Back to Journals » Advances in Medical Education and Practice » Volume 15
Response to Nursing Students’ Satisfaction and Self-Confidence with Simulation-Based Learning and Its Associations with Simulation Design Characteristics and Educational Practices [Letter]
Received 22 November 2024
Accepted for publication 14 December 2024
Published 16 December 2024 Volume 2024:15 Pages 1229—1230
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S507935
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Editor who approved publication: Dr Md Anwarul Azim Majumder
Agussalim,1 Citrawati2
1Parepare School of Nursing, Makassar Health Polytechnic, Ministry of Health Indonesian Republic, Parepare, South Sulawesi, Indonesia; 2Makassar School of Midwifery, Makassar Health Polytechnic, Ministry of Health Indonesian Republic, Parepare, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Correspondence: Agussalim, Email [email protected]
View the original paper by Mrs Bdiri Gabbouj and colleagues
Dear editor
After reading the research from Saoussen Bdiri Gabbouj, et al1 entitled Nursing Students’ Satisfaction and Self-Confidence with Simulation-Based Learning it is stated that this makes a significant contribution in strengthening the argument about the importance of simulation in building a more skilled nursing workforce.
An in-depth analysis revealed several shortcomings of the study, such as the sampling method using convenience sampling, which can lead to selection bias and reduce the ability to generalize results to a wider population, as well as the study being conducted at only one regional university in Tunisia, which limits the representation of results to the global or even broader regional context of nursing education. In sampling, it is better to be representative, it must have the same characteristics as the population as written by Agussalim2 in a publication in the journal of asthma and allergy. This was written by Agussalim, et al3 in another paper that study participants were drawn from multiple hospitals in a single region, which limited the generalization of outcomes to a wider population or to different geographic locations and potential for bias in outcome assessment.
Another weakness found was that there was no control group. The study did not involve a control group with other teaching methods, making it difficult to determine how effective the simulation was compared to other teaching approaches. An article by Agussalim, et al3 said that strictly control external variables, increase participant diversity, and more objective assessment methods will improve the results of a study’s elaboration. Next is the short duration of the study where data collection is carried out in a short time, so it is not possible to evaluate the long-term impact of learning-based simulations. Research with a long duration will increase the quantity and quality of research as stated by Masaki Tago et al.4
Disclosure
Authors declare no conflict of interest in this communication.
References
1. Gabbouj SB, Zedini C, Naija W. Nursing students’ satisfaction and self-confidence with simulation-based learning and its associations with simulation design characteristics and educational practices. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024;15:1093–1102. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S477309
2. Agussalim. Response to molecular complexity of colorectal cancer: pathways, biomarkers, and therapeutic strategies [Letter]. Cancer Manage Res. 2024;16:1523–1524. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S500966
3. Agussalim, Pujiastuti RSE, Nugroho HSW. Respond to the effectiveness of electroacupuncture for diabetic peripheral neuropathy and exploring the feasibility of infrared thermography [Letter]. J Pain Res. 2024;17:2949–2950. doi:10.2147/JPR.S492936
4. Tago M, Hirata R, Shikino K, et al. The milestones of clinical research for young generalist physicians: conducting and publishing studies. Int J Gen Med. 2023;16:2373–2381. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S411687
© 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.