Back to Journals » Advances in Medical Education and Practice » Volume 16

Evaluating the Transformative Impact of Online Education on Medical Student Learning Outcomes [Response to Letter]

Authors Alshammari H , Shaheen S, Mahmoud S, Al-Rabiah A, Alyahya K 

Received 25 February 2025

Accepted for publication 25 February 2025

Published 3 March 2025 Volume 2025:16 Pages 367—368

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S524848



Hessah Alshammari,1 Sameerah Shaheen,2 Shimaa Mahmoud,2 Amal Al-Rabiah,2 Khaleel Alyahya2

1Department of Cardiac Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2Department of Anatomy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence: Hessah Alshammari, Department of Cardiac Sciences, King Saud, University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Email [email protected]


View the original paper by Dr Alshammari and colleagues

This is in response to the Letter to the Editor


Dear editor

We sincerely appreciate the thoughtful comments and insights provided by the authors of the Letter to the Editor regarding our study, “Evaluating the Transformative Impact of Online Education on Medical Student Learning Outcomes”. Their recognition of our methodological rigor and statistical approach is greatly valued, and we welcome their engagement with our findings.

The concerns raised about the small number of test questions and the potential for Type II error are valid considerations in educational research. While our study aimed to provide an initial evaluation of lecture-based retention, we acknowledge that a broader set of assessment tools, including end-of-year examinations, could offer a more comprehensive measure of long-term retention. Future studies should indeed incorporate a wider range of assessment strategies to strengthen the validity of knowledge retention analysis.

Additionally, we appreciate the discussion regarding the Hawthorne effect and its potential influence on our findings. While we sought to minimize such biases, we agree that longer-term objective measures, such as performance in subsequent coursework or clinical assessments, would provide further insights into the true impact of online learning.

We also acknowledge the importance of higher-order thinking skills, particularly in clinical training. As suggested, further research into the ability of online platforms to cultivate critical thinking and problem-solving skills—especially in later years of medical education—would be highly valuable. Exploring blended learning approaches could serve as a promising avenue to enhance engagement and comprehension, mitigating some of the challenges associated with fully online education.

Once again, we appreciate the constructive feedback and thoughtful reflections provided in this Letter. We hope that our study contributes to the ongoing discourse on optimizing medical education in the digital era.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.

Creative Commons License © 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.