Back to Journals » Journal of Inflammation Research » Volume 18

Role of Gut Microbiota in the Development of Some Autoimmune Diseases

Authors Cui X , Cong Y

Received 3 January 2025

Accepted for publication 12 March 2025

Published 25 March 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 4409—4419

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S515618

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Xiaoyu Liu



Xiaojing Cui,1,2 Yanguang Cong1,2

1Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong Province, 523710, People’s Republic of China; 2Dongguan Key Laboratory for Pathogenesis and Experimental Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong Province, 523710, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Yanguang Cong, Email [email protected]

Abstract: The gut microbiota is crucial for maintaining the homeostasis and function of the immune system. It interacts with the host’s immune system through various mechanisms, including promoting immune tolerance, affecting the differentiation and function of immune cells, and participating in the metabolism of immune regulatory substances. The disruption of the gut microbiome may lead to impaired mucosal barrier function, allowing bacteria and their metabolites to invade into the host, activate or interfere with the immune system, and potentially trigger or exacerbate autoimmune responses. Understanding the relationship between the microbiome and autoimmune diseases may help develop new treatment strategies. This article reviewed the recent progresses of microbiome involved in the occurrence and development of some autoimmune diseases and the treatment methods based on regulation of the microbiome, highlighted the key role of microbiome in autoimmune diseases.

Keywords: gut microbiota, autoimmune disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction

More than 1014 cells of bacteria, fungi, and viruses reside in the human gastrointestinal tract.1 The gut microbiota comprises approximately 100 trillion bacterial cells, which is 10 times the total number of human cells. The most predominant bacterial species in the human gut include Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia and Fusobacteria, of which Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the dominant groups of bacteria.2,3 The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in regulating many aspects of host physiology, including glucose and lipid metabolism, systemic immunity and the function of central nervous system.4 Known as the “human second genome”,5 the gut microbiota co-evolves with the host in a symbiotic manner, and promotes the development of the immune system. The immune system has evolved not only to defend against pathogens but also to tolerate beneficial microbiota, which have evolved to coexist symbiotically with the host. Under immune homeostasis, the immune system tolerates commensal bacteria, but during homeostatic perturbations, it can respond to the microbiota and leads to pathological process. The interaction of the gut microbiota with the innate immune system is significant for maintaining homeostasis. Changes in the gut microbiota alter the metabolic environment, activate specific pattern recognition receptors in epithelial cells, and induce a pro-inflammatory state. The resulted epithelial barrier leakage leads to tissue micro-inflammation by triggering bacterial translocation to the interepithelial and subepithelial regions (Figure 1).6,7 Dysbiosis of gut microbiota can be categorized into three types: the loss of beneficial organisms, the overgrowth of potentially harmful organisms, and the loss of overall microbial diversity. Moreover, these three types are not mutually exclusive and can occur simultaneously.8 Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota has been proven to be the cause of various intestinal lesions and can also lead to systemic autoimmune diseases. However, the exact mechanisms by which the disturbed microbiota causes the diseases still need to be elucidated.

Figure 1 The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in modulating the immune response. When the gut flora is dysfunctional, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) produced by the microbes can enter the intestinal lumen. On the one hand, SCFAs can bind to G-protein-coupled receptor 43 (GPR43), leading to the production of interleukin-22 (IL-22) and stimulating the formation of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). AMPs are a vital component of the innate immune defense system, serving to restrict pathogen-epithelial cell interactions.9 On the other hand, SCFAs can enter the intestinal lumen via Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), activating the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase/nuclear factor κB (p38 MAPK/NF-κB) pathway,7 which results in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α, thereby eliciting an immune response.

Autoimmune diseases occur when there is a breakdown of immune tolerance to self-components, resulting in the immune system attacking its own organs, tissues, or cells.10 These diseases are divided into organ-specific and non-organ-specific types based on the range of affected tissues and organs.11 Organ-specific autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes (T1D), Hashimoto`s thyroiditis (HT), involve the pathological damage and dysfunction of tissues and organs limited to a certain organ targeted by antibodies or sensitized lymphocytes.12 Non-organ-specific autoimmune disorders result from the extensive deposition of antigen-antibody complexes on the vascular walls, causing multi-organ damage throughout the body, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA),Multiple sclerosis (MS).13 About 5–8% of the global population suffer from autoimmune diseases, which are recognized as a global public health issue.14 Recent reports indicated that microbial dysbiosis can disrupt immune function, leading to inflammation and sensitization of the immune system and the development of autoimmune diseases (Figure 2).15 For example, multiple studies have reported a decreased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in patients with SLE and T1D.16,17 In patients with psoriatic arthritis, the relative abundance of Clostridium, Akkermansia, and Ruminococcus in the gut microbiota is reduced.18 Compared with healthy age-matched controls, patients with celiac disease have higher abundances of Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Staphylococcus.19 The interactive “host-gut microbiota” axis is crucial for maintaining local homeostasis and may also participate in the pathogenesis of certain autoimmune diseases by reshaping the intestinal immune system.20

Figure 2 Dysbiosis causes autoimmune diseases.

Bell et al suggest that reshaping the gut microbiota can significantly affect the immune system of patients with autoimmune diseases,21 and adjusting the gut microbiota may become a new therapy for treating autoimmune diseases. Probiotics are live microorganisms that, by colonizing the intestinal tract, produce substances beneficial to human health. Prebiotics can serve as an alternative to probiotics and, after fermentation, influence the activity and growth of probiotics in the colon.22 Prebiotic and probiotic therapies modulate gut ecology by competing with harmful microorganisms for nutrients and colonization niches in combination with specific dietary patterns or prebiotics that support their colonization.1 The functions of probiotics include maintaining the function of the gastrointestinal epithelial barrier, promoting the production of antimicrobial peptides, ensuring adequate interaction between the gut microbiota and mucosal immune cells, and ultimately helping to activate the host immune system in response to pathogenic bacteria.23 Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) involves transferring feces from a healthy donor to a patient by infusing bacterial liquid to provide colonization resistance, produce beneficial metabolic products, and restore interaction with the mucosa.24,25 FMT can treat diseases by correcting the disordered gut microbiota of patients, reshaping it to promote the repair of intestinal barrier damage and alleviate metabolic inflammation.26 It has been proven effective and relatively safe for various diseases including autoimmune diseases.27 Deciphering the relationship between the gut microbiota and the innate immune system may elucidate various unknown causes of diseases.

In this paper, we reviewed the recent progresses of microbiome involved in the occurrence and development of the autoimmune diseases and the treatment methods based on regulation of the microbiome, highlighted the key role that the microbiome plays in some important autoimmune diseases, especially SLE, T1D and RA.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

SLE is an autoimmune disease, which is mainly a chronic diffuse connective tissue disease caused by abnormal activation of the immune system to attack its own tissues,28 characterized by the presence of hyperactive immune cells and aberrant antibody responses to nuclear and cytoplasmic antigens. The exact pathogenesis of SLE has not been fully elucidated, but dysregulation of the gut microbiota is closely related to the development of SLE.29 Modulating the gut microbiota appears to be a potential approach for treating SLE. A recent metagenomic study demonstrated that transferring the probiotic flora of lupus-prone mice to non-autoimmune germ-free wild-type mice induced autoimmunity, indicating that the dysregulated gut flora can disrupt immune function, induce inflammation and immune system sensitization, resulting in autoimmune diseases.30 Researches aim to establish effective experimental schemes to explore the microbiological basis of SLE between the gut microbiota and autoimmune diseases, which could lead to the development of effective treatment methods.

Bacterial infections are common in SLE patients, accounting for almost 80% of infections, with the most common bacteria being Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli.31 Studies have reported dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in patients with SLE, which is characterized by reduced bacterial diversity and biased community structure, with an increase in some genera such as Campylobacter, Streptococcus, and Micrococcus, and a decrease in other genera, such as Bifidobacterium,32 resulting in a lower Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio.33 Many studies have also revealed gut microbiota dysregulation in lupus mouse models. Zhang et al found that the gut flora of MRL/lpr mice showed a significant decrease in Lactobacillaceae and an increase in Lachnospiraceae, which was particularly severe in female lupus mice.34 Azzouz et al35 reported that the average amount of Ruminococcus gnavus in lupus patients was five times higher than in healthy controls, with the greatest expansion in patients with high disease activity, especially those with lupus nephritis. Chen et al demonstrated that the abundance of Candida albicans, Sulfurovum, Odoribacter, and Rothia in mice treated with HCMVpp65 polypeptide was significantly associated with lupus-like effects.36 These studies suggest that microbial dysbiosis in the gut of patients with SLE results in reduced bacterial diversity and a decreased proportion of protective commensal species, and that immune disorders triggered by the gut microbiota, together with genetic factors, mediate the occurrence and development of SLE.

Li et al showed that Roseburia and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii were depleted in SLE patients, especially Bifidobacterium, which was negatively correlated with SLE activity. 32 Some beneficial commensal microbes are part of the core community of the gut microbiota and can produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which play key roles in maintaining human health, such as reducing the severity of inflammation, maintaining intestinal barrier function, and enhancing colonic motility. 3739 In addition, viruses have also been implicated in the development of SLE. An in vitro study demonstrated that virus-like particles extracted from the fecal samples of SLE patients increased the production of interferon-α in immune cells, suggesting a potential role of these virus-like particles in the pathogenesis of SLE, 40 but this conclusion requires further validation through comprehensive studies. Furthermore, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection has been implicated in the development of SLE, with EB antigens having molecular similarity to SLE antigens, leading to an autoimmune reaction during EB activation. 41,42

The gut microbiota is not only a potential therapeutic target for SLE, but also a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of SLE, and it has been found that some biomarkers in the gut microbiome of SLE patients are related to disease activity indicators.43 Traditionally, SLE is difficult to treat due to its heterogeneity and complex pathogenesis, while targeting intestinal bacteria may offer a breakthrough. Probiotic therapy has been extensively examined for the treatment of autoimmune disorders, effectively alleviating lupus-related syndromes and enhancing intestinal integrity.44 For example, the presence of Lactobacillus in the gut attenuates renal inflammation in lupus mice in a sex hormone-dependent manner, and oral administration of five Lactobacillus strains to mice largely alleviated lupus-like symptoms.45,46 In lupus-like animal models, administration of retinoic acid restored the genus Lactobacillus and ameliorated lupus symptoms, indicating that these strains can be used as probiotics to reduce inflammation in SLE patients.34 The combined use of probiotics Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Lactobacillus rhamnosus can lessen the expression of chemokine receptors on the surface of dendritic cells in SLE patients, thereby prevent the migration of dendritic cells and reduce inflammation.47 Furthermore, FMT can also be used to treat SLE, Huang et al48 conducted the first FMT clinical trial in patients with active SLE and found that FMT treatment resulted in a significant increase in SCFA-producing bacterial taxa and a decrease in inflammation-associated bacterial taxa. FMT has shown potential therapeutic effects in SLE by reducing the predominantly FMT-responsive lymphocyte populations.49 These data indicated that FMT may act through gut microbiota remodeling, reducing intestinal permeability and immunomodulation.50 However, there are currently few studies on the interventional treatment of SLE patients by regulating the gut microbiota, such as fecal microbiota transplantation, and more studies are needed to verify the feasibility of this approach.

Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease caused by T-cell-mediated destruction of insulin-secreting pancreatic β-cells.5 The onset of T1D results from a complex interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental factors, which include dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, a compromised intestinal mucosal barrier, and altered immune responses within the intestine.51 The gut microbiota plays a pivotal role in maintaining the integrity and function of the intestinal barrier. Various viral factors, such as rotavirus, cytomegalovirus, and enterovirus (EV), are linked to T1D.52–54 Additionally, fungal dysbiosis in T1D relates to the richness of fungal species and the diversity of yeast-like species.55 The increase in fecal yeast in T1D patients may be attributed to the impaired cellular immunity in a hyperglycemic environment, though the causal relationship is unclear.56 Disruption of this microbial balance can compromise the integrity of the gut barrier, facilitating the translocation of bacteria, fatty acids, and lipopolysaccharides into systemic circulation.25 These substances can activate the immune system, leading to antibody production that may cross-react with antigens present on islet cells’ surfaces. This process ultimately contributes to cellular destruction and facilitates the development of T1D.57 Following the emergence of autoantibodies associated with T1D, there is frequently an observed deficiency in butyric acid-producing bacteria within the gut microbiome. Additionally, low bacterial diversity and community stability are common features during this phase.58 Consequently, it becomes evident that gut microbiota is integral to immune regulation and plays a significant role in T1D pathogenesis.59 Furthermore, it also serves as a crucial component in sustaining appropriate gut immune responses. Studies have shown that mice with MyD88 gene defects have an increased risk of T1D under germ-free conditions, while exposure to specific microbial mixtures reduces the incidence of diabetes.60 This indicates a disorder in the gut microbiota of T1D patients and underscores the connection between improved blood sugar levels and changes in the gut microbiota.

Significant alteration occurred in gut microbial diversity and taxonomic composition of gut microbial communities between healthy controls and patients with T1D. T1D patients are enriched in Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes, and lack butyric acid-producing bacteria,61,62 especially bacteroidetes dominate in areas with a high incidence of T1D.63 Butyrate has anti-inflammatory properties, promotes the production of granzyme B in IL-10 tolerant Th1 cells to modulate intestinal inflammation, and enhances the intestinal barrier through tight junctions.64,65 In addition, T1D is characterized by increased abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila and Barnesiella, both of which are lipopolysaccharides (LPS) producing bacteria,66 LPS released by these bacteria may mediate inflammation, obesity, and insulin resistance.67 Kostic et al assessed fecal samples from 33 children genetically predisposed to T1D. They observed a decrease in the number of Gram-negative bacteria in the children as well as a negative correlation between Lachnospiraceae and Gram-negative aerobic Enterobacteriaceae.68

Evidence from germ-free Non Obese Diabetes (NOD) mice suggests that specific pathogen-free (SPF) NOD mice are more susceptible to T1D,69,70 with a significant increase in Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Ruminococcaceae, Proteobacteria, A. muciniphila, and Enterococcus prior to the T1D autoimmune response in these mice.71 This further supports the important role of the gut microbiota in the occurrence and progression of T1D. In addition to bacteria, enteroviral infections in pregnant women have also been reported to increase the risk of T1D in their offspring,72 and certain viral exposures during childhood are also associated with T1D.73,74

During the progression of T1D, the immune system targets three major autoantigens: insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and islet-associated antigen (IA-2),75 with autoantibodies against these antigens serving as markers for predicting the disease. The unique characteristics of gut microbiota in T1D patients can also serve as biomarkers for T1D.16 The gut microbiota is a potential target for T1D prevention and treatment, with certain antibiotics or probiotics potentially influencing the development of disease by altering the gut microbiota balance.76

Commensal bacteria are active participants in shaping the host immune network. Lactobacillus can enhance the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier and prevent intestinal leakage by promoting the expression of tight junction proteins.77 Doxycycline can reduce the incidence of T1D in SPF NOD mice by decreasing Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Lactobacillus.78 A murine study found that when NOD mice consumed dietary fiber inulin-type fructans, the occurrence of T1D could be prevented.79 In newly diagnosed T1D patients, FMT may preserve residual pancreatic β-cell function,80 and reduce islet β-cell apoptosis.81 Metformin, a preferred drug for blood sugar control in diabetic patients, interacts with the gut microbiota by modulating inflammation, intestinal permeability and short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria.82 Bryrup et al found that following six consecutive weeks of oral metformin administration, patients experienced significant changes in gut microbiota richness, with a decrease in Enterobacter and Clostridium and an increase in Salmonella.83 The clear association between gut microbiota dysbiosis and T1D has significant clinical implications, and microbiota-based interventions, such as probiotics, could reduce or even prevent the heavy demand for insulin injections.

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

RA is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial joint inflammation. The defining feature of RA is persistent synovial inflammation with extensive neutrophils infiltrating into bone tissue, mediated by cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-17, eventually leading to damage to articular cartilage and bone.84 Researchers employing the spontaneous arthritis model, K/BxN mice, have discovered the connection between the gut microbiota and autoimmune arthritis.85 An enrichment of fragmented filamentous bacteria within the gut microbiota induces the activation of Th17 cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine, thereby triggering an immune response. Subsequently, Th17 cells migrated to peripheral lymphoid tissues and secreted IL-17.86 In turn, IL-17 directly acted on B cells, facilitating their differentiation and production of autoantibodies, ultimately leading to disease progression. Growing evidence suggests that the gut microbiota induces systemic inflammation and polyarthritis through multiple mechanisms including impaired gut barrier function, immune regulation mediated by gut microbiota-derived metabolites, modulation of the impact of gut microbiota on immune cells, autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells, interactions between the microbiome and alleles of human leukocyte antigen, as well as microRNAs.87

The gut microbiota plays a key role in the progression of RA.88 An abundance of Prevotella copri has been observed in both RA patients and mouse models,89 which stimulates the production of Th17-related cytokines, particularly IL-6 and IL-23.90 Furthermore, a study comparing the gut microbiota of anti-citrullinated protein positive individuals and healthy controls, Prevotella was positively correlated with rheumatoid factor (RF) titer.91 Earlier observations in a type II collagen-immunised RA mouse models revealed a higher relative abundance of Trichosporonaceae, Ruminococcaceae and Bacteroidaceae as a distinctive feature of changes in the gut microbiota of RA.92,93 Some studies have also shown that specific bacterial families such as Muribaculaceae, Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes are negatively correlated with RA progression. Additionally, a decrease in the relative abundance of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes has been observed.94,95 Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is one of the important commensal bacteria in the human gut flora, accounting for 3–5% of the total number of bacteria detected in fecal samples from healthy individuals.96 A decrease in the abundance of Faecalibacterium perfringens in the intestine may be a sign of dysbiosis, such as a decreased self-defense ability against inflammatory responses.97 Interestingly, Clostridium difficile infection can promote mesenteric Tregs and Th2 polarization, thereby prevent the development of RA.98 Furthermore, Zhu et al found that Candida and Debaryomyces were more enriched in patients with RA and may serve as potential biomarkers for predicting early RA.99 However, the relationship between fungi and RA, as well as the biological functions of fungi, require further exploration.

Current approaches for treating RA include probiotics, prebiotics, antibiotic therapy and FMT.100,101 Antibiotic therapy can alleviate arthritis severity by inhibiting Th17 cell differentiation and serum amyloid A (SAA) production and eliminating part of the gut microbiota.94 However, these treatments reduce the levels of Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium and Bacteroides, which lead to the reduction in intestinal metabolites (uracil, primary bile acids and essential amino acids).102 While gut bacterial intervention is a promising therapeutic approach. Dietary supplements and prebiotics have been used in the clinical management of RA by rebalancing the composition of the gut flora.103,104 Oral probiotics can competitively inhibit the colonization of pathogenic Prevotella and suppress the production of autoantibodies.105 In a recent study, the oral administration of Bacillus coagulans with anti-inflammatory properties significantly reduced serum levels of SAA and tumor necrosis factor in a rat model of RA.106 Mechanistic studies of high-fiber supplements have shown that short-term high-fiber supplementation improved immune dysregulation by increasing Treg counts and the ratio of Th1/Th17 and altering the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes.107,108 In an in vivo study of RA, human histobacterium alleviated disease severity without damaging intestinal tissue, suggesting its therapeutic potential.109 Streptococcus lactis induces immune tolerance through the recombination of Hsp65. Hsp65 reduces the synthesis of autoantibodies and the production of inflammatory cytokines via the TLR2 signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting the progression of type II collagen-induced arthritis.110 FMT has been applied to various parenteral diseases. The first trial of FMT for the refractory RA has achieved a favorable therapeutic outcome with reducing arthritis scores and RF levels.101 Therefore, combination therapy of probiotics, dietary interventions, and FMT therapy in regulating the microbiota to prevent RA progression would be a fruitful area for further work.

Future Perspectives

In summary, this article has reviewed the recent progresses of the relationship between gut microbiota imbalance and autoimmune diseases from the perspectives of gut microbiota and SLE, T1D, and RA. By unraveling the complex relationship between the gut microbiota and the immune system, the efficacy of autoimmune diseases treatment can be greatly enhanced. Factors such as impaired intestinal barrier function, intestinal metabolites, specific pathogens and sex hormones can disrupt the gut microbiota homeostasis and exacerbate the autoimmune diseases. We have reviewed the disturbances in the gut microbiota associated with SLE, T1D and RA, highlighting the composition of gut-related microbial communities and their impact on disease development. Additionally, we have summarized the latest therapeutic modalities for the treatment of SLE, T1D and RA with the strategy of microbiota regulation, including probiotics and FMT.

FMT is an active and effective therapeutic approach to modify the composition of the microbiota in a limited clinical setting. To date, FMT has been extensively used to treat a variety of diseases including C. difficile infection,111,112 autism, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease.113,114 The application of FMT in the treatment of autoimmune diseases is effective and relatively safe, and it is expected to become an effective treatment for autoimmune diseases.

Microorganisms have exerted an influence on the evolution of multicellular host organisms from the dawn of time, making their role in host biology particularly notable.115 Even though the gut microbiota plays a vital role in molding the immune system and has a strong connection with innate immunity and adaptive immunity, the association between the gut microbiota and autoimmune diseases still calls for further research to clarify their inevitable correlation. Probiotics, as advantageous microorganisms, not merely play a significant role in regulating intestinal immune function but also hold potential as novel adjuncts in cancer treatment.116 However, individual variances, safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the probiotic treatment remain matters that need to be tackled. Future research ought to focus on identifying the ideal combinations of probiotic species for multispecies therapy to alleviate immune diseases through modulation of immune response, metabolism and gut microbiota. While these findings are preliminary, they are highly auspicious as they showcase the potential of microbial communities as future therapeutic targets.

Funding

This work was supported by the GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation under Grant [number 2023A1515010938]; and Dongguan Science and Technology Commissioner Project under Grant [number 20231800500552].

Disclosure

None of the authors has any conflict of interests that could affect the performance of the work or the interpretation of the data.

References

1. Zhou P, Chen C, Patil S, Dong S. Unveiling the therapeutic symphony of probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics in gut-immune harmony. Front Nutr. 2024;11:1355542. doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1355542

2. Caruso R, Lo BC, Núñez G. Host-microbiota interactions in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(7):411–426. doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0268-7

3. Chi M, Ma K, Wang J, et al. The immunomodulatory effect of the gut microbiota in kidney disease. J Immunol Res. 2021;2021:5516035. doi:10.1155/2021/5516035

4. Erttmann SF, Swacha P, Aung KM, et al. The gut microbiota prime systemic antiviral immunity via the cGAS-STING-IFN-I axis. Immunity. 2022;55(5):847–861.e810. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2022.04.006

5. Abdellatif AM, Sarvetnick NE. Current understanding of the role of gut dysbiosis in type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes. 2019;11(8):632–644. doi:10.1111/1753-0407.12915

6. Le ST, Toussi A, Maverakis N, et al. The cutaneous and intestinal microbiome in psoriatic disease. Clin Immunol. 2020;218:108537. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2020.108537

7. Wang X, Yuan W, Yang C, et al. Emerging role of gut microbiota in autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1365554. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1365554

8. DeGruttola AK, Low D, Mizoguchi A, Mizoguchi E. Current understanding of dysbiosis in disease in human and animal models. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22(5):1137–1150. doi:10.1097/MIB.0000000000000750

9. Zhang LJ, Gallo RL. Antimicrobial peptides. Curr Biol. 2016;26(1):R14–19. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.017

10. Miller FW. The increasing prevalence of autoimmunity and autoimmune diseases: an urgent call to action for improved understanding, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Curr Opin Immunol. 2023;80:102266. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2022.102266

11. Xu F, Jin L, Jin Y, Nie Z, Zheng H. Long noncoding RNAs in autoimmune diseases. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2019;107(2):468–475. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36562

12. Winkler C, Jolink M, Knopff A, et al. Age, HLA, and sex define a marked risk of organ-specific autoimmunity in first-degree relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(9):1684–1691. doi:10.2337/dc19-0315

13. Krainer J, Siebenhandl S, Weinhäusel A. Systemic autoinflammatory diseases. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:102421. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102421

14. Fugger L, Jensen LT, Rossjohn J. Challenges, progress, and prospects of developing therapies to treat autoimmune diseases. Cell. 2020;181(1):63–80. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.007

15. Wang T, Sternes PR, Guo XK, Zhao H, Xu C, Xu H. Autoimmune diseases exhibit shared alterations in the gut microbiota. Rheumatology. 2024;63(3):856–865. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kead364

16. Zhou H, Zhao X, Sun L, et al. Gut microbiota profile in patients with type 1 diabetes based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing: a systematic review. Dis Markers. 2020;2020:3936247. doi:10.1155/2020/3936247

17. Wang H, Wang G, Banerjee N, et al. Aberrant gut microbiome contributes to intestinal oxidative stress, barrier dysfunction, inflammation and systemic autoimmune responses in MRL/lpr mice. Front Immunol. 2021;12:651191. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.651191

18. Lin CY, Hsu CY, He HR, et al. Gut microbiota differences between psoriatic arthritis and other undifferentiated arthritis: a pilot study. Medicine. 2022;101(28):e29870. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000029870

19. Wang Y, Wan X, Wu X, Zhang C, Liu J, Hou S. Eubacterium rectale contributes to colorectal cancer initiation via promoting colitis. Gut Pathog. 2021;13(1):2. doi:10.1186/s13099-020-00396-z

20. Yang J, Yang H, Li Y. The triple interactions between gut microbiota, mycobiota and host immunity. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(33):11604–11624. doi:10.1080/10408398.2022.2094888

21. Bell KJ, Saad S, Tillett BJ, et al. Metabolite-based dietary supplementation in human type 1 diabetes is associated with microbiota and immune modulation. Microbiome. 2022;10(1):9. doi:10.1186/s40168-021-01193-9

22. Markowiak P, Śliżewska K. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):1021. doi:10.3390/nu9091021

23. Yang Y, Hong Q, Zhang X, Liu Z. Rheumatoid arthritis and the intestinal microbiome: probiotics as a potential therapy. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1331486. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1331486

24. Wang JW, Kuo CH, Kuo FC, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation: review and update. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019;118(Suppl 1):S23–s31. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2018.08.011

25. Zhang S, Deng F, Chen J, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation treatment of autoimmune-mediated type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:1075201. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.1075201

26. Zhu X, Zhao L, Lei L, Zhu Y, Xu J, Liu L. Fecal microbiota transplantation ameliorates abdominal obesity through inhibiting microbiota-mediated intestinal barrier damage and inflammation in mice. Microbiol Res. 2024;282:127654. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2024.127654

27. Zeng L, Deng Y, Yang K, Chen J, He Q, Chen H. Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for autoimmune diseases and autoinflammatory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:944387. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.944387

28. Pan L, Lu MP, Wang JH, Xu M, Yang SR. Immunological pathogenesis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. World J Pediatr. 2020;16(1):19–30. doi:10.1007/s12519-019-00229-3

29. Chen BD, Jia XM, Xu JY, et al. An autoimmunogenic and proinflammatory profile defined by the gut microbiota of patients with untreated systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(2):232–243. doi:10.1002/art.41511

30. Choi SC, Brown J, Gong M, et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis and altered tryptophan catabolism contribute to autoimmunity in lupus-susceptible mice. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(551). doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aax2220

31. Gladman DD, Hussain F, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. The nature and outcome of infection in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2002;11(4):234–239. doi:10.1191/0961203302lu170oa

32. Li Y, Wang HF, Li X, et al. Disordered intestinal microbes are associated with the activity of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Sci. 2019;133(7):821–838. doi:10.1042/CS20180841

33. Guo M, Wang H, Xu S, et al. Alteration in gut microbiota is associated with dysregulation of cytokines and glucocorticoid therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Gut Microbes. 2020;11(6):1758–1773. doi:10.1080/19490976.2020.1768644

34. Zhang H, Liao X, Sparks JB, Luo XM. Dynamics of gut microbiota in autoimmune lupus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(24):7551–7560. doi:10.1128/AEM.02676-14

35. Azzouz D, Omarbekova A, Heguy A, et al. Lupus nephritis is linked to disease-activity associated expansions and immunity to a gut commensal. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(7):947–956. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214856

36. Chen YF, Hsieh AH, Wang LC, et al. Fecal microbiota changes in NZB/W F1 mice after induction of lupus disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22953. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-02422-9

37. den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen AK, Venema K, Reijngoud DJ, Bakker BM. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2013;54(9):2325–2340. doi:10.1194/jlr.R036012

38. Ríos-Covián D, Ruas-Madiedo P, Margolles A, Gueimonde M, de Los Reyes-Gavilán CG, Salazar N. Intestinal short chain fatty acids and their link with diet and human health. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:185. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00185

39. Chen L, Sun M, Wu W, et al. Microbiota metabolite butyrate differentially regulates Th1 and Th17 cells’ differentiation and function in induction of colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25(9):1450–1461. doi:10.1093/ibd/izz046

40. Chen B, Cao J, Liu W, et al. Disturbed gut virome with potent interferonogenic property in systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci Bull. 2023;68(3):295–304. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2023.01.021

41. Jog NR, James JA. Epstein Barr virus and autoimmune responses in systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Immunol. 2020;11:623944. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.623944

42. Jog NR, Young KA, Munroe ME, et al. Association of Epstein-Barr virus serological reactivation with transitioning to systemic lupus erythematosus in at-risk individuals. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(9):1235–1241. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215361

43. Yao K, Xie Y, Wang J, Lin Y, Chen X, Zhou T. Gut microbiota: a newly identified environmental factor in systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1202850. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1202850

44. Ahmadi S, Wang S, Nagpal R, et al. A human-origin probiotic cocktail ameliorates aging-related leaky gut and inflammation via modulating the microbiota/taurine/tight junction axis. JCI Insight. 2020;5(9). doi:10.1172/jci.insight.132055

45. Mu Q, Zhang H, Liao X, et al. Control of lupus nephritis by changes of gut microbiota. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):73. doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0300-8

46. de la Visitación N, Robles-Vera I, Toral M, et al. Gut microbiota contributes to the development of hypertension in a genetic mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Br J Pharmacol. 2021;178(18):3708–3729. doi:10.1111/bph.15512

47. Esmaeili SA, Taheri RA, Mahmoudi M, et al. Inhibitory effects of tolerogenic probiotics on migratory potential of lupus patient-derived DCs. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2021;24(11):1509–1514. doi:10.22038/IJBMS.2021.58438.12982

48. Huang C, Yi P, Zhu M, et al. Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: an EXPLORER trial. J Autoimmun. 2022;130:102844. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2022.102844

49. Zheng M, Zhou W, Huang C, et al. A single-cell map of peripheral alterations after FMT treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Autoimmun. 2023;135:102989. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2022.102989

50. Belvoncikova P, Maronek M, Gardlik R. Gut dysbiosis and fecal microbiota transplantation in autoimmune diseases. Int J mol Sci. 2022;23(18):10729. doi:10.3390/ijms231810729

51. Zhou H, Sun L, Zhang S, Zhao X, Gang X, Wang G. The crucial role of early-life gut microbiota in the development of type 1 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2021;58(3):249–265. doi:10.1007/s00592-020-01563-z

52. Ekman I, Vuorinen T, Knip M, et al. Early childhood CMV infection may decelerate the progression to clinical type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019;20(1):73–77. doi:10.1111/pedi.12788

53. Rogers MAM, Basu T, Kim C. Lower incidence rate of type 1 diabetes after receipt of the rotavirus vaccine in the United States, 2001–2017. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7727. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44193-4

54. Ylipaasto P, Klingel K, Lindberg AM, et al. Enterovirus infection in human pancreatic islet cells, islet tropism in vivo and receptor involvement in cultured islet beta cells. Diabetologia. 2004;47(2):225–239. doi:10.1007/s00125-003-1297-z

55. Fuhri Snethlage CM, Nieuwdorp M, van Raalte DH, Rampanelli E, Verchere BC, Hanssen NMJ. Auto-immunity and the gut microbiome in type 1 diabetes: lessons from rodent and human studies. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;35(3):101544. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2021.101544

56. Kowalewska B, Kawko M, Zorena K, Myśliwiec M. Yeast-like fungi in the gastrointestinal tract in children and adolescents with diabetes type 1. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2015;20(4):170–177. doi:10.18544/PEDM-20.04.0017

57. Cole DK, Bulek AM, Dolton G, et al. Hotspot autoimmune T cell receptor binding underlies pathogen and insulin peptide cross-reactivity. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(9):3626. doi:10.1172/JCI89919

58. Dedrick S, Sundaresh B, Huang Q, et al. The role of gut microbiota and environmental factors in type 1 diabetes pathogenesis. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:78.

59. Tanase DM, Gosav EM, Neculae E, et al. Role of gut microbiota on onset and progression of microvascular complications of Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM). Nutrients. 2020;12(12):3719. doi:10.3390/nu12123719

60. Zhou H, Sun L, Zhang S, Zhao X, Gang X, Wang G. Evaluating the causal role of gut microbiota in type 1 diabetes and its possible pathogenic mechanisms. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:125. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00125

61. Siljander H, Honkanen J, Knip M. Microbiome and type 1 diabetes. EBioMedicine. 2019;46:512–521. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.06.031

62. Leiva-Gea I, Sánchez-Alcoholado L, Martín-Tejedor B, et al. Gut microbiota differs in composition and functionality between children with type 1 diabetes and MODY2 and healthy control subjects: a case-control study. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(11):2385–2395. doi:10.2337/dc18-0253

63. Wang Y, Ye X, Ding D, Lu Y. Characteristics of the intestinal flora in patients with peripheral neuropathy associated with type 2 diabetes. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(9):300060520936806. doi:10.1177/0300060520936806

64. Yuan X, Wang R, Han B, et al. Functional and metabolic alterations of gut microbiota in children with new-onset type 1 diabetes. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):6356. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33656-4

65. Yang W, Yu T, Liu X, et al. Microbial metabolite butyrate modulates granzyme B in tolerogenic IL-10 producing Th1 cells to regulate intestinal inflammation. Gut Microbes. 2024;16(1):2363020. doi:10.1080/19490976.2024.2363020

66. Stefanaki C, Michos A, Mastorakos G, et al. Probiotics in adolescent prediabetes: a pilot RCT on glycemic control and intestinal bacteriome. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1743. doi:10.3390/jcm8101743

67. Cani PD, Possemiers S, Van de Wiele T, et al. Changes in gut microbiota control inflammation in obese mice through a mechanism involving GLP-2-driven improvement of gut permeability. Gut. 2009;58(8):1091–1103. doi:10.1136/gut.2008.165886

68. Kostic AD, Gevers D, Siljander H, et al. The dynamics of the human infant gut microbiome in development and in progression toward type 1 diabetes. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(2):260–273. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.001

69. Hu Y, Peng J, Li F, Wong FS, Wen L. Evaluation of different mucosal microbiota leads to gut microbiota-based prediction of type 1 diabetes in NOD mice. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15451. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33571-z

70. Elhag DA, Kumar M, Al Khodor S. Exploring the triple interaction between the host genome, the epigenome, and the gut microbiome in type 1 diabetes. Int J mol Sci. 2020;22(1):125. doi:10.3390/ijms22010125

71. Davis-Richardson AG, Triplett EW. A model for the role of gut bacteria in the development of autoimmunity for type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015;58(7):1386–1393. doi:10.1007/s00125-015-3614-8

72. Wook Kim K, Allen DW, Briese T, et al. Distinct gut virome profile of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes in the ENDIA Study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(2):ofz025. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz025

73. Hyöty H. Viruses in type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2016;17(Suppl 22):56–64. doi:10.1111/pedi.12370

74. Kim KW, Horton JL, Pang CNI, et al. Higher abundance of enterovirus A species in the gut of children with islet autoimmunity. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1749. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-38368-8

75. Bilgic S, Aktas E, Salman F, et al. Intracytoplasmic cytokine levels and neutrophil functions in early clinical stage of type 1 diabetes. Diabet Res Clin Pract. 2008;79(1):31–36. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2007.06.011

76. Mishra SP, Wang S, Nagpal R, et al. Probiotics and prebiotics for the amelioration of type 1 diabetes: present and future perspectives. Microorganisms. 2019;7(3):67. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7030067

77. Chen Y, Zhang L, Hong G, et al. Probiotic mixtures with aerobic constituent promoted the recovery of multi-barriers in DSS-induced chronic colitis. Life Sci. 2020;240:117089. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2019.117089

78. Brugman S, Klatter FA, Visser JT, et al. Antibiotic treatment partially protects against type 1 diabetes in the bio-breeding diabetes-prone rat. Is the gut flora involved in the development of type 1 diabetes? Diabetologia. 2006;49(9):2105–2108. doi:10.1007/s00125-006-0334-0

79. Chen K, Chen H, Faas MM, et al. Specific inulin-type fructan fibers protect against autoimmune diabetes by modulating gut immunity, barrier function, and microbiota homeostasis. mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61(8). doi:10.1002/mnfr.201601006

80. de Groot P, Nikolic T, Pellegrini S, et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation halts progression of human new-onset type 1 diabetes in a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2021;70(1):92–105. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322630

81. Wang H, Lu Y, Yan Y, et al. Promising treatment for type 2 diabetes: fecal microbiota transplantation reverses insulin resistance and impaired islets. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:455. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2019.00455

82. Lee CB, Chae SU, Jo SJ, Jerng UM, Bae SK. The relationship between the gut microbiome and metformin as a key for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J mol Sci. 2021;22(7):3566.

83. Bryrup T, Thomsen CW, Kern T, et al. Metformin-induced changes of the gut microbiota in healthy young men: results of a non-blinded, one-armed intervention study. Diabetologia. 2019;62(6):1024–1035. doi:10.1007/s00125-019-4848-7

84. Zhou N, Zou F, Cheng X, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis induces periodontitis, causes immune imbalance, and promotes rheumatoid arthritis. J Leukoc Biol. 2021;110(3):461–473. doi:10.1002/JLB.3MA0121-045R

85. Horta-Baas G, Romero-Figueroa MDS, Montiel-Jarquín AJ, Pizano-Zárate ML, García-Mena J, Ramírez-Durán N. Intestinal dysbiosis and rheumatoid arthritis: a link between gut microbiota and the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol Res. 2017;2017:4835189. doi:10.1155/2017/4835189

86. Wang Q, Zhang SX, Chang MJ, et al. Characteristics of the gut microbiome and its relationship with peripheral CD4(+) T Cell subpopulations and cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:799602. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.799602

87. Lin L, Zhang K, Xiong Q, et al. Gut microbiota in pre-clinical rheumatoid arthritis: from pathogenesis to preventing progression. J Autoimmun. 2023;141:103001. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103001

88. Mangalea MR, Paez-Espino D, Kieft K, et al. Individuals at risk for rheumatoid arthritis harbor differential intestinal bacteriophage communities with distinct metabolic potential. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29(5):726–739.e725. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.020

89. Wells PM, Adebayo AS, Bowyer RCE, et al. Associations between gut microbiota and genetic risk for rheumatoid arthritis in the absence of disease: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2(7):e418–e427. doi:10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30064-3

90. Maeda Y, Kurakawa T, Umemoto E, et al. Dysbiosis contributes to arthritis development via activation of autoreactive T Cells in the intestine. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(11):2646–2661. doi:10.1002/art.39783

91. Alpizar-Rodriguez D, Lesker TR, Gronow A, et al. Prevotella copri in individuals at risk for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(5):590–593. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214514

92. Rooney CM, Mankia K, Mitra S, Moura IB, Emery P, Wilcox MH. Perturbations of the gut microbiome in anti-CCP positive individuals at risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2021;60(7):3380–3387. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keaa792

93. Hammad DBM, Hider SL, Liyanapathirana VC, Tonge DP. Molecular characterization of circulating microbiome signatures in rheumatoid arthritis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:440. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2019.00440

94. Rogier R, Evans-Marin H, Manasson J, et al. Alteration of the intestinal microbiome characterizes preclinical inflammatory arthritis in mice and its modulation attenuates established arthritis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15613. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15802-x

95. Peng J, Lu X, Xie K, et al. Dynamic alterations in the gut microbiota of collagen-induced arthritis rats following the prolonged administration of total glucosides of paeony. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:204. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2019.00204

96. Breyner NM, Michon C, de Sousa CS, et al. Microbial Anti-Inflammatory Molecule (MAM) from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii shows a protective effect on DNBS and DSS-induced colitis model in mice through inhibition of NF-κB pathway. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:114. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00114

97. Quévrain E, Maubert MA, Michon C, et al. Identification of an anti-inflammatory protein from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a commensal bacterium deficient in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2016;65(3):415–425. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307649

98. Schmidt CJ, Wenndorf K, Ebbers M, et al. Infection with clostridioides difficile attenuated collagen-induced arthritis in mice and involved mesenteric T(reg) and T(h2) polarization. Front Immunol. 2020;11:571049. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.571049

99. Zhu J, Wang T, Lin Y, et al. The change of plasma metabolic profile and gut microbiome dysbiosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:931431. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.931431

100. Lu C, Chen J, Yi C, et al. Gut microbiota mediated the protective effects of tuna oil on collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Food Funct. 2021;12(12):5387–5398. doi:10.1039/D1FO00709B

101. Zeng J, Peng L, Zheng W, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for rheumatoid arthritis: a case report. Clin Case Rep. 2021;9(2):906–909. doi:10.1002/ccr3.3677

102. Sultan AA, Mallen C, Muller S, et al. Antibiotic use and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based case-control study. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):154. doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1394-6

103. Bodkhe R, Balakrishnan B, Taneja V. The role of microbiome in rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2019;11:1759720x19844632. doi:10.1177/1759720X19844632

104. Gioia C, Lucchino B, Tarsitano MG, Iannuccelli C, Di Franco M. Dietary habits and nutrition in rheumatoid arthritis: can diet influence disease development and clinical manifestations? Nutrients. 2020;12(5):1456. doi:10.3390/nu12051456

105. Balakrishnan B, Luckey D, Bodhke R, et al. Prevotella histicola protects from arthritis by expansion of allobaculum and augmenting butyrate production in humanized mice. Front Immunol. 2021;12:609644. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.609644

106. Kouchaki E, Tamtaji OR, Salami M, et al. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic supplementation in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(5):1245–1249. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.015

107. Häger J, Bang H, Hagen M, et al. The role of dietary fiber in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a feasibility study. Nutrients. 2019;11(10):2392. doi:10.3390/nu11102392

108. Dürholz K, Hofmann J, Iljazovic A, et al. Dietary short-term fiber interventions in arthritis patients increase systemic SCFA levels and regulate inflammation. Nutrients. 2020;12(10):3207. doi:10.3390/nu12103207

109. Marietta EV, Murray JA, Luckey DH, et al. Suppression of inflammatory arthritis by human gut-derived Prevotella histicola in humanized mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(12):2878–2888. doi:10.1002/art.39785

110. Gusmao-Silva G, Aguiar SLF, Miranda MCG, et al. Hsp65-producing Lactococcocus lactis prevents antigen-induced arthritis in mice. Front Immunol. 2020;11:562905. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.562905

111. Hvas CL, Dahl Jørgensen SM, Jørgensen SP, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation is superior to fidaxomicin for treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(5):1324–1332.e1323. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.019

112. Ianiro G, Bibbò S, Porcari S, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent C. difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: experience of a large-volume European FMT center. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1994834. doi:10.1080/19490976.2021.1994834

113. Sędzikowska A, Szablewski L. Human gut microbiota in health and selected cancers. Int J mol Sci. 2021;22(24):13440.

114. Vendrik KEW, Ooijevaar RE, De jong PRC, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation in neurological disorders. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:98. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2020.00098

115. Zimmermann J, Piecyk A, Sieber M, et al. Gut-associated functions are favored during microbiome assembly across a major part of C. elegans life. mBio. 2024;15(5):e0001224. doi:10.1128/mbio.00012-24

116. Jiang S, Ma W, Ma C, Zhang Z, Zhang W, Zhang J. An emerging strategy: probiotics enhance the effectiveness of tumor immunotherapy via mediating the gut microbiome. Gut Microbes. 2024;16(1):2341717. doi:10.1080/19490976.2024.2341717

Creative Commons License © 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.