Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 18
Sub-Therapeutic Concentrations of Hexetidine Induce Virulence Gene Expression in Candida albicans
Authors Uygun-Can B , Kadir T
Received 31 October 2024
Accepted for publication 30 January 2025
Published 14 February 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 875—885
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S498943
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Sandip Patil
Banu Uygun-Can, Tanju Kadir
Department of Microbiology, Dental Faculty, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
Correspondence: Banu Uygun-Can, Email [email protected]
Purpose: Intraoral concentrations of antimicrobial agents such as hexetidine (HEX) using alternative antimycotics fluctuate significantly due to the dynamics in the oral cavity, which can affect both the virulence capacity and the outcome of antimycotic therapy in the management of denture stomatitis-associated oral candidiasis.
Methods: This study was carried out to evaluate the impact of different sub-therapeutic HEX concentrations (1/100, 1/200) for different times (0.5, 2, 24, 48 h) on the expression levels of the virulence (hwp1, plb1, plb2, sap4, sap5, sap6) and drug-resistance (cdr1, cdr2, mdr1, erg11) genes of Candida albicans SC5314. Total RNA was extracted immediately after antimicrobial exposure. The qRT-PCR data were performed using the comparative 2−ΔΔCT method to calculate the relative expression of the target genes after treatment to HEX concentrations, standardized to the actin housekeeping gene.
Results: Expression levels of the hwp1 and plb1 genes decrease after exposure to HEX to higher concentrations at 0.5 h, while the expression level of the plb2 gene increases. Only the expression of the erg11 gene showed a significant decrease within the resistance genes at 0.5 h. Sap5, plb2, and mdr1 are overexpressed at 48 h. Sub-therapeutic levels of HEX affect the virulence and drug-resistance genes of C. albicans.
Conclusion: These results give an idea of future strategies for developing and using HEX as an adjunctive therapy for oral candidiasis. The innovation and clinical relevance of our research lie in its exploration of how low doses of HEX influence gene expression over varying time periods, potentially paving the way for alternative therapeutic strategies.
Keywords: antimicrobial agents, hexetidine, virulence genes, drug-resistance genes, oral candidiasis, Candida albicans
Introduction
Candida albicans and Candida spp. species are recognized as key components of the normal microbial flora present in the oral cavity, digestive system, and vagina of a wide range of healthy individuals. Immune deficiencies can disrupt the balance between C. albicans and other components of the normal biota. In such cases, the commensal Candida yeasts can turn into opportunistic pathogens within the host. The ability to switch between yeast and filamentous forms, known for its shape flexibility, is one of the most well-known pathogenic traits of the dimorphic fungus C. albicans. Additionally, several features of C. albicans are considered essential pathogenic mechanisms, including adhesion, invasion, secretion of hydrolytic enzymes, and biofilm formation.1–3
Candida albicans is an opportunistic pathogen frequently isolated from the oral cavity, responsible for causing various types of oral candidiasis, especially in individuals with compromised or weakened immune systems. Additionally, the rising use of antibiotics, hormones, antitumor drugs, and oral biomaterials like dentures has contributed to a yearly increase in oral candidiasis cases. In elderly individuals who wear dentures, the most common form of oral candidiasis is Candida-associated denture stomatitis.4,5
Polyene drugs can act as fungicidal agents, but they are often toxic to the host, while azoles are fungistatic, making fungi more likely to develop resistance.6 Antifungal azoles like fluconazole are commonly used for treatment or prevention, and mouthrinses containing hexetidine (HEX) have been favored as adjunctive therapies or alternatives to traditional antifungal treatments due to the increasing resistance observed.7 Several notable studies have reported that due to the diluting effect of saliva and the cleansing action of oral muscles, intraoral concentrations of antifungal agents decrease significantly, potentially resulting in sub-therapeutic drug levels and diminishing their therapeutic effectiveness.8–10
Previous reports have indicated that many non-antibiotic antimicrobial agents exhibit antiadhesive properties even at concentrations below their therapeutic levels, and also at concentrations lower than those required for complete substrate coverage. Since the adhesion of microorganisms to epithelial cells is a surface-level process and there is rapid clearance by saliva, it is plausible that the prolonged antiadhesive effects may be partially attributed to the retention of low concentrations of HEX on the surface of epithelial cells. Ongoing studies are focused on determining how HEX interacts with epithelial cell membranes.11
Numerous studies have reported that under such conditions, Candida behavior and its virulence factors are also impacted.8 For instance, in vitrostudies conducted by several researchers8–10,12,13 demonstrated that brief exposure of C. albicans to sub-minimal inhibitory concentrations of certain oral antiseptics significantly reduced germ tube formation, cell surface hydrophobicity, and enzymatic activities such as phospholipase and proteinase. All of these studies utilized phenotypic methods, but none examined the expression of genes responsible for virulence. Pathogenic C. albicans possesses 10 secreted aspartic protease (sap) isoenzymes, with saps 4–6 playing a crucial role in mediating fungal hyphae invasion by penetrating tissues. According to the data, saps 4–6 facilitate C. albicans hyphal penetration by hydrolyzing surface proteins, creating openings in the mucosal cells of the host. The main targets of saps 4–6 are integrins located on the outer layer of host epithelial cells. These proteases bind to integrins, creating spaces for the fungal penetration process. This mechanism, referred to as the Trojan horse mechanisms, can induce apoptosis in host epithelial cells through the intralysosomal proteolytic activity of saps 4–6.1 Consequently, the primary aim of this study was to analyze the genes that encode hyphal wall protein (hwp1), proteinase (sap4, sap5, sap6), and phospholipase (plb1 and plb2).
Due to inadequate treatment and recurrent infections, resistance to antifungal azoles in C. albicans has been observed to increase.14–16 The most crucial genes involved in C. albicans drug resistance are (i) cdr1 and cdr2, which encode multidrug efflux transporters from the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family, (ii) erg11, a gene encoding sterol 14 α-demethylase, the drug target enzyme, and (iii) mdr1, a major facilitator transporter gene.17,18 Resistance can arise from changes in drug accumulation within the cell, alterations in membrane sterol composition, mutations in erg11, or changes in its function.19 Therefore, the secondary objective of this study was to analyze the drug resistance genes (cdr1, cdr2, mdr1, and erg11) in C. albicans following brief exposure to sub-therapeutic concentrations of HEX.
The hypothesis of this study is that the expression of virulence and resistance genes in C. albicans will be progressively influenced by long-term fluctuations in the oral environment. The novelty and clinical importance of our research lies in its potential to open avenues for alternative treatment methods by examining the effects of low doses of HEX on gene expression over varying durations.
Materials and Methods
Strain
Candida albicans SC5314 (from our laboratory stock collection) stored in YEPD that contains 10% glycerol at −80°C. Fresh culture was used.
Antiseptic Agent
The preparation of hexetidine (HEX, 0.1%) was performed by adding 0.01 mL of 1% HEX (Sigma) to 0.09 mL of PBS, as previously described.13 Sub-therapeutic concentrations (STC) (1/100, 1/200) of antiseptic agent were prepared by adding a therapeutic concentration of 10 µL from antiseptic agent to tubes containing 0.99 and 1.99 mL of PBS, 20 ppm and 10 ppm, respectively. In this study, the therapeutic dose for HEX (0.1%) was not used, because this dose was going to kill the microorganism13 (Figure 1).
![]() |
Figure 1 Overall schematic diagram representing the workflow. |
Preparation of the Yeast Suspension
C. albicans SC5314 was cultured in YEPD broth (yeast extract at 10 g, peptone at 20 g, and dextrose at 20 g/liter) at 30°C for 24 hours. After culture for 24 hours in YEPD (at 30°C), cells were inoculated in YEPD, 200 mL and brought to the starting concentration of 2×104 cells per mL. Agitation was used to grow cultures overnight at 30°C, reaching 600 nm (OD600) of 0.1 optical density and growing in logarithmic-phase OD600=0.8–1 (approximately 1×107 cells mL−1).19
Exposure of C. albicans SC5314 to an Antiseptic Agent
Three tubes of cell suspension (107 yeast/mL) of the C. albicans SC5314 isolate were prepared in 1 mL of buffered phosphate saline (PBS). The tubes were centrifuged at 3000×g for 10 minutes. After the supernatant was completely decanted, all yeast pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of sterile PBS (control) and 1 mL of PBS/HEX. Each antiseptic solution underwent the same procedure at different time intervals. The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 0.5, 2, 24, and 48 hours on a shaker. Subsequently, two suspension and centrifugation cycles with sterile PBS were performed for 10 minutes at 4°C at 3000×g to thoroughly remove the supernatant containing antiseptic. After removing the supernatant, two additional washes were conducted, and the pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of sterile PBS to prevent any potential carry-over effects of the antiseptic.20 These pellet suspensions were then stored at −20°C until RNA extraction.
Analysis of Gene Expression
Reverse transcription combined with polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been shown to be a highly effective technique for quantifying gene expression. This method reduces potential errors associated with post-PCR processing of PCR products, thereby increasing accuracy and minimizing the risk of carryover contamination.21 In our study, we designed an assay that measures the expression of resistance genes at the mRNA level using RT-PCR.
The comparative ΔCt method was employed, enabling a relatively quantitative calculation of the sample template. This method enhances the output by eliminating the need for standard curves to determine expression levels, using an active reference control for comparison instead.21,22
RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and Quantification
The general extraction of RNA from C. albicans SC5314 strain was performed with a commercially available Bio-Speedy® RNA-TRiRegular (Bioeksen, Turkey), consisting of a solution of phenol and guanidine isothiocyanate solution, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
First-strand cDNA synthesis was carried out using the Biospeedy cDNA synthesis kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bioeksen, Turkey). Briefly, the first step of the reaction was performed with an incubation of 300 ng of total RNA in 6 μL RNase-free water and 2 μL oligo dT at 70°C for 10 min. The reaction mix was prepared with 4 μL 5X speedy reaction mix, 1 μL dNTP mix, 1 μL reverse transcriptase, 14 μL RNAse water, and 8 μL of the RNA mix. The final conditions of cDNA synthesis were 37°C for 60 min.
For the specific and efficient amplification of PCR products, it is very crucial to determine the target sequence and design the primers specific to these sequences. The sequences of the target genes were obtained from the NCBI DNA database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) for primer design, Primer-Blast was used to pick specific primers for our target genes listed in Table 1. In silico analysis of primers was performed using the Primer3 software (v.0.4.0), and those containing internal structures (ie, hairpins and formation of primer dimers, according to the software) in minimal amounts were chosen for qPCR analysis.
![]() |
Table 1 Primer Sets and Their Targets |
For successful and efficient amplification of PCR products, it is essential to accurately identify the target sequences and design primers specific to those sequences. The target gene sequences were retrieved from the NCBI DNA database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), and Primer-Blast was utilized to select primers specific to the target genes, as listed in Table 1. An in silico analysis of the primers was conducted using Primer3 software (v.0.4.0). Primers with minimal internal structures, such as hairpins and primer dimers, as predicted by the software, were selected for use in qPCR analysis.
The Roche LightCycler 480 real-time PCR detection system (Roche, Germany) was utilized to assess resistance gene expression profiles at the mRNA level. Each 20-µL reaction mixture contained 4 µL of reverse-transcribed cDNA, 10 µL of EvaGreen qPCR pre-Mix (Bioeksen, Turkey), 500 nM of each primer, and nuclease-free water. The Bio-Speedy® EvaGreen qPCR preMix included Eva Green Dye® as the fluorescent dye, a one-fusion DNA polymerase, a dNTP blend with dUTP to prevent false positives, and optimized buffer components. The presence of EvaGreen dye in the reaction mix was expected to result in less non-target amplification compared to the more commonly used SYBR Green dye. Primer efficiency and amplicon specificity were verified through serial dilution of cDNA and melting curve analysis, respectively. Detection and amplification were performed using the Roche LightCycler 480 system. The protocol began with an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 amplification cycles: 15 seconds at 95°C, 1 minute at 49–50°C (depending on the annealing temperature), and 30 seconds at 72°C.
In the melting curve analysis, the products were heated to 95°C for 1 minute, then cooled to 65°C before being gradually reheated to 95°C, while fluorescence was monitored throughout the process. To ensure the reliability of the experiments, negative controls such as no-template control (NTC) and no-reverse transcriptase control (NRTC) were routinely included to detect any potential sources of contamination and to prevent the amplification of genomic DNA contaminants in each assay. None of the negative controls produced consistent Ct values after 40 qPCR cycles (data not shown). Changes in the relative mRNA levels were analyzed using the comparative critical threshold (2−ΔΔCT relative expression) qPCR method as described by Livak.22 Amplifications of treated and untreated samples (positive controls) were conducted in separate wells. Relative quantification was carried out by comparing the expression of the target genes to that of the housekeeping gene (ACT1), which served as a reference for normalizing RNA input and the levels of all stress and virulence genes. The experiments were repeated three times for consistency.
Statistical Analysis
Bivariate correlation analyses were conducted using MINITAB (Minitab Ltd., England), with correlations assessed through the Pearson method. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05. Expression levels of various virulence genes (hwp1, sap4, sap5, sap6, plb1, and plb2) and resistance genes (erg11, cdr1, cdr2 and mdr1) in C. albicans were measured at 0.5, 2, 24, and 48 hours at different antiseptic concentrations – 10 ppm (1/200) and 20 ppm (1/100) – using qRT-PCR.
Relative quantification of target gene expression was calculated after normalization to ACT1 under different experimental conditions. The amplification efficiency of each target gene was 1.01 ± 0.05. Results were expressed as nFold (2−ΔΔCT), with values >1 indicating overexpression and values <1 indicating underexpression of target genes in response to antiseptic exposure at different incubation times.
Results
C. albicans Gene Expressions
The amount of change can be seen from Figure 2.
Figure 2 Continued. Figure 2 Heatmaps of Gene expressions at HEX concentrations of C. albicans incubated at 0, 10 and 20 ppm for 0.5, 2, 24, and 48 h.
Expression levels of the virulence gene hwp1 are significantly reduced compared to control (0.002) after exposure to HEX exposure at 0.5 h (Figure 2), hwp1 is down-regulated at 24 h and 48 h (Figure 2) (r>0.8, p<0.01). After 2 hours, the upregulated for all concentrations (0.36–0.18) but was more upregulated at 10 ppm, compared to the control (0.038) (Figure 2).
Sap4 is up-regulated at 24 h, regularly increased by concentraions (r>0.6, p<0.05) (Figure 2). After 30 minutes, there was a slight decrease while this expression increased for 2 and 48 hours.
At 48 h, sap5 showed an increase in expression (Figure 2). After 30 minutes, for 10 ppm, there is a little increase first, but then for 20 ppm, it significantly decreased (r>0.8, p<0.05). For 2 h, at all concentrations, it significantly increased (r>0.6, p<0.05) (Figure 2).
Sap6 expression levels are down-regulated after 30 minutes, while they are significantly up-regulated for the other times, at all concentrations of HEX (Figure 2).
Plb1 expression levels decrease after exposure to HEX at 0.5 h (Figure 2) and also at 10 ppm at 48 h. plb1 is up-regulated for 2, 24 h (Figure 2) and at 48 h in all concentrations of HEX. For only 0.5 h and at 20 ppm concentration, it decreased significantly decreased (r>0.6, p<0.05) (Figure 2).
Plb2 gene expression levels are significant after HEX exposure at 0.5 (Figure 2) and 48 h regularly by concentrations (r>0.6, p<0.05). After 2 h, the first increased and then decreased, while controversial at 24 h (Figure 2).
At 0.5 h, only the expression of the erg11 gene showed a significant decrease within the resistance genes (r>0.6, p<0.05) (Figure 2). At 24 and 48 h, it decreased at all concentrations, as well as (Figure 2).
Cdr1 is upregulated for 30 minutes and 2 h. For 24 and 48 h, it is significantly down-regulated at all concentrations of HEX. (r>0.6, p<0.05) (Figure 2).
Cdr2 is upregulated at 30 minutes. For 2 and 24 h, it is upregulated, while after 48 h it is down-regulated about 10-fold by first concentration, controversial by 20 ppm again up-regulated a little more (Figure 2).
Mdr1 showed a significant increase in expression at 2, 24, and 48 h (Figure 2). For only a 20-ppm concentration at 30 minutes, it was down-regulated approximately five-fold (r>0.8, p<0.05) (Figure 2).
Discussion
The rising morbidity and mortality rates associated with Candida infections in recent years have led researchers to focus on Candida virulence factors, prompting the development of various in vitro tests to investigate the role these factors play in fungal pathogenesis. Animal models of Candida infection have demonstrated the significance of Candida virulence factors and host defenses while also helping to explore new treatment alternatives.23–25
The initial stage of Candida infection is known to involve the adhesion of Candida to host cell surfaces. Hwp1 is one of the key genes that mediates adhesion to mucosal surfaces26 and is highly expressed in germ tubes during the early phase of biofilm formation.27,28 Additionally, C. albicans possesses gene families that encode hydrolytic enzymes involved in infections, such as secreted aspartyl proteinases (Saps) and phospholipase (Pl) gene families.29
Although numerous antifungal agents, both topical and systemic, are available for the treatment of oral candidiasis, antiseptic mouthwashes can also serve as alternatives or adjuncts to traditional antifungal treatments.7,30 Prolonged antifungal use, however, has led to a significant increase in the prevalence of antifungal resistance, complicating infection management.31
In recent years, many studies have uncovered the molecular mechanisms underlying drug resistance in yeast.32,33 In this regard, the ATP-binding cassette transporters, specifically the cdr,34 mdr1,35 and erg1136 genes, have been shown to play crucial roles in mediating C. albicans resistance to azole antifungal agents. Therefore, understanding these mechanisms is essential for developing more effective therapeutic strategies to combat antifungal resistance.
Most antiseptic agents are eliminated from the oral cavity within the first hour due to the diluting action of saliva and the cleansing effect of oral musculature, which diminishes their therapeutic efficacy.9 This raises the question of whether low concentrations of antiseptics influence drug resistance and the pathogenicity of C. albicans during treatment. The effects of sub-therapeutic concentrations of oral antiseptics on C. albicans virulence factors have been examined phenotypically in many studies.10,13,37 To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the impact of oral antiseptic hexetidine (HEX) on the expression levels of genes associated with virulence and drug resistance. Only one previous study examined the effect of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) on the expression of the cdr1 and cdr2 genes, which are involved in drug resistance, and reported the overexpression of both genes;38 however, this study did not assess virulence gene expression.
The aim of our study was to determine the effect of HEX on the expression of virulence factor genes (hwp1, sap4, sap5, sap6, plb1, and plb2) and drug resistance genes (mdr1, erg11, cdr1, and cdr2). Oral antiseptics are known to be quickly absorbed by C. albicans, within 15–30 seconds.39 This study examined the effects of both short-term (30 minutes and 2 hours) and long-term (24 and 48 hours) exposure to the antiseptic on the expression of C. albicans virulence and drug resistance genes.
Virulence factors, including adhesion, biofilm formation, and hydrolytic enzyme activity, play a critical role in the pathogenesis of Candida albicans infections. The primary aim of this study was to determine how sub-therapeutic doses of HEX influence the expression of virulence-associated genes, such as hwp1, sap4, and plb1.
Although resistance genes such as cdr1 and erg11 were analyzed to provide a broader understanding of the molecular impact of HEX, these findings were secondary to the primary aim of understanding virulence regulation.
In this study, the effects of antiseptics at low doses and varying exposure durations on C. albicans were examined in detail. The findings demonstrate that HEX induces significant changes, particularly in virulence and resistance genes such as hwp1, sap4, sap5, and mdr1. The expression of the hwp1 gene was observed to decrease during both short-term (0.5 hours) and long-term (24 and 48 hours) exposure. This gene plays a critical role in Candida’s adhesion to mucosal surfaces and is highly expressed during the early stages of biofilm formation. The suppression of this gene’s expression by HEX may impact biofilm formation and, consequently, the initial stages of infection.
Additionally, with regard to the sap gene family (sap4, sap5, and sap6), HEX exposure increased the expression levels of these genes. Sap proteinases play a central role in the degradation of host cell membranes and tissue invasion. The upregulation of these genes at low doses of HEX suggests the need for further studies to better understand the impact of antiseptics on host-pathogen interactions.
Among resistance genes, the expression of erg11 was found to decrease following 0.5-hour and 24-hour exposure to HEX. The erg11 gene plays a significant role in the resistance mechanism to azole antifungals, and its reduced expression suggests increased antifungal susceptibility. However, the cdr1 and cdr2 genes exhibited a significant decrease in expression during prolonged exposure to low doses of HEX. These genes encode ABC transporter proteins that mediate the efflux of antifungal drugs from the cell, and their overexpression is associated with the development of resistance.
The findings demonstrate that HEX significantly modulates virulence gene expression, particularly those involved in adhesion and biofilm formation. These results emphasize the importance of targeting virulence factors as a therapeutic strategy against Candida infections.
These findings demonstrate that the antiseptic had varying effects on gene expression depending on the duration of exposure. While the discussion could not fully explore some of the intriguing correlations due to the lack of similar studies involving HEX and Candida albicans, these results will likely contribute to the development of new treatment approaches in the future. The study’s evaluation period of 48 hours exceeds the typical timeframes examined in other studies and is clinically relevant, as patients generally brush their teeth at least once daily and sterilize their dentures. These findings provide potential alternatives for the treatment of oral candidal infections.
To further advance these findings toward clinical application, additional analyses such as drug release profiles, cytotoxicity studies, and biofilm assessments are necessary to support the transition to clinical trials as an alternative therapy for oral candidal infections.
The potential of essential oils (EOs) has been highlighted as a promising avenue for discovering new classes of antifungals. Many studies have investigated the antifungal properties of EOs and their potential applications in fungal control, calling for further discussion.40–42 Additionally, combination therapy presents a cost-effective alternative, as it bypasses the expensive and time-consuming process of developing new drugs.43
The findings of this study demonstrate that antiseptics can influence virulence and resistance gene expression during prolonged exposure at low concentrations. Specifically, HEX was shown to significantly modulate the expression of virulence genes involved in adhesion and biofilm formation. These results emphasize the importance of targeting virulence factors as a therapeutic strategy against Candida infections.
This study contributes to the literature as one of the first to examine the effects of HEX on the virulence gene expression of C. albicans. However, further research is required to translate these findings into clinical applications. In particular, the effects of HEX on biofilm inhibition should be detailed with various dose and duration combinations. Additionally, collaboration with biomedical engineers could facilitate the development of drug delivery systems that allow antiseptics to still be longer in the oral cavity. Such systems could mitigate the effects of saliva washing and mechanical cleansing, enhancing the retention and efficacy of the antiseptic.
Conclusion
This study highlights the potential of HEX as a modulator of virulence gene expression in Candida albicans. The significant downregulation of key virulence genes such as hwp1 and plb1 suggests that subtherapeutic doses of HEX may serve as an adjunct therapy for Candida infections. The uniqueness and clinical significance of this research lie in its investigation of how low doses of HEX affect gene expression over various periods, offering potential insights into alternative therapeutic approaches.
Future studies should focus on optimizing HEX concentrations to maximize its impact on virulence without promoting resistance.
Data Sharing Statement
Data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Funding
This work was supported by Marmara University Scientific Research Projects Committee (No. SAG- B-040712 0261).
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Mayer FL, Wilson D, Hube B. Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence. 2013;4:119–128. doi:10.4161/viru.22913
2. Behzadi P, Behzadi E, Ranjbar R. Urinary tract infections and Candida albicans. Cent Eur J Urol. 2015;68(1):96–101. doi:10.5173/ceju.2015.01.474
3. Behzadi P, Behzadi E. Evaluation of UVB light efficacy for inducing apoptosis in Candida albicans cultures. Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol. 2012;71(1):39–42.
4. Pankhurst CL. Candidiasis (oropharyngeal). BMJ Clin Evid. 2013;8:1304.
5. Webb BC, Thomas CJ, Willcox MD, Harty DW, Knox KW. Candida-associated denture stomatitis. Aetiology and management: a review. Part 2. Oral diseases caused by Candida species. Aust Dent J. 1998;43:160–166. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00157.x
6. De Cesare GB, Hafez A, Stead D, Llorens C, Munro CA. Biomarkers of caspofungin resistance in Candida albicans isolates: a proteomic approach. Virulence. 2022;13(1):1005–1018. doi:10.1080/21505594.2022.2081291
7. Budtz-Jorgensen E. Etiology, pathogenesis, therapy, and prophylaxis of oral yeast infections. Acta Odontol Scand. 1990;48:61–69. doi:10.3109/00016359009012735
8. Kadir T, Gümrü B, Uygun-Can B. Phospholipase activity of Candida albicans isolates from patients with denture stomatitis: the influence of chlorhexidine gluconate on phospholipase production. Arch Oral Biol. 2007;52(7):691–696. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.12.008
9. Ellepola AN, Samaranayake LP. The effect of brief exposure to sub-therapeutic concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate on the germ tube formation of oral Candida albicans and its relationship to post-antifungal effect. Oral Dis. 2000;6(3):166–171. doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2000.tb00328.x
10. Mafojane T, Shangase SL, Patel M. The effect of subinhibitory concentrations of gentian violet on the germ tube formation by Candida albicans and its adherence to oral epithelial cells. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;82:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.05.016
11. McCoy CP, Jones DS, McGovern JG, Gorman SP, Woolfson AD. Determination of the salivary retention of hexetidine in-vivo by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2000;52(11):1355–1359. doi:10.1211/0022357001777504
12. Ellepola ANB, Joseph BK, Khan ZU. The postantifungal effect and phospholipase production of oral Candida albicans from smokers, diabetics, asthmatics, denture wearers and healthy individuals following brief exposure to subtherapeutic concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate. Mycoses. 2014;57(9):553–559. doi:10.1111/myc.12194
13. Uygun-Can B, Kadir T, Gumru B. Effect of oral antiseptic agents on phospholipase and proteinase enzymes of Candida albicans. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;62:20–27. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.11.006
14. Al-Fattani MA, Douglas LJ. Biofilm matrix of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis: chemical composition and role in drug resistance. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55(8):999–1008. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.46569-0
15. Yu LH, Wei X, Ma M, Chen XJ, Xu SB. Possible inhibitory molecular mechanism of farnesol on the development of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(2):770–775. doi:10.1128/AAC.05290-11
16. Whaley SG, Berkow EL, Rybak JM, Nishimoto AT, Barker KS, Rogers PD. Azole antifungal resistance in Candida albicans and emerging non-albicans Candida Species. Front Microbiol. 2017;7(1). doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.02173
17. Franz R, Kelly SL, Lamb DC, Kelly DE, Ruhnke M, Morschhäuser J. Multiple molecular mechanisms contribute to a stepwise development of fluconazole resistance in clinical Candida albicans strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42(12):3065–3072. doi:10.1128/AAC.42.12.3065
18. Sanglard D, Kuchler K, Ischer F, Pagani JL, Monod M, Bille J. Mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans isolates from AIDS patients involve specific multidrug transporters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39(11):2378–2386. doi:10.1128/AAC.39.11.2378
19. Banerjee D, Lelandais G, Shukla S, et al. Responses of pathogenic and nonpathogenic yeast species to steroids reveal the functioning and evolution of multidrug resistance transcriptional networks. Eukaryot Cell. 2008;7(1):68–77. doi:10.1128/EC.00256-07
20. Anil S, Samaranayake LP. Brief exposure to antimycotics reduces the extracellular phospholipase activity of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis. Chemotherapy. 2003;49(5):243–247. doi:10.1159/000072448
21. Kofla G, Ruhnke M. Development of a new real-time TaqMan PCR assay for quantitative analyses of Candida albicans resistance genes expression. J Microbiol Methods. 2007;68(1):178–183. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2006.07.011
22. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262
23. Thewes S, Kretschmar M, Park H, Schaller M, Filler SG, Hube B. In vivo and ex vivo comparative transcriptional profiling of invasive and non-invasive Candida albicans isolates identifies genes associated with tissue invasion. Mol Microbiol. 2007;63(6):1606–1628. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05614.x
24. Naglik JR, Fostira F, Ruprai J, Staab JF, Challacombe SJ, Sundstrom P. Candida albicans HWP1 gene expression and host antibody responses in colonization and disease. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55(10):1323–1327. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.46737-0
25. Castillo GDV, de Blanc SL, Sotomayor CE, Azcurra AI. Study of virulence factor of Candida species in oral lesions and its association with potentially malignant and malignant lesions. Arch Oral Biol. 2018;91:35–41. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.02.012
26. Staab JF, Bradway SD, Fidel PL, Sundstrom P. Adhesive and mammalian transglutaminase substrate properties of Candida albicans Hwp1. Science. 1999;283(5407):1535–1538. doi:10.1126/science.283.5407.1535
27. Finkel JS, Mitchell AP. Genetic control of Candida albicans biofilm development. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(2):109–118. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2475
28. Nobile CJ, Nett JE, Andes DR, Mitchell AP. Function of Candida albicans adhesin Hwp1 in biofilm formation. Eukaryot Cell. 2006;5(10):1604–1610. doi:10.1128/EC.00194-06
29. Naglik JR, Rodgers CA, Shirlaw PJ, et al. Differential expression of Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinase and phospholipase B genes in humans correlates with active oral and vaginal infections. J Infect Dis. 2003;188(3):469–479. doi:10.1086/376536
30. Giuliana G, Pizzo G, Milici ME, Giangreco R. In vitro activities of antimicrobial agents against Candida species. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87(1):44–49. doi:10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70293-3
31. Perlin DS, Shor E, Zhao Y. Update on antifungal drug resistance. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. 2015;2(2):84–95. doi:10.1007/s40588-015-0015-1
32. Sanglard D, Coste AT. Activity of isavuconazole and other azoles against Candida clinical isolates and yeast model systems with known azole resistance mechanisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(1):229–238. doi:10.1128/AAC.02157-15
33. Eddouzi J, Parker JE, Vale-Silva LA, et al. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance in clinical Candida species isolated from Tunisian hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(7):3182–3193. doi:10.1128/AAC.00555-13
34. Sanglard D, Ischer F, Monod M, Bille J. Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: characterization of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transporter gene. Microbiology. 1997;143(2):405–416. doi:10.1099/00221287-143-2-405
35. Wirsching S, Michel S, Morschhäuser J. Targeted gene disruption in Candida albicans wild-type strains: the role of the MDR1 gene in fluconazole resistance of clinical Candida albicans isolates. Mol Microbiol. 2000;36(4):856–865. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01899.x
36. Feng LJ, Wan Z, Wang XH, Li RY, Liu W. Relationship between antifungal resistance of fluconazole resistant Candida albicans and mutations in ERG11 gene. Chin Med J. 2010;123(5):544–548. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2010.05.007
37. Ellepola ANB, Joseph BJ, Khan ZU. Effects of subtherapeutic concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate on germ tube formation of oral Candida. Med Princ Pract. 2012;21(2):120–124. doi:10.1159/000332569
38. Edlind MP, Smith WL, Edlind TD. Effects of cetylpyridinium chloride resistance and treatment on fluconazole activity versus Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(2):843–845. doi:10.1128/AAC.49.2.843-845.2005
39. Hiom SJ, Furr JR, Russell AD. Uptake of 14C-chlorhexidine gluconate by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1995;21(1):20–22. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.1995.tb00997.x
40. Handayani S, Nurdiana N, Winarsih S, Tri Endharti A. The effects of holothurin and caspofungin on the vaginal cell inflammation parameters of the Rattus norvegicus strain post induction of Candida albicans. Infect Drug Resist. 2023;16:2501–2509. doi:10.2147/IDR.S400314
41. Contreras Martínez OI, Ortíz AA, Patiño GS. Antifungal potential of isoespintanol extracted from Oxandra xylopioides Diels (Annonaceae) against intrahospital isolations of Candida SPP. Heliyon. 2022;8(10):e11110. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11110
42. Spengler G, Gajdács M, Donadu MG, et al. Evaluation of the antimicrobial and antivirulent potential of essential oils isolated from Juniperus oxycedrus L. ssp. macrocarpa aerial parts. Microorganisms. 2022;10(4):758. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10040758
43. Şenel S, Özdoğan AI, Akca G. Current status and future of delivery systems for prevention and treatment of infections in the oral cavity. Drug Deliv and Transl Res. 2021;11:1703–1734.
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.