Back to Journals » Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma » Volume 12
Genetic Variants of UGP2 and FBP2 in the Glycolysis Pathway Independently Predict Survival of Patients with HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Authors Gong R, Qiu M, Liu Y, Cao J, Zhou Z , Lin Q, Jiang Y, Liang X, Wei Y, Wen Q, Chen P, Wei X, Wei J, Zhan S , Zhang R, Ye D, Yu H
Received 21 August 2024
Accepted for publication 29 May 2025
Published 7 June 2025 Volume 2025:12 Pages 1155—1166
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S492516
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Manal Hassan
Rongbin Gong,1,* Moqin Qiu,2,* Yingchun Liu,1,3 Ji Cao,4 Zihan Zhou,4 Qiuling Lin,5 Yanji Jiang,6 Xiumei Liang,7 Yuying Wei,1 Qiuping Wen,1 Peiqin Chen,1 Xiaoxia Wei,5 Junjie Wei,1 Shicheng Zhan,1 Ruoxin Zhang,8 Dong Ye,9 Hongping Yu1,3,10
1Department of Experimental Research, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Respiratory Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People’s Republic of China; 3Key Cultivated Laboratory of Cancer Molecular Medicine of Guangxi Health Commission, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Clinical Research, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People’s Republic of China; 6Department of Scientific Research, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People’s Republic of China; 7Department of Disease Process Management, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People’s Republic of China; 8School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 9Department of Integrated Medicine, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People’s Republic of China; 10Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor (Guangxi Medical University), Ministry of Education, Nanning, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Hongping Yu, Email [email protected] Dong Ye, Email [email protected]
Purpose: Glycolysis is a group of metabolic processes that may alter tumor microenvironment to have effects on the growth and proliferation of tumor cells, including liver cancer. However, the effect of genetic variants in glycolysis pathway genes in survival of patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) remains unclear.
Methods: We employed multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to estimate associations between genetic variants in 240 glycolysis pathway genes and overall survival (OS) of 866 patients with HBV-HCC, and we also used false positive report probability for multiple testing corrections.
Results: We found that UGP2 rs4293553 G allele was significantly associated with a better OS of HBV-HCC patients [hazards ratio (HR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.62– 0.86, P < 0.001], and that FBP2 rs635087 G allele was significantly associated with a worse OS in these patients (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.18– 1.61, P < 0.001). The expression quantitative trait loci analysis using the GTEx database showed that the rs635087 G allele was significantly correlated with reduced FBP2 mRNA expression levels in normal liver tissues (P < 0.001), but such a correlation was not significant for the rs4293553 G allele. Functional annotation results indicate that these two single nucleotide polymorphisms have potential biological functions, providing biological plausibility for the observed associations. In addition, the mRNA expression levels of both UGP2 and FBP2 were significantly lower in HCC tissues than in normal liver tissues (both P < 0.001), and high expression levels of both UGP2 and FBP2 were significantly associated with favorable survival in HCC patients (both P < 0.001).
Discussion: Our findings suggested that genetic variants in glycolysis pathway genes may serve as novel prognostic markers for survival of patients with HBV-HCC, especially FBP2 rs635087, if validated in additional larger studies and functional investigations.
Keywords: glycolysis, hepatitis B virus, hepatocellular carcinoma, single nucleotide polymorphism, over survival
Introduction
Primary liver cancer has become a global health challenge, with more than 8.65 million new cases and 7.58 million deaths worldwide in 2022.1 Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the predominant form of primary liver cancer, represents 75–85% of all the cases.2 In China, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a significant risk factor, contributing to 84.4% of HCC cases.3 Although recent improvement in diagnostic and therapeutic measures for HCC, many patients are still diagnosed in the mid- to late-stages,4 leading to a 5-year survival rate of only 12.1% in China.5 Indeed, traditional prognostic assessment methods are mainly based on clinical phenotypes, such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and tumor stage; however, these metrics usually do not fully reflect the prognostic differences in HCC patients due to the heterogeneity of individual responses and the key role of genetic factors in patient outcomes. Therefore, it is urgent need to develop more biomarkers that help identify those patients with a poor survival so that more appropriate personalized treatment plans could be provided.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are one of the most common types of genetic variants, some of which are capable of regulating the expression of corresponding genes. Because of the high genetic stability and non-invasive detection of SNPs,6 more and more studies have indicated that SNPs may serve as potential biomarkers for predicting the risk and prognosis of cancers, including HCC.7–10 In recent years, the hypothesis-based pathway and functional analysis methods have been widely employed to explore susceptibility loci and survival predictors,11,12 which may not only improve the study power to effectively identify genetic loci but also take into account their potential biological functions in understanding the disease course.
Glycolysis is a continuous breakdown of glucose processes under anaerobic conditions,13 which is also an essential pathway for cancers to acquire energy.14 Most cancer cells have an enhanced glycolysis by promoting glucose uptake and lactate production to meet their energy needs,15 and increasing evidence suggests that alterations in the glycolysis processes may cause tumor progression.16 Indeed, studies have reported that an enhanced glycolysis is present in HCC,17,18 potentially through the promotion of macromolecule synthesis and the alteration of microenvironment during cancer cell proliferation.19
To date, although a number of glycolysis-related genes have been found to be strongly associated with HCC survival, the effect of SNPs on patient survival remains largely unknown.20 Hence, we aimed to identify associations between genetic variants in glycolysis pathway genes and survival of HBV-HCC patients.
Materials and Methods
Study Populations
A total of 866 patients who were HBV surface antigen-positive and underwent hepatectomy were recruited from the Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital between 2007 and 2017; Details of study populations have been elucidated in previous publications.21,22 Briefly, we collected a 5-mL blood sample from each patient to extract DNA for genotyping. Genotyping was performed by using the Illumina Infinium® Global Screening Assay genotyping chip (GSA, GSAMD-24v1-0, Illumina, San Diego) at Genenergy Biotechnology (Shanghai, China) using the Illumina iScan System. Then, we further imputed the genotyping data in the 1000 Genomes Project. Finally, the genotyping data of these 866 patients were merged into a combined dataset and randomly dichotomized into a discovery dataset (n = 433) and a replication dataset (n = 433). Additionally, demographic and clinical information of the patients, including age, sex, smoking status, drinking status, AFP level, cirrhosis, embolus, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage was collected and used as covariables in further multivariant analyses.
Postoperative overall survival (OS) we defined as the endpoint, and the last follow-up censored in March 2020. The present study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital (Approval Number: LW2023138), and each participant signed an informed consent form to allow the use of their biological samples and clinical data in the future research.
Selection of Candidate Genes and SNPs
We retrieved glycolysis pathway genes in the Molecular Signatures database (http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/search.jsp) by using “glycolysis” as a keyword. A total of 240 candidate genes were ultimately retained for further analyses after excluding 18 duplicates, five pseudogenes, and 12 genes on X chromosome (Table S1). All SNPs in these candidate genes and their ±2 kb flanking regions were extracted to cover the promoter region according to the following quality control criteria: a genotyping rate ≥95%, a minimum allele frequency (MAF) ≥0.05, and the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) P value ≥1×10−6.
Functional Annotation
Four online bioinformatics tools, ie, RegulomeDB,23 HaploReg v4.2,24 SNPinfo,25 and Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project,26 were utilized to predict potential biological functions of the identified statistically significant SNPs. Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analyses were performed to identify the correlation between genotypes of SNPs and mRNA expression levels of the corresponding genes using data of 208 normal liver tissues from the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) database27 and lymphoblastoid cell lines from 76 Chinese Han Beijing population included in the 1000 Genomes Project.28 Subsequently, we performed differential expression analysis of genes in HCC and normal liver tissues using TNMplot29 database and in-house RNA sequencing data. In addition, the available online database Kaplan-Meier plotter30 was utilized to assess the associations between mRNA expression levels of genes and OS of HBV-HCC patients, and LocusZoom (http://locuszoom.org/)31 was used to construct regional association plots. Finally, the public database of the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (http://www.cbioportal.org/) was used to evaluate the somatic mutation status of the identified genes in HCC tissues.
Statistical Analysis
We utilized multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses with adjustment for the covariables as previously defined to assess associations between SNPs in the glycolysis pathway genes and HBV-HCC OS. Considering the high linkage disequilibrium (LD) between most of the imputed SNPs, false positive report probability (FPRP) with a priori probability of 0.10 and a hazards ratio (HR) of 1.5 was performed to reduce false-positive results,32 and only SNPs with FPRP < 0.20 in both the discovery and replication datasets were included for further analyses. To identify independent SNPs, we performed multivariable stepwise Cox regression analyses of the validated SNPs with adjustment for the covariables. We then estimated the joint effects of risk genotypes of the identified SNPs on survival of HBV-HCC patients and showed the results with Kaplan-Meier curves. In addition, we performed stratified analysis to determine whether the effect of the combined risk genotypes on HBV-HCC OS was influenced by the covariables. At last, we assessed the ability of prediction models that included both covariables and risk genotypes to predict OS of patients with HBV-HCC by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
All statistical analyses were performed in R software (versions 4.0.3 and 4.2.2) and P < 0.05 was considered statistical significance.
Results
Associations of SNPs in the Glycolysis Pathway Genes with HBV-HCC OS
The flow of the study is depicted in Figure 1, and the associations of covariables with OS of HBV-HCC patients are summarized in Table S2. In total, we extracted 24069 SNPs (including 1133 genotyped and 23936 imputed) from the 240 glycolysis pathway genes in the discovery dataset by performing multivariable Cox regression analyses in additive models with multiple test correction. We found that 361 SNPs were significantly associated with OS of patients with HBV-HCC (P < 0.05, FPRP < 0.20). As shown in Table S3, after further validation of these 361 SNPs in the replication dataset, three SNPs (UGP2 rs4293553, FBP2 rs2679604, and FBP2 rs635087) remained significant difference (P < 0.05, FPRP < 0.20), with the UGP2 rs4293553 G allele being associated with a better OS of HBV-HCC patients (P < 0.001 in the combined dataset) and both FBP2 rs2679604 A and rs635087 G alleles being associated with a poorer OS in HBV-HCC patients (both P < 0.001 in the combined dataset). The results are also visualized in Figure S1.
Identification of Independent SNPs and Genetic Models Analyses
To determine whether identified SNPs were independent predictors of HBV-HCC OS, multivariable stepwise Cox regression analyses adjusting for the covariables were performed in the combined dataset. We found that UGP2 rs4293553 A > G (HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.61–0.85, P < 0.001) and FBP2 rs635087 A > G (HR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.19–1.64, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with a better or worse OS of patients with HBV-HCC, respectively (Table 1). The LD among the SNPs of these two genes and their flanking 50-kb regional SNPs are illustrated in the regional association plots (Figure S2).
![]() |
Table 1 Two Independent Predictors of OS Obtained from Stepwise Cox Regression Analysis in the Combine Dataset |
The results of multivariable Cox regression analyses of two independent SNPs in different genetic models showed that the UGP2 rs4293553 G allele was associated with a better HBV-HCC OS (Ptrend< 0.001) and the FBP2 rs635087 G allele was associated with a worse HBV-HCC OS (Ptrend< 0. 001) in an additive genetic model. Furthermore, both UGP2 rs4293553 AA and FBP2 rs635087 AG+GG genotypes predicted a poor HBV-HCC OS in a dominant model (Table 2).
![]() |
Table 2 Associations between Two Functional SNPs and OS of HBV-Related HCC in the Discovery, Validation and Combined Dataset |
Combined and Stratified Analyses of Two Independent SNPs
To estimate the combined effect of UGP2 rs4293553 and FBP2 rs635087 on HBV-HCC OS, we categorized the patients into 0, 1 and 2 groups according to the number of risk genotypes (rs4293553 AA and rs635087 AG+GG). Multivariable Cox regression analyses with adjustment for the covariables showed a dose-response effect between the number of risk genotypes and HBV-HCC OS (Ptrend< 0.001, Table S4). Subsequently, we further dichotomized all patients into 0 and 1–2 groups, and the results showed that patients in 1–2 group had a worse survival than those in 0 group (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.17–1.87, P = 0.001), and the results were also depicted by Kaplan-Meier curves in Figure 2.
The results of the stratified analyses using the combined dataset revealed that patients in the 1–2 group exhibited a significantly poorer survival in all subgroups (both P < 0.05) except for age > 47 years, female, smoking, drinking, AFP level > 400 ng/mL, and without cirrhosis; moreover, we did not find a multiplicative interaction between risk genotypes and the covariables (Table S5).
The ROC Curves
We constructed prediction models that included either only covariables or both covariables and risk genotypes to compare the ability of different models in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of patients with HBV-HCC. The findings indicated that the AUC of 1-year OS prediction model increased from 71.07% to 71.86% (P = 0.408, Figure S3A). Notably, the models combined risk genotypes significantly improved the ability of predicting 3- and 5-year OS, with the 3-year OS AUC increasing from 72.72% to 74.42% (P = 0.039; Figure S3B) and the 5-year OS AUC increasing from 72.04% to 74.24% (P = 0.020; Figure S3C). Furthermore, we found that the model with combined covariables and risk genotypes had a better ability to predict HBV-HCC OS over the follow-up period (Figure S3D).
Functional Annotation Analyses
As shown in Table S6, the functional annotation results suggested potential biological functions of these two SNPs, with rs4293553 being located in the 5’UTR region of UGP2 and rs635087 being located in the intronic region of FBP2. In the RegulomeDB, rs4293553 and rs635087 were ranked of 3a and 5, respectively. In the HaploReg, both SNPs may alter motifs and have an effect on promoter or enhancer histone markers, with the difference that rs4293553 was located in the DNase I hypersensitive site and may alter protein binding activity. In the SNPinfo, rs4293553 was located in transcription factor binding sites (TFBS), which suggests that rs4293553 may alter gene expression through transcriptional regulation. Furthermore, the results of the ENCODE project showed that both SNPs had strong signals of histone modification (eg H3K4Me1, H3K4Me3, and H3K27Ac) acetylation, further suggesting their functions of activating both enhancer and promoter Figure 3A and B).
eQTL Analyses and Gene Differential Expression Analyses
The results of eQTL analyses revealed that the rs635087 G allele was significantly correlated with reduced mRNA expression levels of FBP2 in normal liver tissues from the GTEx database (P < 0.001, Figure 3C), however, such a correlation was not supported in the 1000 Genomes project (P = 0.459, Figure S4A). The correlation between the rs4293553 G allele and mRNA expression levels of UGP2 was not statistically significant in both GTEx database and 1000 Genomes project (P = 0.819, Figure 3D and P = 0.483, Figure S4B, respectively). In comparing the mRNA expression levels of UGP2 and FBP2 between HCC and normal liver tissues, we found that UGP2 was significantly lower in HCC tissues than in normal liver tissues in both the TNMplot and in-house RNA sequencing data (both P < 0.001, Figure 4A and B); similarly, the TNMplot database showed that FBP2 was significantly lower in HCC tissues than in normal liver tissues (P < 0.001, Figure 4C), though this difference was not apparent in the in-house RNA sequencing data (P = 0.255, Figure 4D). Furthermore, higher expression levels of both UGP2 and FBP2 were associated with a better HCC OS in the Kaplan-Meier Plotter database (both P < 0.001, Figure 4E and F).
![]() |
Figure 4 Differential mRNA expression analysis in the TNMplot database (https://tnmplot.com/analysis/) and in-house RNA sequencing data and survival analysis in the Kaplan-Meier plotter database (http://kmplot.com/analysis/). (A) UGP2 mRNA expression levels were down-regulated in HCC tissues from the TNMplot database; (B) UGP2 mRNA expression levels were down-regulated in HCC tissues from the in-house data; (C) FBP2 mRNA expression levels were down-regulated in HCC tissues from the TNMplot database; (D) FBP2 mRNA expression levels were not statistically different between HCC tissues and in normal liver tissues; (E) higher mRNA expression levels of UGP2 had better OS of HCC patients. (F) higher mRNA expression levels of FBP2 had better OS of HCC patients. Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HR, hazards ratio. |
Mutation Analysis
Finally, we examined the mutation status of UGP2 and FBP2 in HCC tissues using the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics database. As shown in Figure S5, somatic mutation rates of both genes were extremely low in different HCC datasets. For the UGP2, the mutation rates were as follows: 0.87% in the AMC, Hepatology 2014; 0.82% in the MERiC/Basel, Nat Commun, 2022; 0.80% in the TCGA, Firehose Legacy; 0.55% in the TCGA, PanCancer Atlas and 0.41% in the INSERM, Nat Genet 2015. Similarly, for the FBP2, the mutation rates were 0.54% in the TCGA, Firehose Legacy and 0.27% in the TCGA, PanCancer Atlas. Since the low somatic mutation frequency of FBP2 and UGP2, functional SNPs may be key factors influencing the mRNA expression levels of these two genes in HCC.
Discussion
Glycolysis is a vital process that not only meets the energy needs of normal cells but also promotes metabolic intermediates essential for macromolecular synthesis in cancer cells.33 Cancer cells rely primarily on the programmed glycolysis metabolism to support their rapid growth and division.34 Considering many genes involved in the glycolysis pathway, we comprehensively investigated associations between 24,069 SNPs in 240 glycolysis pathway genes and survival of patients with HBV-HCC. We found that UGP2 rs4293553 G and FBP2 rs635087 G alleles were significantly associated with a better and a worse OS of patients, respectively. Additional eQTL analyses revealed that the rs635087 G allele was significantly associated with mRNA expression levels of FBP2 in normal liver tissues. Moreover, the mRNA expression levels of UGP2 and FBP2 were significantly higher in normal liver tissues than in HCC tissues, and higher mRNA expression levels were significantly associated with better survival in HCC patients. These findings are consistent with the results of survival analyses using risk alleles for two significant SNPs.
UGP2, known as UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase 2, is located at 2p15 and encodes an enzyme crucial for converting glucose 1-phosphate into UDP-glucose,35 which meets the energy demands for cancer cell proliferation primarily by promoting glycogen biosynthesis.36 Similarly, previous studies have reported that UGP2 as a significant factor in the metabolic regulation and post-translational modifications of cancer,37,38 and its expression is reduced in a variety of cancers, including cancer of the pancreas,39 gallbladder,40 and colorectum,41 suggesting that UGP2 may serve as an important prognosis predictor. In the present study, we identified that UGP2 rs4293553 G allele was associated with a favorable survival of HBV-HCC patients. In addition, UGP2 mRNA expression was found to be significantly higher in normal liver tissues than in HCC tissues, and patients with a higher expression level had a better survival, which is consistent with previous findings. Unfortunately, our data did not support the correlation between the rs4293553 G allele and the mRNA expression levels of UGP2, but functional annotation indicated that rs4293553 is located at TFBS, DNase I hypersensitive sites, and marker of promoter histones, which suggests that rs4293553 may have an effect on transcription factor activity.
FBP2 (fructose-bisphosphatase 2), located at 9q22.32, mainly encodes a gluconeogenesis regulatory enzyme and acts as an important player in the glycogen synthesis.42 Gluconeogenesis is essentially the reverse of glycolysis and can inhibit glycolysis in cancer cells.43 The up-regulation of FBP2 may lead to suppression of glucose metabolism, cell proliferation and tumor growth;44 conversely, down-regulation of FBP2 can promote tumorigenesis by enhancing glycolysis.45 In the present study, we found that rs635087 G allele was significantly associated with reduced mRNA expression levels of FBP2 and poorer survival of HBV-HCC patients, respectively. Furthermore, we observed that reduced expression of FBP2 in HCC tissues was associated with a worse survival of HCC patients. These findings indicate that FBP2 may act as an oncogene and that rs635087 G allele may affect the survival of HCC patients by reducing FBP2 expression levels.
The present study exhibits several significant strengths. For SNPs significantly associated with survival of HBV-HCC patients, we used a rigorous multiple correction method (FPRP < 0.20) to reduce the possibility of false discovery and employed an internal replication strategy to bolster the reliability of findings. Furthermore, we found that SNPs combined with covariables significantly improved the ability to predict survival of HBV-HCC patients, emphasizing the importance of SNPs in optimizing prognostic assessment of patients, as well as potential clinical application of SNPs. For example, patients carrying more risk genotypes of SNPs may be categorized as high-risk and thus require a more aggressive treatment approach or closer monitoring. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations inherent in the present study. First, prognostic assessment methods based on single genotype, phenotype or clinical information usually do not fully reflect the prognostic differences in HCC patient. Therefore, it is necessary to further explore their combined effects to provide a more comprehensive assessment in future studies. Second, all study population was recruited from a single institution in Guangxi, China, which may limit the applicability of our findings to other populations or ethnic groups. Third, we failed to collect more comprehensive clinical information about patients, such as treatment information of patients underwent hepatectomy, which may influence our findings. At last, the exact biological mechanisms underlying the observed associations are not fully understood.
Conclusions
We identified two independent and potentially functional SNPs (UGP2 rs4293553 A > G and FBP2 rs635087 A > G) that are associated with OS of HBV-HCC patients. Given that these two SNPs play a role in the glycolysis pathway and effectively predicting 3- and 5-year OS, once validated by additional studies, our results may provide some information about new biomarkers for predicting survival of HBV-HCC patients underwent surgery and new insights for further functional studies in the future.
Abbreviations
HCC, Hepatocellular Carcinoma; HBV, Hepatitis B Virus; SNPs, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms; AFP, Alpha-fetoprotein; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; OS, Over Survival; MAF, Minimum Allele Frequency; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium; eQTL, Expression Quantitative Trait Locus; GTEx, Genotype-Tissue Expression Project; LD, Linkage Disequilibrium; FPRP, False Positive Report Probability; ROC, Receiver Operating Characteristic; AUC, Area Under Curve; TFBS, Transcription Factor Binding Sites.
Data Sharing Statement
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital (Approval Number: LW2023138).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all study participants, researchers and clinicians who contributed to this study.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from Joint Project on Regional High-Incidence Diseases Research of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2023GXNSFBA026201); Joint Project on Regional High-Incidence Diseases Research of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2023GXNSFBA026091); Joint Project on Regional High-Incidence Diseases Research of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2023GXNSFBA026224); Youth Program of Scientific Research Foundation of Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital (YQJ2022-7); Youth Science Foundation of Guangxi Medical University (GXMUYSF202312); Youth Program of Scientific Research Foundation of Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital (2021-10); Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor, Ministry of Education (GKE-ZZ202104); 2023 Autonomous Region Health Commission Self-funded Research Project for Western Medicine Category (Z-A20230759); 2021 Guangxi University young and middle-aged Teachers scientific research basic Ability Improvement Project (2023KY0095); Youth Science Foundation of Guangxi Medical University (GXMUYSF 202225).
Disclosure
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose in this work.
References
1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834
2. Yang JD, Roberts LR. Hepatocellular carcinoma: a global view. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7(8):448–458. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2010.100
3. Lin J, Zhang H, Yu H, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of primary liver cancer in Mainland China from 2003 to 2020: a representative multicenter study. Front Oncol. 2022;12:906778. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.906778
4. Lee M, Ko H, Yun M. Cancer metabolism as a mechanism of treatment resistance and potential therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma. Yonsei Med J. 2018;59(10):1143–1149. doi:10.3349/ymj.2018.59.10.1143
5. Zeng H, Chen W, Zheng R, et al. Changing cancer survival in China during 2003–15: a pooled analysis of 17 population-based cancer registries. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(5):e555–e567. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30127-x
6. Brookes AJ. The essence of SNPs. Gene. 1999;234(2):177–186. doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00219-x
7. Liu X, Qian D, Liu H, et al. Genetic variants of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling pathway genes and risk of pancreatic cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2020;59(8):930–939. doi:10.1002/mc.23208
8. Mu R, Liu H, Luo S, et al. Genetic variants of CHEK1, PRIM2 and CDK6 in the mitotic phase-related pathway are associated with nonsmall cell lung cancer survival. Int J Cancer. 2021;149(6):1302–1312. doi:10.1002/ijc.33702
9. Wang Z, Budhu AS, Shen Y, et al. Genetic susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in chromosome 22q13.31, findings of a genome-wide association study. JGH Open. 2021;5(12):1363–1372. doi:10.1002/jgh3.12682
10. Liu Z, Ye J, Khan AA, et al. Genome-wide profiling of alternative splicing signatures associated with prognosis and immune microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e930052. doi:10.12659/msm.930052
11. Yang W, Liu H, Duan B, et al. Three novel genetic variants in NRF2 signaling pathway genes are associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Cancer Sci. 2019;110(6):2022–2032. doi:10.1111/cas.14017
12. Liu L, Liu H, Luo S, et al. Novel genetic variants of SYK and ITGA1 related lymphangiogenesis signaling pathway predict non-small cell lung cancer survival. Am J Cancer Res. 2020;10(8):2603–2616.
13. Akram M. Mini-review on glycolysis and cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2013;28(3):454–457. doi:10.1007/s13187-013-0486-9
14. Liu G, Wu X, Chen J. Identification and validation of a glycolysis-related gene signature for depicting clinical characteristics and its relationship with tumor immunity in patients with colon cancer. Aging. 2022;14(21):8700–8718. doi:10.18632/aging.204226
15. Mathupala SP, Ko YH, Pedersen PL. Hexokinase-2 bound to mitochondria: cancer’s stygian link to the “Warburg Effect” and a pivotal target for effective therapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009;19(1):17–24. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.11.006
16. Pavlova NN, Thompson CB. The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016;23(1):27–47. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006
17. Beyoğlu D, Imbeaud S, Maurhofer O, et al. Tissue metabolomics of hepatocellular carcinoma: tumor energy metabolism and the role of transcriptomic classification. Hepatology. 2013;58(1):229–238. doi:10.1002/hep.26350
18. Li S, Li J, Dai W, et al. Genistein suppresses aerobic glycolysis and induces hepatocellular carcinoma cell death. Br J Cancer. 2017;117(10):1518–1528. doi:10.1038/bjc.2017.323
19. Ganapathy-Kanniappan S. Molecular intricacies of aerobic glycolysis in cancer: current insights into the classic metabolic phenotype. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;53(6):667–682. doi:10.1080/10409238.2018.1556578
20. Kong J, Yu G, Si W, et al. Identification of a glycolysis-related gene signature for predicting prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):142. doi:10.1186/s12885-022-09209-9
21. Gong R, Qiu M, Cao J, et al. Potentially functional genetic variants in the NRF2 signaling pathway genes are associated with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma survival. J Cancer. 2023;14(18):3387–3396. doi:10.7150/jca.88561
22. Huang Q, Liu Y, Qiu M, et al. Potentially functional variants of MAP3K14 in the NF-κB signaling pathway genes predict survival of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Front Oncol. 2022;12:990160. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.990160
23. Boyle AP, Hong EL, Hariharan M, et al. Annotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB. Genome Res. 2012;22(9):1790–1797. doi:10.1101/gr.137323.112
24. Ward LD, Kellis M. HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D930–4. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr917
25. Xu Z, Taylor JA. SNPinfo: integrating GWAS and candidate gene information into functional SNP selection for genetic association studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W600–5. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp290
26. Consortium EP. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489(7414):57–74. doi:10.1038/nature11247
27. Ardlie KG, Deluca DS, Segrè AV, et al; GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science. 2015;348(6235):648–660. doi:10.1126/science.1262110
28. Lappalainen T, Sammeth M, Friedländer MR, et al. Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans. Nature. 2013;501(7468):506–511. doi:10.1038/nature12531
29. Bartha Á, Győrffy B. TNMplot.com: a web tool for the comparison of gene expression in normal, tumor and metastatic tissues. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(5). doi:10.3390/ijms22052622
30. Győrffy B. Integrated analysis of public datasets for the discovery and validation of survival-associated genes in solid tumors. Innovation. 2024;5(3):100625. doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100625
31. Pruim RJ, Welch RP, Sanna S, et al. LocusZoom: regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(18):2336–2337. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq419
32. Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M, El Ghormli L, Rothman N. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(6):434–442. doi:10.1093/jnci/djh075
33. DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB. The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab. 2008;7(1):11–20. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002
34. Jones RG, Thompson CB. Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth. Genes Dev. 2009;23(5):537–548. doi:10.1101/gad.1756509
35. Hu Q, Shen S, Li J, et al. Low UGP2 expression is associated with tumour progression and predicts poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Dis Markers. 2020;2020:3231273. doi:10.1155/2020/3231273
36. Favaro E, Bensaad K, Chong MG, et al. Glucose utilization via glycogen phosphorylase sustains proliferation and prevents premature senescence in cancer cells. Cell Metab. 2012;16(6):751–764. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2012.10.017
37. Higuita JC, Alape-Girón A, Thelestam M, Katz A. A point mutation in the UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase gene results in decreases of UDP-glucose and inactivation of glycogen synthase. Biochem J. 2003;370(Pt 3):995–1001. doi:10.1042/bj20021320
38. Kim S, Wolfe A, Kim SE. Targeting cancer’s sweet spot: UGP2 as a therapeutic vulnerability. Mol Cell Oncol. 2021;8(6):1990676. doi:10.1080/23723556.2021.1990676
39. Wang L, Xiong L, Wu Z, et al. Expression of UGP2 and CFL1 expression levels in benign and malignant pancreatic lesions and their clinicopathological significance. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):11. doi:10.1186/s12957-018-1316-7
40. Wang Q, Yang ZL, Zou Q, et al. SHP2 and UGP2 are biomarkers for progression and poor prognosis of gallbladder cancer. Cancer Invest. 2016;34(6):255–264. doi:10.1080/07357907.2016.1193745
41. Bi X, Lin Q, Foo TW, et al. Proteomic analysis of colorectal cancer reveals alterations in metabolic pathways: mechanism of tumorigenesis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5(6):1119–1130. doi:10.1074/mcp.M500432-MCP200
42. Dzugaj A. Localization and regulation of muscle fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, the key enzyme of glyconeogenesis. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2006;46:51–71. doi:10.1016/j.advenzreg.2006.01.021
43. Wang Z, Dong C. Gluconeogenesis in cancer: function and regulation of PEPCK, FBPase, and G6Pase. Trends Cancer. 2019;5(1):30–45. doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2018.11.003
44. Li H, Wang J, Xu H, et al. Decreased fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase-2 expression promotes glycolysis and growth in gastric cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2013;12(1):110. doi:10.1186/1476-4598-12-110
45. Wang L, Wang J, Shen Y, Zheng Z, Sun J. Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 2 Inhibits oral squamous cell carcinoma tumorigenesis and glucose metabolism via downregulation of c-Myc. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:6766787. doi:10.1155/2022/6766787
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.