Back to Journals » Journal of Pain Research » Volume 18

The Clinical Effect of Electroacupuncture Combined with Surround Needling in the Treatment of Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain Based on Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Imaging Technology: A Protocol for a Single-Centre, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Authors Chen L, Hu Q, Gao H, Tang D

Received 12 January 2025

Accepted for publication 8 May 2025

Published 15 May 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 2467—2478

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S517109

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Houman Danesh



Liao Chen,1,* Qimiao Hu,2,* Hong Gao,2 Ding Tang3

1The Third School of Clinical Medicine (School of Rehabilitation Medicine), Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Acupuncture, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Tuina, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Ding Tang, Department of Tuina, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected] Hong Gao, Department of Acupuncture, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310005, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]

Objective: To verify the efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) combined with surround needling on acute lateral ankle sprain (ALAS) based on musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) imaging technology.
Methods and Analysis: Sixty-six ALAS patients will be randomly divided into EA combined with surround needling group, sham EA group and ice combined with brake rest group in a 1:1:1 ratio by using a random number table. The Kofoed scores, MSKUS quantitative measurement and circumference of ankle joint will be compared to evaluate the differences in efficacy caused by the three treatment methods as stated. Data for the assessment will be collected at baseline, three-week treatment, and two-month follow-up in three groups of ALAS patients.
Trial Registration: ChiCTR-2300078874.

Keywords: acute lateral ankle sprain, electroacupuncture, musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging technology, protocol, randomized controlled trial, surround needling

Introduction

The ankle joint is composed of the articular surface of the tibia and fibula and the trochlea of talus, respectively. It is an important weight-bearing bone joint and most prone to injury.1 With the improvement of living standards, outdoor activities are increasing, the incidence of AAS (acute ankle sprain) is increasing, it accounts for about 10%~15% of all sports injuries. Among them, lateral ligament injuries accounted for the vast majority, about 85%.2,3

Acute lateral ankle sprain (ALAS) represents a commonly sustained musculoskeletal injury, characterized by its high prevalence both within the general population and among individuals engaged in athletic activities.4–6 Patients with ALAS frequently exhibit symptoms including erythema, edema, pain, and movement disorders localized around the ankle joint. These symptoms can progress to long-term chronic pain and dysfunction of ankle joint, significantly impairing the patients’ daily activities and occupational performance.7–11 Ankle sprains are typically categorized according to the extent of ligamentous injury. Grade I is mild ligament strain without visible rupture or joint instability. Grade II is a partial rupture of the ligament, often accompanied by moderate pain and swelling. There are functional limitations and varying degrees of ankle instability. The patient is unable to bear weight. Grade III refers to complete ligament rupture accompanied by obvious pain, swelling, hematoma, and pain. In grade III injuries, there are significant functional impairments and joint instability.12,13 Depending on the severity of ankle damage, different levels of treatment (including surgery, immobilization, balance training, functional treatment with bandages, tape or different braces) will be selected.

Studies have shown that chronic pain in AAS patients is associated with an increased risk of anxiety, depression, and other adverse emotional states.14 It mainly refers to the injury of lateral ligament of ankle, calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), also known as ALAS.12 Moreover, the clinical symptoms of ALAS greatly affect the quality of life of patients if the treatment is not timely or incorrect. It can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). The combination of treatment costs and sick leave contributes to a significant socioeconomic burden.15–19 Consequently, addressing the pain management of patients with ALAS and improving their prognostic outcomes represents an urgent clinical challenge that requires immediate attention.

Currently, celecoxib capsules (Viatris Pharmaceuticals LLC, USA) are commonly used clinically to alleviate patients’ pain, but prolonged use of this medication often results in diminished efficacy and may lead to severe adverse effects, such as gastric ulcer and liver damage. In the physical therapy methods commonly used by ALAS, the RICE principles are mainly followed and widely used in orthopedic clinical practice,20,21 namely rest, ice, compression and elevation of the affected limb.22 Despite this, the therapeutic effects are often transient, and some patients continue to experience persistent pain. With the continuous updating and application of clinical guidelines, this treatment plan is gradually no longer recommended.23 Therefore, how to effectively relieve the persistent pain of ALAS patients is an urgent problem to be solved clinically.

In China, acupuncture has been developed as a therapeutic method for thousands of years. Recent clinical studies into the anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties of acupuncture have consistently demonstrated its efficacy in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. Multiple studies have shown that it has good therapeutic effects on inflammation, edema and pain. Ph.D. Zhang found that acupuncture reduces pain by desensitizing peripheral receptors and activating the opioid system.24 Hahm’s study on mice with ankle sprains showed that 2 hz electroacupuncture (EA) alleviated both pain and edema, while 100 hz only reduced pain. This highlighted acupuncture’s effectiveness for ankle sprains and identified 2 hz as a more effective frequency. Hahm suggested that acupuncture’s pain relief involves both opioid and non-opioid mechanisms.25 Due to the immediate intervention effects of acupuncture treatment on ALAS, many emergency departments in countries with acupuncture techniques have adopted it as a therapeutic approach to mitigate redness, swelling, and pain, with promising efficacy outcomes.26–28

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) possesses distinct attributes such as dynamic, real-time, continuous visualization capabilities, quantitative and qualitative localization, ease of operation, and the absence of contraindications. Perone highlighted that MSKUS is popular among emergency department doctors for its versatility in examining joints, tissues, tendons, nerves, and fractures, offering immediate imaging and quick diagnosis.29 Yuko Nakashima noted that advancements in MSKUS technology have enhanced clarity, allowing for radiation-free diagnosis of soft tissue issues. Compared to MRI, MSKUS is more time and cost-efficient, assesses muscle, tendon, and ligament damage, and provides insights into movement disorders by allowing patients to change positions.30 Therefore, MSKUS plays a crucial role in evaluating musculoskeletal diseases.

At present, acupuncture is employed in the clinical treatment of ALAS in China; however, its use for ALAS on an international scale remains limited, despite recommendations from some experts. This limited adoption is primarily due to a lack of sufficient clinical trial evidence supporting the efficacy of acupuncture for ALAS.31 Thus, we conduct this well-designed, single-centre, randomized controlled clinical trial to provide more robust guidance for the clinical application of acupuncture in the treatment of ALAS.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

The study is a single-centre, randomized controlled, outcome assessor-blinded clinical trial. It has received approval from the Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University. Sixty-six participants will be recruited in Zhejiang province, using a random number generator in Excel (version 2021, Microsoft, USA), with the groups randomly split (in a 1:1:1 ratio) into three (EA combined with surround needling group, sham EA group and ice combined with brake rest group). Patients in 3 groups will be treated for 3 weeks, followed up for 2 month. Data for the assessment will be collected at baseline, 3-week treatment, and 2-month follow-up in 3 groups of ALAS patients. This study protocol was developed according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Intervention Trials (SPIRIT) 2013, which is supplied in Supplementary Table 1. Chinese Trial Registry (ChiCTR) has registered this trial. The trial flow chart is summarized in Figure 1 and Table 1.

Table 1 Trial Schedule

Figure 1 Route diagram of study design.

Abbreviations: ALAS, acute lateral ankle sprain; EA, electroacupuncture; MSKUS, musculoskeletal ultrasound.

Study Methods

Participant Recruitment

Participants for this investigation will be enrolled from various regions within Zhejiang province. We will utilize WeChat and hospital notice boards as mediums for disseminating information about our research. The eligibility and clinical severity of ALAS patients will be evaluated by medical professionals who have undergone rigorous standardized training. Following the confirmation of eligibility, informed consent will be secured from patients who consent to engage in the study.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical approval from the review board will be secured before initiating this research. Participant privacy will be safeguarded, and all individuals will be enrolled in treatment and assessment protocols only after providing their informed consent.

Randomization and Blinding

Randomization for the study will be facilitated using Microsoft Excel 2021 software. The generated list of random numbers will be printed and subsequently divided into individual small segment. The randomizer will input the estimated sample size into the statistical software package, obtain the sequence number, create a random card, and seal it in an envelope. When subjects who meet the inclusion criteria enter the trial, the randomizer will open the envelopes in the order of their entry and follow the instructions on the randomization card to divide them into one group. Enabling the envelope is considered invalid and cannot be used again. When the case is not included, the envelope shall be kept by a dedicated person and cannot be opened in advance.

Due to the particularity of acupuncture operation, operators and patients will not be blinded. The efficacy evaluation will be conducted using a blind method, including MSKUS imaging, Kofoed score will be completed by inspectors who did not know the grouping information; The data summary stage will adopt blind statistical analysis, and the research results will be statistically analyzed by statisticians who are unaware of the grouping situation. Separate the research operator, efficacy evaluator, and outcome statistician.

Participants and Populations

Diagnostic Criteria for ALAS Patients

  1. Have a history of ankle trauma.
  2. Ankle pain, visible joint swelling and subcutaneous ecchymosis with limited joint movement.
  3. Localized pressure pain is obvious, and the anterior and inferior ankle pain is aggravated when the foot is inverted.
  4. X-ray film excludes ankle fracture and dislocation.

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Meets the diagnostic criteria for a grade I or II injury.
  2. Within 48 h of onset.
  3. Age 18~60 years old, gender is not limited.
  4. The skin of the affected ankle joint is intact, without breakage or ulceration.
  5. Patients without serious cardiovascular system, respiratory system, immune system diseases, diabetes mellitus and mental diseases and other diseases.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Combined with ankle fracture.
  2. Patients with grade III injuries or complete ligament ruptures.
  3. Patients who cannot comply with the treatment program. Those with keloid, localized combined existence of other skin diseases, unsuitable for EA treatment operation.
  4. Patients with serious combined cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, hepatic, renal, hematopoietic system diseases or systemic failure, patients with connective tissue disease, hemophilia, diabetes, malignant tumors, and patients with easy bleeding tendency.

Interventions and Comparison

The treatment period is 3 weeks, and the follow-up is 2 months. Patients need to receive treatment two or three times a week. The Kofoed score will be recorded after each treatment. MSKUS will be performed in 3 groups of ALAS patients before first treatment and after the 3-week treatment. The Kofoed score and MSKUS will be recorded after the follow-up period.

The Position and Function of Acupoints

In accordance with the 2006 People’s Republic of China National Standard (GB/T 12346–2006) “Acupoints names and positioning”, the locations and indications of acupuncture acupoints are detailed in Figure 2 and Table 2.

Table 2 Locations and Indications of Acupuncture Acupoints

Figure 2 Location of acupoints.

EA Combined with Surround Needling Group

For EA, stainless steel needles (size 0.25*40 mm, Huatuo brand, Suzhou Medical Appliance, China) will be inserted. Instruments of EA will be unified by Hans acupoint neural stimulator (HANS-200A, Nanjing Jisheng Medical Technology Co. Ltd, China). In accordance with therapeutics of acupuncture and moxibustion, the textbooks of TCM, patients belonging to the EA combined with surround needling group will undergo the insertion of authentic needles at precisely designated acupuncture points: BL60 (Kunlun), BL62 (Shenmai), KI6 (Zhaohai), ST41 (Jiexi), ST42 (Chongyang) and Ashi point, which need operators search for the acupoint based on the patient’s the most painful location.

All treatments will be administered exclusively by acupuncturists who hold a master’s degree and possess a minimum of five years of professional experience in acupuncture. Before the formal start of the trial, all acupuncturists will be trained in standardized operation to ensure that every acupoint have the sense of Deqi, BL60 and ST41 will be selected to receive EA. The EA parameters will be selected as 2/100Hz, and the treatment time will be 30 minutes. The acupuncture intensity will be tailored to each patient’s tolerance and suitability. The intervention and its comparison will be conducted in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) 2010,32 as detailed in Supplementary Table 2. During treatment, patients must wear relevant braces to maintain ankle joint immobilization.

Sham EA Group

Sham EA will be administered by blunt and retractable needles at acupoints as same as EA combined with surround needling group. After the acupuncturist inserts the needle into the tube, the needle will retract into the handle when the blunt tip touches the skin. There will be no getting Qi sensation. The manipulation techniques will be the same as in the EA combined with surround needling group with 30 min duration without needle penetration.

The acupoint selection of sham EA group will be the same as that of the EA combined with surround needling group. When inserting the needle, only the skin will be punctured, the needle will not enter the muscle layer and without Deqi. After inserting the needle, the EA device will not be turned on. The treatment time, frequency, and observation period will be the same as the EA combined with surround needling group. During treatment, the sham EA group will wear the same brace as the EA combined with surround needling group to maintain ankle joint immobilization.

Ice Combined with Brake Rest Group

Follow the RICE principle and apply ice within 48 hours of ALAS onset. Prepare ice packs and dry towels for the patient and instruct them to make them softer and easier to adhere to the skin. Seal and secure the towel to form an ice pack. Place the ice pack on the twisted area and apply it for no more than 20 minutes each time. At the same time, intermittently remove the ice pack from the twisted area to allow the skin to recover a little temperature, and then reapply. Advise the patient to apply ice packs three times a day.

After 48 hours, only use braces to maintain ankle joint immobilization without special treatment.

The treatment frequency and observation period will be the same as the above two groups.

Frequency, Duration, and Time

Treatment will be required three times a week, with an interval of 1 to 2 days between each session. Continuous treatment for 3 weeks, a total of 9 times. The baseline observation period will be 2 days, the treatment period will be 3 weeks, and the follow-up period will be 2 months. The total research period will be 11 weeks. The observation time points will be baseline before treatment, post-treatment, and 2 months after the end of treatment (follow-up).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measurement

The primary outcome is Kofoed score.33

Kofoed score is a scoring system used to assess ankle joint function, which mainly includes three parts: pain, function, and range of motion (ROM), each with specific scoring criteria. The part of pain has 50 points, and the score gradually decreases from 50 points (no pain) according to the different pain conditions of the patient’s ankle joint. The part of function has 30 points, and the evaluation criteria include toe walking, heel walking, ability to climb stairs, etc. The score is evaluated based on whether these movements can be completed independently and the degree of assistance used. The part of ROM has 20 points, which evaluates the ROM of the ankle joint in extension, flexion, supination, and pronation, as well as the degree of eversion and inversion during weight-bearing. Different scores are given based on the size of the ROM. According to the Kofoed scoring criteria, the evaluation results of ankle joint function can be divided into four levels: excellent, good, moderate, and poor. Specifically, a score of 85–100 is excellent, 75–84 is good, 70–74 is moderate, and below 70 is poor. This scoring system is widely used in the assessment of ankle joint dysfunction, helping doctors and patients understand the functional status of the ankle joint and providing reference for treatment. The Kofoed score is widely used to assess the different degrees of ankle sprains in patients and their quality of life.34–37

Secondary Outcome Measurement

MSKUS is used as the examination method to mainly examine and compare the thickness of the lateral ankle ligament before and after treatment.38 The HITACHI color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic instrument (ARIETTA60, HITACHI, JPN) will be used for high-frequency MSKUS examination of the ankle joint, with a linear array probe frequency of 7.5–5.0 MHz. If the patient’s condition permits, the affected limb will be placed on the examination bed for multi section scanning of the lateral collateral ligament of the ankle joint. When scanning the anterior talofibular ligament, the patient will lie on their back with the foot flexed, and the probe will be placed at the back end on the outer ankle, with the front end inserted diagonally forward onto the talus. When scanning the calcaneal and fibular ligaments, the patient will lie on their side, with their foot dorsiflexion, and the probe will be placed between the lateral ankle and the calcaneus, at an angle of approximately 120° with the anterior talofibular ligament. When scanning the posterior talofibular ligament, the patient will lie prone with the foot dorsiflexion, and the probe will be placed vertically on the skin behind the lateral ankle and talus. During the scanning process of the aforementioned ligaments, apply appropriate pressure to the probe and observe the activity and tension of the ligaments during passive movements such as internal rotation, external rotation, and inversion of the foot. Pay attention to comparing with the healthy ligaments. Simultaneously observe the echo and continuity of the ligaments, whether there is hematoma in the surrounding soft tissues, and whether there is fluid accumulation in the joint cavity.

Anterior Talofibular Ligament (ATFL)

Place the affected limb slightly inward on the examination bed, fully exposing the lateral malleolus. First, place the probe on the outer side of the distal end of the fibula and move downwards until the tip of the fibula is reached. The distal end of the probe will be raised and moved forward to display the talus.

The Calcaneofibular Ligament (CFL)

Place the probe on the oblique coronal section of the lateral malleolus, with its upper edge flush with the tip of the lateral malleolus and slightly backward below. The long axis section shows a cord-like filamentous structure covering the outer surface of the calcaneus, while the short axis section shows the CFL as an oval shape, sometimes resembling a free body related to the peroneal tendon in the joint. The lateral part of CFL runs deep in the peroneal tendon.

Incidence of Adverse Events

Researchers will record and evaluate every adverse event that occurs among participants. If serious adverse events occur, researchers need to immediately contact the chief investigator and ethics committee, and have them discuss and decide whether to remove the participant from the study. Participants who suffer harm due to research needs will be compensated. Common adverse events caused by acupuncture include fainting, stuck needle, bent needle, broken needle, and hematoma.

Quality Control and Data Management

Prior to the commencement of the study, a multidisciplinary research team, consisting of acupuncturists, orthopedic doctors, statisticians, and ultrasound imaging experts, reviewed, evaluated, and revised the test program. Members of this team were required to participate in a series of training sessions to ensure a thorough understanding of the research protocol and standard operating procedures. The researchers were asked to fill in the collected data as CRF according to the requirements of the research plan. After the study is completed, researchers need to submit all data to the data management center. The data management center needs to verify the authenticity and reliability of the data. If there is any data that does not match the true situation, researchers need to clarify it again.

Sample Size Calculation

Before undertaking this study, we performed a pilot study with a small sample size to determine the efficacy of EA for ALAS. The main outcome measure of this study is Kofoed score, and the sample size calculation is based on the comparison of the mean difference between three independent samples. According to the results of preliminary experiments, the mean and standard deviation of EA combined with surround needling group, sham EA group and ice combined with brake rest group were 88.24 ± 1.12, 83.57 ± 3.34, and 82.09 ± 8.45, respectively. Based on the formula, n1 is 17 and n2 is 18. The two results are relatively close, so n2 is used as the sample size for each group, considering a 20% dropout rate, and ultimately 66 ALAS patients are needed.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables will be represented by mean ± standard deviation, with a 95% confidence interval for normal distribution and median and interquartile range for skewed distribution. Based on the collected data, rank sum test will be used for skewed distribution data, and analysis of variance will be used for normal distribution data. The effectiveness indicators and functional scores before acupuncture treatment (baseline), 3 weeks after treatment and 2 months after treatment will be recorded, respectively, and the index change values between the three groups and the baseline will be calculated after 3 weeks of treatment, 2 months after treatment, and the differences in the changes of the above indicators will be compared using the rank sum test or analysis of variance. Record safety events within 3 weeks of treatment and 2 months after the end of treatment. P < 0.05 will indicate statistical difference, and Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, version 22.0, IBM, USA) software will be used for statistical analysis in this study.

Discussion

ALAS is a prevalent disease associated with sports-related injuries. Symptomatic treatment is often adopted for ALAS in clinical practice, using methods such as analgesics combined with immobilization and ice compress. However, the gastrointestinal side effects of analgesics are significant, and some patients fail to achieve complete restoration of ankle joint ROM to its pre-injury state following treatment.

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) recognizes ALAS as the category of “tendon injury”, which includes ligaments, tendons, fascia, and so on.39 Acupuncture, known for its pain relief, anti-inflammatory, and anti-edema benefits, has long been used in China to treat ankle sprains. Acupoint selection often includes points near the ankle and the Ashi point, which targets the pain area. Some acupuncturists suggest choosing acupoints on the distal or healthy side to minimize stimulation. However, clinical evidence supporting acupuncture’s effectiveness on ALAS is currently insufficient and requires further investigation.

It is essential to investigate the potential therapeutic effects of acupuncture therapy on ankle sprains, as well as to assess whether the integration of medication, manipulation, and physical therapy can reduce the treatment duration and enhance efficacy. At present, clinical research on acupuncture treatment for ALAS is limited by a small overall sample size, a lack of standardized efficacy evaluation systems, and insufficient long-term follow-up of ALAS patients. Continued efforts are necessary to address these limitations and to facilitate the development and dissemination of more straightforward, effective, and innovative acupuncture treatments for ALAS.

This trial aims to provide stronger evidence to meet the needs of clinical practice by using MSKUS to quickly assess patients’ musculoskeletal conditions, ensuring timely and appropriate treatment. MSKUS is chosen for its accuracy in evaluating ankle joint status and its cost-effectiveness, which improves patient compliance. As a convenient and economical examination method, MSKUS is gaining popularity in clinical settings and is valued by acupuncturists for its real-time diagnostic feedback.40,41

ALAS patients will be randomly divided into three groups: EA combined with surround needling group, sham EA group, and ice combined with brake rest group. The muscle and ligament conditions around the ankle joint will be evaluated before and after treatment, and during the follow-up period. This trial will use Kofoed score and MSKUS to make an evaluation, which can more timely and cost-effective assess the patient’s ankle joint condition.

It is expected that this study will yield significant evidence within the field of acupuncture and lay a substantial foundation for future large-scale, multi-center clinical trials. Furthermore, the identification of an integrated EA modality for the treatment of ALAS is expected to be highly valuable in clinical practice. Some studies have indicated that kinesiology taping (KT) exerts a moderate stabilizing effect on the ankles of athletes participating in widely played contact sports who suffer from CAI.42 This observation will indicate that future research could investigate the potential for improved therapeutic efficacy by integrating acupuncture with KT or other comprehensive treatment modalities in the management of ALAS or CAI.

Study Limitations

First, a notable limitation of this study is the enrollment of only 66 patients, constrained by financial limitations and a shortage of researchers. Despite this constraint, it is anticipated that the experimental study will yield valuable insights, thereby laying a groundwork for subsequent research endeavors. Second, in China, most people have experienced an acupuncture treatment. Although we will exclude patients who have received acupuncture treatment 4 weeks prior to the study and use the sham device, there is still high possibility that patients will distinguish the sham from verum acupuncture. Third, the fixed time of the brace is not strictly required, and patients can consult the doctor or make adjustments directly according to their own situation.

Trial Status

This study is currently in the recruitment phase. The first patient was randomised on 14 September 2024, and the study is expected to end by the end of 2025.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study will be available from the corresponding author, Ding Tang, upon reasonable request.

Ethics and Dissemination

The entirety of the research procedures will adhere strictly to the ethical principles outlined in the “Declaration of Helsinki” (revised edition of October 19, 2013). The research protocol has secured endorsement from both the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (permission number: ZSLL-ZN-2023-011-01). The results of the study will be disseminated in a reputable, peer-reviewed academic journal. Patients will have the opportunity to access these results through secure channels, including the utilization of the WeChat platform or via telephone consultation.

Consent

Upon receipt of comprehensive information regarding the research procedures, potential risks, and their rights, each registered participant will be provided with a consent form.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the effort and help from all of those involved in this trial.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This study is funded by the programme of the Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Zhejiang (NO. 2024ZR020), and the funder will not have a role in the conduction or interpretation of this trial, or in any decision to publish the results.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1. Anandacoomarasamy A, Barnsley L. Long term outcomes of inversion ankle injuries[J]. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(3)`14. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.011676

2. Al BSA, Gates LS, Warner M, et al. Factors influencing return to play following conservatively treated ankle sprain: a systematic review [J]. Physic Sports Med. 2019;47(1):31–46. doi:10.1080/00913847.2018.1533392

3. Jupil K, Adam R, Brown Cathleen N. Functional performance tests identify lateral ankle sprain risk: a prospective pilot study in adolescent soccer players [J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(12):2611–2616. doi:10.1111/sms.13279

4. Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014;44:123–140. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5

5. Whalan M, Lovell R, McCunn R, Sampson JA. The incidence and burden of time loss injury in Australian men’s sub-elite football (soccer): a single season prospective cohort study. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;2:42–47.

6. Dizon JM, Reyes JJ. A systematic review on the effective-ness of external ankle supports in the prevention of inversion ankle sprains among elite and recreational players. Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(3):309–317. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2009.05.002

7. Waterman BR, Belmont PJ, Cameron KL, et al. Epidemiology of ankle sprain at the United States Military Academy[J]. Ame J Sports Med. 2010;38(4):797–803. doi:10.1177/0363546509350757

8. Attenborough AS, Hiller CE, Smith RM, Stuelcken M, Greene A, Sinclair PJ. Chronic ankle instability in sporting populations. Sports Med. 2014;44(11):1545–1556. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0218-2

9. Debieux P, Wajnsztejn A, Mansur NSB. Epidemiology of injuries due to ankle sprain diagnosed in an orthopedic emergency room. Einstein. 2019;18:eAO4739. doi:10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO4739

10. McCriskin BJ, Cameron KL, Orr JD, Waterman BR. Management and prevention of acute and chronic lateral ankle instability in athletic patient populations. World J Orthop. 2015;6(2):161–171. doi:10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.161

11. Roos KG, Kerr ZY, Mauntel TC, Djoko A, Dompier TP, Wikstrom EA. The epidemiology of lateral ligament complex ankle sprains in national collegiate athletic association sports. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(1):201–209. doi:10.1177/0363546516660980

12. Balduini FC, Tetzlaff J. Historical perspectives on injuries of the ligaments of the ankle[J]. Clin Sports Med. 1982;1(1):3–12. doi:10.1016/S0278-5919(20)31504-0

13. Best R, Brüggemann P, Petersen W, et al. Aktuelle und neue Konzepte in der Behandlung akuter Außenbandverletzungn des Sprunggelenkes. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin Jahrgang. 2011;62:57–62.

14. Cotchett M, Munteanu SE, Landorf KB. Depression, anxiety, and stress in people with and without plantar heel pain[J]. Foot and Ankle Int. 2016;37(8):816–821. doi:10.1177/1071100716646630

15. Verhagen EA, van Mechelen W, de Vente W. The effect of preventive measures on the incidence of ankle sprains. Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10:291–296. doi:10.1097/00042752-200010000-00012

16. Gribble PA, Bleakley CM, Caulfield BM, et al. 2016 consensus statement of the international ankle consortium: prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1493–1495. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096188

17. Gribble PA, Bleakley CM, Caulfield BM, et al. Evidence review for the 2016 international ankle consortium consensus statement on the prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1496–1505. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096189

18. O’Driscoll J, Delahunt E. Neuromuscular training to enhance sensorimotor and functional deficits in subjects with chronic ankle instability: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2011;3:19. doi:10.1186/1758-2555-3-19 PMID: 21939557; PMCID: PMC3189141.

19. Lin CI, Houtenbos S, Lu YH, Mayer F, Wippert PM. The epidemiology of chronic ankle instability with perceived ankle instability- a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2021;14(1):41. doi:10.1186/s13047-021-00480-w PMID: 34049565; PMCID: PMC8161930.

20. Javorac D, Stajer V, Ratgeber L, et al. Hydrotherapy with hydrogen-rich water compared with RICE protocol following acute ankle sprain in professional athletes: a randomized non-inferiority pilot trial. Res Sports Med. 2021;29(6):517–525. doi:10.1080/15438627.2020.1868468 Epub 2020 Dec 27. PMID: 33356580.

21. Zhao M, Gao W, Zhang L, et al. Acupressure therapy for acute ankle sprains: a randomized clinical trial. PM R. 2018;10(1):36–44. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.06.009 Epub 2017 Jun 19. PMID: 28634002.

22. Chen ET, Borg-stein J, Mcinnis KC. Ankle sprains: evaluation, rehabilitation, and prevention[J]. Current Sports Med Rep. 2019;18(6):217–223. doi:10.1249/JSR.0000000000000603

23. Vuurberg G, Hoorntje A, Wink LM, et al. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of ankle sprains: update of an evidence-based clinical guideline. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(15):956. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-098106 Epub 2018 Mar 7. PMID: 29514819.

24. Zhang R, Lao L, Ren K, Berman BM. Mechanisms of acupuncture-electroacupuncture on persistent pain. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(2):482–503. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000101 PMID: 24322588; PMCID: PMC3947586.

25. Hahm TS. The effect of 2 hz and 100 hz electrical stimulation of acupoint on ankle sprain in rats. J Korean Med Sci. 2007;22(2):347–351. doi:10.3346/jkms.2007.22.2.347 PMID: 17449948; PMCID: PMC2693606.

26. Tantivesruangdet N. Acupuncture treatment for acute ankle injury in the emergency department: a preliminary case report. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;99 Suppl 2:S223–6. PMID: 27266242.

27. Kim KH, Ryu JH, Park MR, et al. Acupuncture as analgesia for non-emergent acute non-specific neck pain, ankle sprain and primary headache in an emergency department setting: a protocol for a parallel group, randomised, controlled pilot trial. BMJ Open. 2014;4(6):e004994. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004994 PMID: 24928587; PMCID: PMC4067861.

28. Cohen M, Parker S, Taylor D, et al. Acupuncture as analgesia for low back pain, ankle sprain and migraine in emergency departments: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011;12:241. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-12-241 PMID: 22085683; PMCID: PMC3339354.

29. Perone MV, Yablon CM. Musculoskeletal ultrasound in the emergency department: is there a role? Semin Roentgenol. 2021;56(1):115–123. doi:10.1053/j.ro.2020.09.004 Epub 2020 Sep 4. PMID: 33422179.

30. Nakashima Y, Sunagawa T, Shinomiya R, Kodama A, Adachi N. Point-of-care ultrasound in musculoskeletal field. J Med Ultrason. 2022;49(4):663–673. doi:10.1007/s10396-022-01252-0 Epub 2022 Aug 23. PMID: 35999418.

31. Ruiz-Sánchez FJ, Ruiz-Muñoz M, Martín-Martín J, et al. Management and treatment of ankle sprain according to clinical practice guidelines: a PRISMA systematic review. Medicine. 2022;101(42):e31087. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000031087 PMID: 36281183; PMCID: PMC9592509.

32. Hugh Macpherson AW, Cummings M, Rose K, Rose K, Niemtzow R, Niemtzow R. Standards for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture: the STRICTA recommendations. Acupunct Med. 2002;20(1):22–25. doi:10.1136/aim.20.1.22

33. Kofoed H, Stürup J. Comparison of ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis.A prospective series with long-term follow-up. Foot. 1994;4:6–9. doi:10.1016/0958-2592(94)90003-5

34. Lu SW, Lang BX, Liu JN, et al. Comparative efficacy of micro-needle-knife therapy and acupuncture in acute ankle sprains: a randomized controlled trial. Med Sci Monit. 2024;30:e944157. doi:10.12659/MSM.944157 PMID: 38794788; PMCID: PMC11135136.

35. Kormi S, Koivu H, Kohonen I, Mäkelä K, Tiusanen H, Saltychev M. The ceramic coated implant (CCI). Evolution total ankle replacements: a retrospective analysis of 40 ankles with 8 years follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg. 2023;89(3):515–524. doi:10.52628/89.3.11585 PMID: 37935237.

36. Kerkhoff YR, Kosse NM, Metsaars WP, Louwerens JW. Long-term functional and radiographic outcome of a mobile bearing ankle prosthesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(12):1292–1302. doi:10.1177/1071100716661477 Epub 2016 Aug 18. PMID: 27540011.

37. Zhang J, Yao L, Sun Y, et al. Multiportal arthroscopy-assisted surgical resection of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors in the ankle joint yields favorable clinical outcomes: a retrospective study. Orthop Surg. 2024;16(11):2680–2687. doi:10.1111/os.14180 Epub 2024 Aug 12. PMID: 39135389; PMCID: PMC11541119.

38. Chew E, Lee Day A, Nazarian LN, Kohler M. Basic musculoskeletal ultrasound. Med Clin North Am. 2025;109(1):137–161. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2024.06.007

39. Gao J, Liu J, Han X, Shengai P. Clinical research progress of acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of ankle sprain. Acta Chin Med Pharmacol. 2020;(08):73–76. doi:10.19664/j.cnki.1002-2392.200149

40. Gitto S, Messina C, Vitale N, Albano D, Sconfienza LM. Quantitative musculoskeletal ultrasound. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2020;24(4):367–374. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1709720 Epub 2020 Sep 29. PMID: 32992365.

41. Qiu M, Wu Q, Tao J, Song Z, Yuan X, Li J. Application and thinking of musculoskeletal ultrasound in diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal diseases with acupuncture and moxibustion. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2024;44(1):39–42. doi:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20230630-k0004 PMID: 38191157.

42. Biz C, Nicoletti P, Tomasin M, Bragazzi NL, Di Rubbo G, Ruggieri P. Is kinesio taping effective for sport performance and ankle function of athletes with chronic ankle instability (CAI)? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicina. 2022;58(5):620. doi:10.3390/medicina58050620 PMID: 35630037; PMCID: PMC9146435.

Creative Commons License © 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.