolites. 2024;14(8):398. doi:10.3390/metabo14080398
164. Papandreou C, Harrold JA, Hansen TT, Halford JCG, Sjödin A, Bulló M. Changes in Circulating Metabolites during Weight Loss and Weight Loss Maintenance in Relation to Cardiometabolic Risk. Nutrients. 2021;13(12):4289. doi:10.3390/nu13124289
165. Lemos GO, Torrinhas RS, Nutrients WDL. Physical Activity, and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Setting of Metabolic Syndrome. Nutrients. 2023;15(5):1217. doi:10.3390/nu15051217
166. Shiwani HA, Elfaki MY, Memon D, Ali S, Aziz A, Egom EE. Updates on sphingolipids: spotlight on retinopathy. Biomed Pharmacothe. 2021;143:112197. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112197
167. Yu Z, Peng Q, Li S, et al. Myriocin and d-PDMP ameliorate atherosclerosis in ApoE-/- mice via reducing lipid uptake and vascular inflammation. Clin Sci. 2020;134(5):439–458. doi:10.1042/CS20191028
168. Aragón-Herrera A, Feijóo-Bandín S, Otero Santiago M, et al. Empagliflozin reduces the levels of CD36 and cardiotoxic lipids while improving autophagy in the hearts of Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Biochem Pharmacol. 2019;170:113677. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2019.113677
169. Voors AA, Angermann CE, Teerlink JR, et al. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: a multinational randomized trial. Nature Med. 2022;28(3):568–574. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01659-1
170. Holland WL, Xia JY, Johnson JA, et al. Inducible overexpression of adiponectin receptors highlight the roles of adiponectin-induced ceramidase signaling in lipid and glucose homeostasis. Mol Metabol. 2017;6(3):267–275. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2017.01.002
171. Zhang YZ, Zhang YL, Huang Q, et al. AdipoRon Alleviates Free Fatty Acid-Induced Myocardial Cell Injury Via Suppressing Nlrp3 Inflammasome Activation. Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome Obesity: Targets Ther. 2019;12:2165–2179. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S221841
172. Savira F, Magaye R, Scullino CV, et al. Sphingolipid imbalance and inflammatory effects induced by uremic toxins in heart and kidney cells are reversed by dihydroceramide desaturase 1 inhibition. Toxicol Lett. 2021;350:133–142. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.07.012
173. Lin CH, Lee SY, Zhang CC, et al. Fenretinide inhibits macrophage inflammatory mediators and controls hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats via the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma pathway. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016;10:3591–3597. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S114879
174. Xu X, Li M, Yu F, et al. Platelet Membrane Nanocarriers Cascade Targeting Delivery System to Improve Myocardial Remodeling Post Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Adv Sci. 2024;11(16):e2308727. doi:10.1002/advs.202308727
175. Harada T, Wilbraham D, de La Borderie G, Inoue S, Bush J, Camm AJ. Cardiac effects of amiselimod compared with fingolimod and placebo: results of a randomised, parallel-group, Phase I study in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(5):1011–1027. doi:10.1111/bcp.13203
176. Omi M, Yamada H, Takahashi H, et al. Differences in collateral vessel formation after experimental retinal vein occlusion in spontaneously hypertensive rats and wild-type rats. Heliyon. 2024;10(6):e27160. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27160
177. Bassila C, Kluck GEG, Thyagarajan N, Chathely KM, Gonzalez L, Trigatti BL. Ligand-dependent interactions between SR-B1 and S1PR1 in macrophages and atherosclerotic plaques. J Lipid Res. 2024;65(5):100541. doi:10.1016/j.jlr.2024.100541
178. Yi X, Tang X, Li T, et al. Therapeutic potential of the sphingosine kinase 1 inhibitor, PF-543. Biomed Pharmacothe. 2023;163:114401. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114401
179. Ji X, Meng Y, Wang Q, et al. Cysteine-Based Redox-Responsive Nanoparticles for Fibroblast-Targeted Drug Delivery in the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction. ACS nano. 2023;17(6):5421–5434. doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c10042
180. Shao JJ, Peng Y, Wang LM, Wang JK, Chen X. Activation of SphK1 by K6PC-5 Inhibits Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation/Reoxygenation-Induced Myocardial Cell Death. DNA Cell Biol. 2015;34(11):669–676. doi:10.1089/dna.2015.2959
181. Ji Y, Chen J, Pang L, et al. The Acid Sphingomyelinase Inhibitor Amitriptyline Ameliorates TNF-α-Induced Endothelial Dysfunction. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024;38(1):43–56. doi:10.1007/s10557-022-07378-0
182. Ya’ar bar S, Pintel N, Abd Alghne H, Khattib H, Avni D. The therapeutic potential of sphingolipids for cardiovascular diseases. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1224743. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1224743
183. Kittleson MM. Management of Heart Failure in Hospitalized Patients. Ann Intern Med. 2023;176(12):Itc177–itc192. doi:10.7326/AITC202312190
184. Fretts AM, Jensen PN, Sitlani CM, et al. Circulating Sphingolipids and All-Cause Mortality: the Strong Heart Family Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13(13):e032536. doi:10.1161/JAHA.123.032536
185. Kogler S, Aizenshtadt A, Harrison S, et al. “Organ-in-a-Column” Coupled On-line with Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2022;94(50):17677–17684. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04530
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Recommended articles
HDL Levels as a Novel Predictor of Long-Term Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Abudouwayiti A, Yisimayili S, Tuersun R, Aimaier S, Yisha D, Zhang XY, Zheng YY, Mahemuti A
Journal of Inflammation Research 2024, 17:6251-6264
Published Date: 10 September 2024