Back to Journals » Drug Design, Development and Therapy » Volume 19

Therapeutics for Sarcopenia and Functional Disabilities in Older Adults: A Review of Phase 4 Clinical Trials

Authors Alorfi NM , Alshehri FS , Ashour AM 

Received 17 November 2024

Accepted for publication 20 March 2025

Published 27 March 2025 Volume 2025:19 Pages 2307—2314

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S507033

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Muzammal Hussain



Nasser M Alorfi,1,2 Fahad S Alshehri,1 Ahmed M Ashour1,2

1Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 2King Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh, 11614, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence: Nasser M Alorfi, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966500644261, Email [email protected]

Background: Sarcopenia significantly contributes to physical disability and reduced quality of life in older adults, leading to disability. Therapeutics used to manage sarcopenia can improve not only muscle health but also the overall functional capacity of individuals at risk of developing disabilities. This review focuses on the therapeutic interventions evaluated in phase 4 clinical trials to address sarcopenia and its associated disabilities in older adults.
Objective: To review and summarize the therapeutic agents tested in phase 4 clinical trials for the management of sarcopenia and their potential impact on reducing functional disabilities in older adults.
Methods: A review of phase 4 clinical trials was conducted on 6th November 2024, focusing on interventions for sarcopenia in older adults. Data on therapeutic agents, trial outcomes, and their effects on muscle mass, strength, and disability prevention were collected from clinicaltrials.gov database.
Results: Several therapeutic agents, including whey protein powder, eldecalcitol, testosterone enanthate, and Denosumab, have been tested in Phase 4 trials for their ability to enhance muscle mass and function in older adults with sarcopenia. Allopurinol and Pioglitazone were also studied for their potential to improve muscle metabolism, while Medrol (Methylprednisolone) and Levothyroxine offered supportive effects in inflammatory and metabolic disorders that exacerbate muscle loss. Moreover, combination therapies, such as nutritional supplementation with HMB and vitamin D, showed promise in improving muscle function. These interventions demonstrated varying degrees of efficacy in improving muscle strength, reducing physical disability, and enhancing overall functional capacity in older adults.
Conclusion: Therapeutic strategies targeting sarcopenia in older adults have the potential to reduce functional disabilities and improve quality of life. Phase 4 clinical trials provide valuable insights into the long-term safety and effectiveness of these treatments. Continued research and refinement of these therapies are essential to fully address the disabling effects of sarcopenia and promote healthy aging.

Keywords: aging, disability, geriatric, muscles loss, sarcopenia, therapeutics

Introduction

Sarcopenia, a progressive and generalized skeletal muscle disorder characterized by age-dependent loss of muscle mass, function, and quality, is common among older adults, often associated with aging and chronic illnesses, and is associated with adverse outcomes, including falls, functional decline, frailty, and increased mortality.1–3 It is associated with physical and functional disability in older adults, contributing to higher disability scores and reduced functional capacity, particularly in older adults.4–6 It can also occur in early adulthood with a range of conditions.2,7 It is recognized as a key contributor to physical frailty, with age-related declines in skeletal muscle mass and performance underlying mobility loss and mobility disability.1,8,9

The main mechanisms underlying sarcopenia include age-related factors such as mobility restrictions, muscular anabolic resistance, lipotoxicity, alpha-motor neuron death, altered hormone concentrations, increased inflammation, and changes in nutritional status, along with specific muscle alterations like selective fast fiber atrophy, motor unit loss, and an increase in hybrid fibers.3,10–12 According to different studies, the prevalence of sarcopenia varies widely depending on classification criteria and cutoff points, affecting an estimated 10%–16% of older adults globally, with rates increasing sharply with age to impact approximately 10% of individuals over 60 and up to 50% of those over 80.13–16 Risk factors for sarcopenia include physical inactivity, poor protein intake, smoking, extreme sleep duration, diabetes, and aging, with additional independent factors, such as prefrailty, low activity, functional capacity, triglyceride levels, and systolic blood pressure.14,17,18 Moreover, malnutrition, risk of malnutrition especially protein-energy malnutrition.19,20

This loss of muscle mass and strength directly correlates with increased disability, as sarcopenia impairs the ability to perform essential daily tasks such as walking, climbing stairs, and lifting objects.21–23 The decreased muscle strength and functional capacity not only elevate the risk of falls and fractures but also promote sedentary behavior, further perpetuating the cycle of muscle degradation and disability. Individuals with existing conditions like arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and spinal cord injuries are especially vulnerable to the compounding effects of sarcopenia, making early intervention crucial in these populations.24–26

With the aging population on the rise, finding effective interventional therapies to prevent or treat sarcopenia has become a priority in research, especially in terms of minimizing disability and improving quality of life. This review aims to review and summarize the therapeutic agents tested in phase 4 clinical trials for the management of sarcopenia and their potential impact on reducing functional disabilities in older adults.

By synthesizing results from clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, we provide an overview of nutritional, exercise-based, and pharmacological interventions that have shown promise in maintaining muscle mass and function. These interventions have the potential to alleviate the effects of sarcopenia, particularly in vulnerable populations who are at higher risk of becoming disabled due to muscle loss.

Methods

The primary source of data for this review was ClinicalTrials.gov, a comprehensive repository of clinical studies conducted globally. Relevant trials were identified by searching for studies focused on sarcopenia, muscle wasting, and disability-related outcomes. Inclusion criteria were based on the study’s focus on interventions such as dietary supplementation, physical training, and pharmacological treatments. Both observational and interventional studies were included, with particular emphasis on completed studies that provided clear outcomes related to muscle mass, strength, and disability prevention. The results include clinical trials up to date of the search 6th November 2024.

The selected trials were analyzed for their interventions, methodologies, and outcomes. Particular attention was paid to the primary outcome measures, which included changes in muscle strength (eg, hand-grip strength), muscle mass, and physical function (eg, mobility and daily task performance). Secondary outcomes such as quality of life and reduction in disability risks were also considered to assess the broader impact of these interventions.

Results

The analysis of clinical trials related to sarcopenia, as obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov, provides valuable insights into the range of interventions aimed at preventing muscle degradation and disability. The reviewed trials varied in recruitment status, with most being completed or actively recruiting. The distribution of these studies is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Distribution of Studies by Status and Phase, Summarizing the Number of Studies Completed, Recruiting, or Withdrawn in Each Clinical Trial Phase

A variety of conditions were targeted in these trials, with interventions ranging from behavioral modifications, such as resistance training, to pharmacological treatments, including testosterone and vitamin D analogs. Table 2 presents the frequency of conditions studied and their associated interventions.

Table 2 Frequency of Conditions and Associated Interventions, Detailing the Number of Times Each Intervention Was Tested for Specific Conditions

The medications evaluated in these trials include a range of pharmacological classes, including xanthine oxidase inhibitors, protein supplements, and androgen therapies. Table 3 lists the medications tested and their respective pharmacological classifications. Summary of interventions and outcome measures in clinical studies on sarcopenia and frailty tabulated at Table 4.

Table 3 List of Medications Used in Phase 4 Clinical Trials and Their Pharmacological Classes

Table 4 Summary of Interventions and Outcome Measures in Clinical Studies on Sarcopenia and Frailty

Discussion

This review draws on data obtained from clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, focusing on interventions that target sarcopenia with the goal of preventing disability. The trials included in the analysis identified a range of approaches, from nutritional supplementation and resistance training to different pharmacological treatments.

Muscle degradation in sarcopenia is primarily driven by an imbalance between protein synthesis and protein breakdown.27–29 As individuals age, the anabolic response to dietary protein and resistance exercise declines, leading to insufficient muscle protein synthesis to counteract muscle loss.30–32 Furthermore, decreased physical activity, often associated with aging and chronic illnesses, exacerbates muscle wasting.33–35 Hormonal shifts, such as reductions in growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1 and testosterone, play critical roles in diminishing muscle anabolism.36–38 In contrast, catabolic factors, such as increased levels of myostatin and chronic low-grade inflammation, accelerate muscle protein breakdown.39–42 The findings from the reviewed studies highlight the effectiveness of anabolic interventions, particularly testosterone-based therapies, in counteracting muscle loss and improving functional outcomes in individuals with sarcopenia and frailty. This loss of muscle mass and strength directly correlates with increased disability, as sarcopenia impairs the ability to perform essential daily tasks such as walking, climbing stairs, and lifting objects. The decreased muscle strength and functional capacity not only elevate the risk of falls and fractures but also promote sedentary behavior, further perpetuating the cycle of muscle degradation and disability.

The data analyzed comes from studies such as Nutritional biomarkers of sarcopenia, which examined the impact of leucine-enriched supplements on muscle mass and strength. This finding is supported by previous studies indicating that leucine-enriched supplementation plays a crucial role in stimulating muscle protein synthesis, preserving lean muscle mass, and improving strength in older adults with sarcopenia.43–45 Leucine, a key branched-chain amino acid, has been shown to activate the mTOR signaling pathway, which is essential for muscle growth and maintenance, particularly in individuals experiencing age-related muscle decline.43,46,47

Integrated Physical Training with protein diet, which explored the benefits of combining high-protein diets with physical exercise in enhancing muscle function. Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation introduced innovative exercise modalities to improve muscle strength and prevent functional decline. Blood Flow and Muscle Regeneration in Sarcopenia, an observational study looking at the role of satellite cells in muscle regeneration and potential pharmacological targets. These studies provide valuable insights into the efficacy of multi-modal interventions that integrate exercise, diet, and pharmacology to address sarcopenia.

The findings from this dataset highlight the diverse interventions used in clinical trials addressing sarcopenia and frailty. Most studies focus on pharmacological treatments, particularly testosterone-based therapies, aimed at improving muscle mass and strength in older adults. Additionally, some trials investigate nutritional supplementation and exercise regimens as alternative or complementary interventions.

The primary outcome measures emphasize muscle mass, strength, and functional mobility, which are crucial indicators of sarcopenia progression and treatment effectiveness. Secondary outcome measures provide further insights into body composition, endurance, and risk factor assessments, reflecting the multifactorial nature of muscle deterioration in aging populations. Table 1 summarizes the interventions and outcome measures used in clinical studies related to sarcopenia and frailty.

Phase 4 clinical trials play a critical role in evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of therapeutics after their initial approval. This review presents an analysis of various therapeutic agents tested in these trials for sarcopenia. Agents like whey protein powder and eldecalcitol are used to enhance muscle mass and bone density, particularly in older adult populations. Hormone replacement therapies, including testosterone enanthate, testosterone gel, and testosterone injections, are evaluated for their role in treating hypogonadism, improving muscle strength, and increasing bone density in men.36,48,49 This finding aligns with previous literature, which suggests that testosterone replacement therapy significantly enhances muscle strength, lean body mass, and bone mineral density in hypogonadal men, as demonstrated in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses evaluating its anabolic effects on musculoskeletal health.49–51 Levothyroxine addresses hypothyroidism, improving metabolic regulation, while Medrol (Methylprednisolone) offers anti-inflammatory effects in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Renamezin and Olimel N12 serve critical functions in kidney support and parenteral nutrition, respectively, while Pioglitazone is used to improve insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes. These pharmacological interventions align with existing research on metabolic and inflammatory contributors to sarcopenia, where thyroid hormone regulation, inflammation control, renal function support, and insulin sensitivity improvement have been linked to muscle preservation and reduced muscle wasting.42,52,53

These findings highlight the ongoing post-marketing research aimed at optimizing therapeutic regimens, managing chronic conditions, and improving patient outcomes through targeted, long-term pharmacological interventions.

Conclusion

The results from these clinical trials highlight the potential of novel therapies to preserve muscle function and reduce disability in older adults and those with chronic impairments. These medication could improve the quality of life for disabled people.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the King Salman Center For Disability Research for funding this work through Research Group no KSRG-2024-294.

Disclosure

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Marzetti E, Calvani R, Tosato M. et al. Sarcopenia: an overview.. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29(1):11–17. doi:10.1007/s40520-016-0704-5

2. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia. Lancet. 2019;393:2636–2646. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31138-9

3. Tournadre A, Vial G, Capel F, Soubrier M, Boirie Y. Sarcopenia. Joint Bone Spine. 2019;86:309–314. doi:10.1016/J.JBSPIN.2018.08.001

4. Chien MY, Kuo HK, Wu YT. Sarcopenia, Cardiopulmonary Fitness, and Physical Disability in Community-Dwelling Elderly People. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1277–1287. doi:10.2522/PTJ.20090322

5. Zhou H, Ding X, Luo M. The Association between Sarcopenia and Functional Disability in Older Adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2024;28:100016. doi:10.1016/J.JNHA.2023.100016

6. Phillips A, Strobl R, Vogt S, Ladwig KH, Thorand B, Grill E. Sarcopenia Is Associated with Disability Status—Results from the KORA-Age Study. Osteoporosis Int. 2017;28:2069–2079. doi:10.1007/S00198-017-4027-Y/METRICS

7. Jung HN, Jung CH, Hwang YC. Sarcopenia in Youth. Metabolism. 2023;144:155557. doi:10.1016/J.METABOL.2023.155557

8. Ji S, Jung HW, Baek JY, Jang IY, Lee E. Sarcopenia as the Mobility Phenotype of Aging: clinical Implications. J Bone Metab. 2024;31:1. doi:10.11005/JBM.2024.31.1.1

9. Fielding RA. Sarcopenia: an Emerging Syndrome of Advancing Age. Calcif Tissue Int. 2024;114(1):1–2. doi:10.1007/s00223-023-01175-z

10. Narici MV, Maffulli N. Sarcopenia: characteristics, Mechanisms and Functional Significance. Br Med Bull. 2010;95(1):139–159. doi:10.1093/BMB/LDQ008

11. Orzechowski A. Sarcopenia and the Inflammatory Cytokines. Sarcopenia. 2021;139–157. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-822146-4.00008-9

12. Pham L-AT, Nguyen BT, Huynh DT, et al. Community-Based Prevalence and Associated Factors of Sarcopenia in the Vietnamese Elderly. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):1–7. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50979-4

13. Gao Q, Mei F, Shang Y, et al. Global Prevalence of Sarcopenic Obesity in Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(7):4633–4641. doi:10.1016/J.CLNU.2021.06.009

14. Yuan S, Larsson SC. Epidemiology of sarcopenia: prevalence, risk factors, and consequences.. Metabolism. 2023;144:155533. doi:10.1016/J.METABOL.2023.155533

15. Petermann‐Rocha F, Balntzi V, Gray SR, et al. Global Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Severe Sarcopenia: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(1):86–99. doi:10.1002/JCSM.12783

16. Cao M, Lian J, Lin X, et al. Prevalence of Sarcopenia under Different Diagnostic Criteria and the Changes in Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength, and Physical Function with Age in Chinese Old Adults. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s12877-022-03601-7

17. Therakomen V, Petchlorlian A, Lakananurak N. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Primary Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Outpatient Elderly: a Cross-Sectional Study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):19551. doi:10.1038/S41598-020-75250-Y

18. Hwang J, Park S. A Korean Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study Investigating Risk Factors, Prevalence, and Characteristics of Sarcopenia in Men in Early Old Age. Healthcare. 2023;11(21):2860. doi:10.3390/HEALTHCARE11212860

19. Beaudart C, Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Locquet M, Reginster J-Y, Lengelé L, Bruyère O. Malnutrition as a Strong Predictor of the Onset of Sarcopenia.. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):2883. doi:10.3390/NU11122883

20. Sieber CC. Malnutrition and sarcopenia.. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(6):793–798. doi:10.1007/s40520-019-01170-1

21. Yagi T, Inoue T, Ogawa M, et al. Sarcopenia Affects Activities of Daily Living Recovery and Hospitalization Costs in Older Adults in Convalescent Rehabilitation Wards. Eur Geriatr Med. 2021;12(6):1237–1245. doi:10.1007/s41999-021-00552-x

22. Yoshimura Y, Wakabayashi H, Bise T, Tanoue M. Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Its Association with Activities of Daily Living and Dysphagia in Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward Inpatients. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(6):2022–2028. doi:10.1016/J.CLNU.2017.09.009

23. Hurst C, Robinson SM, Witham MD, et al. Resistance Exercise as a Treatment for Sarcopenia: prescription and Delivery. Age Ageing. 2022;51(2). doi:10.1093/AGEING/AFAC003

24. An HJ, Tizaoui K, Terrazzino S, et al. Sarcopenia in Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases: a Comprehensive Review.. Int J mol Sci. 2020;21(16):5678. doi:10.3390/IJMS21165678

25. de Carvalho BMD, Silva RSC, de Lima VVMD, et al. Excess Weight Increases the Risk of Sarcopenia in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023;79:105049. doi:10.1016/J.MSARD.2023.105049

26. Yuksel H, Balaban M, Tan OO, Mungan S. Sarcopenia in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;58:103471. doi:10.1016/J.MSARD.2021.103471

27. Larsson L, Degens H, Li M, et al. Sarcopenia: aging-Related Loss of Muscle Mass and Function. Physiol Rev. 2019;99:427–511. doi:10.1152/PHYSREV.00061.2017/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/Z9J0041828880019.JPEG

28. Kim IY, Park S, Jang J, Wolfe RR. Understanding Muscle Protein Dynamics: technical Considerations for Advancing Sarcopenia Research. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020;24:157. doi:10.4235/AGMR.20.0041

29. Wang J, Leung KS, Chow SKH, Cheung WH. Inflammation and Age-Associated Skeletal Muscle Deterioration (Sarcopaenia). J Orthop Translat. 2017;10:94–101. doi:10.1016/J.JOT.2017.05.006

30. Boirie Y. Physiopathological Mechanism of Sarcopenia. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13:717–723. doi:10.1007/S12603-009-0203-X

31. Tezze C, Sandri M, Tessari P. Anabolic Resistance in the Pathogenesis of Sarcopenia in the Elderly: role of Nutrition and Exercise in Young and Old People. Nutrients. 2023;15:4073. doi:10.3390/NU15184073

32. Haran PH, Rivas DA, Fielding RA. Role and Potential Mechanisms of Anabolic Resistance in Sarcopenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2012;3:157–162. doi:10.1007/S13539-012-0068-4/FIGURES/1

33. Meier NF, Lee D. Physical Activity and Sarcopenia in Older Adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020;32:1675–1687. doi:10.1007/S40520-019-01371-8/TABLES/6

34. Phu S, Boersma D, Duque G. Exercise and Sarcopenia. J Clin Densitom. 2015;18:488–492. doi:10.1016/J.JOCD.2015.04.011

35. Freiberger E, Sieber C, Pfeifer K. Physical Activity, Exercise, and Sarcopenia - Future Challenges. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2011;161:416–425. doi:10.1007/S10354-011-0001-Z

36. Gupta P, Kumar S. Sarcopenia and Endocrine Ageing: are They Related? Cureus. 2022;14:e28787. doi:10.7759/CUREUS.28787

37. Kamel HK, Maas D, Duthie EH. Role of Hormones in the Pathogenesis and Management of Sarcopenia. Drugs Aging. 2002;19:865–877. doi:10.2165/00002512-200219110-00004/FIGURES/TAB1

38. Priego T, Martín AI, González-Hedström D, Granado M, López-Calderón A, Cardalini D. Role of Hormones in Sarcopenia. Vitam Horm. 2021;115:535–570. doi:10.1016/BS.VH.2020.12.021

39. Rubio-Ruiz ME, Guarner-Lans V, Pérez-Torres I, Soto ME. Mechanisms Underlying Metabolic Syndrome-Related Sarcopenia and Possible Therapeutic Measures. Int J mol Sci. 2019;20:647. doi:10.3390/IJMS20030647

40. Antuña E, Cachán-Vega C, Bermejo-Millo JC, et al. Inflammaging: implications in Sarcopenia. Int J mol Sci. 2022;23:15039. doi:10.3390/IJMS232315039

41. Pérez-Baos S, Prieto-Potin I, Román-Blas JA, Sánchez-Pernaute O, Largo R, Herrero-Beaumont G. Mediators and Patterns of Muscle Loss in Chronic Systemic Inflammation. Front Physiol. 2018;9:343676. doi:10.3389/FPHYS.2018.00409/PDF

42. Jimenez-Gutierrez GE, Martínez-Gómez LE, Martínez-Armenta C, Pineda C, Martínez-Nava GA, Lopez-Reyes A. Molecular Mechanisms of Inflammation in Sarcopenia: diagnosis and Therapeutic Update. Cells. 2022;11:2359. doi:10.3390/CELLS11152359

43. Lin CC, Shih MH, Chen CD, Yeh SL. Effects of Adequate Dietary Protein with Whey Protein, Leucine, and Vitamin D Supplementation on Sarcopenia in Older Adults: an Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:1323–1329. doi:10.1016/J.CLNU.2020.08.017

44. Ham DJ, Caldow MK, Lynch GS, Koopman R. Leucine as a Treatment for Muscle Wasting: a Critical Review. Clin Nutr. 2014;33:937–945. doi:10.1016/J.CLNU.2014.09.016

45. Martínez-arnau FM, Fonfría-vivas R, Cauli O. Beneficial Effects of Leucine Supplementation on Criteria for Sarcopenia: a Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2019;11:2504. doi:10.3390/NU11102504

46. Chaudhuri RH, Chaudhuri RH. The Role of Amino Acids in Skeletal Muscle Health and Sarcopenia: a Narrative Review. J Biomed Res. 2024;38(1). doi:10.7555/JBR.38.20240167

47. Drummond MJ, Rasmussen BB. Leucine-Enriched Nutrients and the Regulation of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Signalling and Human Skeletal Muscle Protein Synthesis. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2008;11:222–226. doi:10.1097/MCO.0B013E3282FA17FB

48. O’Connell MDL, Wu FCW. Androgen Effects on Skeletal Muscle: implications for the Development and Management of Frailty. Asian J Androl. 2014;16:203. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.122581

49. Shigehara K, Kato Y, Izumi K, Mizokami A. Relationship between Testosterone and Sarcopenia in Older-Adult Men: a Narrative Review. J Clin Med. 2022;11:6202. doi:10.3390/JCM11206202

50. Correa C, Bieger P, Perry IS, Souza GC. Testosterone Supplementation on Sarcopenia Components in Chronic Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Pharm Des. 2021;28:586–594. doi:10.2174/1381612827666211115155541

51. Shin MJ, Jeon YK, Kim IJ. Testosterone and Sarcopenia. World J Mens Health. 2018;36:192–198. doi:10.5534/WJMH.180001

52. Dalle S, Rossmeislova L, Koppo K. The Role of Inflammation in Age-Related Sarcopenia. Front Physiol. 2017;8:311540. doi:10.3389/FPHYS.2017.01045/PDF

53. Nishikawa H, Asai A, Fukunishi S, Nishiguchi S, Higuchi K. Metabolic Syndrome and Sarcopenia. Nutrients. 2021;13:3519. doi:10.3390/NU13103519

Creative Commons License © 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.