Menu
Back to Archived Journals » Comparative Effectiveness Research
Comparative Effectiveness Research ceased publishing in September 2018. All articles that have been published in Comparative Effectiveness Research will continue to be available on the Dove Press site, and will be securely archived with CLOCKSS.
ISSN: 1179-8483
- View all (32)
- Volume 8, 2018 (3)
- Volume 7, 2017 (1)
- Volume 6, 2016 (3)
- Volume 5, 2015 (8)
- Volume 4, 2014 (3)
- Volume 3, 2013 (4)
- Volume 2, 2012 (4)
- Volume 1, 2011 (6)
Journal Articles:
- 32 records -
Local triamcinolone acetonide injection for treatment of nasal tip cysts
Li Z, Wang M, Zhang L, Zhang N, Xiang N, Fu ZQ
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2018, 8:19-21
Published Date: 27 April 2018
Application of an adapted PRECIS-2 instrument to assess efficacy- and effectiveness-study designs in a systematic review of intervention studies of the hepatitis C virus-care continuum among people who use drugs
Jordan AE, Perlman DC, Smith DJ, Hagan H
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2018, 8:3-17
Published Date: 4 April 2018
Cost-effectiveness of sunitinib as second-line treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the People’s Republic of China [Corrigendum]
Li J, Ren HY, Zhang J, Dong P, Wang Y, Stevens AL, Han Y, Huang M
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2018, 8:1-2
Published Date: 24 January 2018
Cost-effectiveness of sunitinib as second-line treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the People’s Republic of China
Li J, Ren HY, Zhang J, Dong P, Wang Y, Stevens AL, Han Y, Huang M
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2017, 7:1-9
Published Date: 23 January 2017
Evidence-based research: understanding the best estimate
Bauer JG, Spackman SS, Fritz R, Bains AK, Jetton-Rangel J
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2016, 6:23-31
Published Date: 7 September 2016
Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer
Tremblay G, Holbrook T, Milligan G, Pelletier CL, Rietschel P
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2016, 6:13-21
Published Date: 20 April 2016
Esophageal cancer: comparative effectiveness of treatment options
Xu C, Lin SH
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2016, 6:1-12
Published Date: 13 April 2016
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: comparative effectiveness
Raja SG
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2015, 5:73-79
Published Date: 4 November 2015
Implementation of comparative effectiveness research in personalized medicine applications in oncology: current and future perspectives
IJzerman MJ, Manca A, Keizer J, Ramsey SD
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2015, 5:65-72
Published Date: 26 November 2015
Unannounced or announced periodic hospital surveys: a study protocol for a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial
Simonsen KB, Olesen AV, Jensen MB, Rasmussen GS, Ehlers LH
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2015, 5:57-63
Published Date: 1 September 2015
The role and importance of economic evaluation of traditional herbal medicine use for chronic non-communicable diseases
Hughes GD, Aboyade OM, Hill JD, Rasu RS
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2015, 5:49-55
Published Date: 16 July 2015
Treatment characteristics and mortality of a large insured female population with advanced or metastatic breast cancer by receipt of HER2-targeted agents
Hao Y, Meyer N, Landsman-Blumberg P, Johnson W, Willemann Rogerio J
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2015, 5:35-47
Published Date: 28 April 2015
Health care costs and utilization of a large insured female population with advanced or metastatic breast cancer by receipt of HER2-targeted agents
Meyer N, Hao Y, Landsman-Blumberg P, Johnson W, Juneau P, Willemann Rogerio J
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2015, 5:21-34
Published Date: 28 April 2015
Defining the benefits and challenges of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews
Cottrell EK, Whitlock EP, Kato E, Uhl S, Belinson S, Chang C, Hoomans T, Meltzer DO, Noorani H, Robinson KA, Motu’apuaka M, Anderson J, Paynter RA, Guise JM
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2015, 5:13-19
Published Date: 16 April 2015
Comparison of infliximab and ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: an indirect comparison meta-analysis
Fan T, Bennett HA, Smith NE, Marin M, Sen SS
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2015, 5:1-11
Published Date: 23 March 2015
When patient-centeredness and evidence-based medicine collide
Braithwaite RS
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2014, 4:29-32
Published Date: 5 July 2014
Current issues in comparative effectiveness research for hepatitis C
Yoo M, Cheng Y, Rhien TJ, Biskupiak J
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2014, 4:13-27
Published Date: 26 June 2014
Challenges conducting comparative effectiveness research: the Clinical and Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness (CHOICE) experience
Friedly JL, Bauer Z, Comstock BA, DiMango E, Ferrara A, Huang SS, Israel E, Jarvik JG, Nierenberg AA, Ong MK, Penson DF, Smith-Bindman R, Stillman AE, Vollmer WM, Warren SM, Zhan C, Hsia DC, Trontell A
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2014, 4:1-12
Published Date: 3 May 2014
Interpreting the quality of health care database studies on the comparative effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in routine care
Schneeweiss S, Huybrechts KF, Gagne JJ
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2013, 3:33-41
Published Date: 9 September 2013
Using customer-focused research and design to build a self-service online store: a case study
Ahmadi MB, Trefzger W, Morey R, Quintas I
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2013, 3:21-32
Published Date: 5 February 2013
A tool for assessing the feasibility of comparative effectiveness research
Walker AM, Patrick AR, Lauer MS, Hornbrook MC, Marin MG, Platt R, Roger VL, Stang P, Schneeweiss S
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2013, 3:11-20
Published Date: 30 January 2013
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-II receptor blockers: do future research needs differ across disease states?
Crowley MJ, Powers BJ, Myers ER, McCrory DC, McBroom AJ, Sanders GD
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2013, 3:1-9
Published Date: 10 January 2013
Comparative effectiveness trial of family-supported smoking cessation intervention versus standard telephone counseling for chronically ill veterans using proactive recruitment
Bastian LA, Fish LJ, Gierisch JM, Rohrer LD, Stechuchak KM, Grambow SC
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2012, 2:45-56
Published Date: 27 September 2012
International survey of methods used in health technology assessment (HTA): does practice meet the principles proposed for good research?
Stephens JM, Handke B, Doshi JA
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2012, 2:29-44
Published Date: 31 August 2012
Monotherapy of androgen deprivation therapy versus radical prostatectomy among veterans with localized prostate cancer: comparative effectiveness analysis of retrospective cohorts
Liu J, Shi L, Sartor O
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2012, 2:21-27
Published Date: 1 May 2012
A more rapid approach to systematically assessing published associations of genetic polymorphisms and disease risk: type 2 diabetes as a test case
Cho AH, Jiang X, Mann DM, Kawamoto K, Robinson TJ, Wang N, McCarthy JJ, Woodward M, Ginsburg GS
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2012, 2:1-20
Published Date: 26 January 2012
Assessing exchangeability in indirect and mixed treatment comparisons
Alemayehu D
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2011, 1:51-55
Published Date: 20 June 2011
Telemedicine vs in-person cancer genetic counseling: measuring satisfaction and conducting economic analysis
Datta SK, Buchanan AH, Hollowell GP, Beresford HF, Marcom PK, Adams MB
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2011, 1:43-50
Published Date: 19 May 2011
Challenges and opportunities in comparative effectiveness research
Voils CI, Maciejewski ML
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2011, 1:39-41
Published Date: 19 April 2011
Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks for analgesia post cesarean section
Kelly SMC, Malhotra RK
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2011, 1:35-38
Published Date: 14 April 2011
The effect of comparative effectiveness research on drug development innovation: a 360° value appraisal
Doyle JJ
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2011, 1:27-34
Published Date: 25 March 2011
The basic regulatory considerations and prospects for conducting bioavailability/bioequivalence (BA/BE) studies – an overview
Shaik Mastan, Thirunagari Bhavya Latha, Sathe Ajay
Comparative Effectiveness Research 2011, 1:1-25
Published Date: 22 March 2011